Transcript Highlights:

• > the<00:17:56.480> work<00:17:56.760> again<00:17:56.960> of difficult problems
• thank you commissioner chair uh problems thank you commissioner chair uh Senator<00:24:57.039> yes
• Most of these agencies being general fund, those gambling agencies being a notable exception.
• and planning board um the gambling and planning board um the gambling agencies<01:56:09.119>
• agencies uh being a fund those gambling agencies uh being a notable<01:56:16.320> exception<01

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The big problem I have is I have a veteran. When he bought his house, it cost him $89,000.
• <01:02:50.920> charitable<01:02:51.359> gambling from their gambling charitable gambling
• from their gambling charitable gambling too<01:02:53.279> in<01:02:53.480> this<01:02:
• without an exception from the Gambling Control Board.
• <01:08:16.400> control exception from the gambling control exception from the gambling control

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So, this is an attempt to correct some of the problems.
• The problem we have in this house, yes, it came down with 30 votes for it, but the problem I have between
• It's trying to fix a problem we're trying to solve.
• We're talking alcohol instead of gambling, correct?
• I mean, this 2500 acres... ...gambling, correct?

Bills: HB 1520, HB 1545, HJR 110, HJR 203, HB 245, HB 1465, HB 1482, HB 294, HB 793, HB 809, HB 3928, HB 334, HB 2037, HB 1973, HB 285, HB 4341, HB 4264, HB 1043, HB 837, HB 1234, HB 1193, HB 1194, HB 1646, HB 1729, HB 2498, HB 1314, HB 2295, HB 1353, HB 1531, HB 1988, HB 5398, HB 3960, HB 3923, HB 1407, HB 1764, HB 2221, HB 2214, HB 2517, HB 2518, HB 2213, HB 5008, HB 5092, HB 3421, HB 3663, HB 3748, HB 3800, HB 3756, HB 2613, HB 3782, HB 5246, HB 4344, HB 4044, HB 4066, HB 2702, HB 2807, HB 2869, HB 2898, HB 3181, HB 3250, HB 4153, HB 2091, HB 2115, HB 2542, HB 2768, HB 3349, HB 3352, HB 4406, HB 1593, HB 1899, HB 3133, HB 4432, HB 4960, HB 3214, HB 3915, HB 3508, HB 2145, SB 304, SB 608, SB 2312, SB 494, SB 530, HB 45, HB 2520, HB 35, HB 47, HB 318, HB 349, HB 554, HB 1359, HB 1373, HB 2254, HB 2259, HB 2853, HB 3073, HB 3088, HB 353, HB 355, HB 786, HB 762, HB 705, HB 932, HB 849, HB 1119, HB 3041, HB 713, HB 3104, HB 3970, HB 4042, HB 4490, HB 1731, HB 2607, HB 3689, HB 1788, HB 1612, HB 138, HB 15, HB 1971, HB 1338, HB 2989, HB 267, HB 1201, HB 2954, HB 5265, HB 1804, HB 5061, HB 1520, HB 1545, HJR 110, HJR 203, HB 1887, HB 1914, HB 2402, HB 2306, HB 1809, HB 2350, HB 3000, HB 3237, HB 3326, HB 3211, HB 1056, HB 2081, HB 2187, HB 3092, HB 3308, HB 3526, HB 3750, HB 3527, HB 4219, HB 4230, HB 4290, HB 5238, HB 4804, HB 4749, HB 245, HB 1465, HB 1482, HB 294, HB 793, HB 809, HB 3928, HB 334, HB 2037, HB 1973, HB 285, HB 4341, HB 4264, HB 1043, HB 837, HB 1234, HB 1193, HB 1194, HB 1646, HB 1729, HB 2498, HB 1314, HB 2295, HB 1353, HB 1531, HB 1988, HB 5398, HB 3960, HB 3923, HB 1407, HB 1764, HB 2221, HB 2214, HB 2517, HB 2518, HB 2213, HB 5008, HB 5092, HB 3421, HB 3663, HB 3748, HB 3800, HB 3756, HB 2613, HB 3782, HB 5246, HB 4344, HB 4044, HB 4066, HB 2702, HB 2807, HB 2869, HB 2898, HB 3181, HB 3250, HB 4153, HB 2091, HB 2115, HB 2542, HB 2768, HB 3349, HB 3352, HB 4406, HB 1593, HB 1899, HB 3133, HB 4432, HB 4960, HB 3214, HB 3915, HB 3508, HB 2145, HCR 6, HCR 12, HCR 34, HCR 50, HCR 55, HCR 58, HCR 70, HCR 71, HCR 72, HCR 74, HCR 75, HCR 78, HCR 80, HCR 93, HCR 100, HCR 107, HCR 116, HCR 117, HCR 90

