Transcript Highlights:

• Section two requires certain disclosures. There's one change in section two on page 2, line 15.
• Previously, the language required disclosure of publicly available inspection reports.
• Previously, the language required disclosure of publicly available inspection reports.
• Previously, the language required disclosure of publicly available inspection reports.
• Previously, the language required disclosure of publicly available inspection reports.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• SB 1050 imposes a disclosure requirement on any ad that uses a synthetic performer.
• When everything is labeled, disclosures can become less meaningful.
• A materiality standard would improve focus on disclosures that matter the most.
• And like I said, the disclosure part makes absolute sense to me.
• So I think the protections are absolutely needed, at least the disclosures.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Each member presenting today will have an opportunity to provide an opening and closing statement.
• I think that's a fair statement. Okay, thank you. Thank you so much, Dr. Jackson.
• The audit reviews each university's financial statement.
• So when you talk about audits and public disclosure and transparency, you excite a budget geek like me
• They can see our annual financial statements.

Summary: The committee first adopted its 2025-26 rules on a 7-0 roll call, then approved three consent items—AB 88, AB 240, and AB 313—on a due-pass motion to Appropriations. The hearing then moved to AB 648, which would give community college districts the same zoning authority as the UC and CSU systems to build student and staff housing on property they own or lease. The author and supporters argued the bill would help address severe housing insecurity and homelessness among community college students, while opponents and some members raised concerns about local control, zoning exemptions, and the impact on nearby communities. AB 648 passed the committee on a 5-2 vote and was sent to the Local Government Committee. The committee next heard AB 466, which would require California Community Colleges and CSU campuses to provide organ and tissue donor registry information during student orientation, and request UC campuses to do the same. Supporters shared personal stories about transplants and donation, saying college orientation is a good opportunity to increase registrations. Some members worried about information overload during orientation and suggested campuses have flexibility in how they present the material, but the bill advanced on a unanimous 7-0 vote to Appropriations. AB 326 followed, proposing campus-by-campus external audits of the CSU every three years and public release of the audits. The author, faculty supporters, and a student argued that systemwide audits do not provide enough transparency about how money is spent at individual campuses, citing examples of financial mismanagement and fee increases. CSU opposed the bill, saying it already conducts annual consolidated external audits and that campus-level audits would add cost without added benefit. After extensive discussion about transparency, audit scope, and implementation, the bill passed 6-1 to Appropriations. The committee then took up AB 335, which would create a California Black-Serving Institution Grant Program to support Black student success and broader underserved student services; supporters emphasized persistent equity gaps and low completion rates, while an opponent argued the bill needed to be carefully amended to comply with Proposition 209 and equal protection requirements. The transcript ends during that item’s discussion, before a final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, I guess I'm—I can't separate that statement from another famous statement that was made in another
• My written statement is going around.
• </c><01:34:03.080><c> is</c> forfeiture um uh my written statement is forfeiture um uh my written statement
• Would you think that prohibiting public disclosure or knowing public disclosure would be a better approach
• public disclosure or knowing public<04:16:29.800><c> disclosure</c><04:16:30.359><c> would</c><04:16

