Transcript Highlights:

• My name is Heidi Adams, and I'm a judicial district attorney. I stand in support of House Bill 58.
• The bill is in line with modern judicial practices, use of technology to enhance efficiency.
• HB 57 is a common-sense modernization of our judicial system that allows video testimony for traffic
• My name is Heidi Adams, Judicial District Attorney. I stand in support of House Bill 57.
• We are competing with other judicial districts for these lab analyst times, as well as when they're trying

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• banks, had nothing to do with legal aid; it had to do with the separation of powers between the judicial
• banks, had nothing to do with legal aid; it had to do with the separation of powers between the judicial
• Within 20 days, a business may seek judicial review of the emergency suspension order.
• Within 20 days, a business may seek judicial review of the emergency suspension order.
• Nevertheless, how will negating the need for a judicial process...

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and heard several insurance and banking bills. HB 1399, relating to property insurance affiliates, would increase Office of Insurance Regulation oversight of transactions between property insurers and affiliates, require fair-and-reasonable documentation, review of dividends and asset pledges, contract termination clauses, affiliate registration, and penalties for violations. Members from both parties generally supported the goal of transparency and accountability, though some raised concerns about costs and whether the bill would actually return money to insureds. The bill was reported favorably. HB 427, on public adjuster contracts, would allow vulnerable adults or their legal representatives to rescind public adjuster contracts without penalty, reflecting the sponsor’s personal concerns about protecting elderly and otherwise vulnerable family members from predatory contracting. Public testimony included support from several industry and elder-law groups, while the public adjuster association warned the bill could unfairly target one profession and urged broader language. Members debated whether the bill should be expanded to cover other solicitations and whether legal representatives should be treated differently, but the bill was ultimately reported favorably. The committee also approved HB 893, which aligns bank handling of law-firm trust accounts with Florida Supreme Court rules and supports legal aid funding, and HB 767, a transparency bill requiring insurers to provide consumers with plain-language explanations of rate increases and related factors. Members emphasized consumer education and clearer disclosures, and HB 767 passed 2-0. Later, HB 381, the Office of Financial Regulation agency bill, was amended and reported favorably; it updates financial regulation provisions including cybersecurity-related requirements, money services business rules, credit union and financial institution provisions, and fee timing. HB 777, a related public-records bill protecting nonpublic personal information submitted to OFR, was also heard and moved forward without opposition.

Transcript Highlights:

• and patterned, as the legislation kind of, kind of prodded us in that direction, patterned on the judicial
• As Carl mentioned, um, yesterday, we did approve, um, the, the approval of the judicial districts was
• , uh, approved for the behavioral health regions, and I continually say judicial districts, but really
• And as far as the responses we've received, most responses were in line with the judicial districts.
• Um, lastly, I'll just say, Madam Chair, um, the intent of this is not judicial or criminal by any means

Transcript Highlights:

• The judiciary in California and Maryland have opposed it because it attempts to remove judicial discretion
• We have multiple bills flowing through this house, and I'm talking both chambers, for judicial accountability
• We have multiple bills flowing through this house, and I'm talking both chambers, for judicial accountability
• This is for judges, but until we have judicial accountability ruling on the rule of law, that's when
• This is for judges, but until we have judicial accountability ruling on the rule of law, that's when

Bills: HB40, HB1916, HB1973, HB2524, HB2530, HB3180, HB3421, HB3783, HB4170, HB4213

Keywords: business court, civil procedure, litigation, jurisdiction, arbitration, divorce, property division, family law, court jurisdiction, marital assets, parent-child relationship, birth certificate, identity proof, Family Code, court process, attorney fees, court costs, legal expenses, dispute resolution, child support

