Video & Transcript Research : 'preferential voting'

Page 12 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Health Mar 17th, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh, you most of you guys voted for it unanimously out of public health and it was voted off the house
  • That's 141 members voting.
  • I voted for this bill last session, so I haven't heard anybody come to our office to be against the bill
  • And with that, members, I respect favorable consideration of HB 499 and reserve the right to vote.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Taxes Committee 3/26/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Hope we'll be able to meet them in the future. vote motion that house file 1479 be laid vote motion that
  • neutral this may be my Rochester vote neutral this may be my Rochester vote for<00:26:47.360>
  • Seeing none, Chair Davids called for a vote, and the A1 amendment was adopted.
  • classification rate, like a really very preferential classification rate, um, and so what this bill
  • they they are they get a preferential they they are they get a preferential classification<01:23
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Taxes - 01/15/25

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • of this report it provides preferential of this report it provides preferential treatment<00:15:
  • There's a ninth voting member, which is the Commissioner of the Department of Revenue.
  • Duties related to the... chamber there's a ninth voting member chamber there's a ninth voting member
  • And one preferential computation, which was the open space property program.
  • interest deduction and one preferential interest deduction and one preferential computation<00:58
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture, and Rural Development May 12th, 2026

Agriculture, Forestry, Aquaculture, and Rural Development

TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs May 12th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They enable preferential treatment for individuals on any number of factors that preclude or supersede
  • I urge you all to vote against SB 689. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony.
  • Or give preferential consideration to any person based on the provision of a diversity, equity and inclusion
  • The local voters can vote them out if they do not like these policies or procedures.
  • And your, all the bills we'll be voting out are in Dropbox. Members, that concludes today's agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs May 12th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They enable preferential treatment for individuals on any number of factors that preclude or supersede
  • I urge you all to vote against SB 689. Thank you. Thank you for your testimony.
  • induce, or solicit any person to provide a diversity, equity, and inclusion statement, or give preferential
  • The local voters can vote them out if they do not like these policies or oppose them.
  • All the bills we'll be voting out are in Dropbox. Members, that concludes today's agenda.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Not voting. Tung Pham not voting. Thank you. Voting. That measure has four ayes.
  • out of 58 counties voting for voting against Proposition 16.
  • Burner, not voting. Jeff Gonzalez? No. Jackson, no. Muratsuchi? Not voting. Patel? Not voting.
  • Not voting. Sharp-Collins? Not voting. Tangipa? Aye. Sharp-Collins, not voting. Tangipa, aye.
  • Not voting. Tangipa? Not voting. Jackson? Aye. That measure has eight ayes and two not voting.
Summary: The committee hearing covered several higher education bills, with extensive testimony on student aid, affordability, and institutional debt. AB 587 would add veteran representation to the California Student Aid Commission; the author said the change would bring lived experience from the veteran community to student aid policy, and members raised a concern about keeping the commission’s membership odd-numbered, which the author said would be addressed by amendment. AB 791 would standardize cost-of-attendance housing calculations using objective data and improve notice of the adjustment process; supporters said current budgets often underestimate students’ real living costs, while UC, CSU, and independent colleges opposed or had concerns about the bill’s prescribed methodology, fiscal impact, and a 14-day turnaround for adjustments. AB 850 would create a one-term grace period for students with institutional debt to re-enroll while arranging repayment, bar reporting that debt to credit agencies, and require more transparency; proponents described students being blocked from continuing school over debts, while CSU, UC, and private-college representatives said they already use holds and payment plans and worried about added liabilities and budget pressures. AB 537 would extend the California College Promise Program to part-time community college students; supporters said most community college students attend part-time and should not be excluded from fee waivers, while the committee noted fiscal concerns but ultimately advanced the bill. AB 7 would allow universities to consider whether an applicant is a descendant of American chattel slavery in admissions as a reparative measure; supporters framed it as lineage-based reparative justice, while opponents argued it would function as a racial proxy and conflict with Proposition 209 and equal-protection principles. The committee took roll-call votes on the measures, advancing AB 587, AB 791, AB 850, and AB 537 to Appropriations, with AB 850 and AB 537 receiving fewer votes and the roll left open for additional members.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House repasses omnibus housing finance bill, SF2298 5/18/25

