Transcript Highlights:

• And as a part of that regulatory authority, they go after the bad people who commit insurance fraud.
• Prevention Bureau um that Crime Fraud Prevention Bureau um that was<02:52:30.479> housed<02:52
• insurance related fraud. insurance related fraud.
• to take the Crime Fraud Bureau out of<02:54:53.200> the<02:54:53.439> Department<02:54
• Bureau. of the Crime Fraud Bureau.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Is this not fraud for saying that we are caring for people, and that they are actually in our house,
• and let's put a stop to this fraud. and let's put a stop to this fraud.
• We don't know what they're doing for fraud prevention. The contracts are proprietary.
• The contracts are fraud prevention.
• On the backs of the disabled because we can't control the fraud in Department of Human Services.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Then sections 4, 5, and 6 are definitions of abuse, fraud, and waste.
• And then it adds a new protection for public employees regarding reports of fraud, waste, and abuse,
• And then it adds a new protection for public employees regarding reports of fraud, waste, and abuse,
• <01:11:18.159> And<01:11:18.400> then<01:11:18.719> section abuse, fraud and
• And then section abuse, fraud and waste.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And one thing I want to comment, and that is, um, although you didn't cover it, uh, in terms of fraud
• Um, one or two sentences: what are you doing in terms of honing in on fraud issues and what the cost
• , didn't cover it uh in terms of fraud, didn't cover it uh in terms of fraud, I'm<00:45:09.680>
• Uh, fraud detection and recovery is part of that.
• Uh fraud detection operate the program.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:01 Department for Public Health Budget Request 00:01:46 Department for Community Based Services Budget Request 00:31:58 Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHC) 00:57:13, 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes, then heard a lengthy presentation from the Department for Public Health on Kentucky’s rural health transformation plan and related budget questions. Commissioner John Langfeld said the state received a $212.9 million federal award, one of the larger awards nationally, and outlined five focus areas: maternal and infant health, integrated EMS/trauma response, behavioral health and substance use disorder, oral health, and chronic disease prevention with an emphasis on obesity and diabetes. He stressed that the effort is intended to be integrated, data-driven, and sustainable, and that the federal funds cannot be used for new construction, clinician salaries, research and development, EHR replacement, or to pay for currently billable services. He also said the program carries accountability requirements and that funds can be clawed back if milestones are not met. Members pressed for clarification on duplication with other budget requests, sustainability after the five-year funding period, and how success would be measured. Langfeld said he was not aware of any duplicate funding with the department’s additional budget requests and said the rural health funds were separate from those requests. He also said the program will be tracked through specific metrics and timelines, using both execution measures and outcome measures such as readmissions, with more rapid-cycle feedback to allow course correction. Representative Fleming raised concerns about possible overlap with navigator funding and asked for more detail on the budget breakdown; Langfeld said a detailed line-item budget had been prepared but was still awaiting final CMS approval before release, and that he would explore sharing more information once restrictions were lifted. The committee then heard from the Kentucky State Public Health Laboratory about a request for a new central lab expansion. The presenter described the current 35-year-old facility as outdated and constrained by aging infrastructure, obsolete equipment, deferred maintenance, and inadequate space, and said the lab performs critical work with no in-state alternative for many services, including newborn screening, select-agent and biosafety level 3 testing, animal necropsy for rabies, genetic sequencing, environmental and food safety testing, and response to emerging infectious diseases. The project is already in design phase C, expected to finish in mid-April, with construction funding sought at roughly $276 million on top of about $35 million already approved for design. Members asked about long-term operating costs, backup arrangements, and whether the current facility would remain in use; the presenter said the current lab would continue to be used by the department while other divisions move into vacated space, and that the lab has mutual-aid agreements with the Southeast Consortium and universities for contingency support. Finally, the Department for Community Based Services began its budget presentation on SNAP and relative caregiver issues. Commissioner Lisa Dennis and budget director Misty Sammons identified the governor’s recommended budget items tied to new federal requirements under HR1, including changes affecting payment error rates. The discussion was just beginning when the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:21:20.000> and<00:21:20.320> ensure but also to avoid the fraud and ensure but
• also to avoid the fraud and ensure the<00:21:21.120> public<00:21:21.600> services<00:21
• <00:38:18.560> investigations relative to welfare fraud investigations relative to welfare
• fraud investigations and<00:38:19.440> we<00:38:19.599> did<00:38:20.240> uh<00
• My units do auditing as well as investigations for fraud and abuse benefit programs. them for you and

