Transcript Highlights:

• Maslowski from our Boundary Waters Care Center again this week for this bill. Welcome back, Adam.
• Maslowski from our Boundary Waters Care Center again this week for this bill. Welcome back, Adam.
• Waters Care Center again this Boundary Waters Care Center again this week<01:20:11.000> for<01
• Adam meski administrator up at Boundary Adam meski administrator up at Boundary Waters<01:20:23.120
• to Boundary Waters Care Center<01:20:32.239> my<01:20:32.400> nursing<01:20:32.760>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That is a federal commitment due to the Federal Boundary Waters Treaty Act with Canada.
• When you converted into a district, one of the things was you had to cite your boundaries.
• When you converted into a district, one of the things was you had to cite your boundaries.
• So these are the boundaries of all the rural the one. Was you had to cite your boundaries.
• So these are the boundaries of all the rural water systems out there.

Summary: The Water Topics Overview Committee met to review several interim studies and receive updates from the Department of Water Resources. The committee approved the March 26, 2026 minutes, observed a moment of silence for the late Representative Conmy, and welcomed Representative Hansen to the committee. Staff then reported that the watershed management study and the stormwater/wastewater study had both satisfied the presentation requirements in their study directives, with no further required testimony unless members wanted additional information. The department’s main presentation focused on major water projects and agency operations. Reese Haas and staff updated members on the NAWS project, the Southwest Pipeline Project, Devils Lake outlet operations, low-head dam safety work, floodplain management repository implementation, data center water use, and the 2027 Water Development Plan. Members asked detailed questions about NAWS funding sources, remaining project costs, capacity concerns for All Seasons and other users, and whether current construction is being designed for future demand. The department said NAWS remains on track for substantial completion by October, that remaining NAWS funding will come from a mix of federal, state, and local sources, and that current construction is designed for ultimate capacity while some future components will be adjusted for increased demand. A large portion of the meeting was devoted to the department’s cash management, Resources Trust Fund revenues, carryover balances, and the State Water Commission’s cost-share program. The department reported $340.6 million in carryover remaining, explained that much of it is already obligated to long-term projects, and noted that oil price forecasts and stripper-well exemptions will affect future revenues. Members raised concerns about large carryovers, affordability for local sponsors, and whether the state should continue obligating money multiple bienniums ahead. The department said it is working with the commission on a revised prioritization framework, including high/moderate/low project categories and a two-tier pre-construction/construction approach, to better manage obligations and affordability. The committee also reviewed Deloitte’s finalized studies on regional governance/finance and cost-share policy. Deloitte presented options for Southwest, NAWS, and Red River governance, with stakeholders generally favoring keeping NAWS largely as is, using the current Southwest model with improvements, and pursuing a more structured governance option for Red River. On cost share, the department said Deloitte’s recommended package would cover projected needs through the 2030s, but would require policy changes such as lower percentages for some project types, a 25% replacement-project rate with a cap, and possible bonding or delayed reimbursement strategies. No votes were taken on these policy questions, and the chair indicated the committee would continue the discussion at future basin meetings and the September Water Topics meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• The fire started on the forest side right next to the Isleta boundary and so, you know, it took 18,000
• With the fence being gone, BLM had to come in and resurvey those four miles of the boundary.
• We're getting better at understanding that fire doesn't recognize jurisdictional boundaries.
• Nature knows no boundaries. They don't care. Nature doesn't care if there's a fence in the way.
• It started on forest land right next to the boundary of Isleta.

