Video & Transcript Research : 'testimonials'

Page 137 of 500
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Election Law and Municipal Affairs (01/27/2026)

Election Law and Municipal Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:52:12.960> by still can submit written testimony by still can submit written testimony
  • , that as it as it came out in testimony, that as it as it came out in testimony, the<01:35:07.280
  • Flatch's testimony.
  • Flatch's<01:41:04.400> testimony.
  • Flatch's testimony.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
  • We'll ask people to keep their testimony to about two minutes.
  • Thank you for your testimony. We'll now go to Ms.
  • Thank you for your testimony. Any questions from Mr. Blackie? Mr.
  • Seeing none, thank you for your testimony.
  • And thank you for that testimony.
Keywords: 1182, all
Summary: The joint House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees met to hear identical conformity bills, HB 2153 and SB 1106, which would align Arizona tax law with the federal Internal Revenue Code as of Jan. 1, 2026, including some retroactive provisions for tax year 2025. Staff explained that the bills would exclude three federal provisions: the higher federal SALT deduction, the new senior deduction as written in H.R. 1, and the deduction for interest on new car loans. They would instead include a $6,000 retirement-income deduction for taxpayers age 60 and older, a $6,000 Roth IRA contribution deduction, a higher dependent tax credit, and a deduction for child and dependent care expenses above the federal credit. JLBC estimated the package would reduce general fund income tax revenue by about $441.3 million in FY 2026. Members also discussed that the Department of Revenue’s forms had been issued assuming full conformity, and staff and supporters argued the bills were needed quickly to avoid confusion and amended returns during filing season. Committee members and sponsors largely framed the bills as tax relief and a way to provide certainty for taxpayers and preparers. Supporters said the package would help families, seniors, and workers, and noted that the Arizona version was negotiated to keep the overall tax relief roughly comparable to full conformity while shifting benefits away from the SALT deduction and toward child credits, retirement income, and child care. The sponsors also criticized the governor’s executive action and urged prompt passage so taxpayers would know how to file. Opponents argued the bills would reduce state revenue, worsen the budget outlook, and disproportionately benefit higher-income taxpayers and corporations. Several witnesses and members also raised concerns about the child care deduction, the retirement-income deduction, and the business expensing provisions, while supporters responded that the bill was designed to help working families and encourage saving and investment. Public testimony was mixed. The Arizona Society of Certified Public Accountants and the Arizona Free Enterprise Club supported the bills, emphasizing early conformity, filing certainty, and reduced confusion for taxpayers and software providers. Opponents included Save Our Schools Arizona, the Arizona Center for Economic Progress, Opportunity Arizona, and several individuals, who argued the package would deepen budget problems and favor the wealthy. One witness objected to a federal school-choice-related provision she said was being tied to the bill, though committee members said the measure before them was a tax conformity bill and not a school finance bill. The hearing included extended debate over the fiscal impact, the governor’s prior requests for some of the same tax changes, and whether taxpayers would need to file amended returns if the legislature later changed course. The transcript ends during testimony from NFIB, with no final committee vote or action shown in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Aug 22nd, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for your testimony. I have Daniel Neal.
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • I don't want to say that that's my testimony.
  • Okay, thank you very much for your testimony. Thank you.
  • We have some public testimony. Okay, thank you.
Bills: HB 265, HB25
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Elections Apr 24th, 2025

Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Comments are open until the end of the public testimony period.
  • That concludes our public testimony.
  • Yeah, I watched some of their testimony on this. Senate Bill 16.
  • All right, members, we're going to go to public testimony.
  • Thank you, ma'am, for your testimony. Members, any questions?
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

Senate Energy and Natural Resources (04/10/2025)

Energy and Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • > from<00:10:08.640> the testimony.
  • Any questions from the testimony.
  • for your testimony. Any questions? for your testimony. Any questions?
  • Thank you for your testimony. Yes, and I have a copy of written testimony. Any questions for Noah?
  • Yes, and I have a copy of testimony. Yes, and I have a copy of written<01:04:10.559> testimony.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

