Video & Transcript Research : 'judgment debtor'

Page 14 of 156
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

JDC Public Hearing 01-28-2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • And also any lienors who, like judgment lienors, have—so these are basically those who are unsecured,
  • You mentioned the judgment creditors.
  • If the judgment creditor actually recorded the lien at the Bureau of Conveyances, it would be a lien.
  • If they have a judgment that's not recorded, they would be an unsecured creditor.
  • the Judgment creditors if the Judgment the Judgment creditors if the Judgment creditor<00:10:39.120
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several Judiciary-related measures. SB 94 would increase the mandatory minimum jail term for a first knowing or intentional violation of a temporary restraining order from 48 to 72 hours. The Office of the Public Defender and the Hawaii State Coalition Against Domestic Violence opposed the bill, arguing the current penalty is effective, the measure treats very different conduct the same, and the mental health assessment language is unclear and could be harmful or misapplied. Some other testifiers were listed in support or opposition, but no vote was taken. SB 15 would raise the real property exemption amount for attachment or execution. The Hawaiʻi Financial Services Association offered comments rather than opposition, suggesting the bill should be clarified as applying to creditor claims rather than property taxes and possibly limited to a primary residence, with restrictions on frequency of use. Committee discussion focused on how the exemption would affect unsecured creditors, the role of recorded mortgages and judgment liens, and whether the bill should instead establish a clearer homestead-style exemption. The bill drew both support and comments, with no action taken during the hearing. The committee also took testimony on SB 117, which would protect people making sexual misconduct claims from defamation suits unless made with malice; SB 121, a constitutional amendment to give the Senate more time to confirm judicial appointments; SB 14, a reapportionment amendment tied to the decennial census and resident population; SB 175, which would raise the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 75; SB 173, creating a three-year pilot program for free child care for minor children of parties and witnesses attending First Circuit court hearings; and SB 261, increasing juror pay from $30 to $50 per day. Testimony on these measures was generally supportive in the case of SB 175, SB 173, and SB 261, with some opposition on SB 14 and SB 117. On SB 173 and SB 261, committee members asked questions about practical implementation, and on SB 261 the State Bar Association said the increase was overdue and intended to encourage jury participation.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs May 13th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • new revenue rate or accepting state grant dollars for the following five fiscal years after the judgment
  • Because the 15th Court, when you look at the... process is there when there's a final judgment.
  • That's when the case is over, when you have a final non-appealable judgment or when it is appealable
  • in the final judgment issue.
  • Until the trial court judge reaches a final judgment, those penalties are going to be in place.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Senate in Session Apr 15th, 2025

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • These victims have now spent 15 years trying to enforce their judgment against frozen assets of terrorists
  • It is specifically limited to post-judgment proceedings for terrorism victims with judgments against
  • Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 1430, a bill to be entitled an act relating to post-judgment execution
  • The claimant and South Broward Hospital District agreed to a consent judgment for $6.4 million.
  • This is a bill with a settled excess judgment claim for $200,000.
Summary: The Senate convened with an opening prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance led by pages, and several introductions recognizing guests, family members, and a USF Day at the Capitol presentation. The chamber then moved to the special order calendar, where it first passed two Open Government Sunset Review bills: CS/SB 7010, preserving a public records exemption for certain Department of Financial Services receiver information, and SB 7008/HB 7003, preserving confidentiality for financial technology sandbox application records. Both measures passed unanimously. The Senate also passed CS/SB 1430 on post-judgment execution proceedings relating to terrorism, a bill intended to help victims enforce judgments against terrorist entities, and CS/CS/SB 910 on veterans benefits assistance, aimed at improving veterans’ access to benefits and transition support. Additional measures passed included CS/CS/CS/SB 832 on former phosphate mining lands, SB 796 on general permits for distributed wastewater treatment systems, CS/CS/CS/SB 700, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services bill, and several claims bills, including relief for Darlene Angerville and J.R., Eric and Jennifer Miles on behalf of EEM, and Marcus Button. SB 994 on driver’s license education requirements also passed after an amendment making texting while driving a moving violation with points and a distracted-driving course requirement. The most extended debate centered on CS/CS/CS/SB 700, where senators discussed provisions on fluoride in drinking water, labeling of plant-based products, drone penalties, charity registration, agricultural housing, and other agriculture-related policy changes. Several amendments on fluoride were offered and defeated, while a technical amendment on financial institution definitions was adopted. Senators also briefly discussed the policy implications of the bill’s fluoride language and its relationship to local control and public health. Several other bills on the calendar were temporarily postponed, and at the end of the session the Senate adopted motions to certify passed bills to the House, retain postponed bills on the special order calendar, and remove CS/SB 7016 from the special order calendar. The Senate then adjourned until April 16.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (02/17/2026)

