Video & Transcript : 'Democrat' :

Page 148 of 312
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Floor Session Jan 6th, 2025

California Assembly Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Republicans' Women's Caucus photo and the Democratic Women's Caucus photo will be here.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Finance (03/17/2026)

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • So if Democrats would like to use this room, they may. >> The Democrats will move down to the small room
  • , Democrats would like to use this room, they<01:56:26.159><c> may.
  • &gt;&gt; The<01:56:26.880><c> Democrats</c><01:56:27.360><c> will</c><01:56:27.599><c> move</c><01:56
  • :28.000><c> the</c><01:56:28.159><c> Democrats</c> &gt;&gt; The Democrats will move the Democrats &gt
  • ;&gt; The Democrats will move the Democrats will<01:56:28.880><c> move</c><01:56:29.040><c> down</c><
Committee: House Finance
Keywords: 1189, house, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/22/2026)

Criminal Justice and Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • We were all progressive Democrats.
  • ,</c><01:32:39.360><c> whatever,</c> vote Republican, Democrat, whatever, vote Republican, Democrat,
  • feeling for many people, and so many of my family members, um, who've voted both Republican and Democrat
  • feeling for many people, and so many of my family members, um, who've voted both Republican and Democrat
  • feeling for many people, and so many of my family members, um, who've voted both Republican and Democrat
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The hearing focused primarily on House Bill 1087 and House Bill 123, both related to firearms. HB 1087 was introduced as a Second Amendment measure, but after questions from the chair and discussion with law enforcement, the sponsor agreed it should be set aside and referred to a study committee for further review, rather than advanced as written. The New Hampshire Chiefs of Police Association testified in opposition to the bill as written, while also indicating support for the sponsor’s proposed amendment or a study approach. The bulk of the discussion centered on HB 123, which would require the return of firearms after a not guilty verdict or dismissal. The sponsor and several members described the bill’s purpose as speeding up the return of property, but law enforcement and judicial branch witnesses raised concerns about federal law, the need to ensure a person is still legally eligible to possess firearms, and the bill’s 24-hour return requirement. Witnesses from the State Police and judicial branch explained the current process, including background checks through the state police gun line, and said the existing procedure already aims to return firearms promptly while allowing time to verify disqualifying information. Members and witnesses discussed possible amendments, including removing language that would bar background checks and instead tying return of firearms to completion of the check within a set time frame. Judicial branch and State Police witnesses said a process that requires a background check and return within a reasonable period, with notice if there is a delay or denial, would better address safety and legal concerns. The hearing ended without a vote; the committee closed the public hearing and indicated it would continue working on the language before executive session.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (03/03/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • As you will know, I have problems making, um, talking about Republicans and Democrats as if we're different
  • And that's something that I think, again, whether one is a Republican or a Democrat, whatever one's thoughts
  • As you will know, I have problems making, um, talking about Republicans and Democrats as if we're different
  • As you will know, I have problems making, um, talking about Republicans and Democrats as if we're different
  • I know I have problems making, um, talking about Republicans and Democrats as if we're different species
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The House Judiciary Committee met in executive session and first took up HB 148, a bill allowing classification by biological sex in limited settings such as multiple-use bathrooms, certain sports, and involuntary commitment facilities. Supporters said it was needed to protect privacy and safety, especially for minors, and argued it was consistent with recent federal and state developments. Opponents said the bill was poorly defined, unnecessary, and could create discrimination or confusion, especially because it did not define “biological sex” in the text. The committee voted 10-8 ought to pass, and the chair said a minority report would be written. The committee then considered HB 254, a bill concerning medical aid in dying. The chair moved ought to pass and described the bill as a matter of liberty for