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Medicaid fraud unit has shifted from only focusing on criminal investigations, and they're moving
• The Medicaid fraud unit has shifted from only focusing on criminal investigations, and they're moving
• unit uh that division Medicaid fraud unit uh that division currently<00:43:20.680> all<00:43:
• <00:43:29.280> unit<00:43:29.599> has have now uh the Medicaid fraud unit has have
• now uh the Medicaid fraud unit has shifted<00:43:30.440> from<00:43:30.720> only<00:43:

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• you want to talk about spending money making sure it gets in the right place, we had $9 billion in fraud
• So at a time where we've got a fraud problem and an affordability problem, raising that demand on people
• billion in fraud disappear. billion in fraud disappear.
• we've<00:45:22.120> got<00:45:22.400> a<00:45:22.800> a<00:45:22.840> fraud
• So at a time where we've got a a fraud So at a time where we've got a a fraud problem<00:45:23.960

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 3279, the “Our Future Starts at Home” constitutional amendment, which would ask voters to approve a 3/8 of 1% statewide sales tax increase to create a dedicated housing revenue stream. Chair Howard said the proposal is intended to address Minnesota’s housing shortage through predictable, long-term funding, estimated at about $400 million annually for 25 years, and would be administered through a council that would fund housing vouchers, rental and supportive housing, and affordable homeownership. Supportive testimony came from coalition and nonprofit advocates, including Nelima Sitati Munene, Ben Helvick Anderson, Dakota Morgan, and Chris Berggren. They argued that Minnesota’s housing crisis requires permanent, sustained investment rather than one-time grants, and said the amendment could produce thousands of vouchers, supportive housing units, rental units, and starter homes over time. Testifiers also emphasized the need for community voice and lived-experience representation in how funds are distributed, and described the bill as a way to prevent homelessness and stabilize families statewide. Several members raised concerns that the proposal would add another regressive tax burden on residents already struggling with affordability. Representatives Johnson, Nash, Dotseth, and Myers argued that sales taxes hit lower-income Minnesotans hardest and said the state should focus more on zoning, regulatory reform, and other cost reductions instead of new taxes. Chair Howard responded that housing costs themselves are already highly regressive and that both policy reform and public investment are needed. The bill was laid over and no vote was taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• I did a deep dive into access and the access fraud that had happened over the last several years related
• but it seems to me it would make more sense to go through maybe the Attorney General's health care fraud
• Bill 1116 also came out of the rigorous investigations we did over the interim related to the Access fraud
• We also found that there was an overcorrection when the fraud was discovered.
• So I'm wondering if, as the bill is now, is it going to fix waste, fraud, or abuse that may exist?

Bills: SB1095, SB1114, SB1116, SB1162, SB1164, SB1178, SB1179, SB1249, SB1253, SB1346, SB1347, SB1446, SB1561, SB1813

Keywords: gender transition, minors, irreversible surgery, health professionals, puberty-blocking drugs, medical procedures, prohibition, Arizona Revised Statutes, behavioral health, patient brokering, appropriation, state funds, Maricopa County, claims review, medical necessity, American Indian health program, healthcare regulations, healthcare compliance, behavioral health technicians, licensing

Transcript Highlights:

• And then he said, or if you want, you can file a fraud report, and then we'll look into it.
• So no, I don't have any reason to think there's any fraud going on.
• ><00:30:59.799> report<00:31:00.519> and<00:31:00.639> then can file a uh a a fraud
• report and then can file a uh a a fraud report and then we'll<00:31:00.960> look<00:31:01.080
• going on I just want to know how fraud going on I just want to know how how<00:31:05.799> to<

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• a judge on the Arkansas Court of Appeals denied claimant's motion to file relief from judgment for fraud
• “Okay, that's failure to recognize that land was given away in my family because of fraud, and I was
• “Okay, so the state sold the land because of fraud committed by a relative.
• But that's ultimately my question was, the harm was evidently someone committed fraud in your family
• And based upon what he said, it's dealing with fraud land.