Transcript Highlights:

• These powers allow the district to provide flood protection within its boundaries. and develop those
• In recognition of the significant water supply shortages within its boundaries and the Rio Grande Valley
• not pertinent to the nature of water rights transactions. including any notices regarding coastal boundary
• comes to groundwater and water associated with developments, I don't think that there are any. any boundaries
• Hill Country have also been shown to use far more water than their. counterparts within municipal boundaries

Bills: HB1520, HB1525, HB1530, HB1535, HB2068, HB2091, HB2347, HB2372, HB2805, HB2815, HB2867, HB3154, HB3482, HB3483, HB3663, HB3781, HB3901, HB3915, HB4135, HB4153, HB4158, HB4329, HB4331

Keywords: Angelina and Neches River Authority, river authority, Sunset Advisory Commission, Texas Sunset Act, Special District Local Laws Code, local government, natural resources, board of directors, director training, board governance, public testimony, open meetings, public information, conflict of interest, ethics, complaint system, general manager, board president, staggered terms, removal of director

Transcript Highlights:

• within Kauffman County. whole board meetings and tax rate hearings outside of their jurisdictional boundaries
• requiring all board meetings and hearings to be held inside or within a 10-mile radius of the district's boundary
• mandates that the board conduct their public meetings inside or within 10 miles of the district boundary
• And the one location we did find that was close enough that would have been within the boundary.
• definition mandates that boards conduct their public meetings inside that 10-mile radius. of the district boundary

Bills: HB279, HB310, HB365, HB391, HB420, HB422, HB638, HB279, HB310

Keywords: HB 279, uranium mining, uranium permit, production area authorization, production zone, Texas Water Code, TCEQ, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, contested case hearing, administrative hearing, groundwater restoration, groundwater baseline, water quality, mining permit, restoration values, natural resources, environmental regulation, in-situ uranium mining, permit amendment, public hearing

Transcript Highlights:

• to lawsuits among private property owners, and there's a lot of uncertainty about where property boundaries
• 00:00:58.879> property uncertainty about where property uncertainty about where property boundaries
• 01.000> there<00:01:01.160> are<00:01:01.680> 325,000<00:01:02.680> uh boundaries
• July there are 325,000 uh boundaries July there are 325,000 uh plss<00:01:04.400> monuments<00

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 1478, a bill to continue and expand a grant program for locating Minnesota’s public land survey system (PLSS) monuments and survey corners. The author explained that many of the state’s 325,000 PLSS monuments have unknown locations, which contributes to boundary uncertainty, lawsuits, and inaccurate land records and taxation. The bill, as described, would add criteria for counties, allow tribes to access the program, and continue funding it. The committee also noted Senate authors and bipartisan support for the measure. An A1 amendment was offered by Representative Fryberg to put the bill in the desired form, and it was adopted without objection. Testifiers from the Minnesota Society of Professional Surveyors and county surveying offices supported the bill, saying better monument location improves maps, property transfers, land management, and tax accuracy, while reducing disputes and lowering survey costs for landowners and public projects. One testifier said the work is important but often underappreciated; another emphasized that more monuments can make surveys much cheaper and more accurate. Committee members expressed support for the bill’s goals, with several indicating they would sign on. The chair repeatedly referenced uncertainty around the budget forecast and said the committee would have to consider practical fiscal realities. In the end, Representative Fryberg renewed his motion, and House File 1478, as amended, was laid over for possible inclusion.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are federally recognized, so we do a lot of the services within our boundaries of the reservation
• even though we are acquiring a lot of land, especially that is connected or within our reservation boundaries
• yes, this is something that we need to because what their concern or issue is, is that within the boundaries
• Outside the boundaries, outside those boundaries, there’s many, many acres... ...of tribal land.
• of the Fort Berthold Reservation. ...of oil and gas exploration and production within the boundaries

