Transcript Highlights:

• So they came up with this new Section 5.
• Article 8 was redone, but Section 5 is new because it deals with digital securities.
• So why not change it for all of those sections?
• So why not change it for all of those sections?
• with regard to any actions under this section, under UCC Article 8.

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They are representing the Arizona section of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,
• 46-232 and amending section 46-297.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to public assistance.
• 46-232 and repealing section 46-232, relating to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
• SB 1638, an act in section 42...
• 46-2-32 and amending Section 46-297.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, relating to public assistance.

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And now I'll turn it over to Adrian for our next couple sections.
• Our final map for this section comes from the division.
• They are in a separate section of the Arkansas Code.
• And I'll stop for questions there before our last section.
• Our last section. All right, you’re recognized to finish. Okay.

Summary: The committee received a lengthy Bureau of Legislative Research presentation on Arkansas academic standards, accountability systems, and adequacy requirements. Staff reviewed how state curriculum and standards have evolved from the 1997 Public Education Act through the 2003 Quality Education Act and the 2017 Educational Support and Accountability Act, including required coursework, standards for accreditation, career and technical education, graduation requirements, and recent additions such as computer science, personal finance, firearm safety, and fetal growth and development instruction. Members asked for a chart comparing the major laws and repeals over time, and staff agreed to provide one. The presentation then turned to federal ESSA requirements and Arkansas’s state accountability system. Staff explained Arkansas’s long-term goals for proficiency, English learner progress, and graduation rates, and reported 2025 ATLAS proficiency results, which remained below the 80% goal across student groups. They also reviewed English learner progress, graduation rates, school support and improvement, and equitable access to educators. Data showed gaps by subgroup and by school poverty/minority concentration, with Title I and high-poverty schools more likely to have emergency/provisional teachers and less experienced staff. Members questioned the lack of recent data for some ESSA measures, including equity labs and school index calculations, and asked staff to follow up with the Department of Education. The committee also discussed NAEP results, ACT scores, and teacher quality measures under the state accountability act. Arkansas’s NAEP performance remained below national averages in fourth- and eighth-grade reading and math, and ACT composite scores and benchmark attainment were also reviewed. Members asked for additional information on historical highs and lows, the number of assessments students take by grade, dropout data, and comparisons with other states. No formal votes were taken; the main action was agreement to request additional information from DESE and to schedule department follow-up at a future meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• By deleting that line, we will make those sections effective upon approval, and that would assist in
• the hiring of positions for those two sections. u um states that sections five and six u um states that
• </c><00:21:48.720><c> Is</c> ...positions for those two sections. Is that correct? That's correct.
• Uh, my request would be to take out the special immunity rules on page 17, section 334-I.
• </c> date upon its approval, deleting section date upon its approval, deleting section two<03:02:21.120

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then section 9 is new.
• And then section 9 is new.
• And then section 9 is new.
• And then section 9 is new.
• And then section 9 is new.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms
• Section seven amends the section related to transfer of firearms for ERPOs and this requires firearms

Bills: HF3771, HF3658, HF3453, HF3358, HF1775

Keywords: disaster assistance, contingency account, Minnesota emergency management, public safety, state disaster aid, FEMA, federal cost-share, emergency relief, natural disaster, budget report, appropriations report, management and budget, local governments, utility cooperatives, public works, infrastructure repair, chapter 12B, chapter 12A, emergency management, disaster recovery

Transcript Highlights:

• Section three is another section that is related to banks, and we’re taking that section out in the next
• </c><00:07:45.280><c> Section</c> what's required to be there. Section what's required to be there.
• Section three<00:07:45.919><c> is</c><00:07:46.160><c> another</c><00:07:46.479><c> section</c><00:07
• </c><00:09:39.680><c> Um</c><00:09:40.160><c> section</c> Yes. So that is section four.
• Um section Yes. So that is section four.

Bills: HF3676, HF3683, HF3395

Keywords: Safe at Home, address confidentiality, domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, harassment, victim privacy, survivor protection, confidential address, protected address, secret address, identity protection, residential confidentiality, program participant, nondiscrimination, court disclosure, protective order, service of process, driver's license, state ID

Transcript Highlights:

• Yeah, I should say sections 9 and 10 and then House sections 12 and 13.
• So Senate sections 9 and 10, House sections 12 and 13.
• So, reversing those changes from this section.
• Uh so, all the section would be section.
• </c><01:30:56.800><c> 14</c> explain about what Senate section 14 explain about what Senate section 14

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• In 2024, we passed a constitutional amendment to free up the Section 16 land Section 16 land that Franklin
• It's the when Alabama became a state, they dedicated the 16th section in each county to be used for public
• There were some counties where Section 16 actually was underwater.
• they tried to make it more even across the state and so they ended up giving some counties land sections
• There were some counties where Section 16 actually was underwater.