Keywords: Angelina and Neches River Authority, river authority, Sunset Advisory Commission, Texas Sunset Act, Special District Local Laws Code, local government, natural resources, board of directors, director training, board governance, public testimony, open meetings, public information, conflict of interest, ethics, complaint system, general manager, board president, staggered terms, removal of director

Transcript Highlights:

• These are just the full statewide entities: Department of Corrections, Parks and Rec, Gambling Commission
• Gambling Commission, Washington State Patrol, Department of Natural Resources, Liquor and Cannabis Board
• It also included liquor control officers, park rangers, commercial vehicle officers, and gambling special
• And that's, I mean, I don't have any problem with people being in a different retirement system.
• Maybe it should be understood that the legislature, recognizing the serious problems that our Plan 1

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Are there problems with illness? Because this reporting is not happening.
• If you oppose predatory... ...gambling, predatory gambling.
• The problem they were having was the same problem we were having. We had all gone down the road.
• You can solve this problem.
• We took it out because there was a problem with the two-subject rule in it.

Bills: HB1535, HB 123, HB 111, HB180, HB342, HB 1027, HB 1178, HB610, HB 1277, HB1615, HB1620, HB5342, HB4885, HB4751, HB4689, HB4530, HB4488, HB2149, HB2041, HB2071, HB1813, HB2282, HB2248, HB2243, HB2522, HB2310, HB2513, HB2300, HB1902, HB3719, HB4284, HB4327, HB3743, HB3778, HB3801, HB5153, HB5147, HB4877, HB4850, HB3158, HB3261, HB3005, HB3033, HB3138, HB3099, HB2849, HB2967, HB3488, HB3477, HB3466, HB3396, HB3469, HB2594, HB2776, HB2564, HB2298, HB5331, HB5646, HB5247, HB5323, HB2015, HB4384, HB3896, HB4014, HB3627, HB3594, HB2524, HB510, HB561, HB5111, HB5446, HB 1181, HB3963, HB2785, HB1661, HB2460, HB24, HJR138, HB3800, HB42, HB 129, HB677, HB668, HB2128, HB2038, HB2316, HB3686, HB2563, HB 1160, HB3883, HB2788, HB2663, HB3305, HB3474, HB 1105, HB3490, HB3597, HB 1295, HB3512, HB3783, HB2017, HB3010, HB3112, HB4215, HB3223, HB3464, HB3120, HB4214, HB4081, HB4783, HB4063, HB2783, HB5085, HB2510, HB3426, HB4361, HB 1169, HB2516, HB4700, HB3560, HB3860, HB3146, HB184, HB198, HB247, HB367, HB449, HB1778, HB514, HB632, HB2582, HB766, HB2715, HB2712, HB3069, HB3505, HB 1269, HB4224, HB5032, HB2240, HB5180, HB3348, HB4668, HB4665, HB3395, HB3157, HB4395, HB4325, HB4386, HB4273, HB2760, HB2820, HB1828, HB1579, SB2349, SB1268, SB610, SB1577, SB1369, SB2032, SB2034, SB1057, SB1044, SB922, SB1759, SB1143, SB1506, SB1403, SB2361, SB870, SB372, SB72, SB1583, SB2314, SB1267, SB1273, SB765, SB552, HB2145, HJR112, HB1804, HJR110, HB 1194, HB1531, HB5008, HB3421, SCR27, HB5398, HB1407, HB426, HB1535, HB 123, HB1773, HB1871, HB2035, HB2448, HB2492, HB1411, HB4753, HB4666, HB4529, HB1499, HB1610, HB2028, HB1506, HB886, HB3546, HB796, HB223, HB1475, HB3556, HB4638, HB 111, HB180, HB342, HB 1027, HB 1178, HB610, HB 1277, HB1615, HB1620, HB5342, HB4885, HB4751, HB4689, HB4530, HB4488, HB2149, HB2041, HB2071, HB1813, HB2282, HB2248, HB2243, HB2522, HB2310, HB2513, HB2300, HB1902, HB3719, HB4284, HB4327, HB3743, HB3778, HB3801, HB5153, HB5147, HB4877, HB4850, HB3158, HB3261, HB3005, HB3033, HB3138, HB3099, HB2849, HB2967, HB3488, HB3477, HB3466, HB3396, HB3469, HB2594, HB2776, HB2564, HB2298, HB5331, HB5646, HB5247, HB5323, HB2015, HB4384, HB3896, HB4014, HB3627, HB3594, HB2524, HB510, HB561, HB5111, HB5446, HB 1181, HB3963, HB2785, HB1661, HB2460, HCR98, HCR92, HCR126

