Video & Transcript Research : 'temporary authorization order'

Page 143 of 500
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Education Pre-K - 12 Mar 31st, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE ON PRE-K-12 PLEASE CALL THE ORDER. PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. >> Sen.
  • AUTHORIZES A PRIVATE SCHOOL TO CONSTRUCTIVE FACILITIES ON LAND OWNED BY A CHURCH, LIBRARY, THEATER OR
  • IT INCLUDES AN AUTHORIZATION PRESCHOOL HOPE OPERATING IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY TO CO-LOCATE IN ANY PUBLIC
  • THE COST OF SCHOOL SAFETY AND OTHER PROVISIONS SUCH AS STUDENT AGES TO BE COLOCATED IN SUPERVISION AUTHORITY
  • AND AUTHORIZATION ALSO FOR THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION TO RESOLVE DISPUTES REGARDING MUTUAL MANAGEMENT
Keywords: 999, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Appropriations Committee Aug 20th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have 274 bills to consider this morning as part of our regular order hearing.
  • waives presentation before the close of the regular order hearing.
  • Just want to thank the author for bringing this forward.
  • I just want to thank the author for bringing this forward.
  • Just wanted to thank the author for bringing this.
Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on August 20, 2025, and considered a large number of bills, with most of the discussion centered on election redistricting and several health, labor, environmental, and government-operations measures. The first major item was ACA 8, a constitutional amendment tied to a proposed November special election and temporary mid-decade congressional redistricting in response to partisan redistricting efforts in other states. Supporters, including Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, a 2020 redistricting commissioner, labor groups, and allies of the measure, argued it was necessary to defend democracy, protect representation, and respond to federal actions affecting California. Opponents, including Assemblymember Tom Lackey reading a statement for Assemblymember Gallagher and Assemblymember Dixon, argued the measure would undermine the independent redistricting commission, amount to a partisan power grab, and cost taxpayers roughly $230 million. Committee members also focused heavily on fiscal questions, including litigation costs and county election funding, and Department of Finance staff said counties would be made whole and funding would be advanced. The committee ultimately voted the measure out on a B roll call. The committee then heard SB 280, the implementing bill for the special election and related redistricting process. Supporters repeated the argument that California needed to respond to Texas and other states, while opponents again emphasized the cost, the strain on county budgets, and the state’s broader fiscal pressures. Department of Finance witnesses said the election funding would be provided in advance and that the state would work with counties and the Secretary of State. The bill was moved out on a roll call after extended debate. The committee also advanced several other bills, including SB 283 on battery storage safety standards, SB 470 extending remote participation and open-meeting flexibility for state boards and commissions, SB 697 modernizing stream adjudication procedures, SB 513 requiring more accessible employee training records, SB 30 restricting transfer of older diesel locomotives, SB 841 and SB 81 creating protections for vulnerable facilities and health care spaces from immigration enforcement, SB 358 revising traffic impact fee standards, and SB 630 streamlining state parks land acquisitions. Other measures discussed included SB 62 expanding health coverage benefits, SB 68 requiring restaurant allergen disclosures, and the committee heard both support and opposition on SB 68 from the California Restaurant Association and consumer advocates. Supporters of the health and immigrant-protection bills emphasized patient safety, reproductive health, immigrant rights, and access to care, while opponents on the restaurant bill warned of added mandates and litigation risk for small businesses. Across the hearing, committee members frequently returned to fiscal impacts, county implementation burdens, and whether the bills would save money, cost money, or shift costs to local governments. Several bills were reported out of committee, often on A or B roll calls, with some members not voting on particular measures.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • If there are temporary technical glitches during your turn to testify via Zoom, we may have to move on
  • If there are temporary technical glitches during your turn to testify via Zoom, we may have to move on
  • uh col you had shared that uh in order uh col you had shared that uh in order for<00:28:42.480><
  • <00:58:23.400> has million that have been authorized has million that have been authorized
  • <01:21:33.120> with Hawai public housing authority with Hawai public housing authority with