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • points given up to 5% and preferential points given up to 5% and this<00:03:34.640> program<00
  • It's a big deal, and I look forward to voting green on this bill. Thank you, Madam Chair.
  • Just a few more comments before we vote yes on this bill.
  • Of course, vote yes on this bill that will do some good, but it's not good enough.
  • So, I hope today we can see a good vote in the right direction with this bill.
Keywords: 1183, house
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 17th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Seeing no debate, vote will now occur. Finish what I post. Measure vote.
  • I ask for your yes vote today. That concludes debate. Vote will now occur.
  • If you fate measure vote, pose a measure vote. Nay clerk will call roll.
  • And I would ask for a yes vote that concludes debate. Vote without a curfew.
  • The vote will now occur. Very measure vote. I pose measure vote in a clerk will call the roll.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part IV) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Back in 2021, I spoke for 15 hours and seven minutes without food or water to defend voting rights.
  • Members, the vote is now on final passage. The secretary will call the roll. Alvarado. Bettencourt.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are located in areas that have any polarized voting, racially polarized voting.
  • But I understand, refineries don't vote. Hospitals don't vote. Other buildings don't vote.
  • Workers there and their families vote. The people who have jobs there vote.
  • Voting blocks. What voting blocks do we have here in the state of Texas? I'm sorry, voting blocks.
  • Again, airports don't vote; people do vote.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I drew maps based on historic voting of Republican and Democrat. voting patterns.
  • Hispanic vote and Black voting power? I haven't seen any data suggesting that. No?
  • I asked you then if you would have voted for a map that violated the Voting Rights Act.
  • the Voting Rights Act?
  • That's why you voted for those maps. Yes or no? I, at the time, voted.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • All, then voting must matter for all people.
  • Vote in spite of, vote because of this.
  • racially drawn, and within the Voting Rights Act.
  • Law in 1965 in connection with the Voting Rights Act.
  • The one-vote concept and the Voting Rights Act changed that and ushered in an era where we started to
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • The chair is recommending an aye vote. My apologies.
  • Members, this will be a vote item.
  • floor, and I respectfully ask for an aye vote.
  • The chair is recommending an aye vote.
  • Chair, we're going to be voting on these? Yes. Yes.
Summary: The Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee held a final hearing on a series of Senate bills, with the chair explaining the committee’s suspense-file process and then taking up measures in regular order and later from suspense. SB 1329 on solar property tax assessment drew the most extensive testimony: the author and industry supporters said it would create statewide assessment standards, exclude intangibles, and provide certainty for solar development, while county assessors and county representatives opposed it as a statutory formula that would undercut fair market value and reduce local revenue. The bill was sent to suspense during the first portion of the hearing and later passed suspense 5-2 after amendments. SB 661, dealing with airport funding and aviation fuel tax revenues, also generated support from airport and local government representatives but opposition from airlines over the proposed distribution formula; it was referred to suspense and later passed 7-0 with amendments. SB 1172, which places guardrails on tax-sharing agreements, was supported by local governments and retailers; after the author accepted committee amendments, opposition was withdrawn and the bill passed 4-2 to the floor. SB 9-1-1, a wildfire safety measure using the Preliminary Change of Ownership Report to notify fire agencies about defensible-space compliance, was supported by fire chiefs and wildfire-safety advocates but opposed by assessors; it passed 5-2 to Appropriations. SB 1408, authorizing Contra Costa County to place a transportation sales tax on the ballot, passed 4-2 to the floor. SB 1072, the housing omnibus bill, passed 7-0, and SB 1424, expanding a sales tax exemption for zero-emission vehicle fueling equipment, was held in committee after support from hydrogen and electric transportation advocates and no opposition. In suspense-file action, the committee also passed SB 1435, SB 288, SB 296, SB 420, SB 881, SB 888, SB 1053, SB 1406, and SB 1407, while SB 353 and SB 1249 were held. The chair closed by thanking members, staff, stakeholders, and a retiring consultant, and adjourned the committee.
FL