Summary: The committee first reviewed several wage-claim and labor-related litigation reports from the Department of Labor and Licensing. Members questioned the department’s authority and jurisdiction, whether it was acting like a court, and why it sought attorney’s fees and costs. Department staff explained that the claims arose under the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act and related labor statutes, that the department investigates small wage claims and can file suit when informal resolution fails, and that filing fees are waived by statute though service costs may be incurred. The committee reviewed individual cases, including one where the employer had not proven cash payments, another that had already been paid and dismissed, and a third where service could not yet be completed. The committee then voted to review or batch-file the labor items. The University of Arkansas System then reported on three pending lawsuits under the litigation-notification statute. One case involving a tenured professor alleging age and race discrimination had already been resolved and dismissed after the university re-engaged in discussions about a position. A second case involving a former employee alleging ADA and FMLA retaliation was moving forward after partial dismissal and an answer denying liability. A third case involved a former vendor employee alleging retaliation tied to a parking ticket; members asked about individual-capacity exposure for a university police sergeant, and counsel explained that punitive damages could potentially create personal exposure. The committee reviewed each report. The Department of Finance and Administration presented a proposed tax settlement reducing a sales-and-use tax assessment from about $48,000 to $20,000, with interest and penalties waived, and the committee approved it. The Claims Commission then presented several claims and settlements, including an unpaid salary differential for the Department of Health, reissued warrants, unpaid bills for DHS, and multiple negotiated settlements involving UAMS, Arkansas State Police, and ARDOT; these were generally approved or batched for approval. The most extensive discussion involved a settlement between the Teacher Retirement System and Tetronics International Limited in liquidation, arising from losses tied to the failed Blue Oak project; members questioned the company’s liquidation status, the prior investment loss, and why the matter was settling for $65,000, and the committee ultimately affirmed the settlement. The committee also heard a disputed tax-sale claim involving the Commissioner of State Lands, where a claimant argued that excess proceeds from a 2009 tax sale should have gone to her family rather than escheating to the county. After testimony from the claimant and counsel, members debated sovereign immunity, heirship, and whether the committee could or should award the $4,200 overage. The motion was amended and then replaced with a motion to hold the matter over for further review in a future joint session, which passed. Finally, the committee considered an appeal by Andrew Simpson challenging dismissal of his claim against the Arkansas Court of Appeals; after Simpson and court staff explained the underlying dispute, the committee reviewed the dismissal and the matter was held over for further consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• Medicare ultimately determined that it was fraud and took back all the money.
• So unless we can remove the insurance fraud and the cruelty from this, we don't need to.
• So I need them just done ethically and with integrity, without cruelty and without insurance fraud as
• Last, we have a risk of increased fraud and abuse without judicial oversight.
• On the contrary, prolonged detention without prompt judicial oversight might open the door to fraud and

Bills: HB 1239, HB1990, HB1748, HB1749, HB2578, HB2986, HB1970, HB3163, HB2733, HB1922, HB 113, HB 1088, HB1938, HB3004, HB2637, HB2960, HB113

Keywords: public health, access to healthcare, insurance reforms, medical expenses, healthcare providers, mental health, protective custody, preliminary examination, detention period, emergency circumstances, emergency detention, legal framework, detention, healthcare, liability, landowners, nonagricultural land, trespassing, public safety, interpreters

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, we did have 18 billion dollars surplus and we've had 9 billion dollars worth of fraud that I think
• Um, we did have 18 billion dollars surplus and we've had 9 billion dollars worth of fraud that I think
• Um, we did have 18 billion dollars surplus and we've had 9 billion dollars worth of fraud that I think
• But, I can tell you Representative Tabke and others, there is so much fraud in some of these state programs
• There's that much fraud. Okay. Thank you, Representative Anderson.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• the background, and you explained the bill, it says It does not require a prosecutor to prove force, fraud
• Human Trafficking Statute if it's an adult, the prostitution— prosecutor has to show through forced fraud
• or coercion, or for compelling prostitution, forced fraud, coercion. or threat, but this is a different
• recruitment that goes on, the manipulation that goes. on that might not rise to the level of forced fraud
• traffickers accountable under Chapter 28 of the Human Trafficking Penal Code code is the proof of force, fraud