Keywords: 912, senate, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 834, which would change restrictions on transfers of real property under chapter 201H, HRS, and was discussed in the context of Hawaiian homelands and HHFDC-funded projects. Supporters, including HHFDC, DHHL, and individual testifiers, said the bill would clarify that Hawaiian homelands should not be subject to the 201H buyback and appreciation restrictions, while preserving affordability requirements tied to federal mortgage and tax credit programs. HHFDC explained that the main concern was the buyback/share-appreciation provisions, especially for DHHL projects using LIHTC or similar financing, and said aligning the statute with DHHL’s program goals would not be a problem. Members questioned whether removing the restrictions could weaken affordability protections, and whether the state could still prioritize beneficiaries and workforce housing, but no vote was taken in the portion provided. The committee then took up SB 759, which would add the DHHL chairperson or designee to the HHFDC board of directors and adjust quorum requirements. DHHL and several supporters argued the measure would give Hawaiian Homes a seat at the table, improve access to HHFDC funding sources such as tax credits, private activity bonds, and revolving funds, and help leverage limited resources to reduce the Hawaiian Homes waitlist. One testifier supported the bill but urged safeguards to prevent favoritism or abuse of power, and another raised concerns about whether a DHHL representative would need to recuse from voting on projects involving DHHL. HHFDC testified that DHHL projects still must compete under the same criteria and set-asides as other applicants, and that the board already includes multiple public and executive representatives. Members pressed on whether DHHL could achieve the same informational goals without a voting seat, and whether the added board role would create leverage or conflicts. The DHHL witness said a nonvoting role could provide information, but a voting seat would be more useful for decision-making and advocacy. The discussion also covered DHHL’s use of LIHTC, rent-to-own models, transitional housing, and other layered financing, as well as the broader need to coordinate state housing resources. The transcript ends during continued questioning, with no final committee action or vote shown.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate only provision that authorizes Senate only provision that authorizes and<00:36:21.760>
  • <00:37:23.760> around uh authority around uh authority around u<00:37:26.320> um<00
  • for plate administration authorization for plate administration authorization for um<00:47:51.760
  • requires uh not requires but authorizes requires uh not requires but authorizes an<00:59:36.119>
  • :15:16.159> um This authorizes rulemaking regarding um This authorizes rulemaking regarding um
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Elections Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have many authors here, but we have many authors here, but we're Good morning.
  • We're taking it in member sign-in order.
  • My bill doesn't authorize an allocation.
  • So I just want to thank the author.
  • And I first want to thank the author.
Summary: The committee heard a long agenda of elections-related bills. It first approved three consent items: AB 808, AB 1029, and AB 1072. The committee then took up AB 1249, which would require non-Voter’s Choice Act counties to offer at least one Saturday early-voting location before statewide elections and allow in-person return of vote-by-mail ballots at designated county offices or satellite locations. Supporters said it would expand access for working voters and those with transportation barriers; some members raised concerns about ballot verification and added workload for rural counties. The bill passed the committee on a divided vote and was placed on call for absent members. The committee next considered AB 25, a voter ID and election integrity measure that would require citizenship verification, government ID for voting, tighter voter-roll audits, and a 72-hour ballot-counting deadline. The author and supporters argued it would restore public trust and improve election integrity, while opponents from the League of Women Voters, ACLU California Action, labor groups, disability advocates, and others said it would restrict access, burden vulnerable voters, and amount to voter suppression. After extensive debate, the committee voted the bill out on a narrow split and kept it on call. Members also approved AB 1164, which clarifies when voters are entitled to a replacement ballot and updates the Voter Bill of Rights language; AB 1441, which would create an independent citizens redistricting commission in Merced County despite opposition from the county board over cost and local control; and AB 16, which would clarify county election officials’ authority to begin processing vote-by-mail ballots earlier and clean up outdated code. The committee also heard AB 1411, which would require non-VCA counties to prepare voter education and outreach plans and use a Secretary of State template, with the sponsor saying it would improve voter information statewide.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Order, let's see, where are you? Aransas County? No, I'm sorry. GP, yeah, Gregory Portland.
  • It clarifies the OAG's enforcement authority.
  • Hearing none, so ordered.
  • Hearing none, so ordered.
  • Hearing none, so ordered. Senator Menéndez. Thank you very much.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Floor Session Mar 10th, 2025

