Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial transparency'

Page 153 of 467
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 5th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm just saying that as opposed to having potentially a lawsuit in each one of the judicial district
  • It’s technical, but meaningful updates that increase transparency and reduce some administrative friction
  • But it gives transparency to these projects, which I think is very important.
  • Again, I think it affords transparency to projects. I think it's a good amendment. Thank you, sir.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 9th, 2025

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The sons are subject to audit. which can be done as far as transparency and fiscal.
  • folks in our communities more off, you know staying in our communities, working with our County Judicial
  • anything, involved in government is afraid of reporting, afraid of giving information, afraid of transparency
  • Both sides have always said that more... is better, more transparency is better, and more information
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Performed a federal judicial clerkship, and then, of course, to helm the policy shop of Texas Governor
  • I want to be extremely transparent, and I think that you deserve that.
  • The system in which producers operate needs to be fair and transparent.
  • very clear that the coming tariffs—and I think there's no doubt that President Trump has been very transparent—he
ND
Transcript Highlights:
  • always starting with the purpose of our medical school, which really guides what we do and how we judiciously
  • It's just, well, part of the goal of this is transparency and accountability.
  • It's just, well, part of the goal of this is transparency and accountability.
  • And simplicity, transparency are a couple of reasons why Senator Sorvog was looking at one way to start
  • appreciate because the direction was there, and it came from me because we were looking for simplicity, transparency
Keywords: 908, all
Summary: The Higher Education Funding Committee met to discuss possible changes to North Dakota’s higher education funding formula, with a particular focus on separating the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences MD program from the general formula. Dr. Jenkins outlined several options for the MD program, including a fixed-funding model, a hybrid model, or keeping it in the formula, and emphasized the need to preserve strong support for medical education while making future funding clearer. He also discussed efforts to increase the share of North Dakota students in the MD program through ND85, expanded recruiting, early acceptance pathways, MCAT prep, a four-plus-one program, and the Primary Care Accelerated Track, along with future cost pressures such as AI licensing and residency growth. The committee then reviewed a simplified funding model from the University System Office that would base funding more heavily on student FTE, credentials awarded, and a few incentive factors such as small institution and research adjustments. Members questioned the use of placeholder numbers, the lack of a clear methodology for the small institution and research factors, and whether the model would adequately account for differences among institutions, high-cost programs, and graduate education. Several members raised concerns that arbitrary factors would be hard to defend politically and could distort funding or create competition between schools, while others said the exercise was useful as a starting point for discussion. Alex presented a second alternative that kept the current SIP-code structure but increased CTE weighting, added a progressive economic size factor, and separated out the MD program. His model also added an on-campus face-to-face headcount component and a credentials component, with the intent of rewarding in-person enrollment and completions. Members questioned the use of headcount instead of FTE, how hybrid, online, dual-credit, and off-campus students would be treated, and why face-to-face enrollment was weighted more heavily than completion. No formal votes or final actions were taken; the committee instead continued discussion and asked members to provide direction on which elements, if any, should be developed further.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Apr 15th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • these changes, existing policies, none of them require... aren't appropriation, they only provide transparency