Florida 2026 5th Special Session

Judiciary Feb 10th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • So please vote against this bill. Support the U.S. Constitution. Vote against this bill.
  • Please vote no on this bill.
  • We ask you to vote no on 1134.
  • Please vote no. Thank you.
  • Please vote no.
Summary: The committee first considered CS/SB 1434 on infill redevelopment. A late-filed strike-all amendment narrowed eligibility to certain contaminated or brownfield properties in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties, added adjacency and density/intensity limits, and excluded agricultural land, park land, land outside the urban growth boundary, and land near military installations. The amendment was adopted without opposition, and the bill was reported favorably on an 8-0 vote, with limited support and opposition noted in waived appearance forms. Members then took up CS/CS/SB 212 on sexual offenders and sexual predators. The strike-all added public swimming pools and related child-centered locations to residency and presence restrictions. Testimony was sharply divided: proponents argued the bill would help protect children and law enforcement, while opponents, including treatment experts and homelessness advocates, said there was no empirical evidence the restrictions reduce abuse and warned of retroactive punishment and increased homelessness. The amendment was adopted, and the bill passed 8-1. The committee also approved CS/CS/SB 686 on agricultural enclaves after an amendment allowing certain enclaves adjacent to interstates to be developed for commercial, industrial, or single-family residential uses and clarifying exclusions for protected areas. Opponents argued it would weaken zoning and comprehensive plans, while supporters framed it as a property-rights measure; the bill was reported favorably 10-0. SB 554 on nonprofit corporations, a technical update to nonprofit law modeled on prior for-profit corporate revisions, also passed unanimously after supportive waived testimony. Later, the committee approved SB 1338 on charitable giving, which creates a donor remedy for endowment restrictions and limits state reporting burdens on certain regulated or exempt organizations; members discussed cy pres and the sponsor said further changes would be worked out later. CS/SB 532 on court fees was amended to let clerks retain all collections above revenue projections rather than half, with supporters saying clerks have been underfunded for years; it passed 10-0. The committee also favorably reported SB 218 on land use regulations, which restores normal land-use authority to counties not affected by recent hurricanes, and CS/SB 692 on cybersecurity standards and liability, which creates a presumption against liability for entities that comply with cybersecurity frameworks and reporting requirements; the cybersecurity bill drew concerns about retroactivity and the adequacy of compliance incentives but passed 9-2.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Feb 10th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • So please vote against this bill. Support the U.S. Constitution. Vote against this bill.
  • I urge you to vote no on SB 1106.
  • Please vote no on this bill.
  • We ask you to vote no on 1134.
  • Please vote no. Thank you.
Summary: The committee first considered SB 1434 on infill redevelopment. A late-filed strike-all amendment narrowed eligibility criteria, including environmental and adjacency requirements, density and intensity limits, and exclusions for certain lands and military areas. The amendment was adopted without opposition, and the bill then passed favorably on an 8-0 vote, with testimony both for and against from advocacy groups. Members then heard several bills related to criminal justice, land use, and local government operations. SB 212 on sexual offenders and sexual predators was amended to add public swimming pools and related restricted-location provisions; the committee heard extensive opposition testimony arguing the bill lacked empirical support and could worsen homelessness and burden families, while supporters said it would reduce temptation and improve safety. The amended bill passed 8-1. SB 686 on agricultural enclaves also received a strike-all amendment clarifying development allowances near interstates and protected-area non-preemption; after opposition from a county Republican committee and support from housing and business groups, it passed 10-0. SB 554 updating nonprofit corporation law, SB 1338 on charitable giving and endowment restrictions, SB 532 on court fee retention by clerks, and SB 218 on land use regulations after hurricanes all passed favorably, each with little or no opposition. The committee also approved SB 692 on cybersecurity standards and liability after debate over whether the bill created enough compliance incentives and whether its liability presumption should apply retroactively; supporters said it would encourage adoption of cybersecurity frameworks, while opponents warned it could weaken local standards and create litigation issues. The bill passed 9-2. SB 1138 on qualified contractors was amended to preserve local government authority while allowing licensed professionals to conduct limited pre-application reviews, and it passed 11-0. Finally, SJR 1104 on religious expression in public schools passed 8-3 after extensive public testimony and debate, with supporters saying it would enshrine existing protections in the Constitution and opponents warning it would favor majority religions and increase bullying and litigation. The committee then took up SB 1106 on requiring state agencies and instructional materials to use “Judea and Samaria” instead of “West Bank,” with the sponsor arguing it reflected historical truth and opponents saying it erased Palestinian identity and inserted the state into an international naming dispute; the transcript ends during public testimony on that bill before any vote is shown.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • So I vote aye. Thank you.
  • So I vote aye.
  • We will proceed right now with a vote. This is a voice vote.
  • I vote no. Senator Tishner, Senator Williams would like to explain my yes vote, sir.
  • I vote no. Senator Tishner, Senator Williams would like to explain my yes vote, sir.
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Senate Education Committee met with a quorum and first considered two concurrent resolutions. SCR 76, sponsored by Sen. Amanda Bledsoe, would create a Kentucky School for the Deaf Governance Task Force to examine the school’s future governance and its relationship with the Kentucky Department of Education. Bledsoe described the school’s long history and said the task force would give the small deaf-school community more voice. The committee adopted the resolution unanimously with favorable expression. The committee then took up SCR 131, sponsored by Sen. Max Wise, to continue the Efficient and Effective Districts Task Force from 2024. Wise said the prior task force met about 10 times and focused on student achievement and district policy, and the new version would continue that work as a legislature-only task force. The resolution passed unanimously with favorable expression. Members next considered HB 240 on primary school promotion. Rep. Truitt explained that the bill would require students who are not ready in kindergarten to repeat kindergarten, while a committee substitute softened the approach by allowing a school to hold a child back in kindergarten but requiring action in first grade. He said the bill aligns with existing reading-screening efforts and is intended to strengthen early literacy foundations. The committee adopted the substitute and passed the bill unanimously with favorable expression; Sen. Williams briefly explained his support as favoring performance-based advancement. The committee also approved HB 298, which would change the identification of schools for comprehensive support and improvement from every three years to annually, require KDE recommendations during management audits, add professional development in reading and math, and require effective instructional resources. The committee substitute also allowed districts with multiple CSI schools to contract for a turnaround vendor. The bill additionally carried employee-misconduct provisions from prior sessions, including disclosure requirements for applicants; the only change discussed was removing the word “investigation” from one disclosure section. HB 298 passed unanimously with favorable expression, and the committee also adopted a title amendment. Finally, the committee heard HB 424 on employment at public postsecondary institutions. Rep. Tipton said the bill would require performance and productivity reviews for faculty at least every four years, clarify appointment and removal authority for presidents at certain institutions, and expand “cause” for dismissal to include failure to meet performance and productivity requirements. Dr. Ray Horton, speaking for faculty groups, proposed a small substitute that would tie any performance measures to existing employment contracts to preserve academic integrity and avoid unintended changes to tenure processes. Members discussed how tenure works at Kentucky universities, and the committee was still in the middle of considering the proposed substitute when the transcript ended.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Higher Education - 03/24/26