LBT/LAB Joint Info Briefing - Tue Aug 19, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Hawaii House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for your testimony.
  • Um, I close my testimony. I have gratitude and appreciation for all of you, and thank you.
  • We have Joshua Tom that provided written testimony. Is he on? With your indulgence, Mr.
  • So, you do have those five individuals' testimonies.
  • So, just for the record, we did receive written testimony from Joshua Tom T.
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: A joint informational briefing of the House Committee on Labor and the Senate Committee on Labor and Technology was held on August 19, 2025, to hear testimony on the Office of Community Services’ proposed Community Services Block Grant state plan for federal fiscal years 2026 and 2027. Ray Domingo of OCS explained that the plan is intended to maintain federal CSBG funding and focuses on compliance monitoring, coordination among community action agencies and state agencies, and strengthening partnerships. He also reviewed the program structure, noting that Hawaii’s four CAAs serve low-income residents, that the state must pass through at least 90% of the grant to CAAs, and that Hawaii received about $3.8 million in FFY 2025, with allocations to HCAP, Hawaii County Economic Opportunity Council, Kauai Economic Opportunity, and Maui Economic Opportunity. He said statewide CAAs reported serving 40,980 individuals in FFY 2024. Representatives from each CAA testified in support of the plan and described how CSBG functions as flexible “glue” funding that supports overhead, fills gaps, and helps leverage other public and private resources. HCAP’s Robert Piper said the grant helps sustain its broad service network, including Head Start, job training, weatherization, shelter, food assistance, and energy programs, and emphasized its tripartite board structure and annual service to about 20,000 people. Hawaii County’s Chad Hosigal highlighted support for senior farmers market coupons, Meals on Wheels, and transportation services. Kauai Economic Opportunity’s Mabel Fujiuchi said the agency fully supports the plan and described CSBG as nucleus funding that helps support shelter, Meals on Wheels, weatherization, mediation, and other services, including assistance for homeless families and special needs items such as dentures and hearing aids. Maui Economic Opportunity’s Gay Sabonga described CSBG’s role in disaster response after the 2023 wildfires, including shelter transitions, document recovery, housing and utility assistance, bridge grants for small businesses, youth prevention programs, and employment services. Committee members asked about the stability of future federal funding, the frequency of federal assessments, and how satisfaction scores in the state plan were measured. OCS said federal funding information has been mixed and uncertain, that communication with federal partners has been limited and informal, and that the federal assessment website appears outdated; staff said assessments are done every two years. On the satisfaction metric, OCS said the score was 92 out of 100 and believed it reflected participant responses, though they offered to follow up with more detail. No votes or formal actions were taken at the informational briefing.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Apr 15th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • If not, we'll pro uh proceed with testimony.
  • OK, we will proceed with testimony. The chair calls.
  • Thank you both for your testimony.
  • I got mostly crossouts on this, on this, uh, testimony.
  • Um, I guess I'm a little confused about your testimony.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Human Services Apr 15th, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, we will proceed with testimony.
  • Thank you both for your testimony. Thank you.
  • I got mostly crossouts on this testimony.
  • Thank you all so much for your testimony. Thank you.
  • I guess I'm a little confused about your testimony.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Okay, thank you for your testimony.
  • Okay, thank you for your testimony.
  • Please state your name for the record and present your testimony.
  • in her testimony that really deserve a response.
  • testimony from Miss Cox and she you know testimony from Miss Cox and she you know she<00:28:48.360>
Keywords: 1183, house
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Municipal and County Government (01/16/2026)

Municipal and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • your testimony. Questions for Mr. your testimony. Questions for Mr. Martin?
  • with your testimony. with your testimony.
  • to three minutes for public testimony. to three minutes for public testimony.
  • to three minutes for public testimony. to three minutes for public testimony.
  • <04:10:31.279> testimony,<04:10:32.640> there In the remote testimony testimony, there
Keywords: 1189, house, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Mar 11th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It is something that I mentioned last legislative cycle came in and did similar testimony, and during
  • Uh, it will shorten my testimony.
  • Thank you so much, and I appreciate your testimony. Thank you. Anything else?
  • Bowers, thank you, Chairman Smithy, and thank you, um, for your testimony from NAMI.
  • I appreciate you coming with your testimony and, uh, I'll ask if there are any questions. Ms.
Bills: HB268, HB305, HB307
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Child care program integrity discussed 3/3/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • . testimony. testimony.
  • your testimony. your testimony.
  • So I again I'm saying don't testimony.
  • Uh, if you could introduce yourself and proceed with your testimony. >> Thank you.
  • Thank you for your time and consideration. >> Thank you for your testimony.
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: House File 3819 was heard and ultimately re-referred to the Judiciary Committee after the committee adopted the author’s A1 amendment and then defeated a DE1 amendment. The bill, as described by Chair West, is aimed at strengthening integrity in state child care assistance and other public programs by requiring annual disaggregated fraud reporting, making certain inspections unannounced and in person, tying inspectors to electronic attendance records, extending data retention for video footage from 28 to 90 days, requiring cameras at entrances and exits for centers receiving more than $500,000 in CCAP and/or early learning scholarship funds, adding an extra licensing visit for those higher-funded centers, and restoring perjury penalties for false attendance records. West said the changes were intended to address fraud, improve accountability, and protect assistance for families who need it. Public testimony was largely opposed. Child care providers and advocates argued the bill would impose expensive, unfunded surveillance and compliance burdens on small businesses, blur the line between fraud enforcement and licensing/safety regulation, and disproportionately target providers serving low-income families and families of color. Several testifiers said cameras and retention requirements would be costly, technically burdensome, and invasive, and warned the bill could deter providers from participating in CCAP and discourage families from using assistance. One testifier supported stronger child protection measures in principle but said the bill should focus on funding, training, and wages rather than surveillance. Another parent testifier opposed the bill on privacy and discrimination grounds and urged investment in child care instead. Representative Hansen offered the DE1 amendment, which would have created a task force to study child care surveillance and develop recommendations on safeguards such as encryption and breach notification. Hansen argued the committee was not equipped to design cybersecurity policy on its own and that the issue of child sexual abuse material required urgent, bipartisan attention. Chair West opposed the amendment, saying task forces often do not produce meaningful change and that the bill already addressed the issue. The committee voted on the DE1, and it failed on a tied vote. After that, the committee voted to re-refer House File 3819, as amended, to the Judiciary Committee.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/28/2026 - Senate Health and Human Services