terminally ill patients within six months of death, arguing it should not be treated as suicide. Opponents raised religious, ethical, and policy concerns, including worries about a slippery slope, misuse by vulnerable people, and the effect on death records and public health data. The committee voted 11-7 ought to pass, and the chair said a majority report would be written with a minority report by Representative Perez. Finally, the committee turned to HB 611 with Amendment 2025-0638, a replace-all amendment dealing with recoupment of costs for appointed counsel. The chair explained the amendment would restore the law to its pre-2020 form, allowing the Office of Cost Containment to seek repayment from some recipients of appointed counsel services, including those found not guilty, if they had the ability to pay. Supporters said the prior change had sharply reduced collections and that the state should not treat indigent defendants differently from people who hire private counsel. Opponents argued the policy unfairly bills innocent people and children who were entitled to counsel. The transcript cuts off during debate on the amendment, before a vote is shown.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • This budget does reflect the foundation for the future budget put forth by the Senate Democrats earlier
  • aisle because this issue of fair share is one that is understood and supported by Republicans and Democrats
  • By Republicans and Democrats and independents alike, in terms of what the data is showing us.
  • governance budget trailer bill language, specifically on stripping management authority from the democratically
Summary: The Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review heard the 2026-27 budget package, including AB 111 and AB 112 plus 16 trailer bills and two policy bills. Chair Laird described the budget as balanced over two fiscal years, with about $351.7 billion in total spending, $251.5 billion General Fund, and record reserves, while emphasizing investments in child care, homelessness, housing, Medi-Cal, education, courts, and other core programs. The Department of Finance presented each bill, outlining major items such as Medi-Cal adjustments tied to federal H.R. 1, child care and early learning funding, education and higher education investments, human services, developmental services, health, skilled nursing, resources, energy, transportation, housing, labor, state government, courts, taxation, and two policy bills on education governance and ballot measure placement. The LAO said it had no additional comments but was available for questions. The committee later achieved quorum and moved to member questions and comments, with no votes taken in the portion provided. Members largely focused on the budget’s fiscal structure and policy implications. Several senators praised staff and noted the compressed timeline, while Vice Chair Niello criticized the process as overly complex and burdensome. Senator Smallwood-Cuevas supported the budget but raised concerns about Medi-Cal changes for people with unsatisfactory immigration status, asking about access to care, the number affected, and county eligibility support; Finance said about two million people would transition to fee-for-service and that $39 million was included for care coordination, along with additional county eligibility funding. Senator Durazo said the agreement delayed, but did not resolve, cuts to immigrant health coverage, dental, and clinic payments, and argued that the budget did not create a true restoration mechanism. Senator Richardson highlighted hospital funding, public hospital definitions, DMV data protections, and court construction and maintenance needs, while Senator Grove questioned the sustainability of spending, the Medi-Cal savings assumptions, distressed hospital funding, Planned Parenthood transparency, developmental services changes, high-speed rail costs, and the property tax postponement program. Other members emphasized different priorities. Senator Blake Spear praised climate and parks investments, support for HAP homelessness funding with accountability, transit stabilization, and Care Court referral funding, while expressing concern about the lack of wildlife coexistence funding and long-term transit operating support. Senator Weber Pearson raised a technical concern in the health trailer bill regarding menopause language, arguing that the bill should refer to perimenopausal symptoms and should not narrow provider participation through contracting language. Throughout the hearing, Finance repeatedly explained that many of the budget’s savings came from reduced caseloads or delayed implementation of prior proposals, while some new spending was added to mitigate impacts and support administration of the changes. No final committee action or vote was shown in the excerpt.
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Senate in Special Session F Jun 2nd, 2026

