Transcript Highlights:

• Since June 6, 2025, ICE has conducted, as we all know, military-style immigration raids, arrests, and
• As we all know, military-style immigration raids, arrests, and harassment at California worksites, homes
• The indiscriminate, brutal, and unconstitutional nature of ICE's immigration raids have wreaked havoc
• While California cannot stop ICE from conducting raids in our state, we do have the ability to decide
• These raids are day two. What happened in L.A. happened in my district.

Summary: The Governmental Organization Committee met as a subcommittee for much of the hearing because a quorum was initially absent, and it heard several bills focused on nonprofit support, alcohol regulation, immigration-related funding restrictions, outdoor advertising, and green building standards. SB 1240 by Senator McNerney would create an Office of Nonprofit Empowerment to help nonprofits navigate state procurement, grants, and reimbursement processes; supporters, including the Child Care Resource Center and the Little Hoover Commission, said nonprofits provide essential services but face delayed payments and burdensome bureaucracy. Committee members raised accountability concerns, but the author emphasized the bill does not dispense grants and would cost about $1.7 million in the first year. The bill was later approved and sent to Appropriations. The committee also heard SB 917 by Senator Laird, which would remove the estate-grown grape requirement for wineries selling at farmers markets, allowing more family wineries to participate; winery and grape grower representatives said the change would help direct-to-consumer sales and local growers. SB 1171 by Senator Caballero would make private entities that contract with ICE ineligible for state-funded loans or grants; supporters from immigrant-rights groups described ICE detention and raids as harmful and inhumane, while some members spoke in favor of using state funds to avoid indirectly supporting ICE-related activity. Both bills advanced on party-line or near-party-line votes and were sent to Appropriations or Local Government as noted in the roll calls. Senator Rubio presented SB 1195, which would expand tied-house exemptions for certain entertainment, convention, and sports venues in specified counties, and SB 1228, which would allow a small number of existing outdoor advertising displays to continue operating despite a statutory sunset. Supporters said SB 1195 would create economic opportunity and clarify current law, while SB 1228 was described as a narrow fix to preserve legally permitted signs and local revenue; both bills passed the committee and were sent to Appropriations. The committee also considered SB 1398, which would recognize Green Globes as an alternative green building certification for state projects alongside LEED; supporters argued it would add flexibility and competition, while the U.S. Green Building Council opposed bypassing the Department of General Services’ equivalency review. The bill was approved and sent to Appropriations. The committee also took up a consent calendar and adjourned at 2:55 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• Since June 6, 2025, ICE has conducted, as we all know, military-style immigration raids, arrests, and
• The indiscriminate, brutal, and unconstitutional nature of ICE's immigration raids have wreaked havoc
• While California cannot stop ICE from conducting raids in our state, we do have the ability to decide
• These raids are day two. What happened in L.A. happened in my district.
• So I think anything we could do to send a message that these raids are inhumane, that, you know, there's

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We're also aware of four people who died during ICE raids last year and 28 people who were injured.
• of Minneapolis. aware of four people who died during ICE aware of four people who died during ICE raids
• 05:54.000><c> 28</c><00:05:54.400><c> people</c><00:05:54.639><c> who</c><00:05:54.800><c> were</c> raids
• last year and 28 people who were raids last year and 28 people who were injured.<00:05:55.680><c> And

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I came in about on the last five, six months before the raid occurred, and the funny thing is, when I
• Then we have the raid that occurred a few months later, but before that I held training sessions with
• I came in about on the last five, six months before the raid occurred, and the funny thing is, when I
• Then we have the raid that occurred a few months later, but before that I held training sessions with
• I came in about on the last five, six months before the raid occurred, and the funny thing is, when I

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So, you know, we'll talk about the fraud in a little bit and even the arrest yesterday, the raids yesterday
• the you know, the arrest yesterday the the you know, the arrest yesterday the the<00:02:10.560><c> raids
• </c> the raids yesterday. the raids yesterday.
• And they get embarrassed, you know, weekly with more raids and, you know, yesterday there were 22 raids
• And then they can't even agree on who was in charge of the raids. Like, "Oh, we helped."