Summary: The meeting focused heavily on behavioral health and substance use treatment, especially the IMD exclusion and whether North Dakota should pursue a Section 1115 waiver to allow Medicaid reimbursement for services in institutions for mental diseases for adults ages 21 to 64. Turtle Mountain representatives described major local needs, including limited access to care, high syphilis rates, and the importance of timely public health data. They also discussed the tribe’s recovery center, which opened the prior year, now operating five levels of care with 16 beds, and the desire to expand capacity, possibly through an IMD waiver or related policy changes. Committee members also raised related issues such as rural health transformation funding, telehealth, workforce retention, and the need for better coordination between tribal and state public health systems. A central issue was Turtle Mountain Public Health’s long-running effort to secure a data use agreement with the state so it can receive surveillance data and respond directly to infectious disease cases among tribal members. Speakers said the tribe had a successful COVID-era agreement that allowed faster contact tracing and case management, but that agreement ended with the pandemic. They argued that current delays in sharing data, especially for sexually transmitted infections, leave the tribe unable to respond quickly, while the state and county epidemiology workload is too distant and stretched to be effective. Committee members expressed support and said they would look into the issue, noting that other tribes have secured similar agreements. The committee also heard a detailed presentation from the National Health Law Program on the IMD exclusion. The presenter explained that federal Medicaid law generally bars payment for care in facilities with more than 16 beds, but that states can use other tools such as state plan amendments, managed care arrangements, telehealth, and community-based services. He said IMD waivers are administratively complex, time-limited, and have shown mixed results in other states, with some gains in residential treatment access but limited evidence of improved overdose outcomes or stronger community-based care. He urged the committee to consider broader continuum-of-care solutions and cautioned that waivers alone are not a cure-all. No final vote was taken on the bill draft during the portion shown, but the committee discussed the proposal to appropriate $49,000 and one FTE to HHS to pursue an IMD waiver and report back in the next interim. Members also debated the policy rationale for the 16-bed limit, the role of the state versus tribal sovereignty, and whether the bill should move through the Health Care or Human Services committee in the future.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 2540 by Senator Nichols, relating to the terms of certain agreements involving minor boundary
• Under current law, two contiguous school districts are allowed to adjust their common boundary by agreement
• restrictions, or covenants associated with the land being transferred must be included in the mutual boundary
• The CAD, the Central Appraisal District's records were incorrect regarding where the boundaries were.
• But legislation is required, so going forward, if there's a boundary dispute, it could be useful in resolving

Bills: SB204, SB570, SB735, SB784, SB1207, SB1396, SB1447, SB2392, SB2540, SB747, SB875

Keywords: parental rights, education, school trustees, training, handbook, truancy, attendance policy, chronic absenteeism, school attendance, student absence notifications, parent notification, home visit, attendance officer, truancy court, school district, open-enrollment charter school, student support services, school counselor, principal, administrator

Transcript Highlights:

• <02:07:49.400> Uh<02:07:49.680> we're boundary project work.
• Uh we're boundary project work.
• management work, cross-boundary management work, cross-boundary coordination. coordination. coordination
• <02:53:50.400> Um<02:53:50.840> you boundaries to share resources.
• Um you boundaries to share resources.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's true: 77% of the population lives within an incorporated boundary of our state.
• And every 10 years, all the NRDs, after the census is taken, go back and redraw these boundary lines.
• Where they set the boundaries, we still use county roads as a dividing point.
• And they can sort of push the boundaries of how popular or unpopular those things can be.
• , have them working together to develop a shared plan that's based on a watershed boundary.

