Video & Transcript Research : 'liability limits'

Page 131 of 500
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • For the teachers, it says the limit of the agreement is $500 per teacher.
  • It does limit... Today, which is about $1.314 million.
  • Many also have limited credit history.
  • We are concerned about what this moratorium could do to limit that access.
  • Limiting what those facilities do in my community because there was not a hospital close by.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (04/09/2025)

Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, next up is limited to three minutes.
  • What situation uh does it liabilities?
  • , has requirements around what is the time limit on prior authorization limits that... there would change
  • ,<03:58:56.640> uh, pri authorization time limits, uh, pri authorization time limits, uh,
  • <03:59:04.720> on, around what is the time limit on, around what is the time limit on, um,
Keywords: 1189, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • In order to facilitate the goal of the hearing as much as possible for the public within the limits of
  • Surveillance is no longer limited to cameras.
  • It limits the types of items that can be purchased.
  • , and it establishes a 15-item limit for self-checkout transactions.
  • This legislation does not provide any limits on the range of the pay scale.
Summary: The Assembly Labor and Employment Committee heard several bills focused on worker rights, workplace technology, pay equity, and retail/self-checkout standards. SB 703 would require ports to collect and report information on trucking companies to help identify worker misclassification in the port trucking industry; supporters, including Teamsters and the California Labor Federation, said better data is needed for enforcement, while trucking and retail groups said they were working with the author and expected to remove opposition after amendments. The bill passed 5-0 and was re-referred to Transportation. The committee also approved a consent calendar of other measures. SB 294, the Workplace Know Your Rights Act, would require the Labor Commissioner to create a template for annual employer notices about workers’ labor and civil rights, including emergency contact notification if a worker is detained or arrested. Supporters said the bill would help workers understand their rights amid federal rollbacks and weak enforcement; the California Restaurant Association opposed it. SB 7 would require notice and human review before employers use automated decision-making systems for discipline or termination, and would bar predictive use of such systems for employment actions. Labor groups supported the bill as a safeguard against biased or opaque algorithmic management, while HR, chamber, retail, and local government groups raised concerns about breadth, notice burdens, and small-business impacts. Both bills passed 5-0 to their next committees. The committee also advanced SB 238, which would require disclosure about workplace surveillance and AI monitoring tools, and SB 442, which sets staffing and operational standards for self-checkout, including at least one staffed lane, one employee dedicated to monitoring self-checkout, item restrictions, and a 15-item limit sign. Supporters argued both bills improve transparency, safety, and worker protections; opponents warned SB 238 could expose security practices and SB 442 could raise costs and create preemption issues. SB 464 would expand state pay-data reporting to better capture public-sector workforce demographics in line with reparations and pay-equity goals, and SB 642 would strengthen the Equal Pay Act by extending recovery periods, clarifying wage definitions, and updating pay-scale language. SB 464 and SB 642 also passed, with some opposition from county and business groups over scope and retroactivity. All measures taken up in the hearing were approved by committee, generally on 5-0 votes, and re-referred to the appropriate policy or fiscal committees.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

Senate - Judiciary Mar 1st, 2025

Senate Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think limiting the...
  • So this is putting a limit.
  • To limit their liability and wanting, but the truth is, if you have a priceless piece of art that you
  • Yes, and they can make contracts to limit their liability. We don't need to have this at all.
  • Chair, I just think this was drafted so that the limit they're referring to in line 10 is the limit in
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Rules Apr 16th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • >> Senator Martin: WOULD YOU BE WILLING TO LIMIT YOUR AMENDMENT TO ANYTHING OVER 400 FEET AS OPPOSED
  • NONCOMPETE IMPOSING LIMITS ON EMPLOYEES POSTEMPLOYMENT ACTIVITIES AND AT GARDEN WHICH IMPOSES THIS ON
  • THEY HAVE LIMITED SCOPE ON SOME OF THEIR ACCOUNTS NOW FOR THAT.
  • I'M GOING TO TRY TO LIMIT EVERYBODY'S TESTIMONY TO ABOUT A MINUTE AND A HALF IF YOU WOULD BECAUSE WE
  • SINCE THOSE RIGHTS ARE LIMITED TO WHATEVER THE PARENT AND PARENTAL CONSENT WILL ALLOW, IS THAT NOW MY
Keywords: 999, senate, all
VT