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:39:22.640><c> 22</c> this is not over. 22 this is not over. 22 raids<00:39:24.800><c> are</c>
• raids are because of state, county, and federal uh cooperation.
• Today with the FBI raid, both Tim Walz and your agency has taken credit in saying that these raids are
• I think BCA released a statement saying that they participated in the raids.
• </c> participate in the raids today? participate in the raids today?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And to put this in context, we're already seeing the impacts of mass raids on our state's economy and
• Instead of improving public safety, these raids have created fear and intimidation in our communities
• And to put this in context, we're already seeing the impacts of mass raids on our state's economy and
• Instead of improving public safety, these raids have created fear and intimidation in our communities
• These raids have compounded the chilling effect carried over from the first Trump administration.

Summary: The Assembly Health Committee heard several Senate bills focused on health care access, privacy, and public health data. SB 81 (Arreguín) would require health care facilities to create nonpublic areas and bar immigration enforcement from entering without a judicial warrant or court order, while also protecting disclosure of immigration-related information in medical records. The bill drew strong support from labor, immigrant-rights, health care, and patient advocacy groups, with committee members emphasizing patient safety and privacy; one member raised implementation concerns about how the restrictions would work in practice. The committee voted the bill out on a due pass motion to the Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee, with one no vote recorded. SB 250 (Ochoa Bogh) would add skilled nursing facilities to DHCS’s managed care provider directory so Medi-Cal beneficiaries can more easily identify covered facilities. Supporters said the change would help seniors and people with disabilities avoid confusion and rushed placement decisions, especially during hospital discharge, and would make existing information easier to use. The committee passed the bill to Appropriations on a unanimous vote. SB 717 (Richardson) would formally recognize California’s three regional cancer registries in state law to help preserve federal funding and support cancer surveillance data collection. The author and supporters said the measure would protect more than $15 million in annual federal support and strengthen cancer research and tracking; the committee approved it unanimously to Appropriations. SB 504 (Laird) would allow health care providers to disclose personally identifying information about previously reported HIV infections to state or local health officials when needed for disease control or care coordination. The author described the bill as a modernization of reporting and coordination practices, and supporters from the California Medical Association and Planned Parenthood backed it. The committee sent the bill out as amended to the Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee on a unanimous vote. The meeting also included routine consent-calendar action and multiple add-on votes, with the committee repeatedly holding the roll open to record additional members’ votes.

Bills: HB1160, HB1289, HB1339, HB1798, HB1065, HB1795, HB2107, HB2113, HB2124, HB2125, HB2133, HB2134, HB2140, HB2185, HB2191, HB2205, HB2211, HB2219, HB2245, HB2253, HB2283, HB2343, HB2406, HB2501, HB2531, HB2574, HB1170, HB1544, HB1834, HB2156, HB2188, HB2206, HB2360, HB2471, HB2478, HB2525, HB2605, HJM4012, HB1104, HB1152, HB1254, HB1443, HB1710, HB1750, HB1903, HB1941, HB1974, HB1982, HB1983, HB2006, HB2034, HB2105, HB2179, HB2203, HB2215, HB2223, HB2239, HB2247, HB2297, HB2303, HB2322, HB2329, HB2334, HB2338, HB2345, HB2348, HB2350, HB2353, HB2355, HB2363, HB2367, HB2379, HB2388, HB2399, HB2418, HB2420, HB2428, HB2441, HB2462, HB2464, HB2467, HB2495, HB2505, HB2534, HB2539, HB2544, HB2551, HB2554, HB2557, HB2575, HB2577, HB2588, HB2594, HB2604, HB2636, HB2714, HB1160, HB1289, HB1339, HB1798, HB1065, HB1795, HB2113, HB2124, HB2125, HB2134, HB2140, HB2185, HB2191, HB2205, HB2211, HB2219, HB2245, HB2253, HB2283, HB2343, HB2406, HB2501, HB2574, HB1170, HB1544, HB1834, HB2156, HB2188, HB2206, HB2471, HB2478, HB2605, HJM4012, HB1104, HB1152, HB1254, HB1443, HB1903, HB1941, HB1982, HB2006, HB2034, HB2105, HB2179, HB2203, HB2297, HB2303, HB2322, HB2329, HB2345, HB2350, HB2379, HB2388, HB2399, HB2418, HB2462, HB2464, HB2495, HB2539, HB2544, HB2551, HB2554, HB2588, HB2636, HB1128, HB1408, HB1570, HB1742, HB1823, HB2089, HB2104, HB2114, HB2172, HB2192, HB2207, HB2251, HB2262, HB2266, HB2294, HB2298, HB2319, HB2320, HB2323, HB2351, HB2354, HB2374, HB2401, HB2405, HB2429, HB2431, HB2442, HB2451, HB2479, HB2496, HB2515, HB2523, HB2540, HB2593, HB2632, HB2661, HB1496, HB1898, HB2095, HB2157, HB2225, HB2274, HB2311, HB2325, HB2333, HB2476, HB2508, HB2552