Summary: The Water Topics Overview Committee met with a quorum and received updates from the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Commission, followed by presentations from Deloitte on two legislative studies required by House Bill 1020. Director Reese Haas reviewed major project and budget updates, including the Northwest Area Water Supply and Southwest Pipeline projects, Resources Trust Fund balances, carryover spending, project prioritization, bid conditions, regional water system coverage, and department process improvements. Members also discussed how the commission prioritizes projects, maintenance expectations, and the impact of limited municipal water supply funding. No formal committee action was taken during the DWR update; the commission’s municipal funding decisions were described as pending its April 8 meeting. Deloitte then presented the cost-share policy study, which found that under current policy and forecasted revenues, North Dakota faces an estimated $1.3 billion shortfall over 14 years, with a near-term gap of about $1.8 billion through 2031. The firm outlined seven recommended options, including tighter definitions and a 25% cost share for eligible replacement projects, caps and financing strategies for the Mouse River and Red River Valley projects, aligning cost share with commission priority guidance, delaying lower-priority projects, using available lines of credit, and adjusting reimbursement timing for revolving loan funds. Committee members questioned inflation assumptions, affordability, user fees, and the use of legacy fund earnings for bonding, but no decisions were made. In the governance and finance study, Deloitte said final recommendations are still being refined, with a final report due May 29. The study examined the Southwest Pipeline, NAWS, and Red River Valley systems using governance and finance criteria such as decision authority, transparency, affordability, risk, and access to funding. For Southwest, Deloitte outlined options ranging from improved state-authority coordination to transferring ownership to the Southwest Water Authority; for NAWS, options focused on strengthening the authority’s role and potentially transitioning operations and maintenance; and for Red River, options ranged from enhanced facilitation to formal state oversight or state ownership. Members asked follow-up questions about ownership transfer, capital repayment streams, and why NAWS was not considered for transfer, and Deloitte said NAWS’s limited organizational maturity made that option less viable in the near term.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are finalizing a visual organizer in the form of a map that will show the CESA regions, the boundaries
• will show the CESA<00:05:17.440> regions, CESA regions, CESA regions, the<00:05:18.960> boundaries
• of which would be set in the boundaries of which would be set in state<00:05:20.760> statute,
• These boundaries respect existing school districts and supervisory union boundaries.
• These boundaries respect existing school districts and supervisory union boundaries.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The meeting was a caucus of the whole on House Bill 955, described by House Education Chair Rep. Peter Conlin as the year’s education transformation bill. He said the bill is still evolving and must still go through Ways and Means, Appropriations, and the Senate. Conlin framed the bill as a response to declining enrollment, school building needs, future funding changes, and equity concerns, drawing on prior commission work, testimony, surveys, emails, and committee input. Conlin said H. 955 has two major structural pieces: it creates seven mandatory Cooperative Education Service Areas (CESAs) to provide shared services more efficiently at larger scale, and it requires merger study committees in all parts of the state to examine whether districts should voluntarily merge into pre-K through 12 union school districts. He emphasized that CESAs are service providers, not governing bodies, and that merger study committees are required to study merger but not to merge. He also said the bill includes startup grants for CESAs, fee-for-service funding, a guidance map for facilitator work, deadlines culminating in merger votes on November 7, 2028, and reporting requirements back to the General Assembly. Members asked about whether CESAs duplicate supervisory unions, how representation would work, whether the bill affects academic standards, what happens to articles of agreement, why some study groupings include only one district, how the process would work in practice, and what support facilitators would have. Conlin responded that CESAs are intended to add scale for specialized services rather than replace supervisory unions, that they do not govern schools, and that representation and structure could be adjusted as the bill moves forward. He said the bill does not change what is taught in schools, only governance and funding, and that any merger would still require new articles of agreement and voter approval. He also said the facilitator system would be supported by a lead facilitator and the existing CESA structure, and that some groupings may be revised based on local conditions. The committee also discussed cost savings and timing. Conlin said the bill is intended to reduce costs through shared services and larger-scale districts, and that the proposed delay in implementing a foundation formula is meant to allow time for mergers and related administrative work, including bargaining, records, and district consolidation. He cited the existing Vermont Learning Collaborative in southeastern Vermont as an example of a CESA already providing specialized services and saving member districts money.

Transcript Highlights:

• More than that, though, they really fit into a larger arc of states enforcing constitutional boundaries
• More than that, though, they really fit into a larger arc of states enforcing constitutional boundaries
• More than that, though, they really fit into a larger arc of states enforcing constitutional boundaries
• More than that, though, they really fit into a larger arc of states enforcing constitutional boundaries
• More than that, though, they really fit into a larger arc of states enforcing constitutional boundaries

