Transcript Highlights:

• I'm not sure if the chair has considered this, but maybe turn this into a resolution directed to the
• I'm not sure if the chair has considered this, but maybe turn this into a resolution directed to the
• I'm not sure if the chair has considered this, but maybe turn this into a resolution directed to the
• /c><00:17:22.199> this<00:17:22.319> into<00:17:22.520> a<00:17:22.919> resolution
• maybe turned this into a resolution maybe turned this into a resolution directed<00:17:24.319>

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology heard testimony on several bills, beginning with HB 22, which would limit state and local cooperation with federal immigration detainers. Supporters, including the Legal Clinic, the Office of the Public Defender, and the ACLU of Hawaiʻi, argued the bill would protect due process and constitutional rights regardless of immigration status. Some supporters requested amendments, including removing a probable-cause terrorism provision, adding enforcement language, and preserving warrant requirements. Public testimony was heavily in favor, with the chair announcing 91 testimonies in support and 52 in opposition. The committee then heard HB 73, which would prohibit setting aside public lands for immigration detention facilities. Testifiers in support said public land should serve local needs, not detention centers, and cited housing, food security, and community trust concerns. The Office of the Public Defender and others also supported the measure, and the chair reported 85 testimonies in support and 40 in opposition. The committee next took up HB 438, which would fund legal representation for people in immigration proceedings. Supporters, including the Public Defender, the University of Hawaiʻi Law School Refugee and Immigration Clinic, the Hawaiʻi Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the Legal Clinic, and the ACLU, emphasized the civil nature of immigration court, the severe consequences of removal, and the need for more pro bono and trained attorneys. Several suggested amendments focused on training and building a legal-services pipeline; the chair reported 83 testimonies in support and 51 in opposition. The committee also heard HB 457, aimed at requiring notice to detained individuals about their rights when ICE seeks to interview them or has a detainer request. Supporters said the bill would ensure people understand their right to remain silent and to refuse interviews, and the Legal Clinic suggested the warning be given orally, potentially via recorded messages, rather than only in writing. The Office of the Public Defender noted the bill aligns with existing due-process warnings in criminal court and suggested referencing current law. Finally, HB 476, which would raise the capital gains tax rate, drew support from Hawaiʻi Appleseed on fairness grounds; the Department of Taxation said it would review revenue questions but had no estimate available. After recess, the committee returned to decision-making and moved HB 22 forward on the chair’s recommendation of HD1, with the chair noting that the bill already contained language allowing counties to adopt stronger standards and protections.

Transcript Highlights:

• Introduction of resolutions. >> House Concurrent Resolution 106 by Representatives Luck and Garcia, submitting
• <03:56:02.479> and >> signing of bills resolutions and >> signing of bills resolutions
• <03:56:05.920> and >> signing of bills resolutions and >> signing of bills resolutions
• introduction of resolutions introduction of resolutions >> house<03:56:09.760> concurrent
• concurrent resolution 106 by >> house concurrent resolution 106 by representatives<03:56:12.080

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• But, uh, it sounds like the resolution But, uh, it sounds like the resolution would<01:30:46.960
• No, not on your resolution, in your House Bill 2.
• c> your<03:17:19.479> resolution<03:17:20.479> in resolution that in your resolution
• in resolution that in your resolution in your<03:17:20.800> House<03:17:20.960> Bill<03
• <04:49:33.520> That's to do another House resolution.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 110, as amended by the Senate, which would establish fees for alteration-of-terrain applications and direct the Department of Environmental Services to adopt rules for a permit-by-notification process for certain projects. Trisha Milo introduced the bill for Senator Lang and noted that the department had worked on the amended language. Matt Mayberry of the New Hampshire Homebuilders Association said the industry strongly supported the bill, describing it as a public-private partnership that would speed review for developers without affecting local control, with builders paying the costs rather than taxpayers. Members focused heavily on how the bill’s fee structure and permit thresholds would work, especially for projects near shoreland, wetlands, and protected water bodies. Representative Opel raised concerns about whether the bill reduced review of habitat and shoreland impacts or shifted costs unfairly; Philip Trobridge of DES explained that the bill does not eliminate those reviews and that shoreland projects still receive greater scrutiny. He said the bill creates different tiers, with the permit-by-notification process applying to certain projects between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet that are not in protected shoreland, while larger or shoreland-affected projects remain under the standard review process. He also said the proposed fees were based on sustaining the program, covering added habitat and species review responsibilities, and keeping reviews efficient. Trobridge said the new fee structure would generate about $1.2 million in additional revenue and help fund additional staff and related program costs. He stated that the department had worked with the regulated community and believed the fees were fair and reasonable, though he acknowledged the bill’s wording was confusing and that the threshold could be revisited later if the new process works well. Members also discussed how the state process interacts with local approvals, and Trobridge said both state and local approvals are required before a project can begin. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• .: That the Senate agreed to House Concurrent Resolution 11. Signed, sincerely, Kevin F. McCumber.
• THAT THE SENATE AGREED TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 11.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Friday, February 21, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• days' Jo House Senate bills to join us at second reading, assign my reassignment, buildings and resolutions
• , builds resolutions, conference committee reports, and joint committee reports, most places in new business
• Speaker, I ask you to vote no on this resolution. Thank you. Thank you for your debates.