  • they provided notice to the parent of the student of both the threat... assessment and filing of a judicial
  • Enhances transparency and fairness by requiring school districts and charter schools to report data they
  • members that they can have confidence that their purchasing materials that were vetted in an open, transparent
  • And this is about fairness, transparency, and protecting one of the most vulnerable subsets of our population
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Fri Feb 13, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It ensures that federal agents have a judicial warrant when engaging in conduct.
  • that federal agents have a judicial that federal agents have a judicial warrant<00:13:26.720>
  • So it just requires additional civil rights protections, including a judicial warrant.
  • Appropriate judicial warrants. right? Appropriate judicial warrants.
  • <01:23:36.320> warrant protections including a judicial warrant protections including a judicial
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 1768, which would prohibit state and county law enforcement agencies and officials from entering into federal immigration-enforcement agreements under 8 U.S.C. 1357(g) and from assisting in certain immigration enforcement actions except in limited circumstances. The Office of the Public Defender, Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the Legal Clinic, and the ACLU of Hawaiʻi all testified in strong support, arguing the bill would protect due process, reduce fear in immigrant communities, preserve trust in local police, and keep local resources focused on public safety. Testifiers said cooperation with immigration enforcement can chill court attendance, crime reporting, and cooperation with police, and they emphasized that the bill would not stop federal enforcement or affect other deputization agreements for environmental or other criminal matters. Committee members asked whether any 287(g) agreements currently exist in Hawaiʻi; testifiers said they were unaware of any and believed the bill would maintain the status quo. No vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee then took up House Bill 1548, which would reduce the maximum sentence for misdemeanors from one year to 364 days and allow people previously sentenced to one year to seek sentence modification. The Office of the Public Defender, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Legal Clinic, the Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights, the ACLU of Hawaiʻi, and the William S. Richardson School of Law immigration clinic all supported the measure, saying the one-day change could prevent severe immigration consequences such as detention, removal, and bars to relief that can be triggered by a sentence of 365 days or more. Testifiers stressed that the bill would not change criminal liability or public safety, but would align Hawaiʻi law with similar reforms adopted in other states. Members questioned whether the change would affect citizens or create an automatic immigration process; witnesses responded that the issue is the federal immigration consequence tied to the maximum sentence, not actual time served, and that citizens would not face that consequence. The transcript ends during continued discussion of HB 1548, with no final vote shown.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the country to pursue this approach at best constitutionally dubious bill, we recommend it undergo judicial
  • the country to pursue this approach at best constitutionally dubious bill, we recommend it undergo judicial
  • And I think what Minnesotans want is transparency. That's all we're asking for is transparency.
  • And I think what Minnesotans want is transparency. That's all we're asking for is transparency.
  • Minnesotans want transparency. That's all we're asking for is transparency.
Bills: HF4133, HF3419
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • also includes other good government measures, like tracking significant metrics and increasing transparency
  • We need full transparency on information that is of vital importance to all the consumers in California
  • Unlike public water providers, mutual water companies are not automatically subject to standard transparency
  • SB 1417 addresses the gap in these issues by extending rights and benefits of advanced transparency and
  • I'm a proud co-author of this bill, and I do think that the community really needs transparency.
Keywords: 988, house, all
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