Bills: SB251, SB608, SB487, SB535, SB761, SB955, SB957, SB958, SB988, SB990, SB1019, SB1021, SB1120

Keywords: criminal law, magistrates, Bell County, judicial authority, legal framework, evidence collection, sexual assault kits, reporting, law enforcement, transparency, confidentiality, victim protection, stalking, indecent assault, invasive visual recording, criminal justice, privacy rights, SB 535, Texas criminal procedure, rape shield

Transcript Highlights:

• We're hearing way too much about fraud, waste, and abuse, right, and we can't have that happen in this
• We're hearing way too much about fraud, waste, and abuse, right, and we can't have that happen in this
• /c><00:18:25.000> too<00:18:25.159> much<00:18:25.320> about<00:18:25.559> fraud
• <00:18:25.919> waste hearing way too much about fraud waste hearing way too much about fraud

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 337, a bill addressing long-term funding for rural and Greater Minnesota EMS and ambulance services. The author offered the A2 amendment, moved to divide it, and the committee adopted lines 1.2 to 1.19 of the amendment. The bill, as amended, was described as creating a policy framework for identifying ambulance services with operating deficits, requiring financial audits, and setting up a future grant program, with the author emphasizing that the proposal was still being developed and was intended to be a long-term solution rather than a short-term fix. Testimony was largely supportive. Eric Simonson of the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities said the bill builds on last session’s one-time aid and would target grant dollars using state data, clarify eligible uses, allow audits, address uncompensated care and readiness costs, and require reporting back to the legislature. Mike Warner of the Red Wing Fire Department said his city’s ambulance service operates with a heavy government-funded payer mix and a persistent operating shortfall. Tim Meyer of Sanford Ambulance said low-volume rural services face widening revenue gaps, staffing pressures, and the loss of the volunteer model. Nathan Zacharias of the Association of Minnesota Counties and Kevin Lee of North Memorial Health also supported the bill, citing rising costs, staffing shortages, stagnant reimbursement, and the need for a sustainable statewide funding model. Members raised concerns about how the bill would work in practice, especially around communities that straddle metro and non-metro boundaries and around local control over grant dollars. Representative Pel asked how the eligibility language would apply to places like Northfield and New Prague; the author and a testifier said eligibility would depend on whether a service area is mostly outside the metro area, but acknowledged more review was needed. Representative Huitt argued the bill should give more local control and should address EMS as a statewide issue, not only a Greater Minnesota issue. Representative Ryer asked whether the bill would eventually include revenue recapture or another funding source, and the author said the proposal was still at an early stage and all options were being considered. The committee laid HF 337, as amended, over for possible inclusion in the omnibus bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is to Future Builders, and it is to educate Medicare beneficiaries for Medicare and Medicaid fraud
• This is to future builders, and it is to educate Medicare beneficiaries for Medicare and Medicaid fraud
• This is to add the Summer EBT and SNAP fraud framework implementation grants to the ARIES eligibility
• This is to add the Summer EBT and SNAP fraud framework implementation grants to the ARIES eligibility

