Video & Transcript Research : 'testimonials'

Page 158 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Veterans and Military Affairs Division 4/15/26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Myers, please begin your testimony.
  • Kelly, state your name and begin your testimony. >> Thank you, Chair and members.
  • Representative Rhymer, please begin your testimony. >> Mr.
  • Please state your name and then begin your testimony. Thank you. Jamie Croyle.
  • think you heard a powerful testimony think you heard a powerful testimony about<00:58:12.960>
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/17/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • your testimony. your testimony.
  • . testimony. testimony.
  • >> Thank you for your testimony. >> Thank you for your testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony. >> All right. Thank you for your testimony.
  • >> Thank you for your testimony. >> Thank you for your testimony.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • ,<00:31:11.919> the But uh and listen to the testimony, the But uh and listen to the testimony
  • Thank you very much for your uh testimony.
  • Thank you very much for your uh testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • ><01:08:00.480> agreement, testimony about the master agreement, testimony about the master agreement
Summary: The committee heard a staff report on Kentucky’s statewide emergency responder voice system (SERVS), a multi-phase project intended to improve interoperable radio communications for first responders. Staff said Kentucky State Police did not appear to have violated statutes or regulations, but the project lacked an overall master plan, clear milestones, and consistent documentation, which contributed to delays, spending issues, and deployment problems. The report recommended updating the Kentucky Field Operations Guide to reflect SERVS and noted that the project has been funded in phases since 2018, with appropriations totaling roughly $216 million across 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024, while about $109 million had been spent by the end of fiscal year 2025. The report raised concerns about project sequencing and oversight. Staff said most spending was concentrated in special mobile equipment, with Motorola accounting for about two-thirds of all SERVS expenditures and the top four vendors making up 81 percent of spending. They also said a sample of Motorola payments suggested possible late payments, though they could not confirm whether interest was paid. Staff criticized the use of master agreements for a project of this size, the lack of a centralized ledger, and the absence of a documented timeline or risk mitigation plan. They recommended stronger procurement and planning requirements, including possible legislative changes requiring approved master plans for large capital projects and additional funding conditions tied to SERVS master agreements. Land acquisition and deployment progress were identified as major bottlenecks, especially in Eastern Kentucky. Staff said the project began in western Kentucky using existing tower sites, but the remaining work is concentrated in harder-to-acquire areas, with more than 95 percent of new towers still incomplete. They said the Division of Real Properties did not begin formal contract work on acquisition until October 2024, despite earlier coordination, and recommended earlier consultation on future projects. Staff also noted that the Kentucky Wireless Interoperability Executive Committee had not been active in oversight, and survey results showed limited awareness and involvement among first responders. Committee members agreed that the lack of an initial implementation plan and the continuing need for funding reflected broader planning problems, and they discussed the need for a clearer end-to-end game plan rather than continuing to fund the project without a defined completion path.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Education (04/08/2025)

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • But the testimony given by the costly.
  • I did submit some written testimony.
  • She said she had submitted written testimony.
  • Um and um uh I just written testimony.
  • Um you heard some testimony bill.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 4/3/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for your testimony. Thank you for your testimony. Any final questions for members?
  • Thank you for your testimony. Public input.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Next up is Julia Nuran.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Next up is Julia Nuran.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Taxes - 02/27/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • We appreciate your testimony.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 2/25/25

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:01:50.520> and also have some public testimony and also have some public testimony and
  • <00:03:41.640> from multitude of meetings testimony from multitude of meetings testimony from
  • Uh, we'll do public testimony, I'm sure, then.
  • um we're ready for a public testimony um we're ready for a public testimony then<00:46:51.520>
  • So that is the end of our public testimony.
Keywords: 1183, house
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Emergency Management Committee Apr 23rd, 2026

