Video & Transcript : 'mortality review' :
Page 162 of 500
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Radioactive and Hazardous Materials Dec 8th, 2025 at 09:45 am
Radioactive & Hazardous Materials Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- That's also under an ongoing reclamation permit application and review.
- We asked HALTEC, "Did you guys review it?"
- An expert technical review team for analysis on several complex technical disputes.
- The team was conducting their review.
- We had staff members out there observing the rigor of that review.
HI
Hawaii 2026 Regular Session
EDT DEFER, EDT-HOU, EDT, EDT Public Hearings 02-10-2026
Economic Development and Tourism
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> review uh to approve of the tax credit. review uh to approve of the tax credit.
- complete the review or audit.
- complete the review or audit.
- complete the review or audit.
- complete the review or audit.
Committee:
Senate Economic Development and Tourism
Summary:
The committee first took up SB 2045 relating to combat sports and recommended passage with SD1. Members adopted requested changes from DCCA and the boxing commission, including clarifying that the onsite medical professional must be a licensed physician, specifying when a deputy combat sports commissioner must file a written report, removing the combat sports registry language and ambulance requirement, clarifying promoter payment requirements, and requiring advance coordination with the nearest emergency room or hospital. The bill also makes technical amendments and sets an effective date of July 1, 2050. The measure passed unanimously among members present, with Senators Fukunaga and Kim excused.
The joint hearing then considered SB 2187 relating to the Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. Testimony was brief and largely in support, and the committees agreed to pass the bill with SD1, making technical non-substantive amendments and changing the effective date to July 1, 2050. The committees voted to adopt the recommendation, with members present voting aye and some senators excused.
A longer portion of the hearing focused on several economic development measures, including SB 2072 on tourism, SB 3049 on a trade-oriented production capacity grant program, and SB 3166 and SB 3167 involving technology development and the blue economy. SB 2072 drew questions about cost, benefit, and the practicality of promoting Michelin-star restaurants in Hawaii. SB 3049 received broad support from DBEDT, HTDC, chambers, and industry groups, but members questioned whether a new grant program was needed, why DBEDT could not do it without legislation, and whether the state should instead use existing entities like HTDC; the discussion also covered matching funds, likely beneficiaries, and administrative capacity. SB 3166 and SB 3167 were supported by technology and ocean-sector witnesses who said the state needs coordinated planning, specialized expertise, and support for advanced manufacturing and ocean innovation, but members raised concerns about relying on third-party consultants, duplication of existing public capacity, ethics, cost, and whether the work should instead be done by state staff or existing institutions. No final votes on the later bills were captured in the transcript excerpt.
NV
Nevada 2025 Regular Session
Assembly Committee on Health and Human Services May 31st, 2025 at 12:00 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- revises provisions relating to cottage food operations, farm-to-fork events, and requires NDA to review
- Director Goy Kachia and NACO on Thursday, and just revises the language a little bit so that NDA reviews
- to start by thanking Chair Brown-May, Senator Donate, Director Goy Kachia, and Deputy Ferris for reviewing
- Glickachia and Deputy Ferris, for reviewing and accepting our amendment, we believe it creates coordination
- We felt this method aligns with the department’s plan to review and adjust funding mechanisms through
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Ways & Means Feb 6th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- It does allow a project applicant to choose to use the standard of review under SEPA instead of the review
- Cultural resource review and environmental review cannot be separated because environmental changes impact
- Cultural resource review and environmental review cannot be separated because environmental changes impact
- Cultural resource review and environmental review cannot be separated because the environmental changes
- review hearings through predisposition reports, removing presumption, and replacing mid-sentence review
Summary:
The Ways and Means Committee met on February 6, 2026, and first voted to suspend the five-day notice rule for all bills on the agenda. Senators Braun and Gildon objected, arguing the bill needed more public review and that the fiscal note had only just been released, but a roll call vote passed 15-9 and the committee proceeded to Senate Bill 6346.