Summary: The committee met to review a supplemental agenda, procurement rule revisions, methods of finance, discretionary grants, contracts, and a member disclosure. The Office of State Procurement presented rule changes tied to 2025 legislative changes, including Act 782, with updates to sole-source definitions, unrealistic bids, protest requirements, debarment procedures, and recodification references; the committee voted to accept the supplemental agenda and approve the rules. Members also approved eight methods of finance covering university repairs, equipment replacement, property purchase, and capital projects, along with a large slate of discretionary grants for courts, health, DHS, historic preservation, and tobacco prevention programs. The committee then reviewed RFQs and six ratifications. The ratifications included a Workforce Connections payment to ACT WorkKeys, Department of Health costs from an ice-storm-related water leak, a large Department of Public Safety ratification for Motorola’s Arkansas Wireless Information Network upgrade, Veterans Affairs HVAC and medical-service payments, and a UA Little Rock painting contract. The Department of Public Safety ratification drew extended questioning about why the expired Motorola contract had not been renewed sooner and why the issue took months to reach the committee; agency officials said the project was bond-funded, had not been tracked in ASIS, and involved ongoing negotiations and system updates. Despite concerns, the committee approved the ratifications. Members also reviewed a long list of construction, intergovernmental, out-of-state, and in-state contracts, including numerous university, DHS, health, corrections, and state agency agreements. Several contracts were discussed in more detail, including an SAU custodial contract question about sales tax and transparency reporting, and Department of Corrections aerial application contracts for Tucker and Cummins farms, which officials said served separate facilities in different parts of the state. The committee approved the contract lists, reviewed reports, and accepted a disclosure from Representative Andrew Collins regarding his investment interest in a company leasing property to Arkansas Rehabilitation Services before adjourning.

Transcript Highlights:

• The reading charlatans have been exposed and their frauds have been revealed, and we are intent to keep
• The reading charlatans have been exposed and their frauds have been revealed, and we are intent to keep
• The reading charlatans have been exposed and their frauds have been revealed, and we are intent to keep
• The reading charlatans have been exposed and their frauds have been revealed, and we are intent to keep

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The committee heard presentation on House File 6, an education omnibus-style bill advanced by Representative Peggy Bennett and other Republican members. Bennett said the bill reflects caucus priorities around literacy, parental engagement, local control, and school flexibility. She described three articles: Article 1 on revisions to the READ Act and the science of reading; Article 2 on education innovation and parent-friendly school information; and Article 3 on funding flexibility and temporary relief from several new mandates enacted in recent biennia. On Article 3, Bennett said school boards would be allowed to transfer certain funds and delay implementation of specified mandates through the 2028-29 school year, including provisions tied to recent early childhood and education omnibus laws as well as paid family and medical leave and earned sick and safe time. She framed this as giving districts time to implement requirements carefully and with fidelity, and said such decisions would be made by local school boards in public meetings. She also argued the bill would reduce the burden of new mandates and preserve local decision-making. Representative Mueller then presented Article 1, saying it strengthens the state’s commitment to the science of reading, ends the Department of Education’s partnership with CAREI, repeals some 2024 requirements she said were ideological, and restores expectations for teacher preparation and assessment. Representative Bakeberg presented Article 2, which would require a more user-friendly school performance report, consolidate certain innovation-related programs into a new chapter, and replace the Department’s equity/diversity/inclusion center with an Office of Achievement and Innovation focused on academic achievement. He said the office’s guidance would be advisory only and that local districts would retain final authority. The chair then laid House File 6 over for possible inclusion in an omnibus bill and further consideration at a later date.

Transcript Highlights:

• It builds upon existing protections against elder fraud and financial It builds upon existing protections
• against elder fraud and financial crimes by ensuring that financial institutions have appropriate reporting
• It also requires suspected financial abuse and fraud to be reported to appropriate federal entities.

Summary: The Assembly convened, established a quorum after a roll call, and opened with a prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance. Routine procedural motions followed, including unanimous-consent actions to suspend rules for adjournment-in-memory remarks, guest introductions, and expedited floor processing of certain bills and committee reports. The chamber also recognized several guests, including Sacramento Police Detective Jason Collins, student musician Ethan Shue, and Glendale Councilmember Artie Kasakian. On the floor file, AB 1184 by Assembly Member Patterson, the Homeowner Association Accountability and Transparency Act of 2026, was presented as a measure to add basic transparency requirements for HOAs; it passed 56-0. AB 871 by Assembly Member Stephanie, addressing financial elder abuse and scam reporting/training for financial institutions, also passed 56-0. On the Senate side, SB 25 by Senator Umberg, which would give the California Attorney General earlier access to federal merger-notification filings to streamline merger review, passed 43-14 after the Majority Leader presented it. The Assembly then held several adjournment-in-memory tributes, including Paul R. Ignatius, former U.S. Secretary of the Navy and Glendale native; Oxnard Police Commander Scott Aaron; Private First Class Tanner F. Rubio of the U.S. Marine Corps; and former Yolo County Supervisor Betsy Marchand. Members and family guests offered remarks honoring their service and legacies, followed by a moment of silence for PFC Rubio. The session concluded with announcements about upcoming floor and committee deadlines and adjourned until Monday, January 26 at 1 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• When you look at three different fraud cases that came out just last week, when you look at our test
• When you look at three different fraud cases that came out just last week, when you look at our test
• So, to shut the voices of the public out when there is rampant fraud, poor test scores, and people that