Emergency Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is there anyone that'd like to add on their me too testimony in support? Okay.
  • Okay, thank you both for your testimony.
  • So I'd like to thank my witness for the testimony.
  • Is there anyone who would like to add on any testimony in opposition or any me-too testimony? Okay.
  • Is there anyone who'd like to add testimony in opposition to this bill?
Keywords: 988, house, all
Summary: The committee first took up a consent calendar item, AB 2517, which was moved to the Assembly Committee on Appropriations. The main hearing then focused on several public safety and environmental bills. AB 2152 (fire station construction/CEQA streamlining) was presented by Assembly Member Mark Gonzalez and supported by firefighters, while contractors opposed it over concerns about project labor agreements, small business access, and workforce restrictions; it passed to Appropriations. AB 2041 (emergency medical dispatch/pre-arrival instructions) was presented by Assembly Member Carrillo and supported by dispatch and EMS witnesses, with several local government and fire groups saying they would remove opposition once amendments were in print; it also passed to Appropriations. AB 2101 (human trafficking notices and training at disaster sites) drew support from the author and anti-trafficking advocates, but broadband, county, city, and communications groups raised implementation concerns, especially for rural and remote disaster sites; the bill passed to Appropriations despite a no vote from Vice Chair Hadwick. The committee also heard AB 1805, which would audit and strengthen oversight of the state’s troubled Next Generation 911 modernization project. The author described the bill as a fix to improve transparency, create an oversight board, and require quarterly reports; CalNENA supported the need for accountability while cautioning that the oversight structure should not delay deployment. AB 1805 passed to Appropriations. AB 1536 (offshore oil pipeline safety) was presented as a coastal protection measure requiring public comment, CEQA review, best available technology, and decommissioning of pipelines with major spill histories; environmental, local government, and coastal city representatives supported it, while the Western States Petroleum Association opposed it as too broad and harmful to fuel supply. The bill passed to Appropriations on a divided vote. Later, AB 1964 would require the State Fire Marshal to survey home hardening conditions and costs statewide; it passed to Appropriations after questions about county recorder data and survey methods. AB 1960 would allow Cal Fire wildfire prevention grants to support community-level hardening efforts, but it drew concerns that it could favor wealthier communities able to harden first; the author said the bill was meant as a voluntary certification and marketing incentive, and it passed to Appropriations. Finally, AB 1863, which would prohibit local agencies from charging people simply for calling 911 when no service is rendered while preserving cost recovery for actual services, received no opposition and passed to the Assembly Floor. After add-on votes were taken for absent members, the meeting adjourned.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - Senate Government

Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Otherwise, we'll go straight to testimony. Okay, let's go to testimony.
  • Thank you very much for your testimony. Thank you. Okay, Leah Silverman. Come on up.
  • Thank you very much for your testimony. We do have one more that put in. Okay.
  • Thank you very much for your testimony. Any questions? ...removed per Pico v.
  • Okay, testimony on 14—no, we're just voting it. Okay, 1434.
Summary: The committee approved the February 4, 2026 minutes and held SB 1571 until the following week. It then heard and advanced several measures, beginning with SB 1745, which would cap transaction privilege/excise tax rates in the state’s largest cities at 2.5% per classification unless approved by voters, and would allow enforcement through the attorney general and state-shared revenue withholding. Supporters argued it would protect taxpayers and restrain municipal tax increases; the bill received a technical amendment and a due pass recommendation. The committee also advanced SB 1686, renaming Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza as the Wesley Bolin and Charlie Kirk Freedom Plaza and authorizing memorial placements for Don Bowles and Charlie Kirk, after brief supportive discussion and no substantive opposition testimony. The committee spent substantial time on SB 1567 and SB 1435, both aimed at restricting public entities, schools, and libraries from exposing minors to sexually explicit materials and from using public facilities for sexually explicit filming or access. Supporters framed the bills as child-protection measures and cited examples of explicit books and materials in libraries and schools; opponents, including the ACLU, warned the definitions were broad, could chill speech, and could criminalize librarians and educators for handling constitutionally protected literature or sex-education materials. Both bills were amended and passed on 4-3 votes, with supporters emphasizing existing obscenity standards and opponents stressing First Amendment concerns and implementation problems. The committee also advanced SB 1433 and SB 1434, which would redraw Maricopa County boundaries and, in the latter bill, create three new counties with a transition board and staggered elections. The sponsor argued Maricopa County had become too large and politically dominant, making government less representative and less responsive; opponents called the proposals expensive, disruptive, and politically motivated, citing concerns about debt division, duplicated county systems, and fiscal impacts. Both bills received due pass recommendations on 4-3 votes. Finally, the committee approved SCR 1024, requiring legislators to live in their district for one year before election, and SCR 1025, moving the legislative session start date from the second Monday to the fourth Monday in January; both resolutions passed unanimously or near-unanimously after sponsor testimony that they would modernize outdated rules and improve use of time.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