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard CACR 6, a proposed constitutional amendment by Representative Keith Ammon to recognize a fundamental right to use computation resources. Ammon argued that computing is now essential to daily life, speech, education, and economic opportunity, and said the amendment was intended to push back against government or corporate restrictions, citing a 2023 federal executive order on AI registration and reporting as an example of the kind of precedent he wanted to oppose. He said the proposal should be simple and clear because it would go to voters, and he compared the right to compute to other constitutional rights that do not require the government to provide the underlying tools. Committee members raised concerns about the breadth of the language, including whether it could affect encryption, authentication, network security, energy use, and other regulatory issues. Representative McFarland questioned whether the amendment could interfere with security measures, while others asked whether it would prevent ordinary network management such as throttling or require the state to provide internet access or hardware. Ammon responded that the right would not entitle someone to other people’s resources and said encryption and similar issues would sort themselves out. Several members also raised concerns about child safety, public safety, and whether existing laws could still regulate misuse of computing; Ammon said reasonable limits would still apply, similar to other constitutional rights. Sarah Scott of Americans for Prosperity testified in support, saying the amendment would protect innovation, individual autonomy, and economic competitiveness by preventing overregulation. After questions concluded, the chair closed the hearing on CACR 6. The committee then opened House Bill 615, sponsored by Representative Dan Maguire, which would substantially rewrite the state’s drug-forfeiture law. Maguire said the bill is intended to improve fairness and efficiency in cases where property such as cars or cash is seized in connection with drug offenses, noting that the criminal case and the civil forfeiture case are currently handled separately, with the property case prosecuted by the Attorney General’s office. He explained that the bill addresses courtroom procedure for these forfeiture actions and is meant to make the process more specific and orderly.

Transcript Highlights:

• rule and security rule, and other laws, regulations, and guidelines that impact patient access, disclosure
• It establishes term limits for members of the State Board of Education, ...disclosure requirements.
• The bill establishes the threshold for when applicant information becomes subject to public disclosure
• Madam Chair, last question, last kind of line of statement for me.
• , and that's the bill, Madam Chair. extends the rescission period of non-developer disclosure, and that's

Summary: The committee first took up CS/SB 1606 on patient access to records. The sponsor explained that the bill, as amended, would align Florida law more closely with HIPAA by defining “designated record set,” requiring providers to furnish requested records within set timeframes, allowing a limited extension with notice, and requiring records to be produced in the requested form if readily producible. Several members asked about patient portals, legal representatives, and whether the bill affected meaningful-use rules or post-mortem access. Multiple witnesses opposed the bill, arguing it could create cybersecurity risks, conflict with existing privacy rules, and burden providers; supporters said it would improve patient access and consistency. The committee adopted the amendment and then reported the bill favorably. The committee then considered CS/SB 712 on construction regulations. The bill would direct DEP to establish rules for synthetic turf and limit local governments from banning it if state rules are followed, while also addressing change orders, public works bidding, elevator rails, alarm contractor work, building code updates, spaceport exemptions, permit document limits, and single-trade inspections. Amendments removed the pool and spa contractor provisions and the tall mass timber language. Testimony on the bill centered heavily on the pool industry, with contractors and the Florida Swimming Pool Association opposing expansion of scope to general and building contractors, while some speakers supported other parts of the bill. After adopting the amendments, the committee reported the bill favorably. Finally, the committee heard CS/SB 1288 on parental rights. The bill would allow minors to be tested for STDs without parental consent but require parental consent for treatment, expand parents’ rights to access records and control certain health decisions, and restrict health care services, medical procedures, and biofeedback devices for minors absent consent or an exception. An amendment moved survey and questionnaire provisions into the education code, added an explicit court-order exception, clarified DNA and biofeedback provisions, and added emergency behavioral health exceptions. The committee heard extensive public testimony both for and against the bill, with supporters emphasizing parental authority and opponents warning it could delay STI treatment, mental health care, and other services for vulnerable minors. The transcript ends during public testimony on the bill, before any final committee action is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• rule and security rule and other laws, regulations, and guidelines that impact patient access, disclosure
• rule and security rule and other laws, regulations, and guidelines that impact patient access, disclosure
• The bill establishes the threshold for when applicant information becomes subject to public disclosure
• Madam Chair, last question, last kind of line of statement for me.
• And that's the bill, Madam Chair. ...extends the rescission period for non-developer disclosure, and