Higher Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Ultimately, they also provide the vote Ultimately, they also provide the vote on<00:31:50.880>
  • > when<00:57:56.680> they preferential treatment for when they preferential treatment for
  • Do you want to discuss that, or would you like to just do the vote first?
  • or would you like to just do the vote or would you like to just do the vote first?
  • Vote green. Thank you, Senator Kupec. Any comments from Saint Cloud? Vote green.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Commerce and Economic Development Feb 13th, 2026 at 05:24 pm

House Commerce & Economic Development Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Madam Chair, final tally for the due pass motion: seven votes in favor, four votes against. Okay.
  • I'm sorry, seven votes yes, four votes no. Did I say that correctly?
  • Sorry, seven votes yes, four votes no. Did I say that correctly? All right.
  • votes against.
  • Madam Chair, final tally for the tabling motion: eight votes in favor, three votes against.
Bills: HB303, SB96, HM6
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • So the overarching policy change from OB3 is the creation of preferential tax treatment for two specific
  • Those are your overtime and your tips, and the preferential treatment varies if a taxpayer is married
  • <00:08:07.360> tax OB3 is the creation of preferential tax OB3 is the creation of preferential
  • ><00:08:14.400> tips<00:08:15.520> and<00:08:16.080> the<00:08:17.280> preferential
  • and your tips and the preferential and your tips and the preferential treatment<00:08:18.720>
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes and heard a brief member introduction before taking up an overview of major tax provisions in HR1, referred to by the presenters as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Representatives from the Kentucky Society of CPAs explained new federal deductions for tips, overtime, and car loan interest; a new tax-favored “Trump account” for children; expanded bonus depreciation and Section 179 expensing for businesses; changes to R&D expensing; and a new limit on wagering loss deductions. Members asked several clarifying questions about the duration of the provisions, W-2 and 1099 reporting changes, and how overtime deductions would work. The presenters emphasized that tips and overtime remain subject to payroll taxes and that many of the business provisions are permanent, while the individual deductions are temporary through 2028 or otherwise phased in over time. The discussion then shifted to individual and nonprofit provisions, including the increase in the state and local tax itemized deduction cap from $10,000 to $40,000 with income-based phaseouts, the temporary senior deduction, and a new deduction for car loan interest with income limits and vehicle qualifications. On charitable giving, the presenters described a permanent nonitemizer deduction, new floors for individual and corporate charitable deductions, and a new scholarship-granting organization credit that would allow donors to receive a dollar-for-dollar federal credit up to $1,700, beginning in 2027. Members focused heavily on the SGO provision, asking about state implementation, oversight, whether churches would qualify, and whether the credit could support both public and private education. The presenters said the state would need to establish the mechanism and that additional federal guidance is still pending. After the tax presentation, the committee heard from the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce on workforce issues, with a focus on child care and housing as barriers to labor force participation. Chamber representatives said they were not proposing large new government programs, but rather targeted policy recommendations for the 2026 session. They described Kentucky’s long-term decline in workforce participation since 2000, attributing much of it to demographic change, an aging population, and fewer younger workers entering the labor force. The presentation continued into a broader discussion of workforce trends and the need for practical policy responses, but no votes or formal actions were taken on these informational items.