Video & Transcript Research : 'Native Hawaiian practices'

Page 14 of 500
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Apr 7th, 2026 at 02:00 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • procedures for public construction projects, clarifying definitions and ensuring consistent bidding practices
  • a structured narrow avenue of recourse when their local government adopts a policy, pattern, or practice
  • A policy pattern or practice Which is defined to enforce existing laws, ordinances, or other legislation
  • The bill's written very narrowly, and there has To be a pattern of practice, if a city is answering calls
  • just say that when we get into a bill like this, I think we would have to really be mindful of real practices
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-03-25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • So those rules currently reside in the general rules of practice of the district courts, where I can
  • testify from personal experience no transactional lawyer ever looks at the general rules of practice
  • <00:46:46.880> So practice of the district courts. So practice of the district courts.
  • <00:46:59.680> So of practice of the district courts.
  • So of practice of the district courts.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Policy Committee 3/24/26

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And in the language here it says as soon as practicable.
  • And if you guys prefer the language of the DE as soon as practical to 24 hours, I'm I'll obviously defer
  • <00:03:40.720> But,<00:03:41.120> uh, says as soon as practicable.
  • But, uh, says as soon as practicable.
  • to 24 hours, I'm as soon as practical to 24 hours, I'm I'll<00:04:06.239> obviously<00:04:06.799
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/10/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, the provider is not subject to the Government Data Practices Act. So, um, Mr.
  • and that sort of quality control check is different from the requirements in the Government Data Practices
  • between the avoid any conflicts between the Government<01:19:11.960> Data<01:19:12.160> Practices
  • <01:19:12.760> Act<01:19:13.360> because Government Data Practices Act because Government
  • Data Practices Act because the<01:19:13.680> provisions<01:19:14.120> should<01:19:14.280
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from March 5 by voice vote and welcomed new member Representative Van Binsbergen. It then took up House File 2354, which Chair Liebling moved to re-refer to the Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee. Representative Norris presented the bill as an updated version of the Medical Assistance Protection Act, aimed at strengthening the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, closing loopholes, equalizing fraud penalties, and increasing penalties for large-scale Medicaid fraud. Attorney General Ellison said the bill would add 18 specialized staff to the unit, moving it from 32 to 50 positions, and argued the federal-state matching structure makes the Attorney General’s office the proper home for the funding because the unit is dedicated to Medicaid fraud work. Nick Wonka, director of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, explained the bill’s provisions affecting committee jurisdiction: expanded subpoena authority to obtain financial account contents in provider-fraud investigations, conforming legal representation language to preserve the unit’s authority, venue changes to allow charging in counties where parts of the offense occurred, and a restitution change to let courts order restitution for related conduct in the same scheme. He said the subpoena change would speed investigations and align the Attorney General’s authority with other agencies, and that the restitution change would help recover more fraudulently obtained Medicaid funds. No public testimony was offered. Members questioned why the funding should go to the Attorney General’s office rather than the BCA, whether the new records authority was federally required, how the venue language would work across state lines, and whether the added FTEs indicated the fraud problem was larger than expected. Ellison and Wonka responded that the federal grant requires the work to stay within the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, that the unit’s investigators are specialized and work with, but separate from, law enforcement, and that the venue provision applies only within Minnesota while out-of-state matters would be referred to the appropriate authorities. The amendment that had been posted was withdrawn and not offered.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/11/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Elling, the other part of your question was what's the practical outplay of this.
  • like just practically like just practically speaking<00:10:06.760> Falcon<00:10:07.200>
  • So, we—I spoke with our data practices specialist at the League.
  • So, we—I spoke with our data practices specialist at the League.
  • I think that's a best practice. Thank you.
Bills: HF1917, HF1083, HF367
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/20/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, then we were looking deeper into this and recognizing that the Government Data Practices Act
  • However, then we were looking deeper into this and recognizing that the Government Data Practices Act
  • However, then we were looking deeper into this and recognizing that the Government Data Practices Act
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:45:50.040> Act Minnesota Government data Practices Act Minnesota Government data Practices
  • is just one type of restorative practice is just one type of restorative practice but<01:37:43.400
  • restorative practice.
  • restorative practice.
  • restorative practice.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • American and Native Hawaiian ancestors and their belongings.