Summary: The committee first took up CS/SB 1606 on patient access to records. Sponsor Senator Grall explained an amendment that aligned the bill more closely with HIPAA by defining “designated record set,” allowing a 14-day extension, and requiring records to be produced in the requested form if readily producible. Several senators asked about patient portals, legal representatives, and whether the bill applied post-mortem; Grall said the bill was limited to authorized access during the patient’s life. Testimony was largely opposed, with health information and provider groups warning that the bill could create cybersecurity risks, conflict with HIPAA and meaningful-use rules, burden facilities, and improperly broaden access to portals and sensitive records. Supporters argued it would improve patient access and speed. The amendment was adopted, and the bill was reported favorably by roll call vote after debate on the bill as amended. The committee then considered CS/SB 712 on construction regulations. Grall described provisions on synthetic turf, change orders, public works bidding, elevator rails, alarm contractor scope, tall mass timber, pool and spa contractor scope, spaceport exemptions, permit document limits, and solar/energy storage inspections. Two amendments were adopted: one removed pool and spa contractor language and delayed the change-order provision until July 1, 2025; the other removed the tall mass timber section. Pool contractors testified against the scope expansion in the original bill, while others supported the remaining provisions. Senators raised concerns about the Florida Building Commission process and how the public-works language might affect small-business participation, but the bill as amended was ultimately reported favorably. Finally, the committee heard CS/SB 1288 on parental rights. Grall said the bill would require parental consent for most minor health care decisions, allow parental access to records, restrict surveys/questionnaires, and limit use of biofeedback devices, while preserving certain exceptions such as emergency care and STD testing. An amendment clarified questionnaire opt-outs for K-12 students, added court-order exceptions, addressed DNA sampling for criminal investigations, refined biofeedback language, and added emergency behavioral health exceptions; it was adopted. The bill drew extensive testimony both for and against: supporters said it restored parental authority and protected children from decisions they are not equipped to make, while opponents argued it would endanger minors seeking confidential STI, mental health, or abuse-related care, especially in unsafe homes. Senators also debated whether the bill would conflict with existing laws and whether it could leave some minors untreated. The transcript ends during continued public testimony on the bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Just one question, Detective: you mentioned that you would support some sort of disclosure signage, right
• They don't handle the question of fee caps; they emphasize fee disclosure.
• And again, going back on the fee question, we're in favor of clear disclosures. We want...
• And again, going back on the fee question, we're in favor of clear disclosures.
• It's unclear what the disclosure sections of these bills are trying to address.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several financial services bills, with the main focus on cryptocurrency kiosk regulation, financial literacy, and earned wage access. Legislators and witnesses described widespread crypto-related scams targeting older adults, often involving impersonation, urgency, spoofed phone numbers, and rapid transfers through kiosks that are difficult to trace or recover. Supporters of the kiosk bills said Massachusetts needs licensing, registration, transaction limits, warning notices, receipts, refund protections, and other safeguards; some also urged a “pause” or hold on transactions to give victims time to reconsider and allow law enforcement to intervene. The Attorney General’s office, AARP, local law enforcement, and several prosecutors and sheriffs backed the consumer-protection approach, while Bitcoin Depot supported a narrower regulatory framework but opposed low fee caps and strict daily limits, arguing they would function like a ban and reduce legitimate use. Witnesses from Waltham police, Middlesex and Essex County law enforcement, and the AG’s office said crypto scams are growing quickly, losses are often unrecoverable once funds move, and current tools are limited. They described cases involving elderly victims losing thousands of dollars, and said warnings alone are not enough because scammers keep victims on the phone and guide them through the process. Some witnesses said a temporary hold or refund mechanism has worked in at least one case, while others emphasized that transaction limits and visible disclosures could reduce harm even if they do not stop fraud entirely. The AG’s office also said it would submit written opposition to separate earned wage advance legislation, while DailyPay testified in support of that bill, saying earned wage access helps workers bridge short-term gaps without debt or credit reporting. The committee also heard support for mandatory financial literacy education from Representative Jim Hawkins, who said high school students need instruction on credit, debt, and inflation before they enter adulthood. In addition, the committee took testimony on litigation financing bills from insurance industry representatives, who argued for disclosure and regulation of predatory litigation lending and warned about foreign interference and reduced plaintiff recoveries. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing; members asked questions throughout, and the chair noted the need to move testimony along because of time constraints.