Bills: SB337, HB520, HB75, SB337, HB520, HB75

Keywords: SB337, Montgomery County, probate judge, judge of probate, county officer compensation, salary increase, circuit judge parity, local legislation, county commission, general fund, public official pay, judicial compensation, Montgomery County Legislation, discrimination, immunization, facial coverings, healthcare rights, religious convictions, civil rights, Attorney General

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 49-630 requires drivers to use the right-hand lane except when passing, turning left, or when
• Well, Section 49-65... ...when the right-hand lanes are congested.
• Well, Section 49-65 creates a specific penalty for impeding traffic on the left lane of controlled-access
• The other one is a recorded survey, and it's kind of funny because when you look at Section A...
• And what we did was we bolstered up the official map section of the code.

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And then it Section two of that.
• That section of it? >> Yes. >> Okay.
• </c> &gt;&gt; we're just striking that section &gt;&gt; we're just striking that section &gt;&gt; and
• </c><02:09:19.360><c> Um</c> section at the end on page three. Um section at the end on page three.
• &gt;&gt; Um the finding section is always an easy &gt;&gt; Um the finding section is always an easy one

Keywords: 9:00am HB 155 9:30am HB 1102 10:30am HB 1109 11:00am HB 1356 11:30am HB 1469 1:00pm HB 1323 2:00pm HB 1376, 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting began with unanimous committee approval of amendment 2026-2021S to HB 2. Senator Lang explained the amendment corrected a drafting error so that $2.5 million in state funds, matched with federal money for a total of $5 million, could be spent during the biennium rather than lapse at the end of the fiscal year. The money is intended to stabilize Medicaid per diem rates for county nursing homes, and members agreed without objection to adopt the amendment and continue working from the bill as amended by the Senate. The committee then discussed HB 155 and a proposed amendment, 2026-201H, dealing with the business enterprise tax. The House side described the proposal as a compromise that would raise the filing threshold from $250,000 to $375,000 and create a trigger that would reduce the BET rate by 0.05% for each $100 million in combined business tax surplus, down to a floor of 0.25%. Senate members opposed lowering the rate at this time, arguing that tax relief should focus on the filing threshold, which they said would remove filing burdens for about 3,500 small businesses, and that rate cuts should be considered in a budget cycle rather than an off-year. Concerns were raised that one-time revenues, such as tax amnesty receipts or federal repatriation-related surpluses, could unintentionally trigger reductions. Representative Sweeney later offered a revised approach by moving the effective date of the trigger mechanism to January 1, 2028, and said he was also willing to carve out tax amnesty revenues or adjust the effective date to avoid using one-time funds. The Senate remained unwilling to agree to a rate reduction, though it expressed openness to raising the filing threshold further. The committee ultimately did not resolve the business tax issue and recessed to continue discussions at a later time. The final item discussed was HB 1102, concerning an increase in the research and development tax credit paired with changes to state park fees. House members supported the R&D credit increase but opposed tying it to higher park fees, citing concerns about tourism, especially at border parks, and noting that the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources had said it did not need the increase. Senate members defended the park fee changes as a fairness issue, arguing that New Hampshire residents should pay less than out-of-state visitors and that the department had not raised rates in many years. No vote was taken on this item during the discussion captured here.

Transcript Highlights:

• Insert new sections. Last line. Correct the title.
• Speaker, Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S.
• Now, Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S.
• And the sections of that part of the U.S.
• Insert sub two of this section.