Keywords: design review, local government, land use, zoning, project permits, housing density, middle housing, affordable housing, parking minimums, single-family zoning, infill development, growth management, comprehensive plan, permit streamlining, objective development regulations, architectural review, administrative review, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, ADU

Transcript Highlights:

• But we're raiding that fund.
• It is absolutely wrong to raid the assisted living facility fund for this.
• It is absolutely wrong to raid the assisted living facility fund for this.
• It is absolutely wrong to raid the assisted living facility fund for this.
• So, nothing is being raided, nothing is being stolen.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• You see them in bars, restaurants, workplaces, and in our children's backpacks.
• To California employees, we function like most other workplace retirement programs, save for a few notable
• Mass raids and deportations have detrimental effects on families, communities, and the state's entire

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• warehouses, were suddenly seeing a different kind of tactic for addressing worker enforcement and workplace
• actually called the I-9 investigation because workers were raising concerns about safety in their workplace
• I would like to clarify that was an immigration raid. That was not an I-9 audit.

Bills: SB6061, SB6234, SB6176, SB6335, SB6047, HB2235, HB2340, HB2464, HB2619, HB1376, HB1796, HB2091, HB2249, HB2254, HB2353, HB2431, HB2441, SB5808, SB5949, HB2124, HB1069, HB2104, HB2624, SB6061, SB6234, SB6176, SB6335, SB6047, HB2235, HB2464, HB2619, HB1376, HB1796, HB2091, HB2249, HB2353, HB2431, SB5808, SB5949, HB2124, HB2104, HB2624, HB2510, HB1347, HB1759, HB1983, HB2120, HB2264, HB2338, HB2385, HB2436, HB2495, HB2521, HB2604, HB2610, HB2675

Keywords: tourism, self-supported assessment, funding, statewide promotion, economic development, sewage, grinder pumps, residential buildings, regulation, construction, vehicle registration, enforcement, renewal, transportation, state law, state commission, infrastructure, traffic safety, responsibilities, state capital projects

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, gentlemen, we are not... but in the RAID Act, currently the funding for these mechanisms is
• So again, in the RAID Act, currently as stated, two-thirds of the funding is appropriated specifically
• Also, which I love the title, the RAID Alliance, comes in and oversees everything that's being spent,
• Speaker, gentlemen, the RAID Act that we have here in New Mexico is pretty unique to New Mexico.
• Speaker, gentlemen, the RAID Act, which is not in this bill today, is already current law.

