Video & Transcript Research : 'coverage transparency'

Page 14 of 472
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House County and Municipal Government Committee Feb 19th, 2025

County and Municipal Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • because of what we're doing with the crime packages and also for ... ...crime packages and also for transparency
  • I would always lean on the side of transparency. I think that's always important.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • transparency transparency to<00:29:27.159> public<00:29:27.560> construction<00:29:28.120
  • transparency, uniformity, and making transparency, uniformity, and making sure<00:55:40.480>
  • So I appreciate you transparency.
  • , that transparency, that transparency, I<01:20:54.840> believe<01:20:55.120> the<01
  • transparency as well. transparency as well.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Feb 24th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • This will ensure that there's more transparency and accountability on how our taxpayer funds are being
  • The goal of this legislation is to maintain transparency, seller accountability, and health protections
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals May 1st, 2025

S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 973 will help reduce the workload for appraisal districts processing... and increased transparency
  • It's a good transparency bill, and we are in support of it.
  • So, overall, a great transparency bill. I am happy to answer any questions.
  • and provide a mechanism for appraisal districts to finance these transactions, bringing further transparency
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Apr 8th, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not that we're trying to be non-transparent, but this is an issue that allows us to be more expedient
  • long time and cost too much money because I don't want us to be perceived as trying to get around transparency
  • Dallas HERO is a nonpartisan, citizen-driven initiative dedicated to government transparency and accountability
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EDU Informational Briefing 01-30-2026

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then we try to maintain transparency transparency transparency um<00:21:06.720> by<00:21:07.039
  • The power of showing data is just that: transparency.
  • are intentionally rebuilding the program with an initial focus on governance, prioritization, transparency
  • , you know, we're looking at our data systems, we're looking at what we need to improve on the transparency
  • single audit that comes before the board because you just mentioned it's tax dollars should be transparent
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Elect Committee Meeting - 2026-03-11

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:04:16.799> and the expense of public transparency and the expense of public transparency
  • transparency laws all over our statutes. transparency laws all over our statutes. open<00:04:49.199
  • that transparency without accuracy can be misleading to voters.
  • And in my opinion, House File 3798 does not remove transparency.
  • Districts does not remove transparency.
Bills: HF4077, HF3798, HF3886
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 15th, 2025 at 08:05 am

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 2217 will increase transparency in elections by requiring consistent data reporting across
  • SB 2217 focuses on improving transparency, accuracy, and accountability in Texas elections by mandating
  • It would also bring transparency and confidence. Elections based on targeted issues.
  • It would also bring transparency and confidence to the election process in Texas. Thank you, Mr.
  • So as long as they're transparent, you could ask, like this last election, 10, 100 votes different, and
Summary: The committee heard several election-related bills. SB 447 would let the City of Mission in Hidalgo County permanently move its municipal elections from May to the uniform November election date if it chooses. The bill was described as permissive and intended to increase turnout and reduce costs. Mission’s mayor testified in support, saying voters had already approved the change by a wide margin in a charter amendment election. The bill was left pending after no objection. SB 2217 focused on standardizing election data reporting and reconciliation across counties to improve transparency and comparability. Testimony was generally supportive of the goal, but Dr. Laura Presley and others flagged technical issues, including a discrepancy between a three-ballot mismatch threshold in existing law and a 1% threshold in part of the bill, plus a definition issue involving central accumulators. Supporters said consistent auditing and reconciliation would help election integrity, while the bill was also left pending. The committee then took up SB 2753, a major proposal to create a continuous in-person voting period that would combine early voting and Election Day into one uninterrupted process, with precinct consolidation and other changes. Supporters said it could simplify administration, reduce equipment changes, and improve security by using one set of machines. Opponents and neutral witnesses raised concerns about cost, staffing, ballot security, reporting changes, weekend voting, and whether the bill was ready for implementation; several urged a pilot or study instead. The committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. SB 505 would create a process for election workers, candidates, party officials, and measure proponents or opponents to request explanations of election irregularities, with escalation to the Secretary of State for audit or enforcement if responses were unsatisfactory. Supporters said it would provide a way to resolve irregularities and restore confidence, while opponents argued it was too broad, lacked guardrails against abuse, and could be used by partisan actors to pressure counties. The bill was left pending. Finally, HB 311 would expand Texas’s online voter registration system to first-time registrants and others, with supporters citing efficiency, lower costs, and broader access, and opponents raising concerns about signature verification and implementation details. Testimony was cut short because of the session deadline, and the bill had not been disposed of in the excerpt.