House Chamber - Tue Feb 10, 2026, 12:00PM HST - Day 12

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • "I agree with the introducer and the wide support of co-signers, including supportive testimony from
  • Uh, however, there's a testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office that cautions that the design of
  • Uh, however, there's a testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office that cautions that the design of
  • from the Hawaii State Energy testimony from the Hawaii State Energy Office Office Office that<00:30:
  • We had opposing testimony from the AG's office and the state procurement office stating such.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • If you would please introduce yourself and proceed with your testimony. file 2090 be laid over thank
  • thank you so much chair and testimony thank you so much chair and members<00:03:24.840> of<00
  • Thank you for your testimony, Ms. Williams.
  • Please introduce yourself for the record and proceed with your testimony. Mr.
  • Bill thank you for your testimony Bill thank you for your testimony representative<00:07:51.800>
Keywords: 1183, house
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • A sample of those is shown in Figure 1 in my testimony.
  • The result of that has shown... in Figure 2 of my testimony.
  • Thanks for your testimony.
  • With that, there being no more public testimony.
  • Testimony is closed on SB 815, and the bill is left pending.
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be a limit of 2 minutes per witness during public testimony.
  • We'll proceed to uh we'll continue with public testimony.
  • Alright, we will proceed to public testimony.
  • OK, we will proceed to public testimony.
  • We'll go to public testimony. The Chair calls Ed Johnson.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be a limit of two minutes per witness during public testimony.
  • Testimony, and we will recognize your right to close. Thank you, ma'am. Thank you.
  • We'll proceed to or we'll continue with public testimony.
  • All right, we will proceed to public testimony.
  • Okay, we will proceed to public testimony.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • I look forward to the testimony of these witnesses.
  • You may begin your testimony. Thank you Sheriff.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Next, we're pleased to welcome former Congressman Mr.
  • Thank you for being here and I look forward to hearing your testimony.
  • For just such an extraordinarily powerful testimony.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Appropriations Apr 29th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now there is a point of conflict between Speaker Craddock's testimony and mine.
  • We really appreciate your testimony and in being with us. uh, and there being non-public testimony is
  • Alright, uh, well, we reserve your right to close and we'll move on to public testimony.
  • Uh, I do appreciate the, the testimony that we, that we heard.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
Bills: HB188, HB 265, HJR35
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Appropriations Apr 29th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • The public testimony is closed. I'm sorry, I'm actually... Ben Shepard, Mr.
  • We really appreciate your testimony. And their being non-public testimony is now closed.
  • We appreciate your testimony.
  • There being none, public testimony is closed.
  • There being no public testimony, the session is closed.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