Keywords: Trinity River Authority, river authority, Sunset Advisory Commission, Texas Sunset Act, board of directors, governor appointment, public water authority, regional water authority, water resources, local government, natural resources, board training, ethics, open meetings, public information, conflict of interest, complaint procedures, public comment, director removal, governance reform

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 5, starting at line 3221, eliminates the requirement that lawful gambling taxpayers create an
• Section 5, starting at line 3221, eliminates the requirement that lawful gambling taxpayers create an
• taxpayers create an lawful gambling taxpayers create an annual<00:19:44.799> cash<00:19:45.240
• control board the used by the gambling control board the cash<00:19:57.080> count<00:19:57.400
• I can't solve this problem on my own, and I don't get to add an adult sibling to my health care plan.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill is a gamble. And Floridians deserve better than a gamble.
• Before we rewrite Florida's Constitution, before we gamble with our schools, before we gamble with our
• We don't know what problems we're going to have to endure because of it.
• We don't know what problems we're going to have to endure because of it.
• All heard Miami-Dade has its specific problems.

Summary: The Senate took up Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 2F, a proposed constitutional amendment on property tax reform. The measure would increase the homestead exemption in stages, lower the assessment cap on non-homestead property from 10% to 5%, and limit county and municipal ad valorem tax revenues to specified uses such as public safety, education, infrastructure, natural resources, debt service, employee benefits, and certain administrative costs. Supporters, led by Senator Avila, argued the proposal would provide meaningful property tax relief and push local governments to rein in spending, while opponents warned it would shift costs to fees, reduce local flexibility, and threaten funding for core services. Several amendments were offered and rejected. Senator Sharief proposed an income-based circuit breaker for property tax relief; Senator Smith offered a sunset clause; and Senator Berman proposed revising the ballot statement to better match the amended proposal and remove outdated references. Each amendment failed on recorded votes. During questioning and debate, senators pressed Avila on the ballot language, the effect on local services, whether the legislature could later restrict local spending by statute, and whether renters would benefit. Avila said the ballot language was not his and repeatedly stated he was presenting the governor’s proposal, while also saying local governments would need to prioritize budgets and that future legislatures could address implementation details. After the amendment votes, the joint resolution was read a third time and moved into final debate. Supporters said the proposal would give homeowners relief and force fiscal discipline at the local level. Opponents, including Senators Nathan, Bracey Davis, Smith, Polsky, and Errington, argued the measure was rushed, lacked a completed fiscal analysis or replacement revenue, and could harm police, fire, libraries, parks, housing, and other local services. They also criticized the ballot summary as misleading, especially regarding the staged homestead exemption increase. The transcript ends during debate, before any final vote on the joint resolution itself.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:08:48.080> Um, lawful gambling tax expenditures.
• Um, lawful gambling tax expenditures.
• So next, the LBO also presented a tax evaluation on lawful gambling.
• interview with folks from the gambling interview with folks from the gambling and<00:14:50.240><
• Um, so it's ultimately correcting for a math problem.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• "Yeah, administrative services had less problems."
• gambling to it. gambling to it.
• They didn't want to do problems with.
• had a problem with anything. had a problem with anything.
• Tell them not to have<01:03:09.760> problem. have problem. have problem.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from the September 24 and September 27 meetings unanimously. It then reviewed a spreadsheet and draft report tracking the status of various dedicated funds, with members deciding which items should be kept active, removed, or flagged for follow-up next year. Several funds were identified as no longer needing action because they had been repealed, terminated, or were already handled elsewhere, including mosquito-related funding, child care licensing, and the prescription drug affordability board item. In other cases, members agreed to keep the fund on the list but remove question marks and add notes for future review or for another committee to address. A number of funds drew more detailed discussion. Members agreed that the Fish and Game fee increase issue should not be handled by this committee directly, but that staff should notify the relevant sponsor/department that a legislative change would be needed. They also discussed a medical cannabis fund that was running down significantly; the committee agreed to keep it active, note the concern, and send a letter to the department and Representative McDonald suggesting that HHS review whether fees or another revenue source should be changed, with the possibility of a late bill if needed. The lead poisoning prevention fund was also kept, with a note that the department should take action if it wants changes, and the committee discussed a grants-and-aid escrow-related item, concluding it should remain active and be kept on the list. Members also discussed several legacy or special-purpose funds. They agreed to recommend deleting the broodstock reference, to keep the emergency fund while asking for a better explanation of its funding source, and to retain the building maintenance fund as active. The Recovery Monument fund was identified as inactive and likely eligible for transfer of its remaining $1,000 to the addiction treatment and prevention fund. The Matthew Elliott Trust Fund prompted the most extended discussion; members concluded it should not continue as-is and agreed to draft a letter to the Attorney General recommending that the fund be closed through probate court and the remaining $5,657 transferred to Fund 122, or otherwise handled as unclaimed property if appropriate. The committee also discussed a firemen’s association-related transfer and agreed it should remain, while noting that any broader change would require legislation and a sponsor in the relevant policy committee.