Transcript Highlights:

• One budget year, it was raided to pay for charity care of hospitals.
• It ended up raising their payroll tax because one fund was raided to pay for another.
• But we’ve seen money shifted around, you know, clean energy money has been raided.
• I’m just, I’m a doubting Thomas when it comes to... ...raided.
• So we're living longer, and unfortunately, the younger population needed to fill the workplace to care

Keywords: 1146, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And now this is another form of a rate reform. to child care, foster raid, true cause.
• And it would need to be non-discriminatory, not allowing workplaces to discriminate against Medi-Cal
• It's a workplace, workforce, and economic stability issue.
• It's a workplace, workforce, and economic stability issue.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So in April of this year, federal authorities raided more than 20 locations in Minnesota as part of the
• It must be reflected in our schools, our workplaces, our neighborhoods, and in our democracy.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Thursday, June 11, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• wondering every single day whether they're going to make it to work, whether they're going to have a workplace
• Additionally, the fear that is occurring in L.A. with ongoing ICE raids means families are in hiding

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight held a hearing on the Trump administration’s freeze of federal child care and social services funding and its potential impact on California. The chair opened by emphasizing that child care is economic infrastructure and warning that the freeze could destabilize California’s $10 billion child care system. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and the Department of Social Services explained that California child care programs rely on roughly $1.4 billion in federal CCDF and TANF funds, which are blended with state dollars and support hundreds of thousands of children and families. CDSS said the state and four other Democratic-led states quickly sued, obtaining a temporary restraining order that has kept the funds flowing for now. Witnesses including Los Angeles County Supervisor Holly Mitchell, child care provider Amisha Griffin, and parent advocate Mara Linda Bustamante described the practical consequences of a funding interruption: providers could lose reimbursement, close centers, cut enrollment, or lay off staff; parents could lose child care, jobs, or school opportunities; and counties could not backfill the lost federal dollars. Several speakers stressed that child care centers also provide wraparound supports such as nutrition, developmental screening, and referrals, especially in rural and low-income communities. Mitchell and others argued that the freeze would worsen child care deserts and disproportionately harm women, single parents, and communities of color. Members repeatedly challenged the federal rationale of “waste, fraud, and abuse,” asking for oversight details. CDSS said providers face extensive audits, fraud policies, monitoring, and recoupment procedures, and that identified fraud amounts to about $7 million over two years compared with roughly $6.5 billion in annual child care spending. Several members said the fraud rate is under 1 percent and criticized the freeze as politically motivated and illegal. They also discussed the need for a state “bridge plan” to protect families if federal funds remain disrupted, and some members referenced prior legislation to modernize CalWORKs and child care eligibility. During public comment, parents, providers, county representatives, and advocacy groups echoed the same concerns, citing waiting lists, workforce losses, and the risk of families falling back into homelessness or poverty. No formal vote was taken; the hearing concluded with broad bipartisan expressions of support for child care funding and a commitment to continue working on state protections and federal advocacy.

Transcript Highlights:

• wondering every single day whether they're going to make it to work, whether they're going to have a workplace
• Additionally, the fear that is occurring in L.A. with ongoing ICE raids means families are in hiding

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• did want to give you a little bit of an overview of what we've seen with regard to the Los Angeles raids
• And we have seen over 1,165 families be impacted by these raids.
• So just really briefly, sometimes folks are asked also, like, what did the L.A. raids case do?
• Also, like, what did the L.A. raids case do? What did the TRO case do?
• It did, to a certain extent, sort of reduce the number of raids that we have seen.