Staff briefed SB 6346 as a proposal to create a 9.9% income tax on Washington taxable income above a $1 million per-household standard deduction, with a $50,000 charitable deduction, apportionment rules for nonresidents and certain professions, quarterly estimated payments, and credits for capital gains tax and certain business taxes. Staff said the tax would begin in 2029 and eventually raise about $3.5 billion annually from roughly 30,000 taxpayers. The bill also would expand the Working Families Tax Credit, create a sales tax exemption for grooming and hygiene products, increase the small business B&O tax credit and filing threshold, and end the B&O surcharge on high-grossing businesses one year early. Members questioned the bill’s constitutionality, its exemption from referendum, treatment of student athletes, natural-resource industries, and whether real estate gains would be captured.
Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including labor groups, educators, health care advocates, counties, child care workers, and some business owners and high-income individuals, said the bill would make the tax code more progressive and provide stable funding for health care, education, child care, public defense, and other services, while expanding the Working Families Tax Credit. Opponents, including many small business, construction, housing, and taxpayer advocates, argued the measure would function as a tax on pass-through businesses and retained earnings, harm housing production and investment, encourage wealthy residents and businesses to leave the state, and violate the state constitution or the will of voters. No final action on SB 6346 was taken during the hearing.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- and comment from the obtaining review and comment from the planning<00:17:36.640><c> board.
- </c><00:21:23.200><c> and</c> where it says quote after review and where it says quote after review and
- I think that we need to slow down and review these more in their entirety.
- </c> and review these more in their entirety. and review these more in their entirety.
- </c><01:36:44.320><c> board</c> to the state building code review board to the state building code review
Committee:
Senate Commerce
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- House Bill 907 is an act relating to legislative review of reporting requirements.
- Member from Virgin. >> Madam Speaker, I move that we postpone action on H. 907, legislative review of
- 907 is an act relating<00:08:02.319><c> to</c><00:08:02.639><c> legislative</c><00:08:03.360><c> review
- </c><00:08:03.680><c> of</c> relating to legislative review of relating to legislative review of reporting
- </c><00:08:13.599><c> of</c> action on H907, legislative review of action on H907, legislative review
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs May 14th, 2025
Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- So after they do the review?
- If, for some reason, the individual feels like they have not received satisfaction based on the review
- , then they can go through a process in the legal system to ask a judge to review the...
- OK, so if it's every five years, it needs to be reviewed. Who does the review?
- If an agency does not go in there and review the data, attribute the officer's name and their agency
Keywords:
smuggling, human trafficking, criminal penalties, felony offenses, law enforcement, foreign adversary, foreign-owned company, scrutinized company, China, national security, cybersecurity, information technology, communications technology, ICT, critical infrastructure, state contracts, government procurement, vendor certification, debarment, civil penalty
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, April 14, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Senate National Security Working Group, 119th Congress, United States China Economic and Security Review
- :06:38.080><c> Security</c> States China Economic and Security States China Economic and Security Review
- Commission signed sincerely Kevin Review Commission signed sincerely Kevin F.<00:06:41.680><c> Mccumber
- of the Residual Risk and Technology Review,” 89 FR 38508, which amended the pre-existing mercury and
- of the Residual Risk and Technology Review,” 89 FR 38508.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy Committee 4/10/25
Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- Uh, Vice Chair Mekeland, have you had a chance to review the minutes of April 9th?
- be considered both by the public for testimony and have the members of this committee be able to review
- be considered both by the public for testimony and have the members of this committee be able to review
- it as well committee be able to review it as well despite<00:04:32.479><c> exactly</c><00:04:32.800>
- Back together to review the budget bill, it'll be essentially at the call of the chair.