HSH Public Hearing - Thu Apr 10, 2025 @ 11:30 AM HST

Human Services & Homelessness

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, I stand in strong support, and on my testimony, I would just like to add I'm a former school teacher
  • Uh, we stand on our testimony with comments as submitted by our controller in the department.
  • , I I would just like and on my testimony, I I would just like to<00:11:11.120> add<00:11:11.360
  • <00:13:02.639> with<00:13:02.880> comments we stand on our testimony with comments
  • Is there any individual that would like to submit testimony in person or online?
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard STR 73 SD1, which requests the Office of Wellness and Resilience to develop a report on the developmental needs of children born during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Office of Wellness and Resilience testified in support, saying it was eager to work with local researchers on evidence-based, community-informed recommendations. Support also came from a Zoom testifier, the Department of Education, and the Hawaii Community Foundation. The testifier emphasized the need for trauma-informed supports for children who were ages zero to five during COVID, especially in communities also affected by the Kilauea eruption and the Maui wildfires. Members discussed the long-term impacts of the pandemic and natural disasters on children, and one member said they would support the measure but vote with reservations because they wanted the phrase “climate crisis” changed to “natural disasters.” The committee adopted the chair’s recommendation to pass the resolution as is, with some members noting reservations. The committee then took up SCR 239 SD1, which asks DAGS, DLNR, and the City and County of Honolulu Department of Parks and Recreation to provide universal changing accommodations in state and county facilities and parks. DAGS submitted comments, DLNR State Parks testified that it supported the intent but raised concerns about the cost and feasibility of retrofitting existing facilities, noting it has 73 comfort stations statewide, ongoing vandalism and maintenance issues, and possible ADA space conflicts. The Hawaii State Council on Developmental Disabilities and the Hawaii Disability Rights Center supported the measure, with testimony stressing that accessible changing facilities are important for independence and equity for people with disabilities. In response to questions, DLNR said it had not received complaints about the lack of such infrastructure and that any future installations should be considered in new designs rather than existing facilities. After discussion, the chair moved to defer the resolution, citing budget and implementation concerns and suggesting the issue be revisited in the future with a revised approach and possible needs assessment. The committee agreed to defer SCR 239 SD1 and then adjourned.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-02

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, seeing none, we'll close the testimony and go to member discussion.
  • But I will, as he said, limit my testimony to Section 5.
  • Holden, you didn't have separate testimony. Okay, very good.
  • If you'd like to state your name, please, and go ahead with your testimony.
  • So, seeing none, we'll close testimony and go to member discussion.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies Jun 21st, 2026 at 12:30 pm

Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have virtual testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Appreciate it.
  • Thank you all for your testimony.
  • Thank you all for your testimony.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee on Economic Development held a hearing on the DRIVE Act, a proposal to invest $400 million in Massachusetts research and innovation without new taxes. Governor Healey and administration officials said the bill would direct $200 million to public higher education research and regional partnerships and $200 million to a research funding pool for hospitals, universities, and other institutions, with the goal of retaining talent, leveraging private and philanthropic dollars, and offsetting major federal R&D cuts. They argued that research is a core economic engine for the state, supporting jobs across labs, construction, services, and surrounding businesses, and said the bill would help protect the Commonwealth’s tax base and competitiveness during a period of federal uncertainty and cuts to SNAP, Medicaid, and other programs. Committee members raised concerns about whether Fair Share surtax dollars should instead be used for K-12 and other community needs, whether the proposal is enough given the scale of lost federal grants, and how the money would be allocated. The governor responded that the funds are one-time surplus dollars, that most surtax revenue already supports education, and that the bill is meant as a bridge to stabilize public higher education and research. She also said the legislation includes a review board and could support a revolving or matched-fund approach in some cases. Several members pressed for more detail on selection criteria, future funding, and whether private companies and large endowments should contribute more. University of Massachusetts leaders and researchers testified that federal grant cancellations and delays are already causing layoffs, furloughs, rescinded admissions, and lost research capacity. UMass officials said the bill would help preserve faculty, postdocs, graduate students, and research programs in medicine, climate science, marine science, Braille instruction, and AI decision-making. They emphasized that the funding should be merit-based and that the state needs to act quickly to prevent talent from leaving Massachusetts. Business, labor, and industry groups, including MassBio, the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, AIM, the AFL-CIO, and Building Trades, supported the bill, saying it would protect jobs, sustain the innovation ecosystem, and reinforce Massachusetts’ national leadership in research and life sciences. No vote was taken in the hearing.