Health and Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you, and our final testimony, please. And our final testimony.
  • And thank you for that testimony from our health care.
  • Arnold, is it true that he has actually come out and said very publicly and in testimony...
  • And I think you heard that testimony today. I know there was some blight at the state hospital.
  • I heard your testimony, Senator Gowan, and I just would like to maybe have you restate it.
Summary: The Health and Human Services Committee approved the January 21 minutes and then heard a series of bills focused on developmental disabilities oversight, behavioral health fraud, AHCCCS operations, child safety, and state hospital capacity. SB 1179 would make the Developmental Disabilities Group Home Monitoring Program permanent and remove the appropriations contingency; Disability Rights Arizona and program managers testified that Commit had identified systemic care problems, while the sponsor said the work should continue. The bill received a 6-1 do-pass recommendation. SB 1114 would appropriate $1 million to the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office for behavioral health patient brokering investigations; Native advocates described widespread recruitment and exploitation of vulnerable people, especially Native Americans, and the bill passed 8-0. SB 1115 would prohibit AHCCCS from allowing remote work for Access employees; the sponsor argued in-person oversight was needed, while AHCCCS warned of space and staffing problems. It passed 4-3. SB 1051 would require hospitals to collect and report patients’ citizenship or immigration status for cost accounting; supporters called it a data-collection measure, while nurses and physicians said it would create fear and deter care. It passed 4-3. SB 1122, as amended, would replace prior authorization with 100% prepayment review for certain behavioral health services under the American Indian Health Plan, and passed 7-0 after AHCCCS said it had worked on the amendment. SB 1132, to appropriate unspecified funds for a new Arizona State Hospital wing, drew testimony from families and advocates describing severe shortages of state hospital beds and the need for more long-term treatment capacity; it passed 7-0. SB 1169, to fund graduate medical education and a new residency program, passed 6-0. SB 1171, requiring AHCCCS to check for dual enrollment in exchange plans and AHCCCS, passed 4-2-1 after AHCCCS said implementation would require system changes and costs. SB 1172, requiring more experienced DCS investigators for repeated abuse/neglect reports and court notification of hotline calls in dependency cases, passed 7-0. SB 1173, requiring behavioral health facility applicants, owners, and licensees to be U.S. citizens or lawfully present permanent residents with fingerprint clearance cards, passed 4-3 after an amendment clarifying the lawful-presence requirement.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Bill would require landlords to notify tenants of nearby water hazards, HF1566 3/18/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for your testimony, and next we have Isaac Rubo.
  • Thank you for your testimony, and next we have Isaac Rubo.
  • <00:13:54.279> next time thank you for your testimony next time thank you for your testimony
  • Thank you so much for your testimony. Thank you very much. Thank you so much for your testimony.
  • Thank you so much for your testimony.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/10/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • Her, if you would please hit your full name for the record and commence testimony when you’re ready.
  • name for the record and commen testimony name for the record and commen testimony when<00:05:00.160
  • Thank you very much for your testimony, Mr. Carbo.
  • the record and commit your testimony the record and commit your testimony when<00:14:37.279>
  • We will hear a lot of bills, but testimony and presentations will be brief.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative, thank you for the testimony.
  • As we've heard from our own testimony and from other testimony you've heard today, the process now of
  • The first story is how to give testimony.
  • The first story is how to give testimony.
  • We've heard a lot of testimony today asking... ...sections 38 and 39 that we've heard a lot of testimony
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The hearing focused broadly on solar policy and several related bills, especially S. 2269, S. 2270, H. 3520, H. 3521, and related measures on distributed energy resources, municipal solar caps, permitting reform, and tax credits. Testimony from the Air Force supported S. 2232, which would exempt federal military installations from renewable energy production caps and net metering limits to support energy resilience at bases like Hanscom. Most other witnesses argued that Massachusetts needs to speed up rooftop, municipal, and community solar deployment to address high electricity prices, federal tax credit rollbacks, grid reliability, and climate goals. A major theme was streamlining permitting through automated or “smart” solar permitting, including a statewide platform managed by DOER. Permit Power, SEIA, Vote Solar, 350 Mass, and others said current local permitting is fragmented and costly, and that instant permitting could reduce soft costs and speed installations. Several witnesses also urged changes to interconnection rules, including flexible interconnection, remote inspections, and faster utility approval timelines. Some speakers raised concerns about small towns lacking staff to meet short deadlines and suggested a state-hosted platform to reduce the burden on municipalities. Another major topic was lifting caps on solar deployment. Municipal officials from Lexington and Cambridge said the 10-megawatt municipal cap and regional caps are blocking shovel-ready projects and should be removed, including for behind-the-meter municipal solar and MBTA-community housing. Other witnesses described additional limits on project size, net metering, and residential tax credits, and called for making the state residential solar credit refundable and larger. Several speakers also supported virtual power plants, distributed energy resource targets, solar canopies, microgrids, and expanded access for affordable housing, tenants, and low- and moderate-income customers. No votes were taken. Committee members asked questions about permitting timelines, grid modernization, the rationale for caps, balcony solar, and interconnection delays, and witnesses said they would follow up with additional information where needed. The hearing ended with broad support from industry, municipal, environmental, and advocacy groups for advancing the solar and distributed energy bills, while some witnesses opposed provisions they viewed as overly restrictive, such as mandatory SMART participation for all solar projects.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 03/05/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • with your testimony. with your testimony.
  • Um, 41 we've heard other testimony.
  • If you could introduce yourself for the record and proceed with your testimony.
  • Senator Rest, thank you for bringing this bill and for the excellent testimony.
  • Rice's testimony about perhaps why the pass-through entity tax is so needed.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • Testimony and support will be 30 minutes, testimony in opposition will be 30 minutes, and testimony in
  • With that, we will go ahead and open it up for testimony.
  • So please proceed with your testimony, please. Thank you so much, Chairman.
  • Thank you so much, and that concludes our opposition testimony.
  • Opposition testimony has closed. We are in neutral. Next caller, please.
Bills: AB275, SB371, SB457
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

