Video & Transcript Research : 'Testimony'
Page 122 of 500
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (10/08/2025)
Health, Human Services & Elderly Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- As you can see in the written testimony, it is a little over $11 million that could be at question.
- ,<00:28:11.520>
it <00:28:11.679>is can see in the written testimony, it is can see - in the written testimony, it is a<00:28:12.399>
little <00:28:12.640>over <00:28:12.960 - circumstances and the credible testimony circumstances and the credible testimony that<01:24:10.159
- Thank you all for your input, your testimony. It was very, very valuable.
TX
Texas 89th Regular
Delivery of Government Efficiency Apr 2nd, 2025
Delivery of Government Efficiency
Transcript Highlights:
- Seeing none, thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- No, thank you so much for your testimony. Thank you.
- Thank you very much for your testimony.
- That, thank you for your testimony. Thank you. Okay, so members, next we will have the testimony.
Bills:
HB512, HB2248, HB2679, HB2832, HB3112, HB3368, HB3490, HB3512, HB3623, HB3666, HB3700, HB3711, HB3770, HB3963
Keywords:
grievance procedures, state agency, employee rights, workplace regulations, employment law, employees, employment actions, appeal, state employees, workplace rights, disciplinary actions, employment conditions, employment disputes, job protections, public information, transparency, government accountability, information access, notification requirements, federal funding
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for your testimony. You're dismissed.
- Thank you for your testimony. Both are dismissed.
- Thank you for your testimony and both are dismissed.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- If not, public testimony is closed.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- State your testimony for three minutes, and avoid repeating any testimony that has already been presented
- We will now proceed to testimony.
- All right, seeing none, thank you for your testimony. Thank you.
- And we'll now proceed to testimony.
- We will now proceed to testimony.
Keywords:
school district, ad valorem tax, local revenue, tax collection, education funding, border security, tax exemption, ad valorem, real property, infrastructure, Texas-Mexico border, ad valorem taxation, farm products, livestock, timber, death tax, inheritance tax, estate tax, property transfer, constitutional amendment
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Citizen Commission for Performance Measurement of Tax Preferences May 6th, 2026 at 10:00 am
Citizen Commission for Performance Measurement of Tax Preferences
Transcript Highlights:
- Next, we look at our testimony questions for 2026, and we have to approve them.
- Next, we look at our testimony questions for 2026, and we have to approve them.
- You dedicate the September Commission meeting to taking that testimony.
- Okay, seeing none, a motion is in order to approve the testimony questions for 2026.
- The vote is unanimous and the 2026 testimony questions are approved. Thank you.
Summary:
The Citizen Commission for Performance Measurement of Tax Preferences met on May 6, 2026, with quorum present and unanimously approved the October 21, 2025 minutes. The Attorney General’s Office then provided its annual refresher on Washington’s Public Records Act and Open Public Meetings Act, emphasizing broad disclosure requirements, records retention, prompt routing of records requests to staff, and OPMA rules for meetings, conference calls, emails, special meetings, and executive sessions.
JLARC staff next reviewed 2026 tax preference legislation, noting 20 bills affecting tax preferences. Examples included repeal of the coal sales tax exemption, changes to data center exemptions, new property tax exemptions for renewable energy facilities and land bank authorities, and a broad tax package in Senate Bill 6346 that created credits and deductions, expanded the working families tax credit, and exempted items such as diapers and hygiene products. Staff also presented the 2026 expedited review report covering 64 tax preferences and explained that it is based on prior JLARC reviews and Department of Revenue studies rather than full new reviews.
The commission approved unchanged 2026 public testimony questions and then adopted the draft 2027–2036 tax preference review schedule, along with a new rolling 10-year schedule format that will be updated each May. During discussion, Representative Pollitt questioned how preferences are prioritized for full review versus expedited or no review, especially for large preferences without performance statements, and staff explained that legislative mandates, expiration timing, and staff capacity drive the schedule. The commission agreed staff would meet with members to discuss possible future adjustments.
The meeting concluded with public and staff recognition of Commissioner Grant Forsyth, who is leaving the commission after 13 years of service. Speakers praised his leadership, consensus-building, and long tenure as both commissioner and chair. The next commission meeting was announced for August 4, 2026.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
House Chamber - Fri Apr 4, 2025, 12:00PM HST - Day 46
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- There was opposing testimony from the Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Unit, ARF, and the testimony reads
- There was opposing testimony from the Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Unit, ARF, and the testimony reads
- There was opposing testimony from the Aircraft Rescue Firefighting Unit, ARF, and the testimony reads
- And that is the general's uh testimony.