Bills: HB1160, HB1289, HB1339, HB1798, HB1065, HB1795, HB2107, HB2113, HB2124, HB2125, HB2133, HB2134, HB2140, HB2185, HB2191, HB2205, HB2211, HB2219, HB2245, HB2253, HB2283, HB2343, HB2406, HB2501, HB2531, HB2574, HB1170, HB1544, HB1834, HB2156, HB2188, HB2206, HB2360, HB2471, HB2478, HB2525, HB2605, HJM4012, HB1104, HB1152, HB1254, HB1443, HB1710, HB1750, HB1903, HB1941, HB1974, HB1982, HB1983, HB2006, HB2034, HB2105, HB2179, HB2203, HB2215, HB2223, HB2239, HB2247, HB2297, HB2303, HB2322, HB2329, HB2334, HB2338, HB2345, HB2348, HB2350, HB2353, HB2355, HB2363, HB2367, HB2379, HB2388, HB2399, HB2418, HB2420, HB2428, HB2441, HB2462, HB2464, HB2467, HB2495, HB2505, HB2534, HB2539, HB2544, HB2551, HB2554, HB2557, HB2575, HB2577, HB2588, HB2594, HB2604, HB2636, HB2714

Keywords: design review, local government, land use, zoning, project permits, housing density, middle housing, affordable housing, parking minimums, single-family zoning, infill development, growth management, comprehensive plan, permit streamlining, objective development regulations, architectural review, administrative review, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, ADU

Summary: The House took up second reading and final passage on several bills. House Bill 2575, relating to reducing certain environmental reporting obligations, was amended to direct savings from reduced utility reporting toward low-income electricity assistance, then passed 95-0. House Bill 2334, on cash transaction rounding for the loss of pennies, passed 89-6 after debate over common-sense rounding, tax treatment, and concerns about moving away from cash. House Bill 2714, updating caseload forecasting for food and nutrition assistance programs including SNAP, passed 95-0. Engrossed Substitute House Bill 2557, concerning parental access to special education evaluation meetings and timelines, passed 95-0 after a technical amendment clarifying terminology and discussion about giving parents more time to prepare for meetings. The House also passed Substitute House Bill 2594, which codifies protections for unhoused students and aligns state law with federal McKinney-Vento protections; supporters described the bill as ensuring continued educational access for homeless youth, and it passed 94-1. House Bill 2348, updating timber sale process efficiencies, including electronic notice and appraisal/approval requirements for certain land sales, passed 95-0. Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2215, dealing with Climate Commitment Act compliance obligations for fuels, drew extensive debate over market fairness, fuel prices, rural impacts, and Ecology’s authority; after adopting a striking amendment and rejecting several others, it passed 57-38. The House then considered House Bill 1710, a Washington Voting Rights Act compliance bill creating a new chapter in Title 29A RCW. Members debated numerous amendments focused on preclearance standards, lookback periods, fee shifting, rulemaking authority, settlement treatment, and the use of citizen voting-age population. Some technical amendments were adopted, while many substantive amendments were rejected. The transcript ends during continued amendment debate on the bill, before final passage is recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• The reason for that is one section of the statute deals with our comprehensive universities and KCTCS
• ; the first section deals with the University of Kentucky, and section 830 deals with the University
• </c><00:18:55.880><c> uh</c><00:18:56.039><c> section</c> kctcs uh the first section uh section kctcs
• uh the first section uh section 230<00:18:57.000><c> deals</c><00:18:57.360><c> with</c><00:18:57.559
• </c><00:20:27.480><c> this</c> with subsection two of the section this with subsection two of the section

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 305, which would clarify and expand a healthcare workforce bill to explicitly include physician assistants and dietitians in efforts to address shortages, especially in rural areas. Rep. Fleming said the change was intended to help with Medicaid-related needs such as diabetes care and noted a decline in dietitian internship applications. Rep. Roarx supported the bill, emphasizing the value of dietitians in helping patients make practical nutrition changes. The bill received a unanimous favorable expression, 14-0, and was reported to the House floor. The committee then considered House Bill 427, which would create statewide 60-credit-hour transfer pathways for high-demand bachelor’s degree programs under the Council on Postsecondary Education. Rep. Grossl explained the bill is meant to prevent students from losing major credit when transferring between KCTCS and four-year institutions, using nursing as an example. Questions focused on rigor, dual credit, how high-demand programs would be selected, and the July 1, 2026 implementation date; the sponsor said CPE and faculty would map curricula and align standards. The Kentucky Student Rights Coalition testified in support, saying the bill would help students complete degrees faster and make credits count toward majors. HB 427 also passed unanimously, 14-0, with favorable expression. The committee then took up House Bill 424, as amended by a committee substitute. Rep. Tipton said the substitute removed language allowing up to six-year contracts and instead set up a process for four-year contracts and periodic performance reviews for faculty, including presidents, at public postsecondary institutions. He said the bill is intended to give universities clearer authority to remove underperforming employees and be more efficient with taxpayer dollars. Several faculty witnesses opposed the bill, arguing it would erode tenure protections, create arbitrary performance standards, and harm recruitment, retention, and academic freedom. The committee adopted the substitute and heard testimony, but no final vote on HB 424 is shown in the transcript excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 5, subsection E: This section shall be enforced as provided in chapter 398.
• 393 or 29 USC section 1144 SEC subsection<00:52:37.079><c> B</c><00:52:37.440><c> Section</c><00:52:
• :52:40.839><c> section</c><00:52:41.079><c> shall</c><00:52:41.400><c> be</c> subsection e this section
• </c> paid fam paid leave pursuant to sections paid fam paid leave pursuant to sections 3984<00:53:24.160
• </c> testimony of page five amending sections testimony of page five amending sections 15<00:54:18.799