Bills:
HF2440
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
Environment and Natural Resources Jan 13th, 2026
Environment and Natural Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- Members, under current law, the disposition of state-owned lands is reviewed first by the Acquisition
- the Board of Trustees publish the required information at least 30 days prior to their meeting to review
- DEP also conducted analysis that evaluated future growth and recreational demands through the review
- in one or more public meetings, providing citizens, partners, and stakeholders the opportunity to review
- We also conducted analysis that evaluated future growth and recreational demands through the review of
Committee:
Senate Environment and Natural Resources
Keywords:
golf courses, best management practices, fertilizer regulation, Department of Agriculture, environmental protection, certification, beach management, beach erosion, beach nourishment, coastal resilience, shoreline protection, critical erosion, critically eroded beach, Florida DEP, Department of Environmental Protection, coastal flooding, compound flooding, storm surge, inlet management, coastal engineering
Summary:
The Environment and Natural Resources Committee met with a quorum and took up several bills. SB 636 on beach management, by Senator Leek, would create additional pathways for counties and municipalities to obtain critically eroded beach or area of critical state concern designations, shifting the process toward a more proactive approach. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell raised concerns about local capacity and funding, and the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association said the bill was an alternative pathway but emphasized the need for more recurring funding. The bill was reported favorably.
The committee then considered SB 544, which transfers the Golf Course Best Management Practices Certification Program from DEP to FDACS and establishes certification and training standards there. Senator Smith and Senator Harrell asked about environmental oversight, taxation, and whether the change would affect state park restrictions; the sponsor said it would not change tax treatment or park rules and that DEP would still handle enforcement if BMPs are not followed. The Florida Springs Council opposed the bill, arguing golf courses are not agriculture and warning of weaker protections for springs, while the Florida Golf Course Superintendent's Association supported the move as a continuity and participation measure. After adopting a technical amendment, the committee reported the bill favorably, with Senator Smith voting no.
SB 848 on stormwater treatment, also by Senator Trunow, was amended to clarify the role of water quality enhancement areas while stormwater rules are still being finalized and to make public-land project review forward-looking. Resource Environmental Solutions supported the amendment and bill as providing a clearer market for water quality credits, and the Florida Home Builders Association supported the measure. The committee adopted the amendment and reported the bill favorably. SB 546 by Vice Chair Mayfield would require 30-day public notice before meetings reviewing the sale or exchange of state conservation lands, including at water management districts; after a technical amendment, it received support from conservation groups and was reported favorably.
The committee also received a DEP presentation on the State Park Amenities Report, which said Florida’s 175 state parks drew over 28 million visitors and generated a $3.6 billion economic impact. DEP identified nearly $759 million in needed repairs and upgrades over 10 years and $1.39 billion in contemplated new construction and development in unit management plans. No votes were taken on the presentation, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- We'll review this evening. I think we are of like mind on this one. Okay.
- We'll check and review it. I believe we have an understanding on that measure as well.
- We'll review we'll we'll work it out. We'll review this<00:02:11.360><c> evening.
- We'll check and review Uh I'm not sure. We'll check and review it. it. it.
- We're drafting a CD1 now that we'd like to present for your review. That's okay.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><00:25:54.720><c> it</c> investigation, and they can review it investigation, and they can review
- </c> would review these petitions and review would review these petitions and review the<00:47:43.520
- </c> would need an additional judge to review would need an additional judge to review such<00:48:05.760
- </c><00:49:55.119><c> this</c> that uh despite a judge reviewing this that uh despite a judge reviewing
- Supreme Court for review or whether they have even come before a state supreme court for review.
Committee:
Senate Judiciary
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/28/25
Public Safety Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- The Clemency Review Commission is a new agency as of July 1st, 2024.
- </c> review commission uh the clemency review review commission uh the clemency review commission<00:
- </c><00:15:57.800><c> process</c> related to the clemency review process related to the clemency review
- </c><00:16:09.639><c> those</c> provide um so I'll let you review those provide um so I'll let you review
- </c><00:31:13.799><c> not</c> guidelines comprehensive reviews not guidelines comprehensive reviews not
Bills:
HF2432
Committee:
House Public Safety Finance and Policy
Keywords:
HF2432, judiciary finance bill, public safety finance bill, corrections policy, crime victims, victim services, Minnesota victims of crime account, court fees, marriage license fee, financial crimes, fraud investigations, insurance fraud, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, BCA, Commerce Fraud Bureau, wage theft, automobile theft prevention, nonprofit security grants, 911 funding, POST Board
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Municipal and County Government (02/17/2026)
Municipal and County Government
Transcript Highlights:
- </c><02:03:15.280><c> um</c> no cup or sight plan review. um no cup or sight plan review. um separation
- </c> knowing that there will be public review knowing that there will be public review of<02:45:18.000
- </c> review until it's a done deal. review until it's a done deal.