Commerce and Consumer Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Clinical judgment is a medical tool.
  • :01:03.600> healthcare the clinical judgment of healthcare the clinical judgment of healthcare
  • <04:20:13.600> to clinical judgment remains central to clinical judgment remains central to
  • intelligence to change clinical judgment intelligence to change clinical judgment which<04:46:19.920
  • <04:54:17.520> do judgment is overridden, patients do judgment is overridden, patients do
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Feb 17th, 2026 at 09:37 am

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, you're making judgments about who's qualified and sometimes you get someone who's very good
  • And number two, that goes beyond summary judgment.
  • You have the defense file a motion for summary judgment.
  • And judges are pretty judicious about dismissing summary judgment or Judgment as a matter of law at that
  • And among the judgments that I got in that case from the jury In Gallup was a judgment against UNM Hospital
Keywords: 996, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Governmental Oversight, Select Jun 4th, 2026

Governmental Oversight, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • And the Tort Claims Act is the principal expression of that legislative judgment.
  • From a base policy level, any type of judgment that a private citizen gets against the government is
  • Here's what I'm getting at: if we had no cap and City A got sued and they had a $10 million judgment
  • And we were definitely talking about, well, if they go to enforce that judgment, how is that going to
  • But that is the risk, and I believe the judgment in that case actually exceeded the value of the city
Keywords: 1184, house, all
Summary: The House Select Committee on Governmental Oversight met to begin hearings on two interim charges: the Texas Regulatory Consistency Act (HB 2127, also called the “Death Star” bill) and the Texas Tort Claims Act. The first panel on HB 2127 included James Quintero of the Texas Public Policy Foundation and Bill Longley of the Texas Municipal League. Quintero argued the law was intended to curb local regulatory overreach, said many cities and counties have not meaningfully reviewed or removed preempted ordinances, and cited Dallas litigation over numerous ordinances that he said remain on the books despite state preemption. He recommended more transparency, mandatory removal of invalid ordinances, stronger state enforcement, and possible expansion of preemption to additional codes. Longley said the act has significantly affected local governments, especially home-rule cities, by prompting legal review and changes to ordinances, but he emphasized that the field-preemption language is still unclear and has created confusion for city attorneys. He noted the act’s 90-day notice provision has helped avoid litigation and said cities often need clearer standards before they can know what is preempted. Members questioned both witnesses extensively about the scope and effects of HB 2127. Supportive members cited examples such as local water-break, paid sick leave, mask, plastic bag, and other ordinances they viewed as overreach, while critics argued the bill undermines home-rule authority and local responsiveness to community conditions. Several members raised concerns about enforcement proposals that would penalize cities by withholding tax revenue before a court ruling, and about whether the law’s ambiguity could force cities to spend significant time and money on compliance reviews. The committee also discussed whether cities should be required to periodically review or sunset ordinances, and whether the Legislature should instead use more direct preemption when it wants to limit local regulation. No votes were taken during this portion of the hearing.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • In either case, it raises, at least for this senator, serious questions about your judgment.
  • I salute your service to our country, but I have serious doubts about your judgment.
  • Again, in my mind, this is a question of judgment. 702 is critical.
  • Just in complete hindsight, would you view this trip as good judgment? Yes, Senator.
  • I'm questioning her judgment. That's the issue that's at stake here.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

More drugs approved for opioid use disorder 2/23/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And it is dangerous and frankly irresponsible to let insurance companies override medical judgment in
  • And it is dangerous and frankly irresponsible to let insurance companies override medical judgment in
  • And it is dangerous and frankly irresponsible to let insurance companies override medical judgment in
  • And it is dangerous and frankly irresponsible to let insurance companies override medical judgment in
  • And it is dangerous and frankly irresponsible to let insurance companies override medical judgment in
Keywords: 1183, house
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • is the section four, which refers to 107.008 of the Texas Family. code regarding the substituted judgment
  • of the attorney for the child under A2, where you're putting in, making reasonable judgments.
  • I believe that substituted judgment should be very rare.
  • Due to judgment too much for my taste, and I would take that part out. Alright, Ms. Ken Tony.
  • Our attorneys for children that misuse a substituted judgment statute to argue for what they think is
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

FL House Floor Session - 2025-04-15 (4:30PM Session)