Florida Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • We should have worked together, Democrats and Republicans, conservatives and liberals, to try to put
  • to come to some kind of perspective that will help our communities move forward, whether we are Democrats
  • Our voters are facing higher... move forward, whether we are Democrats or Republicans.
  • We did put forth proposals for these items, and we even had an agenda with the Democratic minority in
Summary: The Senate took up Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 2F, a proposed constitutional amendment to expand homestead property tax relief, lower the assessment cap on non-homestead property from 10% to 5%, and limit county and municipal ad valorem tax revenues to specified uses. Senator Avila presented the measure as a major property tax reform intended to provide relief to homeowners and restrain local government spending, while opponents argued it would shift costs to fees, services, and state appropriations and could harm local budgets, public safety, schools, and other services. Several senators also raised concerns about the ballot language and the lack of a completed fiscal analysis. The chamber considered and rejected multiple amendments. Senator Sharif’s income-based “circuit breaker” amendment failed, as did Senator Smith’s sunset clause amendment and Senator Berman’s amendment to rewrite the ballot statement for greater accuracy. During questioning, Avila said the revised language was meant to preserve flexibility for local governments and that future legislatures could set implementing procedures and, if necessary, prohibit certain local expenditures by general law. He also confirmed that the proposal would not affect refinancing or portability, and said the measure would not prevent local governments from continuing to fund many services such as libraries, parks, animal control, code enforcement, mosquito control, public housing, county health departments, and elections. Debate on final passage was extensive. Supporters described the proposal as overdue relief for homeowners and a way to force local governments to prioritize spending, while critics called it a risky tax shift that could reduce local revenue by billions and force cuts or higher fees. Some senators emphasized concerns about public safety funding, mental health and social services, and the accuracy of the ballot summary; others argued the measure would give voters a chance to decide on property tax reform. After debate, the resolution was rolled over for third reading and the Senate continued discussion, but the transcript provided does not include a final vote on the joint resolution.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives May 27th, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • She's also my counterpart in being the chair of the Georgia Democratic Caucus, the minority leader.
  • Chair of the Georgia Democratic Caucus, the Minority Leader. Thank you for being here.
  • So did I also hear you say that this is not a Republican or a Democratic issue? No, ma'am.
  • Members of the House Democratic Caucus, we will be having a brief meeting upon adjournment in the members
Bills: SCR59 , SCR70 , HR275 , HR279 , HR282 , HR289 , HR307 , HCR112 , SCR61 , SCR62 , SCR64 , SB121 , HR310 , HR314 , HR316 , HR317 , HR321 , HCR117 , SCR5 , SCR29 , SCR33 , SCR37 , SCR63 , SCR30 , SCR40 , SCR65 , HCR3 , HCR49 , HCR66 , HCR67 , HB54 , HB137 , HB321 , HB368 , HB386 , HB414 , HB431 , HB552 , HB555 , HB578 , HB590 , HB593 , HB618 , HB638 , HB670 , HB692 , HB707 , HB708 , HB715 , HB718 , HB732 , HB741 , HB748 , HB776 , HB796 , HB807 , HB822 , HB848 , HB856 , HB887 , HB888 , HB917 , HB921 , HB1082 , HB1243 , HB1246 , HB1 , HB2 , HB42 , HB45 , HB71 , HB79 , HB126 , HB133 , HB159 , HB213 , HB218 , HB222 , HB289 , HB291 , HB312 , HB313 , HB324 , HB352 , HB383 , HB398 , HB403 , HB429 , HB457 , HB459 , HB549 , HB571 , HB579 , HB591 , HB608 , HB616 , HB624 , HB766 , HB769 , HB783 , HB804 , HB864 , HB874 , HB909 , HB951 , HB971 , HB983 , HB1005 , HB1017 , HB1051 , HB1056 , HB1126 , HB1186 , HB1193 , HB1223 , HB1224 , HB1235 , HB1249 , SB259 , SB295 , SB312 , SB348 , SB444 , SB485 , SB441 , SB149 , HB359 , SB29 , SB43 , SB78 , HB463 , HB998 , SB197 , SB268 , SB123 , SB276 , SB326 , SB80 , HB901 , HR20 , HR74 , HCR65 , HCR71 , HCR98 , HB284 , HB306 , HB341 , HB366 , HB393 , HB458 , HB577 , HB603 , HB605 , HB614 , HB625 , HB646 , HB733 , HB752 , HB773 , HB798 , HB911 , HB955 , HB996 , HB1035 , HB1069 , HB1113 , HB1140 , HB1180 , HB1191 , HB1240 , HB1255 , SB82 , SB89 , SB97 , SB479 , HB74 , HB119 , HB134 , HB210 , HB258 , HB468 , HB784 , HB870 , HB953 , HB956 , HB1117 , HB1236 , SB42 , SB208 , SB217 , SB274 , SB300 , SB341 , SB379 , SB382 , SB387 , SB401 , SB449 , SB487
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Session - 2026-05-19 - 11:55AM