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The House will come to order. Prayer by the chaplain.
  • The clerk will give the Oral Code Adding Order. A quorum is present.
  • The third is a report to the legislature related to the order recommendations.
  • I recognize the author of the bill from Kandiyohi, Representative Baker.
  • So this bill is a temporary measure that would put the state to standard time as authorized by federal
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • That'll be the order. Third reading the bill. House Bill 4052 by Caldwell, Be the order.
  • Without objection, that will be the order. Without objection, that will be the order.
  • Without objection, that will be the order.
  • Members, House Bill 4057 authorizes the Oklahoma Capital Improvement Authority to utilize $25 million
  • Without objection, that will be the order.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Without objection, that will be the order. Ms.
  • House, come to order.
  • House, come to order.
  • That means we're not simply authorizing a project of development.
  • Without objection, that'll be the order. Without objection, that'll be the order.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Call the Oversight for Health and Human Services to order.
  • We had some issue with the Health Care Authority last year with some of our providers and how they were
  • Seeing no objection, that'll be the order. Back on the bill with the title on.
  • So this just gives them the continuing ed authority over that. Move adoption over for questions.
  • So I think we need this in order to keep the pharmacies, both independent and chain pharmacies, alive
TX

Texas 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session May 29th, 2025

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's none, so ordered.
  • The chair hears none, so ordered.
  • The committee substitute author...
  • It authorizes courts to enter an order allowing a violator to spend up to 50% of the civil penalty the
  • Speaker, I raise a point of order. of order under Rule 11, Section 2 against further consideration of
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (01/07/2026)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Senate will come to order.
  • We're going to move on to special orders. We're going to move on to special orders.
  • is ordered to third reading. is ordered to third reading.
  • ordered to third reading. ordered to third reading.
  • bill is ordered to third reading. bill is ordered to third reading.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary (04/08/2025)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:29:25.600> Um, order, warrant, or subpoena. Um, order, warrant, or subpoena.
  • <01:53:53.679> to they don't have the statuto authority to they don't have the statuto authority
  • Thank you, Representative Lyn. specifically authorized by statute, not specifically authorized by statute
  • that you're not authorized to do by statute."
  • you're not not authorized that you're not authorized<02:01:15.920> to<02:01:16.080> do
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 112 May 5th, 2026

Colorado House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • orders today, May 5th, at 9:45 a.m. orders today, May 5th, at 9:45 a.m.
  • Or the temporary worker did that. So, is the temporary worker being fined the $500?
  • Um, maybe not here in Denver, but down in Colorado Springs, if you order something, you order whether
  • You just ordered takeout. I did.
  • >> The house will come back to order. >> The house will come back to order.
Keywords: 981, all
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee Jun 24th, 2026

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • We see one of the authors in the house. Subimeh Burtah. We see one of the authors in the house.
  • Any other authors present? The committee will now go into recess until we have another author.
  • We'll add you as a co-author.
  • I thank the author.
  • One author? All right, we're going to go to recess until we get the last author here.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