Transcript Highlights:

• Simple disclosure bill, and I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
• The bill... ...symbol disclosure bill and I respectfully ask for your aye vote.
• It requires disclosure of the companies controlled through these investments, and it requires disclosure
• Disclosure requirements do not dictate investment decisions.
• passed AB 2833 fee disclosure for private equity firms.

Summary: The committee heard SB 921, which would create a tax credit to help agricultural employers offset overtime premium costs for farmworkers. Senator Grove and supporters, including farmworkers, the California Farm Bureau, and agricultural groups, argued the bill would restore lost hours and take-home pay after California’s agricultural overtime law reduced schedules. Opponents, including the California Federation of Labor Unions and CRLA Foundation, argued the proposal would subsidize employers with taxpayer dollars and undermine the principle that employers should pay overtime themselves. The bill was held in subcommittee until more members arrived. The committee then took up SB 1083, a cleanup bill to the prior year’s school employee misconduct database law. The author and supporters said it would add due process protections for classified school employees, require an administrative law judge review before placement in the database, and improve notice and vetting rules for contractors and non-permanent staff. School employer groups and other opponents warned the bill could slow investigations and weaken child-safety protections. The committee approved the bill 3-0 and sent it to Senate Appropriations. Members also considered SB 1089, which would require CalPERS health plans to cover GLP-1 medications and expand access through CalRX for chronic weight management and related health conditions. The author and supporters, including the American Diabetes Association and medical groups, said the drugs can prevent diabetes and improve health outcomes but remain unaffordable for many. Pharma representatives expressed concerns about the bill as drafted but said they were open to continued discussions. The bill passed 4-0 to Appropriations. The committee also approved the consent calendar 4-0. Later, the committee heard SB 954, which would narrow and add guardrails to last year’s CEQA exemption for advanced manufacturing, including environmental review near disadvantaged communities and labor standards such as prevailing wage and skilled-and-trained workforce requirements. Labor, environmental, and community groups supported the bill as a cleanup of an overly broad exemption, while business and manufacturing groups opposed it, warning it would discourage investment and worsen California’s competitiveness. The bill passed 3-1 to Appropriations. Finally, SB 1299, a fire sprinkler fitter certification bill, was heard and passed 3-0 to Appropriations with support from the sprinkler fitters and building trades and no recorded opposition.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yet the summary on the statement itself.
• prohibits the non-disclosure of the subpoena.
• prohibits the non-disclosure of the subpoena.
• prohibits the non-disclosure of the subpoena.
• prohibits the non-disclosure of the subpoena.

Keywords: 981, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Disclosure does oftentimes lead to compromising investigations.
• Disclosure<01:24:24.320><c> does</c><01:24:24.960><c> often</c><01:24:25.360><c> times</c> Disclosure
• > disclosed The disclosure of disclosed The disclosure of investigation<01:25:47.920><c> would</c><01
• </c><01:33:52.600><c> before</c> may want to withhold disclosure before may want to withhold disclosure
• And and so, I disclosure of the details.

Bills: HF3542

Keywords: data privacy, investigative data, welfare system, public funds, transparency, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• on who paid for Express disclosure on who paid for Express advocacy<00:09:39.760><c> advertisements<
• But if they were doing that, uh, paid by someone else and it had a paid-for disclosure, I guess that
• The trouble is right now when somebody runs an ad for a ballot measure, there's no disclosure required
• But if they were doing that, uh, paid by someone else and it had a paid-for disclosure, I guess that
• The trouble is right now when somebody runs an ad for a ballot measure, there's no disclosure required