Vermont Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Democratic majority, not the supermajority, the Democratic majority post-election, we're saying to
  • The Democratic majority, not the supermajority, the Democratic majority post-election, we're saying to
Keywords: 927, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session 5/11/26 - Part 2

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Democrats, we are going to our caucus room as well.
  • </c><01:05:58.880><c> Democrats,</c><01:05:59.280><c> we</c> &gt;&gt; Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • Democrats, we &gt;&gt; Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
  • Democrats, we are<01:05:59.599><c> going</c><01:05:59.680><c> to</c><01:05:59.839><c> our</c><01:06:00.000
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Labor - 03/24/26

Labor

Transcript Highlights:
  • First off, I have three Republican authors and Senator McEwen is my Democratic co-author, so we have
  • Senator<00:01:28.360><c> McEwen</c><00:01:28.840><c> is</c><00:01:29.000><c> my</c><00:01:29.240><c> Democratic
  • </c> Senator McEwen is my Democratic Senator McEwen is my Democratic co-author,<00:01:30.600><c> so</
Committee: Senate Labor
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Day 51 (3-20-26)

Kentucky Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Upon the first recess, the Senate Democrats will caucus in room 156 here in this building.
  • :11:35.920><c> recess,</c><00:11:36.399><c> the</c><00:11:36.880><c> Senate</c><00:11:37.279><c> Democrats
  • </c><00:11:37.760><c> will</c> first recess, the Senate Democrats will first recess, the Senate Democrats
Keywords: 958, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Finance - 03/12/26

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • the last number of years and prior to, of course, the 2023 session, but the Senate and the Senate Democrats
  • ><00:30:51.720><c> the</c><00:30:52.000><c> the</c><00:30:52.120><c> Senate</c><00:30:52.360><c> Democrats
  • </c> the Senate and the the Senate Democrats the Senate and the the Senate Democrats in<00:30:52.880>
Committee: Senate Finance
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Resident tuition rates 3/12/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, the Democrats have squandered an $18 billion surplus.
  • an unfriendly tax environment.<00:35:20.320><c> Um,</c><00:35:20.640><c> the</c><00:35:20.880><c> Democrats
  • Um, the Democrats have environment.
  • Um, the Democrats have squandered<00:35:22.160><c> an</c><00:35:22.320><c> $18</c><00:35:22.720><c> billion
Keywords: 1183, house
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (02/17/2026)

Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, that's certainly one of the issues between the Republicans and Democrats, conservative and liberal
  • 40.159><c> and</c> the issues between the Republicans and the issues between the Republicans and Democrats
  • ,<01:19:41.120><c> conservative</c><01:19:41.600><c> and</c><01:19:41.840><c> liberal,</c> Democrats,
  • conservative and liberal, Democrats, conservative and liberal, however<01:19:42.719><c> you</c><01:19
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • We've done so under Democratic governors. Uh, started in uh 2007 under Governor Fletcher.
  • We've done so<00:16:15.360><c> under</c><00:16:15.600><c> Democratic</c><00:16:16.160><c> governors.
  • </c><00:16:16.880><c> Uh</c> so under Democratic governors. Uh so under Democratic governors.
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The subcommittee met without a quorum and first heard from Kentucky Department of Education officials on career and technical education funding. KDE explained that House Bill 499 created a CTE funding formula using 60% weighted full-time equivalent enrollment and 40% incentives, but House Bill 6’s budget language excluded area technology centers (ATCs) from that supplemental funding. KDE requested approval of an additional budget request of $14,789,352 in each fiscal year 2027 and 2028 to include ATCs in the formula and hold local districts harmless. Officials said ATCs serve students from 117 of Kentucky’s 171 districts and argued the change would reduce funding disparities and better reflect the return on investment from CTE programs, citing growth in dual credit and work-based learning participation. Members asked whether the issue would need to be revisited each budget cycle. KDE responded that the problem could be fixed by removing the notwithstanding language from the budget bill, which they said would allow ATCs to be included under the existing statute. Representative Klein supported the request, saying the current clause could lead to stagnation and that the committee should help the program continue to grow. No vote was taken on the CTE item during the portion of the meeting provided. The committee then heard a presentation from PreK for All on expanding preschool access in Kentucky. Advocates said the state’s preschool program has been funded since 1990 and currently serves about 14,200 children at roughly $84 million per year, but that many working families still fall into a coverage gap. They proposed expanding eligibility to 250% of the federal poverty line, which they said would add about 9,600 children at a cost of $40 million in year two, after a planning year. The proposal also included regulatory flexibility for classrooms and partnerships with private child care providers and nonprofits, with speakers emphasizing child care deserts in some counties and citing research that early learning improves kindergarten readiness and later outcomes. No action or vote was taken on the preschool proposal in the transcript provided.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session Jan 27th, 2026

California Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • A number of states, both Democrat and Republican, have included medium-format batteries in recently enacted
  • another question being asked, what is different right now with this administration from the previous Democratic
  • So as I said before, So, as I said before, Republican and Democrats, immigrants, and native-born, this
  • Democrats are not having a caucus, but everyone is to stay in the Capitol.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Finance (05/27/2025)

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> [Music] Um, my notes, LBA has, and the Democrats here, they'll be able to do it.
  • </c><02:04:56.679><c> has</c><02:04:57.679><c> and</c><02:04:58.080><c> the</c><02:04:58.320><c> Democrats
  • </c> um my notes LBA has and the Democrats um my notes LBA has and the Democrats here,<02:04:59.920><
Committee: Senate Finance
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