- their testimony that if the ...
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development - Subcommittee on Veterans - 03/03/25
Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development - Subcommittee on Veterans
Transcript Highlights:
- And you can just state your name and begin your testimony. Thank you, Chair and members.
- uh thank you and uh begin your testimony uh thank you chair<00:04:18.799>
and <00:04:18.959>- thank you Mr chair good testimony thank you Mr chair good afternoon<00:07:34.039>
chair <00:07- <00:53:53.559>
we hope you realize from the testimony we hope you realize from the testimony- Thank you for your time, thank you for hearing my testimony, Mr. Chair and committee.
- thank you Mr chair good testimony thank you Mr chair good afternoon<00:07:34.039>
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
Keywords:
education, literacy, science of reading, school performance, funding flexibility, innovation zones, equity and inclusion, HF52, New Germany, wastewater treatment, wastewater facility, sewer infrastructure, capital investment, bonding bill, state bonds, Public Facilities Authority, municipal infrastructure, water quality, sanitation, sewage treatment
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Resources, Recreation and Development (01/14/2026)
Resources, Recreation and Development
NH
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (02/04/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:09:36.960>
that to caution that we had testimony that to caution that we had testimony - I have prepared written testimony.
- I have prepared written testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- DeJoy’s testimony.
Summary:
The House Children and Family Law Committee opened its February 4, 2025 hearing with a business item on House Bill 553, appointing a subcommittee chaired by Representative Greg and including several named members. The committee then took up House Bill 486, which would revise New Hampshire’s grandparents’ visitation law. The prime sponsor said the bill is intended to address gaps in current law, especially in situations involving divorce, separation, kinship care, and parental substance use, so that children can maintain important relationships with grandparents or other kin caregivers. He emphasized that the proposal was meant to supplement existing law rather than replace it, and said the language was modeled on statutes from other states.
Several witnesses testified in support of HB 486, describing painful family separations and arguing that current law can be interpreted too narrowly. One grandmother said the existing statute had been used to dismiss her visitation case because she was restricted while the parents were separated, and she asked for language changes so courts could still order visitation in similar circumstances. Another witness, testifying online, urged passage of the bill as being in the best interest of children. A third witness described a family living arrangement in which grandparents had been a consistent presence in their grandchildren’s lives but were later cut off during a contentious separation, and said the bill would help repair those relationships. Committee members asked about the six-month timeframe in the bill, whether the proposed language would affect cases where a grandparent does not live with the child but is still a regular caregiver, and whether the sponsor had written amendment language; the sponsor said the six-month language was taken from other states’ statutes and that the new language would not change existing visitation rights but would add to them.
After hearing the testimony, the chair said the committee would hold HB 486 aside for a week or two while awaiting additional information before voting. The hearing then moved to House Bill 320, an act relative to enforcement of marital property settlements. The sponsor explained that the bill would require courts to enforce final property decrees and would clarify the difference between enforcement and contempt, arguing that courts should have clear authority to fashion remedies and that litigants, especially self-represented parties, need clearer statutory guidance. Committee members questioned the legal distinctions the sponsor drew, including whether the bill was aimed at enforcement rather than contempt and how the proposed language would operate in practice. The transcript cuts off before any vote or further action on HB 320.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/25
Human Services Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:10:57.120>
is 1337 see none uh public testimony is 1337 see none uh public testimony is - Chair, and thanks for your testimony.
- Chair, and thanks for your testimony.
- <01:05:15.799>
is 382 seeing none public testimony is 382 seeing none public testimony is - Please state your name for the record and present your testimony.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Thank you all for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. Mm-hm.
- So thank you for your testimony, Thomas.
Bills:
HB 3772, HB 1656, HB 4504, HB 1896, HB 4420, HB 4421, HB 4076, HB 3708, HB 2806, HB 3540, HB 1586, HB 5459, HB 4553, HB 4535, HB 3811, HB 3749, HB 4255, HB 4051, HB 5098, HB 3554, HB 4539, HB 5274
Keywords:
e-cigarettes, health and safety, regulations, directory, penalties, regulation, certification, compliance, manufacturers, FDA, nicotine, mental health, emergency detention, paramedic authority, mental illness, healthcare facility, public health, covenants not to compete, health care practitioners, physicians
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 4/10/25
Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- If you'd like, please come forward and begin your testimony.
- Please introduce yourself and begin your testimony. Great.
- Please introduce yourself and begin your testimony.
- We will close testimony at this point.
- Uh are close uh testimony at this point.