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Caucus of the Whole - Act 73 Overview - 2026-01-16 - 12:00PM

Vermont House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it's just outright reducing the liability.
  • So it's just outright reducing the liability.
  • It allows for limited supplemental district spending, as John spoke to.
  • It allows<00:30:05.919> for<00:30:06.159> limited<00:30:06.559> supplemental<00:
  • 30:07.120> district allows for limited supplemental district allows for limited supplemental district
Keywords: 926, house, all
Summary: The meeting was a high-level walkthrough of Act 73, with staff from Legislative Council and the Joint Fiscal Office summarizing major education policy, governance, tax, and fiscal changes. The presentation covered class-size minimums and related enforcement, creation of a state aid for school construction program, narrowed tuition eligibility for approved independent schools, changes to State Board of Education appointments, special education reporting and staffing, and a new report on standards for schools deemed small or sparse by necessity. It also noted that some provisions take effect immediately or in 2025, while the major funding and tax changes are contingent on new school districts being operational and a foundation formula report being received, with most of those changes targeted for July 1, 2028. The central fiscal change described was a move from the current locally voted budget and varying homestead tax system to a foundation formula. Under that model, districts would receive an educational opportunity payment based on a base amount per pupil, adjusted by student weights for factors such as pre-K, economic disadvantage, English learner status, and special education, with small-school and sparsity weights replaced by support grants. Districts could still seek limited supplemental district spending above the foundation amount, subject to a cap and a uniform method for raising the funds, with excess collections recaptured at the state level. The presenters also described transition mechanisms to phase in the new system over several years. The tax section explained that Act 73 would replace the current property tax credit with a homestead exemption and create a new non-homestead residential classification intended for second homes and short-term rentals, though further statutory or regulatory work would still be needed to implement it. The JFO presentation emphasized that the act also creates regional assessment districts for reappraisals and includes a transition to smooth changes in education tax rates. No committee vote or formal action was taken during the presentation; it was informational only.
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

Senate Session (01/07/2026)

New Hampshire Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:42:39.440> for<00:42:39.680> state discouraged or limited for state discouraged
  • So, in regards to immunity, it's both immunity to civil and criminal liability.
  • So, in regards to immunity, it's both immunity to civil and criminal liability.
  • Uh any any and criminal liability.
  • So for that and criminal liability.
Keywords: 1191, senate, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

November 4, 2025 - 01:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • Energy requirements taking into account the need for fuel diversity and liability.
  • I understand there's just a very limited number of lines into the state of Florida, which I would think
  • in the state for natural gas and this just organization to SCG called Frcc, which is electric a liability
  • And the only limiting factor there is getting the pipelines out of that region to other areas.
  • I know there's a >> 75, you know, megawatt of >> limitation where if you're over that even if you're
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Edpol Committee Meeting - 2025-03-19

Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Current statute limits ABE program approval to only up to five years.
  • So elaborating on the term instead of just limiting it to parents, replacing that with "individuals with
  • of Chapter 120B applies to charter schools and requires that charters comply with the screen time limits
  • This section is not meant to be limited to oral language development.
  • It's much more than just civil liability or confidentiality, but we can talk offline about... ...that
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA-EDU, EDU Public Hearings 02-18-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:23:01.520> And<00:23:01.760> so Turning into a liability, right?
  • <00:48:22.640> English about 30% of them were limited English about 30% of them were limited
  • licenses subject to certain limitations. licenses subject to certain limitations.
  • Um and then we also do have liability.
  • and supervision is often simply limited. and supervision is often simply limited.
Bills: SB2003
Summary: The joint committees on Water, Land, Culture, and the Arts and Education heard testimony and discussed SB 20003, which would require the auditor’s report under Act 255 to include a recommendation on whether the Monarch Stewardship and Oversight Authority is fit to continue managing Monaca lands. Testimony focused on the bill’s reversion language, the role of the auditor, and whether the measure gave the auditor too much discretion without clear criteria. The Office of the Auditor’s position, read into the record, was that it had strong reservations because the bill did not provide standards for assessing fitness and asked that the requirement be held or amended. Other testimony suggested a work group with relevant agencies and Hawaiian practitioners to manage the transition and reduce conflict. Committee members debated whether the bill should simply restore the original reversion language or also require an audit-based fitness determination. Several members questioned the need for a 2031 audit when Act 255 already provides for a performance and financial audit in 2031 and noted that the bill could shift authority away from the legislature. In response, the committee chair explained that the measure was intended to restore language removed during conference and to address the transition back to the University of Hawaii if the authority was not meeting the act’s purpose. The committees ultimately recommended SB 20003 be passed with amendments. The amendments would strike the auditor/audit section, add language addressing timelines by providing a 10-year lease extension and sublease extension, and make technical changes including a defective date. The committees voted to adopt the amended measure and send it forward as an SD1. The transcript also included a separate Education Committee hearing on SB 3286, which would require the University of Hawaii to develop a facilities and student housing master plan and report to the legislature. University of Hawaii testimony said the system supports the intent but that the bill’s requirements are a heavy lift across 10 campuses and should follow development of a broader academic strategy. Members raised concerns about deferred maintenance, shifting priorities, and the lack of a systemwide plan, while the university said it already has a six-year capital improvement plan but acknowledged it does not fully incorporate the broader academic and housing strategy the bill contemplates.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Further, for many claims, the statute of limitations... for breach of contract and property damage in
  • You have multiple different types of lines, like liability. insurance that's now covered by this, and
  • There is a limit to the amount of renewables. ...this, except right now.
  • I don't think you need to limit renewables. At all. The economics of it will take care of itself.
  • Cancellations, and limited data regarding non-renewals. So we can see what companies are doing.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Finance Division III (02/21/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have a price limitation and then a budget limitation, and in all periods we've been able to stay within
  • We have a price limitation and then a budget limitation, and in all periods we've been able to stay within
  • We have a price limitation and then a budget limitation, and in all periods we've been able to stay within
  • Strengthening third-party liabilities, coordination of benefits, and third-party liability—strengthening
  • <03:39:20.640> we're<03:39:20.800> at poverty limit we're at poverty limit we're at
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The House Finance Division Three work session on February 21, 2025 focused on the Division of Medicaid Services budget. The chair opened with procedural guidance, noting the division’s role is to make recommendations to the full Finance Committee, that the budget must be balanced, and that members should track possible amendments ahead of a March 26 target for House Bills 1 and 2. Members also discussed the importance of using official budget documents and online resources, and the chair said no motions would be taken at this session. A major early topic was concern over a five-point Medicaid policy document and the timing of House Bill 2. Representative Tarki objected that the document appeared to be an unofficial draft and argued that significant Medicaid policy changes should have been transmitted by February 15 under state law. He said the lack of an official, posted document raised transparency concerns because the changes could affect tens of thousands of residents. Committee leadership responded that the five-point document was a working document, that it would be posted online within minutes, and that House Bill 2 is often delayed while the Office of Legislative Services finalizes and formats the governor’s proposed trailer bill. DHHS Chief Financial Officer Nathan White and Medicaid Director Henry Litman then began the budget presentation. White said the committee would use the PowerPoint as the document of record, starting with the governor’s operating budget pages 885-893, and noted that Medicaid is the largest accounting area in the state budget. He said the governor’s budget reflects about $60 million in reductions within the Medicaid area, with Granite Advantage handled off-budget and another $10 million in reductions there, for roughly a $70 million difference overall. Members asked whether the comparison was being made against an efficiency budget or a prioritized-needs budget, and White said the department could look at it different ways. The presentation then outlined Medicaid’s role in New Hampshire: it provides health coverage, serves as the state’s direct interface with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, and helps finance related services such as long-term supports, school-based services, adult dental coverage, and re-entry programs for people leaving correctional settings. White also reviewed enrollment and program context, saying New Hampshire has about one in seven residents enrolled in Medicaid, making it the fourth smallest Medicaid program in the country by enrollment, and described recent efforts such as youth re-entry and the Medicaid unwind after the end of the federal continuous coverage period. He said the state had to process more than 238,000 redeterminations after the public health emergency and that the department tried to avoid unnecessary coverage loss during that transition.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