Summary: The committee heard several House bills, most of them relating to family law and court procedure, and left each bill pending after testimony. House Bill 1916 would clarify that the court that issued a final divorce decree retains exclusive jurisdiction over later actions involving undivided property. House Bill 1973 would require a certified birth certificate, if reasonably available, to be filed with a SAPCR petition or allow alternative proof of parentage while keeping the information confidential. House Bill 2530 would add qualifications and procedural safeguards for appointing amicus attorneys in SAPCR cases, including notice and hearing requirements, minimum qualifications, conflict rules, and limits on what amicus attorneys may do. House Bill 2524 would make Family Code references to attorney’s fees consistent by using “reasonable and necessary” language. House Bill 3180 would correct a scrivener’s error in the civil discovery rules by changing “settlement” to “statement.” The committee also heard House Bill 4213, which would change the interest rate on overdue child support from the current 6 percent simple interest to a fixed 5 percent and require the Attorney General to report on the impact of the change. Testimony was sharply divided: supporters argued lower interest could improve collections and help low-income obligors catch up, citing research and the size of child-support arrearages; opponents said lowering the rate would reduce incentives to pay and harm custodial parents and children. The Attorney General’s office raised implementation concerns about a House version that would have created a variable rate, while the committee substitute was described as restoring a simple fixed rate. After testimony, the bill was left pending. The committee also discussed House Bill 40, updating business court provisions and supplemental jurisdiction; House Bill 3421, streamlining probate procedures for original wills and copies; and House Bill 417, clarifying venue for lawsuits involving private transfer fees on real property. Each drew limited testimony and was left pending. Finally, House Bill 3783 drew extensive testimony on court-ordered counseling and reunification therapy in family cases. The sponsor and supporters said the bill would protect children and abuse victims from coercive, unregulated reunification practices, while opponents argued it was too broad, could interfere with legitimate therapy and judicial discretion, and might affect military families and other high-conflict cases. The committee heard testimony from judges, therapists, parents, survivors, and advocates, but took no final action and left the bill pending.

Transcript Highlights:

• that needed to get mandamus review or something like that, there would be a way for them to seek judicial
• providing those rights, it's time to create a similar procedure and due process checkpoint at the judicial
• Essentially, with the... ...sections B and C being struck, this essentially becomes a judicial procedural
• Ultimately seeks to remove your child through a judicial proceeding, or whether you work services and
• seeking to do is to add or to address the situation at the adversarial hearing when legislative or judicial

Bills: HB168, HB 1044, HB1534, HB1914, HB2240, HB2530, HB3284, HB3395, HB3515, HB3783, HB4034, HB4213, HB168

Keywords: marriage age, minors, family law, void marriage, rights of minors, Texas marriage law, marriage ceremony, authorized officiants, family code, judges, religious leaders, parent-child relationship, Department of Family and Protective Services, legal rights, notice requirements, HB 1914, Texas Family Code, Chapter 156, conservatorship, custody

Transcript Highlights:

• I am the CEO for the Second Judicial District Court.
• is now requiring us to be a storage facility for anyone, regardless of whether they live in our judicial
• We don't know how many other wills there are in the state and other judicial districts with those same
• I'm just one court, one judicial district. There's also safety deposit boxes.
• And they have to then be able to search the entire state, not just one judicial district, because again

Transcript Highlights:

• So I'm interested if you've had conversations with the various agencies and with the judicial branch
• <00:39:35.720> branch agencies and with the judicial branch agencies and with the judicial
• <00:39:54.319> branch<00:39:54.680> about anybody in the judicial branch about anybody
• in the judicial branch about that<00:39:55.480> at<00:39:55.680> all<00:39:56.680>
• discretion fair enough but then judicial discretion fair enough but then what<01:02:36.599> about

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Without any reason to believe that a fair and transparent and just investigation or judicial process
• last year, agents were instructed to enforce administrative awards in exactly the same manner as judicial
• judicial process will occur.<00:55:44.720> ones<00:55:45.040> left<00:55:45.280> to
• ><00:56:26.160> same<00:56:26.319> manner<00:56:26.880> as<00:56:27.280> judicial
• <00:56:27.839> ones Exactly the same manner as judicial ones across the country.

Keywords: 981, all

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, approved the January 23, 2026 journal, and then took up two resolutions. HJR 26-103, recognizing National Blood Donor Month, was adopted unanimously, 34-0, with the current roll call added as co-sponsors. SJR 26-005, designating Monday, January 26, 2026 as Colorado 4-H Day, was also adopted unanimously, 34-0, and the morning roll call was added as co-sponsors. Most of the meeting centered on SJR 26-005 and a large 4-H presence in the galleries and on the floor. Senators and guests gave extended remarks about 4-H’s role in youth development, agriculture, leadership, and hands-on learning, with several members sharing personal 4-H experiences and welcoming students from across Colorado. The resolution text highlighted 4-H’s statewide reach and its partnership with Colorado State University Extension. After the resolution, senators made announcements about upcoming Bible study, Smart Act hearings, a State Farm breakfast, and Joint Budget Committee presentations. The latter part of the meeting shifted to personal privilege remarks on immigration enforcement, protests, law enforcement, due process, and public safety, with sharply differing views expressed about ICE, CBP, and recent incidents in Minnesota. No further legislative votes or actions were taken after the resolutions.