Bills:
HF2439
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
House committee considers proposed amendment to MN Constitution guaranteeing equal rights 4/3/25
Transcript Highlights:
- You'll state your name for the record and please begin your testimony. Sure.
- <00:06:48.880>
and thank you so much for your testimony and thank you so much for your testimony - <00:09:05.839>
we very much for your testimony we very much for your testimony we appreciate - Thank you for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. And now we'll move to member testimony and member discussion.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- But again, we thank you for your testimony.
- Ott, I appreciate your testimony. Members, any questions?
- That's where we get our other testimony in.
- I appreciate your testimony. The Chair calls Matthew.
- I appreciate the testimony.
Bills:
HB 1239, HB1990, HB1748, HB1749, HB2578, HB2986, HB1970, HB3163, HB2733, HB1922, HB 113, HB 1088, HB1938, HB3004, HB2637, HB2960, HB113
Keywords:
public health, access to healthcare, insurance reforms, medical expenses, healthcare providers, mental health, protective custody, preliminary examination, detention period, emergency circumstances, emergency detention, legal framework, detention, healthcare, liability, landowners, nonagricultural land, trespassing, public safety, interpreters
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Hearings to examine the poisoning of America, focusing on fentanyl, its analogues, and the need for permanent class scheduling. Feb 4th, 2025 at 09:30 am
Senate Judiciary
Transcript Highlights:
- My testimony today does not seek to invalidate yours.
- To restate what I mentioned in my testimony, the data from the U.S.
- You heard their testimony back then in January 2024.
- Thank you both, again, for your testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. I yield back. I couldn't agree more.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy (05/13/2026)
Transcript Highlights:
- And number four, if you see in the quote in the middle, but basically the testimony in 2024 was that
- And number four, if you see in the quote in the middle, but basically the testimony in 2024 was that
- I believe even there was some testimony I gave in a previous bill about a potential process for that.
- <01:04:43.640>
or if we are getting our testimonies or if we are getting our testimonies or - <01:23:05.440>
to that we need to expand testimonies to that we need to expand testimonies
Summary:
The Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy for New Hampshire held its first organizational meeting. The chair read the committee’s updated mission statement, which says the bipartisan committee will fact-find on the state’s COVID-19 response and its impact on the healthcare system, with focus areas including federal guidance, federal funds, emergency use authorization vaccination efforts, long COVID, the Patient Bill of Rights, and vaccination policies. The chair also announced committee staffing changes: Linda McGrath stepped down as vice chair and Representative Gerard was named vice chair; Representative DeRoy was named clerk. The chair emphasized the committee’s work is intended to be science-based and fact-finding, not anti-vaccine, and noted that the committee may issue follow-up reports and recommendations.
Members discussed a broad list of topics for future hearings, including long COVID treatment, ongoing vaccination policies, reporting of COVID deaths, standards of care and provider discretion, COVID-related funding such as ESSER/CARES Act money, and communication of treatment developments during the pandemic. Representative Pollina argued the committee should examine specific treatments and outcomes, including remdesivir, oxygen/intubation practices, and ivermectin, and raised concerns about whether some treatments were harmful or suppressed. He also focused on pediatric vaccination policy, saying the committee should review New Hampshire’s recommendations for children and medical students, and questioned the state’s reliance on federal guidance versus independent review. The chair responded that shifting federal positions may justify an independent New Hampshire evaluation and asked him to gather more information and potential witnesses.
In open discussion, members suggested additional witnesses and topics, including local funeral directors, nursing homes, and emergency medical services, as well as how nursing homes were affected by positive tests and admission restrictions. Another member suggested the committee consider what products it should produce, such as a final report, possible bill recommendations, and better documentation or footnotes tying findings to testimony and scientific sources. The chair said the committee’s deliverables could include reports, letters to department heads or legislative leaders, and other actions, and noted that the committee’s 2024 report and supporting documents are available on the House committee page. No votes or formal actions beyond the organizational appointments were taken.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:33:37.159>
on committee received testimony on committee received testimony on legislation - With that, I guess I can end my testimony there.
- With that, I guess I can end my testimony there.
- With that, I guess I can end my testimony there.
- With that, I guess I can end my testimony there.
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Resources, Recreation and Development (02/11/2026)
Resources, Recreation and Development
Transcript Highlights:
- I for indulging my lengthy testimony.
- Thank you for your testimony. Thank you for your testimony.
- . testimony. testimony.
- during testimony, I believe during testimony, I believe Representative<04:17:31.520>
Donnelly - of testimony that this the questioning of testimony that this really<04:21:10.000>
applies <04