Bills: HB4319, HB4317, HB1225, HB3076, HB3081, HB4226, SCR17, HB4432, HB3304, HB3411, HB3435, HB4339, HB4331, HB4341, HB4342, HB1770, HB1016, HB4113, HB2950, HB4141, HB3277, HB2988, HB3029, HB3338, HB1889, HB3834, HB3831, HB2939, HB3045, HB3657, HB1739, HB3759, HB3755, HB4484, HB4486, HB4108, HB1250, HB2961, HB1219, HB3025, HB1782, HB1907, HB3718, HB4459, HB2976, HB3548, HB3545, HB2952, HB2929, HB2956, HB2973, HB3055, HB3086, HB3040, HB3794, HB4336, HB3151, HB1590, HB3581, HB3313, HB3429, HB3448, HB1752, HB2650, HB3584, HB4202, HB3586, HB4321, HB4280, HB3650, HCR1020, HB2116, HB2206, HB4301, HB3625, HB3147, HB3403, HB3498, HB3970, HB3975, HB3976, HB3980, HB4265, HB4266, HB3638, HB3880, HB3930, HB3942, HB3944, HB4191, HB3242, HB3678

Keywords: administrative procedures, rulemaking authority, specific authority, legislative review, agency rules, accounting, CPA, licensure, educational requirements, reciprocity, professional conduct, vital records, birth certificate, birth registration, biological sex, sex designation, male, female, nonbinary, gender identity

Transcript Highlights:

• as the Chair deems appropriate, in accordance with Texas Government Code Section 103.024, Senate Resolution
• Senate Resolution 5, and Senate Rule 11.20. Issue one or more subpoenas to compel Mr.
• ever do anything. or establish any precedent taking away from a committee's authority to issue a resolution

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Conerly: WHERE DOES DOA GET THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ALTERNATIVE YOUTH RESOLUTION PROGRAM?
• DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT HOW LONG IT TAKES TO GET FROM ETHICS COMMISSION TO THE RESOLUTION OF
• TO GO FROM THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON ETHICS TO THEIR HANDS TO YOUR HANDS, FROM YOUR HANDS TO A RESOLUTION

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:38:45.199> on<01:38:45.520> its enrolled bills and resolutions on its enrolled
• bills and resolutions on its public<01:38:46.159> website.
• ordered to third reading be by this resolution read a third time, all titles be the same as adopted,
• Some of them are here today, and we will be giving them resolutions at the luncheon.
• them resolutions um at the<01:57:35.599> lunchon.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's why I am so angry about the news from Washington that Pete Stauber's continuing resolution to
• That's why I am so angry about the news from Washington that Pete Stauber's continuing resolution to
• That's why I am so angry about the news from Washington that Pete Stauber's continuing resolution to
• From Washington that Pete Stauber's continuing resolution to remove the protections from some of our
• Stauber's resolution will allow permits for copper sulfide mines near the Boundary Waters, and any pollution