Transcript Highlights:

• imminent threat, subject to legislative review by majority vote, and timelines for reassessment and judicial
• imminent threat, subject to legislative review by majority vote, and timelines for reassessment and judicial
• imminent threat, subject to legislative review by majority vote, and timelines for reassessment and judicial
• imminent threat, subject to legislative review by majority vote, and timelines for reassessment and judicial
• imminent threat, subject to legislative review by majority vote, and timelines for reassessment and judicial

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Committee on Public Safety and Military Affairs took up several measures, beginning with House Bill 2413 on pre-trial reform, which had been deferred from a prior agenda. The chair said the committee would incorporate judiciary recommendations and other technical, non-substantive amendments to continue discussion, and the measure was adopted with amendments by a 2-1 vote, with one member excused. The committee then heard extensive testimony on House Bill 2062, which appropriates funds for gun violence prevention efforts, including processing temporary restraining orders and gun violence protective orders and funding public awareness campaigns. Supporters, including county, advocacy, law enforcement, and student witnesses, said the bill would improve implementation of an existing law, save lives, and reduce suicides and violence. Opponents argued red flag laws can be abused, raise due process concerns, and may create dangerous enforcement situations. Written testimony was reported as 60 in support, 47 in opposition, and one comment. The committee later passed HB 2062 with amendments, including a corrected effective date, by a 3-1 vote with one member excused. The committee also considered House Bill 1957 on safe entryways, which would establish enforcement procedures in larger cities to prevent blocking of private doorways and entrances. Written testimony included support and opposition, but no oral testimony was offered, and the bill was passed with technical, non-substantive amendments. House Bill 253 on fireworks, which expands civil asset forfeiture for felony fireworks offenses and clarifies air-delivery provisions, was also passed with an amended effective date. House Bill 2581 on emergency management, which would narrow the definitions of disasters and emergencies, drew testimony both supporting the bill as a check on emergency powers and opposing it as incomplete or too broad in its current form; decision-making on that measure was deferred to the committee’s March 23 meeting. House Bill 2498 on a care home resilience pilot program was also deferred to March 23 after no testimony was offered.

Transcript Highlights:

• the Minnesota sex offender program petition for a reduction in custody, and replace this with the judicial
• custody and um replaces this<00:08:23.479> with<00:08:23.680> the<00:08:23.840> judicial
• <00:08:24.280> appeal<00:08:24.639> panel this with the judicial appeal panel this
• with the judicial appeal panel hearing<00:08:25.159> and<00:08:25.360> review<00:08:25.840
• DHS policy bill adds the DHS appeals division judges and current employees to the definition of judicial

Keywords: 1183, house

Bills: SB1636, SB1584, SB1730, SB1255, SB1627, SB137, SB2062, SB1470, SB1284, SB1632, SB1594, SB2045, SB1251, SB1884, SB1250, SB1630, SB1262, SB1374, SB1292, SB1432, SB1199, SB1790, SB1481, SB1614, SB1734, SB1437, SB1489, SB1718, SB1778, SB1327, SB1372, SB1403, SB1937, SB277, SB2131, SB1749, SB1348, SB1469, SB2018, SB1931, SB1530, SB2155, SB2030, SB1926, SB2170, SB2151, SB2166, SB1213, SB1381, SB1824, SB1876, SB1728, SB1582, SB1286, SB1386, SB1708, SB1618, SB2106, SB1471, SB2139, SB2154, SB1619, SCR15, HB2786, HB2787, SB1525, SB2011, SB2159

Keywords: cold case, unsolved homicide, violent crime, case file review, law enforcement, police records, victim family, immediate family member, designated person, forensic testing, witness reinterview, investigative leads, cold case unit, unsolved murder, public safety, Title 21, Oklahoma statutes, sexual assault, evidence kits, DNA testing

Transcript Highlights:

• this section that the conduct was for a bona fide educational, medical, psychological, psychiatric, judicial
• Judicial or law enforcement purpose. Okay, we will make that note. So, tell me...
• I mean, there are bona fide judicial or law enforcement...

