Video & Transcript Research : 'Delaware Code'

Page 14 of 419
TX
Summary: The committee considered several House bills dealing with family law and civil procedure. House Bill 1916, concerning a court’s jurisdiction in suits to divide property not divided on dissolution of marriage, was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 1973, addressing proof of the identity of a child’s parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, was also adopted with a committee substitute, reported favorably 4-0, and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. House Bill 2524, on recovery of fees, court costs, and expenses in family law proceedings, and House Bill 2530, on special appointments in suits affecting the parent-child relationship, each received favorable 4-0 votes and were likewise recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The committee then took up House Bill 3180, which was reported favorably 4-0 and recommended for the local and uncontested calendar. The most detailed discussion centered on House Bill 40, relating to updates to business courts. Senator Hughes explained a committee amendment that made conforming changes requested by the Finance Committee and removed language creating two new judgeships, replacing it with a different judge allocation. The amendment was adopted, the amended committee substitute was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably on a 4-0 vote and sent to the local and uncontested calendar. At the end of the meeting, members briefly clarified procedural details about the House Bill 40 amendment and then closed out the agenda. The committee also noted a correction to an earlier reference to Bartleby the Scrivener, and the Chair recessed the Committee on Jurisprudence subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) May 21st, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Is it 304.003 of the Finance Code? So that's not a fixed 7.5 percent, is it?” “That's correct, sir.
  • “House Bill 2524 simply renders the language regarding attorney's fees in the Family Code consistent.
  • This basically update to the code makes sure that all references to awards of attorney's fees be in..
  • The issue under 15-0-11 of our civil practice remedy code for 150 years is that a land suit should be
  • The code already defines all the different levels of abuse, psychological, emotional, because of all
Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 19th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It really makes one significant change under the current education code requirements.
  • It's just amending the code to say that, in addition to the total principal amount of the debt obligations
Bills: SB414, SB621, SB2395
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education May 15th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Section 264.902 of the Texas Family Code created parental child safety placement agreements, safety placement
  • child or children reside, in accordance with the appropriate section of the law." of the Education Code
  • sponsored or sanctioned by the UIL, state law with an AG opinion KP 0481, and the health and safety code
  • It closes a loophole in the Texas Education Code by making it clear that anabolic steroids prescribed
  • Policies are filed within the attendance code because it allows for that excused absence.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 13th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Under current statute, based on agreement... under the Texas local government code, between a city and
  • Under Texas local government code chapter 242-001-D to a county may regulate planning and permitting
  • in the ETJ of a municipality. and under Texas local local government code chapter 232008 A county may
  • The TCEQ and the there's very specific code right now.
  • As you know, law enforcement and fire protection, Chapter 26 of the Texas Water Code, requires.
Bills: HB23, HB363, HB447, HB954, HB23
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections May 8th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill provides common-sense safeguards into the election code.
  • The bill completely ignores Election Code 84.007, which requires a hard copy of the application to be
  • The section of the code that y'all are amending to put the dates forward was set up for a bill.
  • Members, Chapter 32 of the Election Code provides for the ...judge and alternate presiding judge for
  • What I was saying is how it is in the current code: you have to write 25 days before... ...before the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Delivery of Government Efficiency May 7th, 2025

Delivery of Government Efficiency

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill amends the federal government code to include both current and former administrative law judges
  • The current fee-for-service model within the code has led to. to fragmented billing and unpredictable
  • I'd like to highlight three key parts of the First, it will establish an AI code of ethics to be adopted
  • It establishes a comprehensive code of ethics, as was mentioned previously, and the bill also calls for
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 24th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's clear in Texas election code 11.002. Why are we wasting time on this?
  • Have it in code, in our code. When did we do it?
  • Voter ID, we allow in the election code 63.001.
  • I mean, it's something that's across other parts of the election code.
  • So the election code is very specific on what our office can and cannot do.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • , also commonly known as the Forgiveness Doctrine, which is found in Chapter 665 of the Government Code
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
  • I was able to bring this issue directly to his In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other authorized user on the account, as directed by the Code of Federal Regulations, requires retail
  • little to no procedural guidelines on the impeachment process. impeachment contained in Government Code
  • , also commonly known as the Forgiveness Doctrine, which is found in Chapter 665 of the Government Code
  • To just what, to push me into a box that I'll just get like V-coded to death or like what?
  • In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring employees to dress in accordance with their
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 3rd, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Statutory impeachment, contained in Government Code Chapter 665, applies to a state officer, a head of
  • what, to push me into a box that... to just, what, to push me into a box that I'll just get, like, V-coded
  • In response, we implemented a strict dress code requiring employees to dress in accordance with their
Summary: The committee first heard Senate Bill 1183, by Senator Creighton, which would require Lone Star Cards used for SNAP and TANF benefits to display the recipient’s name and photo, add fraud-reporting information, and require HHSC to track replacement-card requests. Creighton argued the bill would reduce fraud and protect taxpayer dollars, citing Texas SNAP theft and overpayment data. HHSC testified that photo IDs on the card are technically possible and explained how authorized secondary users are added. Dr. Amber O’Connor of Every Texan testified against the bill, saying SNAP fraud is a small share of expenditures, that the proposal would be costly and ineffective, and that federal rules limit mandatory photo requirements. Public testimony closed and SB 1183 was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1184, also by Senator Creighton, which would lower from 20 years to 10 years the minimum age of collectible wine that Texas collectors may sell to permitted restaurants. Supporters said the change would help Texas restaurants access desirable vintages, keep collectible wine in-state, and align with market demand; invited witnesses from the wine industry testified in favor. No opposition was heard, public testimony closed, and SB 1184 was left pending. Next, Senator Birdwell laid out Senate Bill 2051 and Senate Joint Resolution 68, both aimed at revising Texas impeachment procedures in response to issues identified during the 2023 impeachment process. The measures would clarify constitutional and statutory impeachment authority, require sworn testimony, extend review periods for House members, address conflicts of interest and presiding officers, require cost reporting, and modify rules for impeaching the governor or lieutenant governor. A committee substitute added protections for the accused, longer review periods, and a fallback presiding-officer option. Witnesses generally supported stronger accountability but raised questions about whether the language should also cover retired or visiting judges. Both measures were left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 1577, which would expand Texas Motor Speedway’s alcohol sales authority to include distilled spirits and remove certain event and concession limits; the Speedway’s representative supported the bill and it was left pending. Later, the committee heard Senate Concurrent Resolution 42 and Senate Bill 240, which would recognize only two sexes and restrict access to sex-designated private spaces in public facilities based on biological sex. Supporters argued the measures were needed to protect women’s privacy and safety, including in schools and shelters, while opponents warned about enforcement problems, privacy concerns, and impacts on transgender Texans and others who do not fit stereotypical sex traits. After extensive testimony, both measures were left pending. The committee then took up multiple pending bills and reported several favorably, including SB 511, SB 33, SB 510, SB 871, SB 2024, SB 2166, SJR 27, SJR 40, SB 1313, SB 1314, SB 1316, SB 1541, SB 2420, SB 1999, SB 2309, SB 1860, and SB 2429, with some also certified for the local and uncontested calendar.