Florida House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Committee substitute for Senate Bill 1430, a bill to be entitled, an act relating to post-judgment execution
  • These victims have now spent 15 years trying to enforce their judgment against frozen assets of terrorists
  • It is specifically limited to post-judgment proceedings for terrorism victims with judgments against
  • The claimant and South Broward Hospital District agreed to a consent judgment for $6.4 million.
  • This is a bill with a settled excess judgment claim for $200,000.
Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several gallery introductions, including family members, university guests, local officials, and student groups. The chamber then moved to special order bills, beginning with two Open Government Sunset Review measures: SB 7010, preserving a public records exemption for certain Department of Financial Services receiver information, and SB 7008, preserving confidentiality for financial technology sandbox application records. Both bills passed unanimously after brief explanations and no amendments. The Senate also passed SB 1430 on post-judgment execution proceedings for terrorism victims, SB 910 on veterans benefits assistance, SB 832 on former phosphate mining lands, SB 796 on general permits for distributed wastewater treatment systems, and SB 700, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services bill. SB 832 drew debate over a possible lawsuit and created a narrow strict-liability defense for landowners who survey and record notice of former phosphate property. SB 700 generated the most extended debate, especially over a provision removing fluoride from public water systems and related amendments on public health, local control, and study requirements; several fluoride-related amendments failed, while a technical amendment passed. The bill also included provisions on agricultural regulation, labeling, drones, lending, charities, housing for agricultural workers, and youth programs. The Senate then approved several claims bills, including relief for Darlene Angerville and J.R., Eric Miles Jr. and Jennifer Miles, and Marcus Button, all involving catastrophic injuries and settlements paid by the relevant public entities. SB 994 on driver’s license education requirements passed after an amendment that increased penalties for texting while driving and added a distracted-driving education component. SB 1718, preserving a public records exemption for minors seeking an abortion without parental consent or notification, also passed unanimously. Several other bills were temporarily postponed. At the end of the session, the Rules Chair moved to immediately certify all bills passed that day to the House, retain postponed bills on the special order calendar, and move CS for SB 7016 back to second reading; all motions were adopted. The Senate then adjourned until Wednesday, April 16, at 2:00 p.m. or upon the call of the President.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Patel has demonstrated a lack of sound judgment by associating with extremist figures like Mr.
  • This is a guy whose judgment... ...is beyond questionable. It's appallingly bad.
  • With appallingly bad judgment. Second point, we don't know enough about this mischief yet.
  • The work of the FBI is essential to judgment and integrity.
  • Tough judgments that have to be made.
Bills: SB331
Summary: In this committee meeting, the primary focus was on the nomination of Kash Patel for the position of director of the FBI, which had sparked considerable debate over the past week. Members discussed the extensive vetting process Patel underwent, including a lengthy hearing where he addressed numerous questions, which emphasized his qualifications and the support he received from various law enforcement organizations. The meeting included significant arguments from both sides, reflecting the polarized nature of the nomination, especially regarding the allegations made against Patel by some committee members. As discussions continued, the committee decided to hold off on the Fentanyl Act, listed as S331, until the next meeting, indicating a prioritization of the nomination vote over new legislative measures at this time.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Thursday, May 29, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Perhaps the court of public opinion has rightly or wrongly made their judgment on this, your child.
  • opinion has rightly or wrongly<00:06:02.320> made<00:06:02.560> their<00:06:02.800> judgment
  • ><00:06:03.120> on<00:06:03.280> this<00:06:03.520> your wrongly made their judgment
  • on this your wrongly made their judgment on this your child.<00:06:04.960> But<00:06:05.199><
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Feb 17th, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's for catastrophic judgments.
  • And so, in short, it's to manage the large federal civil rights judgments that we've seen so recent,
  • , basically, this was a a thought that I had, an interim study with all the jail litigation, the judgments
  • This is going to be for any of the civil federal civil rights judgments that's going to be large scale
  • Yes, so when you litigate and it goes to judgment, it's going to be a federal.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Children and Family Law (01/13/2026)