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It requires mandatory judicial review of any family law arbitration, clarifies that criminal matters
• It mirrors approaches that have survived much, much judicial scrutiny, for example, in Kansas.
• Does that mean we're going to have to eliminate the judicial system or legislative system?
• Does that mean we're going to have to eliminate the judicial system or legislative system?
• They need a statute for the judicial branch, for the judicial branch. Mr. Farley, you're excused.

Bills: SB1018, SB1037, SB1568, SB1687, SB1825, SCR1001

Keywords: foreign law, Sharia law, cultural practices, women's rights, marriage laws, domestic violence, honor killings, Arizona legislation, elections, voting systems, vote tabulation, election security, internet connectivity, offline voting, chain of custody, polling place equipment, counting center, central counting center, election management system, EMS gateway

Summary: The committee first considered SB 1018, which would expand Arizona’s foreign law statute to expressly include Sharia law and certain foreign religious or cultural laws or customs that condone practices such as honor killings or other conduct violating criminal law. The sponsor said the bill was meant to strengthen enforcement against foreign, private, or religious adjudications that violate constitutional rights, while opponents, including the ACLU, argued it was unconstitutional, singled out Islam, and was part of a broader anti-Muslim effort. After extended debate, the committee approved SB 1018 on a 4-3 vote. The committee then heard SB 1568, requiring election systems and software clocks to be set to accurate time and verified during logic and accuracy, compatibility, and security testing. Supporters said accurate timekeeping is important for chain of custody and election integrity; county representatives opposed the bill as impractical because some equipment is not connected to the internet, batteries can drain, and different time zones in Arizona complicate compliance. The bill passed 4-3. Next, SB 1687 proposed moving primary elections to the Tuesday before Memorial Day, adjusting nomination paper filing windows, and changing the date used to calculate required petition signatures. A Marquez amendment dealing with Clean Elections timing and funding was offered but defeated. The sponsor said the bill would reduce extreme heat burdens and improve participation; county officials were neutral but noted timing changes would require broader cleanup. The committee then approved SB 1687 on a 4-3 vote. The committee also considered SB 1825, which changes how precinct committeeman vacancies are filled by giving legislative district chairs or county chairs authority depending on the situation and requiring action within 30 days. Supporters said it would streamline a slow, opaque process and improve local control; opponents warned it could concentrate power and be abused. An amendment limiting the bill to counties over 500,000 people was adopted, and the bill passed 4-1 with one present and one absent. Finally, the committee revisited SB 1037, which imposes security requirements on voting and tabulating equipment, including no internet connectivity, user logins, chain-of-custody controls, and continuous video recording at counting centers. An amendment broadened the bill to cover election management systems and tightened the no-connectivity and no-port provisions. The sponsor and amendment proponent argued the bill was needed to prevent indirect internet access and strengthen election security. The transcript cuts off before the final vote on SB 1037.

Transcript Highlights:

• I have the honor of being a circuit judge in the 20th Judicial District that covers Faulkner, Van Buren
• I'm Kathy Hess, a circuit judge for the First Judicial District. That's cross.
• Kathy Hess is a circuit judge for the First Judicial District. That's Cross, Lee, Woodruff, St.
• And so we've seen the impact of that, not only in the 20th Judicial District, but across the state.
• It just takes a lot of time, and we have 28 judicial districts.