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: House Republican leaders in Minnesota held a press availability focused on the ongoing absence of Democratic members from the House and the resulting inability to organize the chamber. They said it was day 21 of Democrats not showing up, argued that the situation was harming Minnesotans, and tied the impasse to broader issues including fraud cases, declining reading scores, and challenges facing poultry producers affected by avian flu. Republicans said they were continuing to meet among themselves, with constituents, and with interest groups, but that committee work and public testimony were being delayed by the stalemate. The leaders described negotiations with Democrats as ongoing but said there had been no meaningful movement from the other side. They said they met that morning, planned to meet again later in the afternoon, and hoped for a substantive offer. They also said they were open to discussing common-sense changes, including ways to compel attendance, and noted that recall petitions against absent DFL House members were reportedly being prepared by the state party. One Republican said the party was committed to passing a budget on time but warned that Democrats’ posture could threaten state government later in the year if the dispute continued. A separate issue discussed was a lawsuit over Secretary of State Steve Simon’s refusal to recognize motions made by the smaller number of members present. Republicans said the motion at issue remained on the desk and that the Minnesota Supreme Court was scheduled to hear the case on Thursday. They also discussed the possibility of a special election in House District 40B and said March 17 could be a key date if that election occurs. The group ended by saying they hoped to have more to report at a press conference the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• Perhaps some alcohol was consumed, just as the leaders testified in their depositions, both of them.
• This body did, in fact, find that there was no merit to the claims of Medicaid fraud and other issues
• This body did, in fact, find that there was no merit to the claims of Medicaid fraud and other issues
• "This body did, in fact, find that there was no merit to the claims of Medicaid fraud and other issues

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission met on November 18, 2025, approved the October 14 minutes, and then took up five motions in ethics matters 24LEC3 and 24LEC6. Those motions included a renewed motion to dismiss and motion to quash by Representative Daniel Gberg, a renewed motion to compel/sanctions and continuance request by Mr. Jenkins, and competing motions in limine concerning evidence and redaction of deposition transcripts. Vice Chair Mike Schaw was appointed hearing officer for the motion practice, and the commission agreed to hear the motions one at a time in open session. Representative Chris Lily joined later by Zoom. Counsel for Representative Gberg argued the remaining allegations were minor, that the commission lacked key exculpatory materials such as an alleged LRC report, policies, procedures, and training materials, and that the record did not support the ethics charges. She also argued the case had been broadened by extraneous allegations and that the respondent had been unfairly prejudiced. Enforcement counsel responded that he had produced all materials in his possession, that any LRC materials were not in the commission’s custody, and that the commission’s probable-cause findings were based on sworn testimony and affidavits already in the record. He argued the motions to dismiss and for summary judgment should be denied because genuine issues of material fact remained and the commission had already found probable cause on three ethics violations. Commission members questioned both sides about the alleged LRC report and whether it was part of the commission’s record. The chair stated the commission had not relied on any LRC report and had not withheld anything, while another member emphasized that the proceeding concerned alleged violations of the ethics code, not LRC sexual-harassment policy. A commissioner also noted the unusual structure of the proceeding and questioned whether the complaints, taken as true, stated a basis for dismissal. The transcript ends during continued discussion of the standard for dismissal and summary judgment, with no final ruling on the motions captured in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• misclassification fraud.
• misclassification fraud.
• And that is a fraud just like other public benefits fraud.
• And that is a fraud development fund.
• just like other public benefits fraud. just like other public benefits fraud.

Keywords: 1183, house