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 3477, Representative Long’s “Universal Constitutional Remedies Act,” which would create a civil damages remedy for constitutional violations by government actors, including federal officials. Long and supporting testifiers argued the bill fills a gap in current law, noting that people can sue state and local officials under Section 1983 but generally lack a meaningful damages remedy against federal actors. Supporters said the bill would improve accountability, make harmed individuals whole, and is consistent with the Supremacy Clause and federal law. Public testimony included Dr. Roger Day, who said the bill was important to people harmed by “color of law” abuses and urged broad, inclusive language. Members then considered amendments. The A1 amendment, offered by Representative Duran, removed subdivision 2, which had required federal law enforcement partners entering agreements with Minnesota to agree to abide by the state and federal constitutions; the amendment was adopted. The A2 amendment, which would have added a six-year lookback and limited the bill to future causes of action, was debated at length and rejected. The A3 amendment, which would have required state agencies to absorb litigation costs, was also debated; House fiscal staff said a fiscal note was not complete and costs were uncertain, and the amendment was not adopted. In discussion after amendments, opponents argued the bill would conflict with federal supremacy, duplicate or interfere with existing federal remedies, and could create fiscal and operational burdens. Supporters responded that the bill is modeled on existing remedies for state and local officials and that federal accountability is currently inadequate. The bill, as amended by A1, was then moved toward the general register, with a roll call requested on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's security without boundaries.
• from COVID on the security side is that we needed to mobilize and be able to protect beyond our boundaries
• from COVID on the security side is that we needed to mobilize and be able to protect beyond our boundaries
• It's security without boundaries.
• to protect beyond our boundaries. to protect beyond our boundaries.

Keywords: Meeting Start - 00:00 Roll Call – 00:34 KY Chamber of Commerce KY Business Perspectives – 01:50 COT Update on SB4 – 27:16 Adjournment – 48:18, 958, all

Summary: The 2025 Artificial Intelligence Task Force met for its first meeting of the year and heard updates on federal AI policy, state implementation of Senate Bill 4, and the business community’s perspective on AI regulation. Co-chairs noted that federal legislation could affect the task force’s work later in the year, but said Kentucky still has significant issues to study, including energy, land use, education, social media, and children’s engagement with AI. The task force had quorum and no votes were taken. Kate Shanks of the Kentucky Chamber said the business community supports continued discussion but favors a federal approach over a patchwork of state laws. She described the Trump administration’s new AI executive order as emphasizing innovation over regulation, noted the pending federal AI action plan, and discussed congressional action including the Take It Down Act and industry-specific changes to existing laws. She warned that state-by-state AI rules could increase costs and burden businesses, and said the Chamber would prefer incremental, flexible policy that avoids conflict with existing law and limits private rights of action. Members asked about uniform model legislation, education uses of AI, and civil liability; Shanks said a model approach could help avoid fragmentation and that liability should generally be handled through consumer-protection-style enforcement rather than broad litigation. The Commonwealth Office of Technology then reported on implementation of SB 4, saying it has worked with industry, agencies, other states, and vendors to build an AI policy framework now in final review. Officials said an AI Governance Committee has been established and will meet in July, and a draft RFP is being prepared to meet the bill’s tracking and documentation requirements. They said no major implementation challenges have been identified so far, but the impact of pending federal rules remains uncertain. Members also discussed the need to educate students and teachers about AI, with one member emphasizing that schools should teach both how to use AI and how to think critically about information online.

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, this would be an HJR to go and update our constitution when it comes to county boundaries.
• Many of our county boundaries are waterways which can meander over time since 1907 and subsequently through
• How we have determined county Boundaries has been very, very conflicting, and depending on what state
• But doesn't it change some of the boundaries between Jackson and Tillman County?
• We, as the legislature, have the authority to set those boundaries.

Bills: HB4420, HB3974, HB3016, HB3062, HB3021, HB3145, HB4128, HB3131, HB3015, HB3472, HB3453, HB1638, HB4126, HB2696, HB2710, HB3552, HB3031, HB3544, HB3521, HB4490, HB4488, HB1746, HJR1069, HB4428, HB4429, HB1170, HB3538, HB4124, HB3904, HB4106, HB2999, HB3982, HJR1077, HB3464, HB2588, HB3462, HB4440, HB3674, HB3345, HJR1067, HB4326, HB4331, HB4337, HB4338, HB4359, HB4392, HB3557, HJR1076, HB4003, HB3495, HB3497, HB3501, HB3505, HB3749, HB3011, HB4336, HB4346, HJR1087, HB3240, HB3647, HB3796, HB3969, HB3972, HB3983, HB3984, HB3989, HB3383, HB3130, HB4358, HB3327, HJR1055, HB3386, HJR1089, HB3087, HB2970, HB3314, HB4129, HB4199