Summary: The Senate and House Joint Committee on Children and Youth approved the December 10 minutes and confirmed Representative Mary Bentley to the Child Maltreatment Investigations Oversight Committee. The committee then heard the annual Arkansas Infant and Child Death Review report, which said the state reviewed 148 of 170 non-natural child deaths in 2023; the reviewed deaths included 69 accidents, 14 suicides, 18 homicides, and 47 undetermined causes. Members asked about how the report’s recommendations could be used, grant opportunities tied to prevention work, and whether the data could be broken down by age; presenters said the report is intended as a prevention tool for agencies and nonprofits and that some age detail is available in later pages of the report. The committee next took up HCR 1010 and then a broader discussion of juvenile justice reform. Senator Missy Irvin, judges, and Administrative Office of the Courts staff described Arkansas’s use of validated risk assessments, including SAVRY, the Ohio Youth Assessment Tool, MAYSI, and substance-abuse screening, as part of a long-running effort to reduce juvenile incarceration and tailor services to individual youth and families. They said the reforms have contributed to fewer delinquency filings, fewer DYS commitments, and more diversions, while also emphasizing that mental health, substance abuse, school issues, and trauma often drive juvenile court involvement. Several members raised concerns about data gaps, school collaboration, and whether community-based services are sufficient, and presenters said more shared data and stronger school use of safety dashboards could help intervene earlier. Division of Youth Services Director Michael Crump then presented custody, education, recidivism, and cost data. He said DYS commitments rose after the pandemic, secure residential populations remain high, and detention-center use increased when intake beds filled; he also noted that DYS pays about $320 per day for secure custody and that detention beds cost roughly $90 to $100 per day. Crump said most youth in custody are older teens, about 80 percent are male, and many have behavioral-health needs or educational deficits; he reported 222 GEDs and 102 high school diplomas over six years. He also said about 15 to 19 percent of youth return to DYS within three years and that a larger share later enter the Department of Corrections, while members pressed him on how assessments relate to commitments, how low-risk cases are handled, and how to improve mental health and substance-abuse services statewide.

Transcript Highlights:

• The protesters did not prevail, and so an appeal to the circuit court for judicial review did not actually
• 38:56.480> for appeal to the uh uh circuit court for appeal to the uh uh circuit court for judicial
• 58.240> uh<00:38:58.560> did<00:38:58.800> not<00:38:59.119> actually judicial
• review uh did not actually judicial review uh did not actually prevail<00:38:59.920> there<00
• <00:39:20.240> review to the circuit court for judicial review to the circuit court for judicial

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This judicial pay raise is long overdue.
• It's my understanding that judicial pay and legislative pensions have been linked for over half a century
• The bill raises the judicial base pay salary by 25% to $175,000.
• As Representative Money said, we're 49th out of 50 right now in judicial pay.
• To increase the judicial pay fully, finally, and historically, we can do so without worrying about it

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > district District Attorney uh judicial district District Attorney uh judicial district number
• So 305 is the executive branch, 306 is the judicial branch.
• branch, 306 is the judicial branch. branch, 306 is the judicial branch.
• <03:49:45.600> difference<03:49:47.040> agencies judicial difference agencies judicial
• <03:57:16.479> Your Judici Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Your Judici Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, there's another process out there called the judicial system and the legal process, and so we should
• system and the legal called the judicial system and the legal process,<00:17:10.480> and<00:17
• ><00:17:30.520> the that out from the politics and the that out from the politics and the judicial
• side of the conversation that's judicial side of the conversation that's happening<00:17:33.520>
• Judicial Conduct and Ethics Commission: Justin Spicer, Joey Bell.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Another idea that has come up along the way here that's incorporated in this bill is to allow for judicial
• Another idea that has come up along the way here that's incorporated in this bill is to allow for judicial
• Another idea that has come up along the way here that's incorporated in this bill is to allow for judicial
• /c><00:11:00.079> um<00:11:00.399> allow<00:11:00.800> for<00:11:01.120> judicial
• in this bill is to um allow for judicial in this bill is to um allow for judicial review<00:11:03.519

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Bills: SB903, SB2101, SB2550, SB2983, HB2433, SCR8, SCR20, SCR28, SCR32, SCR40, SCR48, SCR55, SCR57, SCR69, SCR74, SCR83, SCR87, SCR94, SCR99, SCR114, SCR139, SCR160, SCR165, SCR177, SCR178, SCR179, SCR41, SCR78, SCR90, SCR130, SCR159, SCR162, SCR173, SB2024, SB2075, SB2730, HB2581, SB2050, SB2471, SB2466, HB1163, HB1514, SB3082, SB2135, SB2727, SB3097, HB1696, HB2021, SR20, SCR110

Keywords: public land trust, Hawaiian affairs, OHA, ceded lands, financial reporting, income settlement, trust responsibility, organic waste, solid waste, waste diversion, composting, bioconversion, recycling, food waste, green waste, food-soiled paper, wood waste, landfill diversion, waste reduction, waste management