March 27, 2025 - 03:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, the Transportation and Economic Development Budget Subcommittee will come to order.
  • In order to streamline and create efficiency, we looked at a very important In order to streamline and
  • But in order to be consistent, and keep in mind, this is statewide in all the committees, we have made
  • These funds are currently a temporary supplemental allocation of funds for the State Apartment Incentive
  • The $150 million being redirected from the Live Local program to general revenue was designed as a temporary
Summary: The Transportation and Economic Development Budget Subcommittee met to consider its recommended fiscal year 2025-2026 budget and a conforming committee bill. Chair Shove presented an $18.5 billion TED budget, describing it as about 8.5% below the prior year’s TED budget and emphasizing recurring savings, reductions to vacant positions over 90 days old, and a focus on core agency needs. He highlighted funding for economic development, Visit Florida, Space Florida, affordable housing programs, military affairs, libraries, cultural and historic preservation grants, emergency management, and a $14.1 billion transportation work program. The committee then took up PCB TED 2501, which changes documentary stamp tax distributions by redirecting certain revenues to general revenue. The bill would reinstate the general revenue service charge on the supplemental housing-related dock stamp revenue, eliminating a recurring $150 million source for the State Housing Trust Fund, and would also redirect about $466 million from the State Transportation Trust Fund to general revenue. Chair Shove said the measure has no net zero fiscal impact on state revenues and does not alter the longstanding standard dock stamp funding for affordable housing or eliminate FDOT programs, arguing the bill preserves flexibility for future legislatures. Public testimony was split. Representatives from the Florida Transportation Builders Association and the Florida Public Transportation Association warned that the transportation trust fund reduction would significantly affect FDOT’s five-year work program, especially the Strategic Intermodal System, and could reduce planned capacity improvements and transit funding. Several members also raised concerns about the housing-related changes, arguing the bill undercuts commitments made through the Live Local framework and could weaken affordable housing efforts. In closing, Chair Shove defended the bill as a necessary tightening of recurring spending and said existing affordable housing and transportation programs would still be funded through other appropriations. The committee approved PCB TED 2501 on a 10-2 vote and reported it favorably before adjourning.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Business and Commerce May 15th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hearing none, so ordered.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • Without objection, so ordered.
  • Hearing none, it is so ordered.
Summary: The committee first handled pending business, including reconsidering a failed vote on SB 715 and then reporting several measures favorably. SB 1978 was reported from committee on a committee substitute, and a series of House bills — including HB 431, HB 1522, HB 1922, HB 3228, HB 3229, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 4219, HB 4238, HB 434, HB 1584, and HB 4739 — were moved out of committee, most to the local and uncontested calendar. The votes on these items were overwhelmingly or unanimously in favor, with committee substitutes adopted where applicable. The committee then heard HB 2963, a right-to-repair bill for consumer electronics. The author said the bill would require manufacturers to provide parts, tools, and documentation on fair and reasonable terms while preserving trade secrets and excluding certain categories such as medical devices, motor vehicles covered by an MOU, critical infrastructure, and commercial-only transactions. Supporters from the Texas Public Policy Foundation and Environment Texas argued it would strengthen property rights, help small businesses, and reduce e-waste. Opponents, including representatives of SafeLight Auto Glass and LKQ, said they supported right-to-repair in principle but objected to the bill’s automotive MOU exemption and broader scope, warning it could create uncertainty and leave some manufacturers and repair shops outside the framework. The bill was left pending after testimony. Members also heard HB 2467 on salary parity for State Fire Marshal investigators, HB 252 on allowing some state agencies to pay certain employees twice monthly, HB 2468 on public improvement district notice and a buyer’s right to terminate, HB 4386 on annuity contract exchanges and surrender timelines, HB 4751 creating a Texas Quantum Initiative and related fund, and HJR 175 proposing a constitutional amendment protecting Texans’ ability to use mutually agreed-upon mediums of exchange, including cash, bullion, and digital currency. Testimony on HB 4751 was largely supportive but included questions about whether the state needs a new coordinating structure and funding mechanism for quantum research and commercialization. HJR 175 drew discussion about barter, taxes, and concerns over central bank digital currency. Each of these items was left pending after hearing testimony. The committee also heard HB 2221, which would update insurance anti-rebating laws to allow more wellness and value-added services in life and health insurance, with supporters saying it would encourage healthier behavior without requiring data monitoring. Finally, the committee took up a package of utility and wildfire-related bills from Chairman King’s portfolio: HB 106, requiring oil and gas operators to maintain certain overhead electrical lines; HB 144, requiring utilities to submit pole inspection and management plans to the PUC; and HB 145, requiring wildfire mitigation plans and allowing utilities to self-insure under certain conditions. Utility, co-op, and insurance representatives generally supported the safety and resiliency goals of HB 144, while asking for clarifications and less frequent reporting; HB 145 was introduced as a broader wildfire-risk and liability measure. These bills were also left pending after testimony.