State Affairs (Part I) Aug 4th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It is transparent, it is tired, and it is harmful. Please vote against SB 7.
  • It is transparent, it is tired, and it is harmful. Please vote against SB 7. Thank you.
  • This is a bill that uses transparency.
  • the Board of Adjustment, for those of you who aren't familiar with it, is a state-mandated quasi-judicial
  • we were at prior to any of the conversations for multiple sessions was there really wasn't any transparency
Bills: SB7, SB14
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs heard testimony on Senate Bill 7, the Texas Women’s Privacy Act, with the author and committee substitute explaining that the bill would require public facilities to designate multi-use private spaces by biological sex, restrict access to women’s restrooms, locker rooms, showers, sleeping quarters, shelters, and correctional facilities, and create civil penalties and enforcement mechanisms. Members asked about how the bill would apply to family violence shelters, children in mixed-family settings, venue layout, and venue for lawsuits; the author said the bill was similar to prior legislation but with stronger penalties and the 15th Court of Appeals as the exclusive intermediate appellate court for challenges, while clarifying that trial venue should generally be local except for state agencies. The committee also heard that the bill would be amended to better address local venue concerns and shelter-related issues. Invited testimony was largely in support of the bill from witnesses who described personal experiences in women’s sports, prisons, shelters, and public facilities, arguing that single-sex spaces are necessary for privacy and safety. Supporters included parents, former incarcerated women, a Republican county chair, a legal advocate, and a prison educator, who cited incidents involving transgender-identifying individuals in locker rooms, shelters, prisons, and restrooms, and said the bill would restore sex-based boundaries and protect vulnerable women and girls. One witness from Texas Values said the bill was needed despite the recently enacted Women’s Bill of Rights, and another ADF witness said the measure would protect privacy in schools and shelters. Opponents testified that the bill would harm transgender and intersex Texans, create harassment and “gender policing,” and expose cisgender women and children to invasive enforcement. Several witnesses argued there is no evidence that transgender women pose a restroom safety threat, while others said the bill would worsen mental health, employment, and school conditions for trans people and could conflict with prison standards and federal law. Family violence advocates urged changes to protect shelter operations and clarify that children can stay with parents, while other witnesses said the bill would create barriers for victims seeking help. The hearing featured extensive public testimony on both sides, but no final vote or committee action was taken in the portion provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/17/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the bill is not about stopping sacred settlements but making sure they're done right with transparency
  • said the bill is not about stopping sacred settlements but making sure they're done right with transparency
  • So the bill is not about stopping sacred settlements but making sure they're done right with transparency
  • So the bill is not about stopping sacred settlements but making sure they're done right with transparency
  • that the bill is not about stopping sacred settlements but making sure they're done right with transparency
Bills: HF1051, HF16
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • for disabled people and, in other areas, is just abdicating our legislative responsibility to the judicial
  • <00:19:04.160> So,<00:19:04.280> members,<00:19:04.640> I'll the judicial branch
  • So, members, I'll the judicial branch.
  • I worry that what we are doing instead is opening up the door for the judicial branch to step into what
  • branch to step into what should judicial branch to step into what should be<00:35:08.720> our
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The House took Senate File 3210 off the table and then adopted an amendment from Representative Nadeau that added the word “reasonable” and a statutory reference clarifying who qualifies as a person with a disability. The bill, as amended, was then given third reading. The measure is described as relating to human rights and disability accommodations as protection from discrimination. Representative Hicks, the bill’s author, said the proposal is intended to send a clear message that discrimination against people with disabilities is unlawful and that entities must engage in a good-faith process to identify reasonable accommodations. Supporters, including Representatives Finke, Feist, and Luetkemeyer, argued the bill reinforces existing law, reflects the interactive process already used in practice, and helps protect access in employment, public accommodations, schools, and other settings. Hicks also responded to questions from Representative Joy by describing the process as a simple conversation to meet a person’s needs. Representative Niska opposed the bill, arguing that it is unclear whether it changes the meaning of other provisions in the Minnesota Human Rights Act beyond employment and that it could create ambiguity and more litigation for businesses, schools, and public entities. He said the legislature should be explicit if it intends to change those provisions and warned the bill could invite lawsuits rather than provide clarity. Representative Loegering-Nicolai responded that the bill would change the practice of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights and that referencing the interactive process in public policy would provide a lens for assessing whether accommodations were handled in good faith. No final vote on passage was taken in the portion provided.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice May 27th, 2025

Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • I serve as the Deputy District Attorney here at the First Judicial District Attorney's Office over the
  • So the, I think the primary concern from the first judicial District Attorney's Office and many of my
  • The one here in the first judicial is a program of Saint Vincent's uh Christos Regional Medical Center
  • We have a body of nurses in our first judicial district, and with them we work, and their work is done
  • I am a Deputy District attorney in the 2nd Judicial District.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Interim Joint Committee on Transportation. (6-2-26)

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:26:03.360> Most<01:26:03.760> complaints to improve transparency.
  • Most complaints to improve transparency.
  • Um, and this reluctance is that you get your ticket in the mailbox and it circumvents our judicial system
  • of our citizens, so anyway, thank you and thank you all for the implementation. circumvents our judicial
  • But um circumvents our judicial system.
Keywords: 958, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Every new judge has to make that transition at the start of their judicial career.
  • In terms of what you view your inherent judicial powers as, what can you do?
  • And she doesn't see this judicial And she doesn't see this judicial appointment<00:36:43.120>
  • a part of, Access to Justice, Judicial a part of, Access to Justice, Judicial Administration<00:
  • Um Okay, moving on to Judicial Communication 25.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the confirmation of Kursha Kauahi Kani Mililani Durrant to the District Court of the First Circuit, but announced it would not vote until April 2. The chair also noted a backup plan if Zoom failed. Testimony was limited to two minutes per speaker. The hearing focused on Durrant’s qualifications, judicial temperament, and readiness for the bench, with no opposition presented. Support came from the Office of the Public Defender, Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation, Native Hawaiian Bar Association, Hawaii State Bar Association, Hawaii Women’s Lawyers, and numerous individuals. Witnesses described Durrant as highly experienced in both criminal and civil practice, including district, family, circuit, appellate, ICA, and Supreme Court work. Several speakers emphasized her legal reasoning, mentorship, civility, cultural grounding, and ability to listen and treat litigants with dignity. Personal supporters also highlighted her public service, hula background, and character. Committee members questioned Durrant about how she would approach district court cases involving repeat offenders, mental illness, substance abuse, houselessness, and diversion. Durrant said she would follow the law, consider the full range of sentencing factors, and use available probation, diversion, and treatment options where appropriate. She said she would be committed to using legislative tools such as Act 26 and other diversion powers, and to looking beyond advocacy toward practical justice and reducing recidivism. She also said her clerkship with Judge Marsha Waldorf, including exposure to drug court and mental health court, shaped her approach to problem-solving on the bench.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • council because in the DE2 amendment the compensation council would make recommendations regarding judicial
  • 08.640> regarding would make recommendations regarding would make recommendations regarding judicial
  • 09.560> salaries<00:03:10.120> next<00:03:10.360> year<00:03:10.680> in judicial
  • salaries next year in judicial salaries next year in 2026<00:03:12.440> but<00:03:12.599>
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee considered House File 1837 and first adopted the A6 amendment to the DE2. Staff explained that the A6 made several technical and policy changes, including fixes to compensation council language, grants management changes drawn from prior legislation and the governor’s fraud package, clarifying revisions to state contracting language, revival of the 2025 compensation council so it could address judicial salaries in 2026, changes requested by Minnesota Management and Budget to personnel management statutes, and a conforming change renaming the commissioner’s plan to the Non-Represented Employees Compensation Plan. After discussion, the committee adopted the DE2 as amended to House File 1837. Members and the chair described the bill as a bipartisan policy package reflecting work from both sides of the aisle. No opposition was recorded on the final motion. The committee then voted to re-refer House File 1837, as amended, to the General Register. The motion carried by voice vote, and the bill was reported out of committee.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • than a high would like nothing more than a high degree<00:30:33.720> of<00:30:33.880> transparency
  • <00:30:34.440> and degree of transparency and degree of transparency and accountability<00
  • But again, we're willing to work with you in order to provide that level of transparency and accountability
  • timeline of 21 days, but would look at other avenues, leveraging ESF-1 and 6 or other ways to provide transparency
  • My understanding is the impact fee mechanism was supposed to be more fair and transparent, so whatever
Keywords: 910, house, all
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Feb 4th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • , it modernizes Alabama's jury selection procedures, particularly in capital cases, by restoring judicial
  • judicial discretion and preventing<01:05:18.400> unnecessary<01:05:19.440> mistrials.
  • entity for the purpose of judicial educ. entity for the purpose of judicial educ. education.<01:
  • Amendment number two makes this particular judicial college education fund a tax-exempt entity.
  • college education fund uh a judicial college education fund uh a taxexempt taxexempt taxexempt uh<01
Keywords: 1136, house, all
DE

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Capital Improvement Committee Meeting Jun 23rd, 2026