April 8, 2025 - 03:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • Do we have any public testimony? We have no public testimony. We're in debate.
  • That's all our public testimony, members, and debate.
  • We have one public testimony appearance record.
  • We have one public testimony card: Chris Lyon, North St.
  • We're moving into public testimony.
Summary: The Ways and Means Committee met on April 8, 2025, and first took up several local bills that were presented briefly and then approved without public opposition. HB 4035 would merge the Fort Myers Beach Mosquito Control District and the Lee County Mosquito Control District, contingent on approval by voters in both districts at the 2026 election; it passed 15-0. HB 307 would extend to county property appraisers the same authority tax collectors already have to use salary savings for employee bonuses or incentives, and it passed 17-0 after testimony from property appraisers and their associations in support. HB 4047 and HB 4049 would adjust assessment caps for the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District and the North St. Lucie River Water Control District, respectively, with inflation indexing, annual increase limits, and referendum approval requirements; both passed unanimously. The committee also adopted an amendment to the committee substitute for HB 1169, a broader water management district bill covering quorum and meeting rules, lobbying restrictions, ad valorem taxing authority for certain capital projects by referendum, budget reporting, bidding preferences, and additional oversight and funding information; the amended bill passed 16-0 and was reported favorably with committee substitute. The final and most heavily debated item was HB 4079, which would dissolve the Town of White Springs and return it to unincorporated Hamilton County. The sponsor argued the town had a pattern of mismanagement, including financial problems, audit findings, canceled elections, and public safety concerns, and said dissolution would lower taxes and preserve services through the county. Committee members asked about the town’s finances, audits, law enforcement, fire protection, debt, and whether the county could absorb services and liabilities. Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters of dissolution cited audit findings, alleged illegal gambling operations, double taxation for law enforcement, high administrative costs, and intimidation at meetings. Opponents, including current and former town officials and residents, said the town had made progress, had corrected audit issues, maintained reserves, and was working to restore services and governance; they asked for more time and pointed to an upcoming election. No vote was taken on HB 4079 in the portion provided.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • There will be testimony that it is an enforceable agreement by the PUC.
  • There are two individuals who wish to provide public testimony.
  • Clearly, there are two individuals wishing to provide public testimony. ...testimony.
  • There's no testimony from them today. Interesting.
  • We did open public testimony and close.