Children and Family Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a judgment. So assets shall be considered.
  • It's a judgment.
  • It's a judgment. That's their oath.
  • judgment. It's a judgment. judgment. It's a judgment.
  • It's a judgment. That's the way the law states it.
Keywords: 1189, house, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • designated caregivers for the child to DFPS and it it eliminates section 4.0 related substitute judgments
  • me is the Section 4, which refers to 107.008 of the Texas Family Code regarding the substituted judgment
  • Where you're putting in, um, making reasonable judgments, um, the attorney ad litem is really the only
  • I believe that substituted judgment should be very rare.
  • And so I think uh it's a little, it makes, it expands the substituted judgment too much for my taste,
Bills: HCR 10
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cat declawing prohibited 3/18/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • personal story, because I also want to make sure that this bill is not presented in any sort of judgmental
  • This is a relatively new procedure from 1952, and this is not a judgment on those cases.
  • judgmental space. judgmental space.
  • <00:05:04.840> on<00:05:05.000> those um, and this is not a judgment on those um, and
  • this is not a judgment on those cases.<00:05:05.960> This<00:05:06.200> is<00:05:06.600
Keywords: 1183, house
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • What rules are being changed with regard to summary judgment?
  • motions for summary judgment but also for judges to respond to motions for summary judgment, are set
  • Need to be encouraged to set motions for summary judgment for hearing.
  • As a civil practitioner, I like to be able to have my motions for summary judgment heard promptly.
  • Chairman Leach, was it the subject matter of this summary judgment amendment, or the summary judgment
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • physician's reasonable medical judgment. physician's reasonable medical judgment.
  • Reasonable medical judgment. You can't I can't go to court with that as my defense.
  • Reasonable medical judgment. You can't I can't go to court with that as my defense.
  • Reasonable medical judgment. You can't I can't go to court with that as my defense.
  • Um I welcome your suggestions and but judgment to be the range of conclusions judgment to be the range
Summary: The Health Services Committee met with a quorum and took up House Bill 414 with a committee substitute. The bill, described by sponsors and supporters as a continuation of prior maternal-health legislation, was framed as a clarification of medical standards and an effort to improve care for women and families facing complicated pregnancies. Representative Tate, Representative Nemes, Adair Wushar of Kentucky Right to Life, and Dr. Jeff Goldberg of ACOG Kentucky all testified in support, saying the substitute was developed collaboratively to reduce confusion in the law and help physicians provide evidence-based care without fear of criminal penalties. Supporters said the committee substitute was intended to define what is not an abortion under Kentucky law and to spell out medical treatments for conditions such as miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, sepsis, hemorrhage, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes, and fetal demise. Dr. Goldberg said current statutes contain significant ambiguity and have created unintended barriers to treating pregnancy complications, including emergency situations, and he gave examples of patients who were delayed or harmed because physicians were uncertain about what the law allowed. Representative Nemes said the measure was the result of unusual cooperation among groups that do not usually agree and described it as a first step toward fixing a discrete problem. Representative Wilner raised concerns that the language could effectively require a patient to be in severe distress before treatment is clearly permitted and that it was too prescriptive about how physicians should manage miscarriages. In response, Dr. Goldberg and the sponsors said the substitute was not perfect, was meant as a short-term solution, and was designed to give doctors more confidence in providing routine, medically necessary care for pregnancy complications. The transcript indicates the committee substitute was adopted, but no final vote on the bill itself is shown in the excerpt.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • What's the practice of care and the exercise of professional judgment? Where is that coming about?
  • <00:52:57.200> Where exercise of professional judgment?
  • Where exercise of professional judgment?
  • <00:53:19.599> and judgment and judgment and uh<00:53:21.839> were<00:53:22.319> were
  • apparent that the professional judgment apparent that the professional judgment of<00:53:50.000>
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee met to review its mission and to discuss recent work on a letter sent to the governor and legislative leaders regarding COVID vaccine safety and related scientific references. Members said the letter, which included 31 cited sources, had been delivered to the governor’s office, the Speaker’s office, and the Senate President’s office, and a press release had been issued. Several members defended the letter’s sourcing and urged the public to read the materials and evaluate the evidence themselves, while also acknowledging questions about the trustworthiness of some cited articles. A major portion of the meeting focused on a research assistant’s effort to use AI tools to help reconstruct and verify the committee’s 2024 COVID report with citations. She reported mixed results from Copilot and Gemini, noting that the tools often produced broad or incomplete outputs and that she would need to break the report into smaller sections and ask for more specific source types. Members advised using more precise prompts and emphasized that any AI output would still need human verification. The committee said it hoped to produce a revised, fully footnoted 2024 report by early September. The chair then outlined the committee’s fall agenda, saying it would examine long COVID treatment, the patient bill of rights as it relates to COVID vaccinations and death reporting, standards of care and professional judgment by New Hampshire health care providers, and oversight of federal COVID-related funding such as CARES Act education relief dollars. He also referenced a recent fraud case involving misuse of COVID funds and suggested the committee may ask the DOJ for information. The committee will not meet in July or August and plans to resume in September and October, with a final report targeted for the end of October. The chair also introduced a recent DNI/Tulsi Gabbard press release about U.S.-funded biolabs overseas, which members discussed as a possible transparency issue relevant to future pandemic policy.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means Mar 17th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Judgment, I think both lawyers on both sides would agree with that.
  • I mean, this is an unusual situation and an unusual... judgment ordinarily, it's perfectly clear what
  • There's a disagreement among the lawyers on what the judge's judgment meant.
  • And so I was anticipating a very lengthy and- Telled and structured final judgment, but it looks like
  • The judge issued that judgment on December 3rd of 2024, just a few months ago.