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• recommended by Her Excellency the Governor be considered in the following form: The second sentence of Section
• Walsh of Peabody moves to amend the bill by striking out Section 5 and inserting in place thereof the
• following section: Section 5.
• Section 2B of Chapter 131, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the words...
• Section 5, Section 2B of Chapter 131, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the words...

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The House began with the Pledge of Allegiance and then took up a series of Rules Committee reports, mostly extending committee reporting deadlines on various House orders and bills. These extensions covered committees including Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities; Economic Development and Emerging Technologies; Education; State Administration and Regulatory Oversight; Revenue; and Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy. In each case, the House suspended the rules and adopted the orders without recorded opposition. The Steering, Policy and Scheduling Committee then reported several bills for House consideration, including measures on critical incident leave, hostile architecture targeting unhoused individuals, the Salem licensing board, James J. O'Neill Park, the Boylston select board, and Milford’s authority to appoint a highway surveyor. The House suspended Rule 7A, ordered these bills to a third reading, and proceeded through the calendar. On third reading and final action, the House accepted a governor’s recommended amendment to House No. 3912, which would increase the Marblehead Board of Health from three to five members, and then passed the bill as amended. The House also passed to be engrossed House No. 924 on the Great Barrington Fire District, House No. 4657 authorizing additional on-premises liquor licenses in Scituate, and House No. 1064 renaming the Inland Fisheries and Game Fund, after adopting an amendment offered by Representative Walsh. Finally, the House enacted House No. 4287 authorizing West Springfield to grant four additional off-premises liquor licenses, adopted an order to meet again Monday at 11 a.m., and adjourned to that time in informal session.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 47-1505 specifically authorizes the Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners, and thereby the
• Under page, I think page 117 of the pending rules book, Section 155, five-year updates and inspections
• You'll see that below, Section 02 is a little bit changed, and Section 03 is repealed, removing the requirement
• In essence, the five-year update section should also include language to state that Idaho allows the
• For example, section, subsection of Rule 155.02, right of inspections, essentially mirrors what is in

Keywords: 989, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On page two, beginning on line 17, strike all of Section 3. Last line. Section 3. Thank you.
• On page two, beginning on line 17, strike all of Section 3. Last line. Section 3. Thank you.
• Last line: This section expires January 1, 2028. There are amendments. Amendment 1481.
• New section. Section 1. Last line: Correct the title.
• Section 1, RCW. Last line. Correct the title.

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Moving through, and that's in the findings section, I would recommend that in Section 5, about the piece
• 82, around First Amendment... ...law, and it cites General Law Chapter 71, Section 82, around First
• I just want to clarify and I propose that that section be written to say, DESE should coordinate with
• General Law, Chapter 71, Section 82, and also cite to my colleague, Assistant Attorney General Jonathan
• And then in the very last section, measures to build— And in the very last section, measures to build