Capital Improvement

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then on page 17, Section 15 for Judicial.
  • And then on page 17, Section 15 for Judicial.
  • the Customs House and/or the old Kent and Sussex Family Courthouse from the Kent and Sussex County Judicial
  • creates a nine-member executive committee to oversee construction of new or major renovation of judicial
  • authorizes the Director of OMB to designate the name of state-owned or state-operated courthouses or judicial
Summary: The committee met for a fiscal year 2027 capital budget writing session with all 12 members present. It first reviewed and approved the DNREC Resource Conservation and Development drainage project list, which would add projects across New Castle, Kent, and Sussex counties and bring the total eligible projects to 1,561. Members offered personal remarks thanking retiring conservation district staff, especially Kevin Donnelly, for years of work on drainage and water issues. The committee then reviewed DelDOT Rule 12 changes, including annual date updates and a reduction in the inflation markup applied to older estimates, and approved the rule as amended. The committee next adopted DelDOT Appendix A and the FY27 paving and rehabilitation list, including the subdivision street management fund and various road resurfacing projects. DelDOT explained that paving projects are for state-of-good-repair work and that major changes from corridor studies would be handled separately. The committee also approved DelDOT epilogue changes, including updates to authorization amounts, a $25 million increase for toll infrastructure work, changes to subdivision street paving language, and an increase in the subdivision street paving management fund to $30 million. Several sections were placed on hold for later updates. The committee then moved through boilerplate epilogue sections in the bond bill, approving a wide range of provisions affecting conservation districts, housing, economic development, corrections, DNREC, public safety, transportation, agriculture, fire prevention, education, and other agencies. Many sections were adopted in groups, while some were held for later revisions or deleted as no longer needed. The session included updates to school capital rules, transportation restrictions and reporting requirements, DNREC conservation and land-use provisions, and funding and administrative authorities across multiple agencies. The committee broke for lunch after approving the education-related sections through 147, with additional sections still pending.
MS

Mississippi 2026 Regular Session

MS House Floor - 23 March, 2026; 4:00 PM

Mississippi House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill allows judicial assessments, or our conviction assessments, on all misdemeanors of $25 and
  • This bill allows judicial assessments, or our conviction assessments, on all misdemeanors of $25 and
  • 00:12:01.040> This<00:12:01.280> bill<00:12:01.520> allows<00:12:02.600> judicial
  • This bill allows judicial >> Thank you.
  • This bill allows judicial assessments, assessments, assessments, or<00:12:04.840> our<00:12:04.920
Summary: The House convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, confirmed a quorum, dispensed with reading of the journal, and received no reports from select committees or resolutions. Members then recognized several guests, including the JPS Tougaloo Early College High School Mock Trial Team, which was congratulated for its performance in the Magnolia Bar Association Mock Trial competition, along with Gayla Carver Sanders and Judge Crystal Wise Martin. The chamber then took up a series of local and county bills on the calendar, all of which were advanced by the usual motions and passed overwhelmingly or unanimously. House Bill 4080 authorized Jackson County to contribute $5,000 to the Junior Auxiliary program; HB 4110 created a trust fund for Oktibbeha County related to the sale of medical property; HB 4111 and HB 4135 authorized conviction assessments in Perry County and Waynesboro, respectively, for justice court building maintenance; HB 4115 extended a Hattiesburg lease to 30 years; HB 4130 created the Yazoo County Economic and Industrial Development Authority, with an amendment changing “partnership” to “alliance”; and HB 4134 created an industrial zone emergency response district for Lowndes County. Each bill passed with little or no debate, with vote totals ranging from 115 to 119 yeas and zero nays. After the bills, the Clerk reported no announcements, and members made several notices, including a Capitol Prayer Group meeting, BEAM office hours for broadband grant information, and a joint Public Utilities/Senate Energy hearing on the MSWiNS system. The House then adopted a motion to adjourn until 10:00 a.m. the next day.