Summary: The hearing focused first on how wildfires and other disasters affect child care providers, families, and early education infrastructure. State officials from the Department of Social Services and Department of Education described disaster response and preparedness efforts, including shelter coordination, licensing outreach, emergency waivers, distribution of supplies, and the statewide child care disaster plan. Testimony from providers and advocates emphasized major gaps in recovery funding, insurance coverage, rebuilding support, mental health services, and coordination with local rebuild plans. Several witnesses urged more dedicated disaster-recovery funding for child care facilities and suggested statutory changes, including allowing greater flexibility for rebuilding costs and requiring early childhood programs to be included in local disaster planning. The second panel addressed immigration enforcement and its impact on child care. Advocates from the Children's Partnership, Every Child California, and CHIRLA said enforcement activity is causing families to keep children home, disrupting continuity of care, reducing enrollment, and creating fear and trauma for children and providers. They argued that immigrant and mixed-status families need clearer protections, privacy safeguards, legal support, trauma-informed guidance, and safe-haven policies for child care settings. Speakers also stressed that the child care workforce is heavily immigrant and that recent state laws such as AB 49 and AB 495 will require funding, training, and technical assistance to implement effectively. Public commenters, including child care providers, described personal experiences with fire damage, displacement, permit delays, lost income, and the emotional toll of serving families during crises. Others described how immigration enforcement has made parents afraid to attend events, drop off children, or remain connected to providers. Committee members repeatedly noted that child care is often overlooked in emergencies and asked state officials how child care systems are being integrated into disaster planning and how local and state agencies can better coordinate. No formal votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Even though it's not in this bill, all the actions related to immigration raids.
• fact, intersect all these issues that are happening at the same time, for example, mass immigration raids
• While immigrant families live under the constant fear of raids, detention, and deportations, this is
• In Los Angeles, where our nonprofit is based, entire communities were upended by ICE raids; 700 Marines
• . 1 allocates $170 billion over four years to the Department of Homeland Security to increase mass raids

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Accountability and Oversight held its fifth hearing of the year to examine the newly enacted federal H.R. 1 and its effects on California. Members and the chair described the law as a major threat to state health, food, education, and climate programs, and emphasized that California would not be able to fully backfill the federal cuts. Several members also highlighted the bill’s tax provisions, including temporary deductions for tips, overtime, seniors, and auto loan interest, while warning that the largest benefits flow to higher-income taxpayers and that major cuts to Medi-Cal, CalFresh, and clean-energy incentives are delayed or phased in over time. The Legislative Analyst’s Office and the Department of Finance presented detailed overviews of the bill’s likely impacts and implementation timelines. They identified the main affected areas as health care coverage and financing, food assistance, higher education, personal income taxes, and clean-energy/electric-vehicle credits. They explained that H.R. 1 limits provider taxes used to finance Medi-Cal, adds work and redetermination requirements, restricts CalFresh eligibility and increases state costs, changes student loan and Pell Grant rules, extends and modifies federal tax provisions, and phases out many clean-energy credits. Finance also noted major rescissions of Inflation Reduction Act funds, new border and immigration enforcement spending, and the possibility of PAYGO sequestration if Congress does not act to offset the deficit increase. During member questions, the committee focused on likely enrollment losses, administrative burdens, and fiscal exposure for the state and counties. Witnesses said many details still depend on federal guidance, but they estimated significant impacts on Medi-Cal, CalFresh, and graduate/professional student borrowing, and noted that California’s high CalFresh error rate could increase state costs. UC testified that the elimination of Graduate PLUS loans would affect thousands of professional students, especially in health, law, and other high-cost programs. Members asked for follow-up data on county, health, and tax impacts, and staff agreed to provide additional tables and estimates as implementation guidance becomes clearer. Public commenters from counties, early childhood advocates, health coalitions, disability rights groups, immigrant-rights organizations, and other stakeholders urged the Legislature to mitigate the law’s effects. They warned of higher county costs, reduced access to health care and food assistance, increased administrative burdens, and harm to children, immigrants, people with disabilities, and low-income families. Several urged new state revenue solutions and stronger protections for Medi-Cal, CalFresh, child care, and home- and community-based services. No votes were taken; the hearing was informational and ended with a commitment to continue monitoring federal guidance and to work on state responses in the budget process.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, a less far-fetched scenario is an instance in which, let's say, your home gets raided by a number
• of ATF employees and they happen to raid the wrong home and they arrest you and detain your family and
• :17:15.760><c> gets</c> in which uh let's say your home gets in which uh let's say your home gets raided
• raided raided by<00:17:17.560><c> a</c><00:17:17.640><c> number</c><00:17:18.079><c> of</c><00:17:18.640
• the wrong home and they happen to raid the wrong home and they<00:17:24.880><c> arrest</c><00:17:25.280

Keywords: 927, senate, all