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: Minnesota legislators held a press event responding to a U.S. Senate vote that they said would remove federal protections and allow copper-nickel mining activity that could affect the Boundary Waters. Senator Foung Hawj opened by condemning the vote as favoring corporate interests over Minnesotans, and Representatives Leach Kozlowski and Shelley Buck, along with Senator Jen McEwen and Senator Ann Johnson Stewart, framed the Boundary Waters as both an environmental treasure and, for Native communities, homelands with treaty-protected rights. They argued that copper sulfide mining poses irreversible risks to water quality, wildlife, and tribal fishing, gathering, and hunting rights, and said the federal action lacked adequate government-to-government consultation with affected tribes. The speakers highlighted several state bills they said are intended to fill the gap left by the federal vote. McEwen described her “Prove It First” bill, which would require a mine of the same type to have operated in the U.S. for 10 years and closed for 10 years without pollution before a similar project could be permitted in Minnesota. Johnson Stewart outlined three measures: a permanent protection bill for state-owned lands in the Rainy River watershed, a taxpayer protection/financial assurance bill requiring non-iron mining companies to fully fund cleanup guarantees in cash up front, and a “bad actor” bill barring permits for companies with records of corruption, bribery, or environmental destruction. The speakers said these bills need hearings and discussion and urged Governor Walz and state agencies to take action now, including possible permit revocations. In response to questions about economic arguments for mining, McEwen said she understood why some Northland residents might hope for jobs but argued that mining companies exploit economic desperation with propaganda and that most Minnesotans oppose this type of mining near the Boundary Waters. She said there is limited Republican support for some narrower bills, especially financial assurance, and suggested the issue could become a political liability for Rep. Pete Stauber. The event ended with a call for bipartisan action, state-level enforcement, and continued public pressure to protect the Boundary Waters.

Transcript Highlights:

• emergency is declared during the Second Regular Session of the 57th Legislature, and all bills, resolutions
• The Second Regular Session of the 57th Legislature, and all bills, resolutions, and memorials under the
• And all bills, resolutions, and memorials under the order of business, third reading and final reading
• George runs Resolute Group. And lastly, George Caleb.
• George runs Resolute Group and Data Orbital and is also a candidate for the House in 2026, LD3.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We'll revert to motions and resolutions.
• So with that, I'll defer back to you, Madam Speaker, to the reading of our resolution. Mr.
• A House resolution recognizing the 2024 NFL Coach of the Year.
• about an important bridge at the University of Minnesota, and I'm glad that we will be putting some resolution
• There being 65 ayes and 68 nays, the motion—the resolution, I'm sorry—the amendment does not pass.

Transcript Highlights:

• just want to thank the commissioner and your team for identifying this error and finding a quick resolution
• But I appreciate you all being transparent and upfront and letting us know the resolution and how you
• just want to thank the commissioner and your team for identifying this error and finding a quick resolution
• But I appreciate you all being transparent and upfront and letting us know the resolution and how you
• But I appreciate you all being transparent and a fountain and letting us know the resolution and how

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We are moving to House Joint Resolution Number 1.
• House Joint Resolution Number 1 calls on Chair Meyer to explain the joint resolution.
• Resolution 1 is a constitutional amendment for House Bill 9.
• House resolution is pending. Thank you.

Bills: HB8, HB9, HJR1, HB22, HB8, HB9, HJR1, HB22

Keywords: HB 8, school finance, compressed tax rate, maximum compressed tax rate, MCR, PYMCR, property tax, school district taxes, Education Code, Tax Code, state aid, school funding formula, local school taxes, Texas school finance, tax rate compression, public education funding, ad valorem tax, tangible personal property, income-producing property, business personal property

Transcript Highlights:

• And a resolution was offered at the UN General Assembly containing this phrase, the full scale invasion
• The resolution failed. The U.S. voted no, along with Russia, Nicaragua, North Korea.
• General Assembly resolution that I referred to that the U.S. voted against and caused it to fail, I'd
• Reserving the right to object, I was told the resolution was adopted by the General Assembly.
• The resolution adopted, the one that I read that put the onus on Russia was defeated.

Keywords: Steven Feinberg, Deputy Secretary of Defense, national security, budget cuts, military readiness, global threats, Department of Defense

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on the nomination of Steven Feinberg as Deputy Secretary of Defense. The committee emphasized the urgent need for strong leadership in response to a complex array of global threats posed by adversarial coalitions, including China, Russia, and Iran. The discussions highlighted concerns regarding budget cuts and personnel reductions within the Department of Defense, showcasing the challenges posed by the current economic context and the pressing need to maintain military readiness and capabilities. Various members expressed their apprehensions about how impending layoffs and budget reductions would impact the defense workforce and national security.

Transcript Highlights:

• is to protect rights and liberties, uphold and interpret the law, and provide for the peaceful resolution
• We similarly have a committee on alternative dispute resolution rules and policies, so our work with
• situations, and that's very important when we work together and we have differences and we end up with a resolution
• And that's very important when we work together and we have differences and we end up with a resolution
• We end up with a resolution. We end up with solving the problem.

