Video & Transcript Research : 'consent'

Page 13 of 274
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • making it a criminal offense to not only produce or distribute a deepfake video without the effective consent
  • , this bill did not criminalize sexually explicit photos that are created of people without their consent
  • And consent to calendar. Is there objection? Chair, there's no objection. It's all ordered. Okay.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 21st, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • The consent they deemed was, they deemed my consent was not adequate, so we corrected to whatever they
  • Every consent form I give a patient.
  • The anesthesia consent in state Texas required. that when I get a antecedent consent, I actually list
  • I will go get the consent.
  • Consent is provided and the delegating physician for anesthesia is on the consent.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Justice

Summary: The committee heard several criminal justice bills, with testimony largely focused on public safety, court procedures, and local criminal justice administration. SB 2371 would expand mandatory skimmer-reporting requirements from gas pumps to ATMs, point-of-sale systems, and virtual currency kiosks, with the Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center saying centralized reporting would improve investigations, preserve evidence, and help identify organized criminal groups. SB 2581 would repeal a special law governing commissary funds in certain large counties; the sponsor and the Sheriff’s Association said it would restore parity with other counties while keeping spending subject to audit and inmate-benefit limits. Both bills were laid out and left pending after testimony, with no public witnesses opposing them at the hearing. The committee also heard SB 330, which would require voter approval before counties over a certain size reduce prosecutor funding, similar to an existing law for law enforcement budgets. Supporters argued prosecutors are essential to public safety and need stable funding, while an opponent from the Texas Civil Rights Project said the bill would restrict local budget flexibility and impose costly elections. SB 663 would remove district judges’ approval role for community supervision and corrections department budgets, replacing it with judge review after TDCJ-CJAD approval; probation officials said the change would reduce delays and confusion without reducing judicial oversight. SB 1020 would require more immediate sharing of ankle-monitor violation information and clarify that such records are not judicial work product; the Harris County DA’s office and Crime Stoppers supported it, citing inconsistent local practices and delays that can hinder prosecutions. The committee then took up SB 1164 on emergency detention and court-ordered mental health services. The bill, from the Texas Judicial Commission on Mental Health, would update emergency detention forms, clarify officer duties, allow filings in the county where a person is apprehended or located, and add a factor related to a person’s inability to recognize symptoms or appreciate treatment risks. Supporters included family members, law enforcement, and mental health and judicial witnesses who described cases where earlier intervention might have prevented tragedy; opponents warned the broader language could be misused and emphasized due process and the need for dangerousness to remain the standard. SB 2111 on indigent defense would expand access to counsel at first hearings, strengthen managed assigned counsel programs, create internships and fellowships, and adjust other defense-related procedures; the Texas Indigent Defense Commission and county defense program leaders supported it, while the committee substitute removed some provisions to reduce fiscal impact. Finally, SB 2383 would let recently retired DPS officers return to work in limited roles to help address staffing shortages, and SB 2797 would create reciprocal discovery requirements for criminal cases; prosecutors and some committee members said it would reduce trial surprise and improve truth-seeking, while others questioned whether the bill fully matched the state’s disclosure obligations and whether it could burden defense rights. Several bills were left pending after testimony, and the committee established a quorum later in the hearing.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • a<00:04:36.520> higher consent informed consent is a higher consent informed consent is a
  • this amendment requires informed consent this amendment requires informed consent for<00:04:41.520
  • We're fully supportive of the informed consent amendment.
  • We're fully supportive of the informed consent amendment.
  • We're fully supportive of the informed consent amendment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The following resolutions are being referred to the committee and local consent calendars: HCR16 by Craddick
  • Speaker, I move to suspend all necessary rules to allow the Chair of the Committee on Local Consent Calendars
  • The motion for this is the second extension requiring unanimous consent. Is there objection?
  • . ...consent, limiting the Office of the Attorney General's ability to enforce election laws directly
  • "Absent the consent and deputization order of a local prosecutor or the... ...upstream connect error
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Apr 28th, 2025 at 08:04 am

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's no a requirement to get the parent's consent or... I'm sorry, where are you reading from?
  • Informed consent is obviously the gold standard. In that case, I was able to get in touch with.
  • So, but it's not required, you're not required to. to contact the parent to get consent?
  • So no, but it, you know, you you do your best to get informed consent from that patient's parent.
  • Are you required to get informed consent? As an officer, no. Thank you.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Likewise, I would require written information. consent for collecting, analyzing, retaining, selling,
  • Individuals who have had their DNA harvested and used without their consent have no ability to recover
  • The screenings are mandatory and the states presume parental consent.
  • documents. in terms of service to include broad consents and licenses, but we must not let the perfect
  • citizen's DNA can be modified or altered without first being provided an opportunity for informed consent