ECD Public Hearing - Wed Mar 12, 2025 @ 10:00 AM HST

Economic Development & Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • <01:07:53.799> to industry including but not limited to industry including but not limited
  • <01:24:40.760> for was on the statute of limitations for was on the statute of limitations
  • :25:13.800> limitations<01:25:14.400> specifically that statute of limitations specifically
  • <01:26:17.840> on think there should be a limit on think there should be a limit on taxpayers
  • this threeyear statute of a limitation this threeyear statute of a limitation does<01:28:41.920>
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The committee on Economic Development and Technology met on March 12, 2025, and heard testimony on several measures. On SB 9, the Hawaii Food Industry Association, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Hawaii Technology Development Corporation testified in support, and there were no questions or objections. On SB 148, the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs offered comments, and a member of the public testified in support of combining boxing and MMA oversight into a single combat sports commission, with amendments to preserve safety standards and separate or distinct treatment for the two sports. Committee discussion focused on whether proposed requirements were primarily safety-related or cost-related, how to handle smaller events, and whether a one-year implementation delay was necessary; the department said many safety provisions already exist in the MMA program, that it was open to continued discussion on costs, and that it needed time to combine rules and appoint new commissioners. The chair suggested possible amendments to account for event size and to reduce burdens on smaller events. The committee then heard SB 816, which drew extensive testimony on providing legal representation for immigrants in immigration proceedings. Supporters included the Hawaii State LGBTQ+ Commission, ACU Hawaii, the Refugee and Immigration Law Clinic, the Legal Clinic, Hawaii Friends of Civil Rights, the Hawaiʻi Coalition for Immigrant Rights, Pride at Work Hawaii, and others. Supporters argued that immigration cases can be as serious as criminal cases, that counsel is essential for due process, and that representation improves outcomes; several also emphasized the economic importance of immigrants to Hawaii. One supporter noted a suggested amendment to include training for attorneys and partners doing deportation defense and asylum work. Opposition came from a Navy veteran who argued the bill would use state resources for a federal issue, create inequities, and impose fiscal burdens. The chair noted 69 testimonies in support and 44 in opposition, and later an additional supporter brought the total to 70 in support. No vote was taken in the portion of the meeting provided. The committee also heard SB 125, with the Department of Economic Development, the Agreed Business Development Corporation, and the Hawaii Food Industry Association in support, and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii offering technical comments about complicated nested definitions in the bill. Testimony on SB 125 focused on updating the Enterprise Zone Program so local manufacturers selling directly to retail could qualify, along with value-added products and certain health-related sectors. Finally, on SB 732, the State of Hawaii Creative Industries testified with comments, raising concerns about county permit-fee waivers, implementation timing, and the bill’s lack of a carry-forward provision for the film tax credit. The witness said uncertainty in the credit was already causing productions to delay coming to Hawaii and urged stability to support the industry and local workers. The committee then moved on to additional testimony on the measure.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • Is the law so specific that it's limited to liquor stores and grocery stores?
  • Jesse Wadams, for the record, at this point this is a pretty limited exception.
  • But the answer is it is intended to be limited to this situation, but not this product.
  • And is there a limit on what they can do?
  • I mean, like, is there a limit? Because I'm thinking a trailer is what I'm thinking.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 19th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, this is actually limited to the specific areas. are incorporated by the city or has been annexed
  • seem to do at least is to define what a maximum exposure is for a, or where the start, where the limits
  • I do you understand it to be in this bill that there's some type of a like a financial limit. mean a
  • That the adoption of this bill would actually save, or could save, operators from loss. liability.
  • Members, this is the bill we heard previously that dealt with the limitations on the issuance of bonds
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