Transcript Highlights:

• And the problem that we have, I was able to move him to the SSLC.
• So and this is a problem that we have because there's too many kids and no we have no places to go, and
• Lauren Gamble, Christopher Winkler, Emily Kidd. and Charlie Gagin. Thank you.
• Lauren Gamble. representing the Texas Medical Association, the Texas Public Health Coalition, the Texas
• They don't see. a problem with it.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I know we talk about sunset a lot every session, and there's certainly a problem process for that.
• I think the problem with the sunset process is that there's a very small number of legislators to get
• A part of it is then a gamble.
• And so you're saying it's OK for our money to be gambled with by the state? I wouldn't say gambled.

Bills: HB565, HB3743, HB4310, HB5083, HB5129, HB5195, HB5331, HB5469, SB21, HB3185, SB 21

Keywords: constitutional amendment, fiscal impact, state budget, ballot measure, transparency in voting, management-to-staff ratio, state agencies, employee regulations, government efficiency, workforce management, public information, governing board, transparency, confidentiality, access rights, privacy, identifying information, state agency, consent, occupational license

Transcript Highlights:

• If you do that, it really creates a problem; they think we're not going to make it.
• Every time we had an issue or a problem, we had to go back out to whoever built the system.
• So by theory, it’s not a problem, is it?
• You know, if it's a constant problem with one, like you get a lemon or whatever.
• Then we have a problem, and we have a serious issue that we need to look at.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I don't believe that it creates any problems.
• It's a real problem.
• Nobody likes it, but there's no problem.
• gambling.
• gambling.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This bill is a gamble, and Floridians deserve better than a gamble.
• Before we rewrite Florida's Constitution, before we gamble with our schools, before we gamble with our
• But this proposal, this amendment, does not fix the problems of Miami-Dade County.
• We don't know what problems we're going to have to endure because of it.
• So members, I have so many problems with how we got to this place and where we are.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It seems like an expansion of gambling, and I don't think the Gaming Commission has authority to do that
• I mean, who has the authority to expand gambling to that degree without legislative input?
• That authority to go to admin rule without any limitation on an expansion of gambling.
• We're pretty careful with our gambling rules here.
• We're pretty careful with our gambling rules here.

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and Senator, that sports betting creates a big problem with problem gambling, and the only one.
• .. ...gambling, problem gambling, and the only ones, and these operators are not paying a cent to support
• The problem is it's also damaging the air.
• Now we don't have that problem. In fact, we are struggling.
• And while we're on that subject, I want to talk about gambling.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I've been in the gambling business for 30-plus years.
• I've been in the gambling business for 30-plus years.
• So you want to take care of this while it's a smaller problem versus a larger problem.
• And we're trying to fix the problems we have.
• And we're trying to fix the problems we have.