WAM-EDU, WAM, WAM-GVO, WAM Public Hearings 03-28-2025

Ways and Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • The League of Women Voters, Democratic Party, Chamber of Commerce, AFL-CIO, Grassroots Institute, Hawaii
  • support this than you League of Women support this than you League of Women Voters<00:32:56.440><c> Democratic
  • Yatsi, Democratic Party, Island Film Group, SAG, and we stand on our SAG. Thank you.
  • The Democratic Party Education Caucus.
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee took up House Bill 422, relating to school impact fees. The Education Committee recommended passage with amendments, and Ways and Means concurred. The amendments would repeal the construction fee component of the school impact fee while retaining the land impact fee and in-lieu fee requirements, remove related statutory language, exempt certain developments from school impact fees, raise the unit threshold for satisfying the land component to 100 units, require the School Facilities Authority to adopt rules and policies, and require a report to the Legislature on the effect of repealing the construction portion of the fee. The measure was also given a sunset date of June 30, 2029, with the committee report to note that the changes are intended to test the efficiency and efficacy of the fee structure and could be made permanent if the report supports that outcome. The committees adopted the recommendation, with one senator initially voting no and then changing to yes after the amendments were explained. The meeting also included a separate hearing on House Bill 1155, concerning procurement for Department of Transportation projects and construction manager/general contractor procurement. DOT testified that it supported the concept but wanted to narrow the bill, saying the current language was too broad and that the goal was to allow more innovative procurement while preserving selection safeguards. The State Procurement Office said it supported the bill’s language but was willing to work with DOT on alternative wording. Several construction-related organizations, including subcontractors, iron workers, elevator constructors, and building trades representatives, opposed the bill, arguing that exemptions from the procurement code would weaken protections such as retainage, equality, and prompt payment and could invite favoritism or corruption. In response to those concerns, the chair proposed amendments limiting the exemption to DOT, narrowing the qualifying contracts, adding a two-year sunset, requiring a report after the first year, and clarifying that project management could not be procured under the section. The amended recommendation passed, though several members voted with reservations. A separate item, House Bill 476, was briefly called up at the end of the agenda, with a recommendation to pass with amendments to increase a rate from 7.25% to 8%, but discussion was not completed in the portion of the transcript provided.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have Democratic Party of Hawaii Education Caucus in support. comments.
  • </c><00:23:51.200><c> We</c><00:23:51.520><c> have</c><00:23:51.840><c> Democratic</c> support.
  • We have Democratic support. Not present.
  • We have Democratic Party<00:23:52.720><c> of</c><00:23:52.880><c> Hawaii</c><00:23:53.440><c> Education
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The joint committees on Education and Higher Education first heard HCR 75 and HR 67, which ask the Department of Education and the University of Hawaiʻi to assess criteria for building an educational pipeline and curriculum for advanced manufacturing and cybersecurity. The Department of Education said it would stand on its written testimony, and UH supported the measure, noting existing community college and four-year programs related to the topic. Members asked how DOE promotes cybersecurity opportunities and whether it provides funding; DOE said schools usually connect with partners and its office works with them, but it does not have separate funding for such efforts. UH also explained that some advanced manufacturing concepts may overlap with 3D printing, material sciences, and entrepreneurship, and described P20 as a forum for aligning K-12 and higher education pathways. The committees then recessed the joint hearing and moved to the Education Committee agenda. The committee next heard HCR 46 and HR 39, which would make DOE recreational facilities available to the public during non-peak hours and non-school days. DOE said it already uses facilities agreements with insurance, liability waivers, indemnification, and certificates of insurance to protect schools. The Attorney General opposed the resolutions, warning that unrestricted public use without safeguards could create substantial liability and cost risks for the state. The measure’s introducer said the goal was to help underserved communities that lack access to public recreation spaces, and DOE said it would be open to joint-use arrangements with larger organizations but remained concerned about vandalism and liability. The committee also heard HCR 86 and HR 80 on creating an Aloha Civics working group, with DOE offering comments and Common Cause Hawaiʻi strongly supporting the idea. DOE described a civic learning and engagement task force that met with stakeholders, including UH and the PACE Commission, and produced recommendations such as building partnership inventories, integrating civic learning across grade levels, and aligning the work with DOE’s HA framework and learner outcomes. Common Cause said civic education can be implemented effectively and affordably, citing existing school projects such as ranked-choice voting and classroom constitutions. Later, the committee took up HCR 87 and HR 81, urging an annual Climate Week in public schools. DOE again stood on written comments, while the Climate Change and Health Working Group, Climate Future Forum, a student from Kaimuki High School, and other supporters argued that a dedicated week would ensure consistent climate education, build resilience, and connect climate issues to health, food security, and disaster preparedness. Supporters said existing climate-related opportunities are uneven across schools and that a formal Climate Week would create a more equitable approach. The committee then heard HCR 95 and HR 91 on informing students about changes to gun safety and storage laws; DOE asked for clarification on the measure’s intended outcome, and one individual testified in support. Finally, the committee heard HCR 104 and HR 100 on strengthening farm-to-school initiatives. DOE said it is already working to improve menus, emphasize local products, and meet with distributors to increase local procurement, while the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resilience offered food science, nutrition, and extension support. Climate Future Forum, the Hawaii Youth Food Council, and other supporters said farm-to-school efforts are important for student health, local farmers, and food sovereignty, noting that local food procurement in schools remains far below the state’s 30% by 2030 goal. DOE explained it is trying to provide distributors and farmers with more predictable demand and is meeting with distributors to set up next year’s supply chain.