  • nations and Native Hawaiian organizations and a small part of a much larger healing process.
  • American and Native Hawaiian ancestors and cultural items.
  • Native American and Native Hawaiian nations are waiting for their ancestors to come home.
  • To the Native American nations and Native Hawaiian organizations who have waited for far too long, we
Summary: The joint hearing of the Select Committee on Native American Affairs and the Joint Legislative Audit Committee focused on the University of California’s compliance with NAGPRA and CalNAGPRA and the return of Native American human remains and cultural items. Senators and Assembly Members opened by emphasizing the sacredness of repatriation, the ongoing trauma caused by delayed returns, and the need for stronger systemwide accountability. The State Auditor presented the third audit of UC’s repatriation efforts, concluding that UC still lacks the urgency, oversight, and clear timelines needed to promptly return remains and belongings. The audit found thousands of remains and hundreds of thousands of cultural items still in UC custody, new undisclosed collections at several campuses, weak budgeting and underspending, and repatriation plans that often lacked concrete deadlines. The auditor recommended stronger UCOP oversight, performance metrics, proactive searches for undiscovered items, and possible legislative action to tie funding to measurable progress. UC officials responded that the system is committed to full compliance and has accelerated its work since adopting a new policy in 2022. UC Provost Catherine Newman said the system repatriated more than 2,800 ancestors and nearly 80,000 funerary belongings in the past year, and that UC now says 80.3% of Native American remains are either repatriated or available for repatriation. UC announced a new systemwide plan to complete repatriation of human remains by the end of 2028, to finish high-risk campus reviews by June 2026, to recall all loans by January 2026, and to require quarterly reporting to UCOP. UC also said it will spend an additional $8.8 million over three years, expand staffing, improve databases, support tribal consultation costs, and identify potential reburial sites on UC land. Berkeley and San Diego described increased staffing, consultations, and repatriation activity, while Santa Barbara said it had corrected earlier omissions, notified tribes about previously unreported ancestors, and was working toward completing repatriations and updated inventories. Committee members pressed UC on why progress has been so slow, why the audit’s timelines differed from UC’s public reporting, and whether the 2028 goal applies only to human remains rather than all cultural items. UC said the 2028 target is for human remains, while cultural items will take longer, and acknowledged that more work remains. Members also asked about the technical expertise needed for repatriation, the role of tribal experts, and whether repatriation should be embedded more permanently in UC governance or statute. Tribal leaders and representatives then testified that remains and belongings were taken without consent and must be returned with tribal consent and leadership. They criticized the repeated delays, stressed that tribes are the experts on their ancestors and cultural heritage, and urged UC to treat repatriation as a top priority and to return all associated items, not just human remains, so ancestors can truly rest.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Tue Feb 24, 2026 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • [clears throat] As a mahu Native Hawaiian person myself, I strongly urge you to pass this measure.
  • We support HB 1858 with the following amendments: Please provide an exemption for Native Hawaiian and
  • Please provide an exemption for Native Please provide an exemption for Native Hawaiian<01:06:06.799
  • and other cultural religious Hawaiian and other cultural religious practices.<01:06:09.440> There
  • And just to repeat what is in our testimony, I think it's important as far as the Native Hawaiian seat
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard testimony on HB 1875, which would expand Hawaii’s existing protections to include gender-affirming health care, clarify permitted disclosures of protected health information, and bar certain adverse actions by malpractice insurers and health carriers against providers of lawful reproductive or gender-affirming care. The Insurance Division of DCCA supported the bill with a technical amendment, suggesting language tied to actuarial analysis rather than the phrase “actuarially sound.” The Office of Information Practices also provided comments. Most testimony was strongly in support. State agencies and advocacy groups, including the Hawaii State Youth Commission, State Health Planning and Development Agency, Commission on the Status of Women, Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, Hawaii Public Health Institute, Stonewall Caucus, ACLU of Hawaii, PFLAG Oahu, Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates, the Healthcare Association of Hawaii, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said the bill would protect patient privacy, reduce chilling effects from out-of-state litigation, and help retain providers in a state already facing shortages. Several testifiers said gender-affirming care is medically necessary, evidence-based, and life-saving, and emphasized that Hawaii should protect its own health care decisions from outside political pressure. A few individuals testified in opposition, arguing the bill was unnecessary or that it protected providers more than opponents of the bill, but these views were not echoed by most of the testimony. The chair repeatedly reminded testifiers to keep comments brief and maintain decorum. The transcript provided does not include a final committee vote or disposition on the bill.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

JHA Public Hearing - Fri Mar 14, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST

Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:15:21.959> director<00:15:22.399> carlot practices director carlot practices director
  • Mandatory sentences may contribute to Native Hawaiians' overrepresentation in the juvenile justice system
  • Mandatory sentences may contribute to Native Hawaiians' overrepresentation in the juvenile justice system
  • trauma inflicted upon minors, including a disproportionate number of Native Hawaiians, who are unnecessarily
  • trauma inflicted upon minors, including a disproportionate number of Native Hawaiians, who are unnecessarily
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee heard several measures, beginning with Senate Bill 869 on community outreach boards. The Office of Information Practices said the bill was now clear and raised no concerns after clarification that it applies to Hawaii County community development action plan committees under the Sunshine Law. Written support was received from several individuals, and one testifier initially opposed the bill but withdrew opposition after hearing OIP’s explanation. No vote was taken in the excerpt. The committee then heard Senate Bill 405 on neighborhood board meetings, which would let boards receive and discuss reports from government officials that were not on a noticed agenda, with final action deferred to a later noticed meeting. OIP said the bill was a policy choice but warned it would give boards more flexibility at the cost of less public notice. Support came from the Wke neighborhood board and Jacob Weinek, while Natalie Iwasa and Greg Mian opposed it, arguing it could lead to unclear agenda items and deeper discussion without adequate public notice. No vote was taken. The committee also heard Senate Bill 903 on a claims review working group in the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, with the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands asking for the measure to be deferred because it believed a complete inventory and audit of the public lands trust should come first. Members asked about the status of related House Bill 1358. The committee then heard tax measures: Senate Bill 1469, which would suspend the collection statute of limitations while tax assessments are on appeal, and Senate Bill 1467, which would clarify that county tax appeals do not need to be served on the Director of Taxation. The Tax Department supported both bills, and the Tax Foundation’s witness generally agreed but suggested a possible amendment to SB 1469 regarding insurance premium tax language. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 544 on sentencing of minor defendants, which would require courts to consider youth-related factors and allow departures from mandatory minimums; OHA, the Public Defender, Human Rights for Kids, and others supported it, citing trauma, diminished culpability, and national trends, and no opposition was noted in the excerpt. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 691 on family courts, which would set a minimum age of 12 for adjudication of law violations. The Public Defender and Human Rights for Kids supported the bill, saying very young children should not be treated as law violators and can still receive services through other family court mechanisms. The Attorney General’s office and the Honolulu Prosecutor’s Office opposed the measure, arguing it could limit court jurisdiction and services for younger children and might have unintended consequences, including recruitment of children into criminal activity. Members asked whether amendments could preserve the bill’s intent while addressing those concerns; no final action is shown in the excerpt.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Opening Day Floor Session 01-15-2025 10:00am

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • For this, I am grateful as a Native Hawaiian.
  • <00:01:11.000> Hawaiian<00:01:12.000> I grateful as a native Hawaiian I grateful as
  • a native Hawaiian I recognize<00:01:12.680> my<00:01:12.880> kulana<00:01:13.600> both
  • the office of Hawaiian the office of Hawaiian Affairs<00:31:23.240> former<00:31:23.720><
  • We know one in three families consider it. 370,000-plus Native Hawaiians are living it.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