Summary: The Judiciary Interim Committee met to begin its study of charitable gaming and the ownership of alcoholic beverage establishments by licensed charitable gaming organizations, a study directed by Senate Bill 2334. Legislative Council gave an overview of the constitutional and statutory framework for charitable gaming, site authorizations, rent limits, proceeds, and recent legislative changes. The Attorney General’s Gaming Division then clarified the financial flow of gaming, explaining that in fiscal year 2025 North Dakota had about $2.5 billion in gross gaming proceeds, with roughly 88-90% paid back in prizes and about $256 million available to organizations after taxes; most of that activity came from electronic pull tabs. Members asked for more detail on winnings, replays, rent, and the breakdown of manufacturer/distributor revenues, and the AG’s office agreed to provide supplemental information. The committee also heard from the League of Cities and the Association of Counties about local site authorization. Cities said they have a limited role in approving gaming sites, can adopt policies after public hearing, may charge up to $100, and can set certain conditions, including local nexus requirements, but cannot require donations or force a specific charity or site. The League said it had worked with stakeholders on a model policy to provide more consistency, though members raised concerns that local requirements could become too restrictive for charities serving broader areas. Counties said the issue is mostly a city matter, with little county involvement beyond minimal site fees and general site approval. The North Dakota Gaming Alliance testified in support of the study and provided IRS-related material suggesting charities may use asset diversification, while emphasizing it had not taken a position on whether charities should own bars. Members questioned whether bar ownership is being used for site stability or to channel charitable gaming dollars, and whether city policies might disadvantage charities with broader missions. The committee also discussed the relationship between gaming organizations, manufacturers, and distributors, including restrictions on incentives and interference, and asked for more information on those entities and their ownership. Later in the meeting, the Racing Commission gave its regular update on live racing, pari-mutuel wagering, ADW providers, purse and promotion funds, a new TRPB contract, and concerns about cease-and-desist actions from other states. Finally, the State Hospital superintendent briefly reported on the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s support services, including the SORT team, training, and security assistance for the hospital campus.

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you have that problem with alcohol and gambling and with any other things that we allow and that the
• Do you have that problem with alcohol and gambling and with any other things that we allow and that the
• “All right, no problem. Onchall Bradford Rosenberg.
• Let's say we have Procter & Gamble in our parish.
• I can catch it because there was no problem.

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, the problem was that ADC and the cabinet um didn't have regs, the regulations promulgated in time
• Um the problem was more time to do this.
• We have a a health, re-entry, gambling.
• And this bill has the same problem. It's vague. It's not precise and it does It's vague.
• And this bill has the same problem. law. And this bill has the same problem.

Keywords: 00:00 - Call to Order/Roll Call 01:27 - Discussion of 26RS HB 470 29:05 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS HB 470 32:06 - Discussion of 26RS HJR 25 34:49 - Roll Call Vote on 26RS HJR 25 37:08 - Adjournment, 958, all

Summary: The House Standing Committee on Health Services met with a quorum and took up House Bill 470, which was presented as a cleanup and delay measure related to peer support specialists and Medicaid reimbursement. The bill would extend the deadline for registered alcohol and drug peer support specialists to be Medicaid reimbursable, address issues created by delayed regulations under House Bill 505, remove a limit on direct client care hours, and create a work group to examine oversight and possible future board structure for peer professionals. The committee adopted a committee substitute before hearing testimony. Bill sponsor Rep. Kim Moser and supporting witnesses said the change was needed because implementation problems and regulatory backlogs had created a peer support workforce shortage and confusion across multiple peer categories, including substance use, mental health, re-entry, and gambling peers. Elena Swezy argued the bill would stabilize the workforce, improve oversight, and allow time to develop a more effective credentialing framework. Frank Miller Jr. testified in opposition, arguing the bill lacked a proper enabling statute for Medicaid-related changes and would not be enforceable as written. Sarah Vaughn also raised concerns about the bill’s impact on mental health peer specialists, multispecialty behavioral health groups, and whether separate regulations would be needed for mental health and substance use services. Committee members questioned the bill’s structure, fiscal impact, training costs, and whether the work group would be appointed or informal. Sponsors responded that the bill does not require providers to hire anyone, only sets registration requirements if they do hire substance-use peer specialists, and said the work group was intended to help develop a more unified oversight model. Several members expressed concern about the complexity of the issue and the short testimony time, while others supported the bill as a way to improve oversight and reduce fraud risk. The committee approved House Bill 470 as amended by the committee substitute, and then adopted a title amendment; the bill passed with favorable expression.

Transcript Highlights:

• Bartleman: gambling and alcohol are sin taxed. That's what people have to do.
• property taxes that are outlined would be more permanent in nature, and that also applies to the gambling
• Hart Lowman: No problem. Thank you very much, Mr. Vice Chair. Mr. Chairman, Rep.