Keywords: reading, intervention, literacy, education, third grade retention, teacher training, funding, Strong Readers Act, tort claims, inmate housing, government immunity, public trust, private prison, emergency legislation, vision screening, binocular vision, kindergarten, elementary education, health, firearm rights

Transcript Highlights:

• Currently, GCDs may collect export fees on groundwater transported outside their boundaries, but the
• However, the lines of local government boundaries above the ground do not dictate the flow of water in
• God did not draw the boundaries of our counties and our GCDs.
• Lines have impacted the well levels across a GCD boundary.

Bills: HB2018, HB1633, HB1689, SB612, SB3058

Keywords: agricultural conservation, land preservation, environmental protection, wildlife habitat, Texas Farm and Ranch, groundwater conservation district, Texas Water Code, water permit, permit amendment, groundwater permit, water rights, aquifer, well registration, exempt wells, beneficial use, water conservation, groundwater quality, well plugging, Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area, surface water resources

Transcript Highlights:

• From the North Shore to the western prairies, from Bluff Country to the Boundary Waters, from the Iron
• ><00:00:58.800> Country<00:00:59.199> to<00:00:59.359> the<00:00:59.520> Boundary
• from Bluff Country to the Boundary from Bluff Country to the Boundary Waters,<00:01:00.800> from

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• As Representative Eggbaje just noted, this boundary was first established in 1986 when the state was
• We believe the expansion of the taxing boundary to include the North Loop will bring it more in line
• The expansion of this boundary will also help the city to address what has been a 20% decline in our
• we appreciate the representative for bringing this proposal forward to bring the downtown taxing boundary
• <00:51:00.360> into the downtown taxing boundary into the downtown taxing boundary into alignment

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• They have repeatedly drawn boundaries which increased majority... white districts.
• Here, I don't know what these boundaries look like. I don't know what Congressman...
• The current boundaries were approved during the 2021 session.
• Redrawing these lines wouldn't just move boundaries on paper.
• They will fracture neighborhoods, split communities, and manipulate boundaries.

Keywords: 997, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Do you have a reaction to the Senate passing the bill on the Boundary Waters?
• >> We have more responsibility now than ever to protect the Boundary Waters here in the state of Minnesota
• uh bill on the Boundary Waters? uh bill on the Boundary Waters?
• <00:58:13.520> Waters<00:58:13.800> here ever to protect the Boundary Waters here ever
• to protect the Boundary Waters here in<00:58:14.040> the<00:58:14.120> state<00:58:14.320

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I think we've talked a bit about the marijuana growing operation and the boundary in the eastern band
• control and ultimately I believe the United States, the U.S., the federal government needs to set boundaries
• have the eastern and the Cherokee who have made it legal to sell and dispense marijuana inside the boundary
• It is outside of the boundary.
• unless they're using teleportation, it's not clear to me how they can grow it here and sell it in the boundary

Keywords: fentanyl crisis, DEA, drug trafficking, public safety, Judea Serrata, Terrence Cole, judicial security, social media, drug prevention

Summary: The committee meeting centered on the urgent crisis of fentanyl abuse and the government’s response to the drug trafficking epidemic. Key discussions revolved around the nomination of Terrence Cole as the Administrator of the DEA and Judea Serrata as Director of the U.S. Marshals Service. Cole emphasized his commitment to combating the fentanyl crisis, highlighting the rising number of overdose deaths and the necessity of bipartisan efforts to dismantle drug cartels. Members engaged in dialogue on the effectiveness of various strategies and the importance of education aimed at preventing drug-related deaths among youth. Additionally, the challenges of social media in drug trafficking were highlighted, indicating a need for greater accountability in how platforms handle such issues. Senators voiced concerns about the impact of administration policies on judicial security and the resources available for marshals to perform their critical roles.