House Chamber - Wed Apr 30, 2025, 9:00AM HST - Day 59

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hawaiians and the people of Hawaii. $660,000 for the practical uh nurse $660,000 for the practical uh
  • Um so Native Hawaiian families workers.
  • Native Hawaiian women have the highest rates of breast cancer.
  • Native Hawaiian women have the highest rates of breast cancer.
  • that we can really look at Native that we can really look at Native Hawaiians,<06:35:27.280>
Keywords: 910, house, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders are dying at nearly two times the rate, and the deaths of Native
  • <00:33:31.200> Hawaiian rate and the deaths of native Hawaiian rate and the deaths of native
  • <02:02:54.239> Hawaiian<02:02:54.719> actor I'm a 16-year-old native Hawaiian actor
  • I'm a 16-year-old native Hawaiian actor and<02:02:55.719> a<02:02:55.960> proud<02:02:
  • On behalf of the Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement, we stand on our written testimony.
Keywords: 910, house, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • It disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian communities in a state where the ocean is not recreational
  • It disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian communities in a state where the ocean is not recreational
  • It disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian communities in a state where the ocean is not recreational
  • It disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian communities in a state where the ocean is not recreational
  • It disproportionately impacts Native Hawaiian communities in a state where the ocean is not recreational
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Native Hawaiians are not a box to check.
  • Native Hawaiians are not a box to check.
  • Native Hawaiians are not a box to check.
  • <00:27:36.080> Hawaiian from the Council of Native Hawaiian from the Council of Native Hawaiian
  • Commerce,<00:27:41.679> and Native Hawaiian Chamber of Commerce, and Native Hawaiian Chamber
Keywords: 910, house, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Traditional and cultural value to, you know, to us native Hawaiians, there is going to be some concern
  • Hawaiian flora, at least so far.
  • Hawaiian flora, at least so far.
  • Hawaiian flora, at least so far.
  • Hawaiian macadamia nuts.
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The joint House Agriculture and Food Systems and Tourism hearing focused on HB 189 and HB 966, both dealing with agricultural tourism. HB 189 would require counties to adopt ordinances governing review and permitting of agricultural tourism as secondary uses on working farms, require the principal agricultural use to pre-exist any tourism-related permit, and limit ag tourism to land where productive agriculture is occurring. HB 966 would create statewide uniform standards for agricultural tourism, require county registration of activities, require ag tourism to coexist with agricultural activity on a farming operation, and end the tourism use when agricultural activity ceases. Testimony on HB 189 was mixed. The Department of Agriculture and Kualoa Ranch opposed the bill, arguing that the proposed restrictions and income-based limits could burden bona fide farms and ranches, reduce flexibility for counties, and harm food production, jobs, and diversification efforts. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism supports its food sales and community market and warned the bill could cost more than 350 jobs. The Hawaiʻi Cattlemen’s Council also opposed the measure for similar reasons. The Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported the bill with suggested amendments, including clearer language around agricultural dedication. The Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau supported the intent of the bill but urged caution, saying ag tourism should remain tied to actual agricultural production and that counties need flexibility to address abuses without imposing overly rigid standards. Members discussed how to define a bona fide agricultural operation and whether property tax agricultural dedication could serve as a clearer qualifier. They also raised concerns about how counties would enforce revenue thresholds or separate accounting for tourism and farm income, and whether state law should better target clearly non-agricultural uses such as gondolas or other abusive developments. The Department of Agriculture and Farm Bureau said counties already have authority to regulate ag tourism through ordinances, but that any new standards should avoid unintended burdens on true farmers and ranchers. HB 966 was then introduced, and initial testimony again reflected support for the bill’s intent from some agricultural groups and opposition or caution from others. Kualoa Ranch said ag tourism can help educate visitors and support agriculture, the Hawaiʻi Farmers Union supported county flexibility, and the Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau reiterated concerns about the bill’s income comparison provisions and the need to distinguish legitimate agricultural tourism from misuse. No votes were taken during the hearing.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • I studied Native Hawaiian teen suicide. It’s a huge problem in Hawaiʻi.
  • partner violence and like native partner violence and like native Hawaiian<00:32:56.360> teens
  • > it's<00:33:10.480> a<00:33:10.679> huge native Hawaiian teen suicide it's a huge
  • native Hawaiian teen suicide it's a huge problem<00:33:11.240> in<00:33:11.559> Hawaii<
  • <00:33:25.919> Hawaiian them away from like native Hawaiian them away from like native Hawaiian
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee first took up SB 547 on water conservation, a deferred agenda item that had already been considered by the other joint committees and received no public testimony. The chair recommended adopting Department of Taxation and Department of Health amendments, passing the bill, and adding a defective date of July 1, 2050. The committee voted to adopt the recommendation; the vice chair voted yes, two senators were excused, and the recommendation was adopted. The main hearing focused on SB 1030, which would define election fraud intimidation to include carrying any firearm or weapon at or near a voter service center, place of deposit, or polling place. Testimony was overwhelmingly opposed, with speakers arguing the bill duplicated existing sensitive-places law, raised Second Amendment concerns, and could create confusion for lawful concealed carry holders using ballot drop boxes. A smaller number of supporters, including gun violence prevention advocates and labor representatives, argued the measure would improve voter safety. The committee heard more than 1,560 total testimonies for the hearing overall, and for SB 1030 staff noted over 10 in support and over 80 in opposition; no vote on SB 1030 was taken in the portion provided. The committee then heard SB 38, which would extend Hawaii’s ban on high-capacity magazines from pistols to any firearm with a detachable magazine over 10 rounds. Supporters, including the Department of Law Enforcement, Moms Demand Action, Everytown, Brady, and other gun violence prevention advocates, said the bill would close a loophole, improve consistency in the law, and reduce the harm caused by mass shootings. Opponents, including gun owners, veterans, and Second Amendment advocates, argued the bill would criminalize lawful owners, be difficult to enforce, and would not reduce crime. The committee reported receiving over 40 testimonies in support and over 400 in opposition. Finally, the committee began SB 401, which would add rifles capable of firing .50 caliber or higher ammunition to the list of prohibited weapons, excluding antiques and muzzle loaders. HPD and Everytown testified in support, describing the weapons as military-grade and dangerous, while Jerry Yuan and others opposed the bill, saying it was overbroad and would sweep in firearms and ammunition types that are not used in crime. The transcript ends during testimony on SB 401, before any committee action or vote on that measure.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

HHS Informational Briefing 04-09-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • caregiver who usually is not of Native Hawaiian descent.
  • > with<01:26:25.679> Native<01:26:26.000> Hawaiian them to stay with Native Hawaiian
  • So, um so in Native Hawaiian descent.
  • So um for Native Hawaiian um children.
  • <01:59:34.880> that<01:59:35.119> and native Hawaiians but to expand that and native
Keywords: 912, senate, all