Summary: The Justice Budget Subcommittee met for an introductory overview of the justice budget and the major agencies within it. Chair Maney explained that the committee would hear broad presentations rather than detailed budget questions, and the first panel included the Department of Juvenile Justice, Department of Corrections, Commission on Offender Review, Department of Law Enforcement, Office of the State Courts Administrator, and the Attorney General’s Office. Each agency described its mission, staffing, budget, and major responsibilities, with repeated emphasis on public safety, rehabilitation, staffing shortages, technology needs, and the importance of mental health services and education in reducing recidivism. Secretary Hall described DJJ’s prevention-to-aftercare continuum, including civil citation, detention, probation, and residential commitment programs, and highlighted reductions in juvenile arrests and commitments. Secretary Dixon said DOC’s biggest issues are staffing, overtime, and inflation, while noting progress in education, reentry, and a low recidivism rate. FDLE Commissioner Glass outlined the agency’s investigative, forensic, intelligence, and protective functions, including work on fentanyl enforcement and crime reporting systems. The State Courts Administrator emphasized the judiciary’s constitutional role, case volume, and challenges in providing interpreters, experts, and technology support. Chief Deputy Attorney General Guard described the office’s litigation, criminal appeals, consumer protection, and opioid recovery work, especially defending state laws and recovering opioid settlement funds. Members then asked questions about prison conditions, immigration enforcement, court filing fees, crime reporting, staffing ratios, and transnational gangs. Agency leaders responded that they were not aware of ICE contracts in some cases, that FDLE works with immigration authorities and detention facilities under existing authority, and that filing fees are a legislative policy decision. The committee also heard from the Justice Administrative Commission, prosecutors, public defenders, guardian ad litem, regional conflict counsel, and capital collateral regional counsel, who focused on indigent representation, dependency and death penalty cases, and persistent staffing and retention problems. No votes were taken, and the meeting concluded after the presentations and questions.

Transcript Highlights:

• House Concurrent Resolution 2040, subject to voter approval, amends the Arizona Constitution to prohibit
• House Concurrent Resolution 2048 amends the Arizona Constitution to withhold outlined elected state officer

Summary: In caucus, members discussed two bills they expected to move to the floor, with the chair noting they needed 31 votes and also had nine additional bills to handle later. The first measure, HCR 2040, would amend the Arizona Constitution to bar school districts from using public money or resources to support labor organizations or conduct union activities during working hours; the Senate amendment also bars the state and political subdivisions from negotiating certain labor terms with unions while affirming employees’ right to negotiate their own terms. The bill’s sponsor concurred and argued it simply prevents taxpayer dollars from subsidizing a private organization. The second measure, HCR 2048, originally dealt with withholding elected state officers’ salaries until a budget is enacted, but the Senate replaced it with a strike-everything amendment focused on protecting scholarship accounts for children of military families. Staff explained the amended version would prohibit the state from confiscating money from those accounts under specified conditions, void any conflicting future law or voter-approved measure, and prevent severability of violating provisions. The sponsor strongly concurred, saying the measure was intended to stop harmful provisions, including a proposed anti-ESA ballot initiative, from affecting military families. No formal votes were taken in the caucus transcript, and members indicated they would go to the floor to pass the bills with limited discussion. The meeting ended with the chair adjourned the caucus.

Transcript Highlights:

• Resolutions. There is a motion to read at the desk. The secretary will read the motion. Sen.
• Members, Senate Resolution Number 88 through 96 will be referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They have to do a resolution.
• So, just making sure that they understand that they just can't bring an ordinance or resolution or whatever

Bills: HB424, SB286

Keywords: HB424, Montgomery County, sheriff, county sheriff, salary increase, expense allowance, local act, county general fund, retirement contributions, public official compensation, law enforcement pay, elected official salary, Montgomery County legislation, sheriff compensation, term-based salary, retirement system, Montgomery City Council, constitutional amendment, employees, service credit

Transcript Highlights:

• 00 p.m., that the Senate passed 177 and the Senate agreed to without amendment House Concurrent Resolution
• :00 P.M., THAT THE SENATE PASS 177 AND THE SENATE AGREED TO WITHOUT AMENDMENT, HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Motions and resolutions.
• I move that Resolution Number 1771 be recalled from the Committee on Education Policy and be re-referred