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Special Commission on Combating Antisemitism met to review and discuss draft preliminary recommendations, with the co-chairs explaining that the draft had been released publicly and that the meeting was intended for open discussion and edits rather than a final vote. They emphasized the urgency of addressing antisemitism in Massachusetts, especially in K-12 schools, while noting that the recommendations are preliminary, may be revised, and will be supplemented by further testimony and a final report later. Several members also referenced recent allegations and incidents in local schools as examples of why the commission’s work is needed. Commissioners broadly supported the draft but proposed numerous refinements. Common themes included clarifying the distinction between antisemitic incidents and hate crimes; strengthening reporting systems and privacy protections; adding clearer guidance from DESE and the Attorney General on First Amendment issues, curriculum, and investigations; expanding Holocaust and genocide education; and improving professional development for educators, school committees, and administrators. Several members urged better links to mental health and victim services, more support for the Genocide Education Trust, and stronger language on bystander training, digital literacy, and the role of school committees in addressing bias. There was also discussion of how to frame antisemitism as a distinct form of hate, how to address antisemitism related to Israel and Zionism without restricting legitimate political speech, and how to avoid unfunded mandates for school districts and municipalities. Some commissioners suggested adding timeframes, a centralized reporting or investigative mechanism, and more explicit model policies for schools. The meeting ended with the chairs thanking participants and the public for their input, and the commission then moved to adjourn.

Transcript Highlights:

• , which is an entirely separate section of the SAT.
• then they take the reading and writing section.
• , that essay section.
• So the essay section would still remain as a voluntary section, but it would not necessarily be a requirement
• The essay section is a separate voluntary section, and it's not, I will say too, even though we've had

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Education Freedom Account Oversight Committee met on March 27 and approved the agenda, adding a request for clarification on how the Children’s Scholarship Fund separates applications for the EFA program and the education tax credit program. The committee also approved minutes from December 30, 2025, and March 27, 2026, with a request that the March minutes include a link to the live stream. Members discussed the status of pending Legislative Budget Assistant audit reports on EFA and special education, noting the reports were still not released and would likely come later in the summer after review by the Department of Education and the Children’s Scholarship Fund. A major topic was the EFA program’s administrative fee, which statute allows up to 10% of deposits. Children’s Scholarship Fund representatives said current administrative costs were under 8%, that staffing had been reduced through the ScholarVia platform, and that any unused amount is reconciled and returned to students at year’s end. Members asked for historical administrative-cost data and a written explanation of how the withholding and reconciliation process works. The committee also reviewed the distinction between the EFA and education tax credit funding streams and was told the two programs use separate applications and separate funds, though both use the same platform. The committee spent substantial time on assessment and accountability. Department of Education staff explained that EFA students may satisfy annual assessment requirements through a portfolio, a norm-referenced test, or the statewide assessment; only about 10 EFA students took the statewide assessment, while most used portfolios or standardized tests such as the California Achievement Test and NWEA. Staff described how statewide assessment data are kept separate by student identifier and can be aggregated for EFA reporting, and members asked for breakdowns by grade, test type, and school district. The department also discussed linking assessments through Lexiles and Quantiles and said it could provide a list of commonly used formative assessments in New Hampshire districts. The committee additionally discussed a possible PSAT addition to the state contract and the costs of the statewide assessment program. Another major issue was special education eligibility and services within the EFA program. Members questioned the rule allowing a medical certification of disability from a licensed professional anywhere in the United States as an alternative to an IEP-based determination. Department staff said the current system allows either pathway, that about 1,000 EFA students are identified as special education students, and that the program does not track growth or service alignment on an individual basis. Members expressed concern that the medical-certification route may be too broad and asked for data on the disability categories used. The committee also discussed career and technical education access for EFA students, noting that Senate Bill 491 would provide guidance and that House Bill 1817 would address access and funding issues, but that current law still allows EFA funds to be used to pay CTE costs. The meeting ended with a request for future agenda items and a decision to leave the next meeting date open until fall, pending further information from the LBA audit process.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 5. Senator Chapman. Thank you, Mr. President.
• Two, Sections 4, 8, and 29 of this act expire June 30, 2027.
• On page 89, after line 17, insert the following: New section. Section 46. Appoint...
• On page 89, after line 17, insert the following: New section. Section 46.
• On page 89, after line 17, insert the following: New section. Section 46.

Bills: SB6061, SB6234, SB6176, SB6335, SB6047, HB2235, HB2272, HB2340, HB2543, HB2554, HB2632, HB2464, HB2619, HB1376, HB1796, HB2091, HB2249, HB2254, HB2353, HB2431, HB2441, SB5808, SB5949, SB6006, SB6260, SB6297, SB6351, SB6354, SB6355, HB2124, HB1069, HB2104, HB2624

Keywords: tourism, self-supported assessment, funding, statewide promotion, economic development, sewage, grinder pumps, residential buildings, regulation, construction, vehicle registration, enforcement, renewal, transportation, state law, state commission, infrastructure, traffic safety, responsibilities, state capital projects