March 27, 2025 - 09:00 AM

Transcript Highlights:
  • But on line 101, it says including but not limited to.
  • And it's saying, but it's not limited to those.
  • with low limits and catastrophic damages.
  • company to an excess verdict well and above the low limits.
  • So I understand putting time limits on insurance companies, but not policyholders.
Summary: The committee met with a quorum and heard several insurance- and trust-related bills. CS/HB 265, relating to post-judgment execution proceedings involving terrorism, was presented as a measure to help victims enforce long-standing judgments against terrorist assets; it received no opposition in testimony and was reported favorably. CS/HB 1173, concerning the Florida Trust Code, clarified that the Florida Attorney General is the only public official with standing to enforce charitable trusts administered in Florida; members discussed that it was intended to resolve ambiguity identified by a court decision, and it also passed favorably. The committee then took up PCS/HB 643 on residual market insurers. The bill would remove the “diligent effort” requirement for surplus lines placements, revise surplus lines eligibility, and let Citizens policyholders elect arbitration through DOAH or the courts at renewal or issuance. The sponsor argued the changes would reduce red tape and give consumers more options, while an opponent from the Florida Justice Association warned that removing diligent-search protections could push more policyholders into higher-cost, less-regulated surplus lines coverage and that arbitration could favor insurers. Committee members raised concerns about the lack of premium credits for arbitration, the effect on Citizens, and the loss of consumer protections, but the bill was reported favorably. Finally, PCS/HB 1047 on insurance regulation generated extensive debate. The bill would reduce pre-licensure hours for general lines agents from 200 to 60, clarify restrictions on public adjuster conduct, require claims-handling manuals only for active residential property insurers, and define “sufficient evidence” for bad-faith claims with examples and a 10-day objection/response process. Supporters said it would streamline claims handling and clarify timelines; opponents and several members argued it could burden policyholders, especially after disasters, and might make it easier for insurers to delay or deny claims. There was also concern about the reduced training hours for new agents and the lack of detail on what constitutes sufficient evidence or a specific objection. After a divided debate, the bill was reported favorably by a 12-6 vote. The meeting then adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Legislation reducing the property tax burden on Texans and legislation imposing spending limits on entities
  • Legislation to comprehensively regulate hemp-derived products, including limiting potency, restricting
  • the 89th Legislature, regular session, that protects victims of human trafficking from criminal liability
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Judiciary (02/05/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:53:53.480> women's side effect of further limiting women's side effect of further limiting
  • I'm going to have to limit follow-ups at this point and limit you to one opportunity to ask a question
  • means ask it I'm going to have to limit means ask it I'm going to have to limit follow-ups<01:02
  • follow-ups at this point and uh limit follow-ups at this point and uh limit you<01:02:39.160>
  • <01:52:25.119> against<01:52:25.400> the criminal liability against the criminal liability
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The committee heard testimony on House Bill 232, which would protect health care workers’ conscience rights in connection with certain procedures, especially abortion and sterilization, and also referenced contraception. The prime sponsor, Rep. Mark Pearson, said the bill is meant to prevent medical professionals from being forced to participate in procedures that violate their beliefs, while still prohibiting discrimination against patients based on protected characteristics. He said the measure was intended to help retain health care workers in New Hampshire and noted he had added an amendment to address concerns about people taking jobs only to later refuse duties, as well as emergency situations where a provider is the only one available. Committee members raised concerns about how broadly the bill and amendment were written. Questions focused on whether the protections could apply to non-physician staff such as schedulers, receptionists, or pharmacy employees; whether a provider could refuse to schedule, refer, or otherwise assist with services; and how “emergency” would be determined in practice. Several members also questioned whether the bill could affect access to contraception, including pharmacy sales and procedures such as tubal ligation, and whether the language was clear enough to prevent confusion or unintended refusals of care. Pearson said the bill was not intended to allow refusal of emergency care or general patient discrimination, and he acknowledged some language could be tweaked. Rep. Paige Boerman, a maternal-child health nurse, testified in opposition, saying she had seen pharmacists question prescriptions related to miscarriage care and that the bill could create barriers to contraception and other reproductive health services. She warned that the lack of a disclosure requirement and the broad definitions could create risks, especially in rural areas with limited providers. She also pointed to problems she said had occurred in other states, arguing the bill could lead to delayed care in emergencies. The hearing ended after questions and discussion; no vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.