- </c><06:07:19.040><c> or</c> who applies for site plan review or who applies for site plan review or
- ><c> them</c> I can um review them I can um review them and<07:23:42.080><c> if</c><07:23:42.320><c>
Committee:
House Municipal and County Government
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection - 03/03/26
Commerce and Consumer Protection
Transcript Highlights:
- Instead, his vehicle has remained at the shop while his claim has been under review.
- After submitting our damage review.
- have reviewed the Minnesota statutes<00:11:38.880><c> and</c><00:11:39.120><c> were</c><00:11:39.279
- </c> be allowed without further review? be allowed without further review?
- </c> often best be identified from a review often best be identified from a review of<01:31:38.320><c
Committee:
Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection
WY
Wyoming 2026 Regular Session
House Minerals, Business & Economic Development Committee, February 20, 2026
Minerals, Business & Economic Development
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> >> Subject to review and objection. Okay. >> Subject to review and objection.
- Chairman, mayor, please. half mile where again review and half mile where again review and objection<
- </c><00:29:17.440><c> that</c> can object, but they get to review that can object, but they get to review
- In reviewing the very significant.
- </c><01:34:49.600><c> of</c> interact with those and no review of interact with those and no review of
Keywords:
pari-mutuel wagering, simulcasting, historic horse racing, HHR terminals, horse racing, gaming commission, Wyoming Gaming Commission, local control, city approval, county approval, municipal approval, permit renewal, gaming permit, wagering regulation, racetrack, live pari-mutuel event, district court appeal, public notice, land use, public safety
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- That doesn’t preclude it from being reviewed at a different time. That’s just a mandatory review.
- </c> then it says that it can be reviewed then it says that it can be reviewed that<00:18:46.320><c>
- just a mandatory review yeah that's just a mandatory review yeah shall<00:18:51.080><c> not</c><00:18
- </c> long time not to have a mandatory review long time not to have a mandatory review of<00:19:07.880
- </c> it you know we we're going to review it you know we we're going to review these<00:24:30.960><c>
Committee:
Senate Education
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/25
Children and Families Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- They're also reviewing policies and procedures.
- They're also reviewing records, both the child records and staff records, for compliance with what is
- </c> and have had um on each of their reviews and have had um on each of their reviews there's<00:42:
- </c> own intake process that they review own intake process that they review those<01:13:24.719><c> complaints
- </c> exit interview at the end of the reviews exit interview at the end of the reviews and<01:24:41.840
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26
State Government Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> enterprise, along with reviewing enterprise, along with reviewing performance<00:02:56.440><c> against
- </c> those cost-benefit analysis are reviewed those cost-benefit analysis are reviewed by<01:12:33.640
- We call it sunsetting, retrospective review, periodic review.
- , periodic review.
- We we I think review, periodic review.
Committee:
House State Government Finance and Policy
Keywords:
Inspector General, fraud prevention, state audit, public funds, misuse, transparency, government accountability, HF4482, Minnesota Historical Society, state historic sites, historic site management, historic preservation, county historical society, local historical society, municipality, county government, admission fees, grants-in-aid, site operations, site maintenance
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- The idea at one time had been, in response to a great deal of investigation and program review done by
- </c> staff and project assistance for review staff and project assistance for review and<00:09:44.959
- And then MnDOT also was to provide draft review of contractual language, a review of change orders for
- And then MnDOT also was to provide draft review of contractual language, a review of change orders for
- We're doing a 30-, 60-, and 90-day review on our cost for those.
Committee:
Senate Transportation