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:05 Attendance Roll Call: 00:17 HB 30 (Rep. Blanton): 01:12 HB 27 (Rep. Osborne: 05:22 HB 45 (Rep. Hodgson): 08:29 HB 211 (Rep. C. Lewis): 15:54 HB 441 (Rep. Tipton): 36:38 Adjournment: 41:20, 958, all

Summary: The Senate State and Local Government Committee met and first took up House Bill 30, which addresses pension spiking and retired state troopers returning to work. The sponsor and Kentucky Public Pensions Authority staff said the bill would codify court language clarifying that across-the-board raises from the General Assembly do not count as pension spiking, and the committee substitute would also give retired troopers rehired on a year-to-year basis the same vacation, sick leave, and bereavement benefits as new troopers. The committee adopted the substitute and a title amendment, and HB 30 passed 9-0. The committee then considered House Bill 27, which removes an arbitrary 2023 date from the Planned Communities Act that had created confusion over political signage rules in HOA and planned community phases. The sponsor said the change would preserve HOA authority to regulate sign size, duration, and placement while eliminating inconsistent treatment of neighboring properties. The bill passed 10-0. House Bill 45 followed, proposing to ban foreign funding in Kentucky elections and ballot measures and to require disclosure for express advocacy ads related to ballot measures. Supporters said the bill would put ballot measures on the same footing as candidate and PAC restrictions and prevent foreign nationals from influencing Kentucky elections; one senator raised concerns that the language could unintentionally chill participation by noncitizens, especially in one-on-one discussions, and the sponsor said he would work on that issue. The committee adopted the bill as amended, and it passed 8-1. The final major item was House Bill 211, which would create a narrow exemption allowing cigar bars under defined conditions, including a revenue threshold, age restrictions, ventilation requirements, and local permitting options. The sponsor said the bill would not roll back general smoke-free laws but would allow tightly regulated cigar bars and grandfather existing ones from some requirements. Public health witnesses, including a nurse, a physician, and a thoracic surgeon, opposed the bill, warning it would weaken strong smoke-free protections, harm workers and patrons, and reverse progress against tobacco-related disease. The transcript provided did not include a final vote on HB 211.

Transcript Highlights:

• City staff signed a non-disclosure agreement so the development proceeded in secrecy.
• </c> City staff signed a non-disclosure City staff signed a non-disclosure agreement<00:56:54.359><c>
• Potter for making a good<01:50:26.240><c> statement</c><01:50:26.840><c> on</c><01:50:27.640><c> on</
• I'm reading a statement on behalf of Bruce Anderson, who could not be here today.
• :58:48.080><c> Bruce</c><01:58:48.320><c> Anderson</c> statement on behalf of Bruce Anderson statement

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• have a problem here where look at what Farmington, look what Apple Valley has done with the non-disclosure
• I think these non-disclosure agreements should not be allowed in any of these projects where we're giving
• The Senate has, as long as I've been here, resisted a provision in law that requires purpose statements
• The Senate has, as long as I've been here, resisted a provision in law that requires purpose statements
• </c><01:19:15.040><c> of</c> themselves having to do a statement of themselves having to do a statement

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And for full disclosure, I am contingent faculty at Metro State, where I co-e the latest iteration of
• And for full disclosure, Minscu system.
• Um so I'm going to keep my statement be.
• :56.160><c> turn</c> there or my my statements there and turn there or my my statements there and turn
• Chair, Madam Chair, I'm signing the statement of work.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• He has a statement to talk about, but this bill is a clean bill and it came from the Lottery Office,
• talk about but this bill is statement talk about but this bill is clean<00:15:13.560><c> bill</c><00
• of data things unauthorized disclosure of data things like<00:28:13.960><c> that</c><00:28:14.679><c
• Lead Clor, thank you, and I just want to start off with a clarifying statement to you, Mr. Chair.
• </c><00:49:24.760><c> to</c><00:49:24.960><c> you</c> off with a clarifying statement to you off with

Bills: HF1867, HF1240

Keywords: lottery, retailer contracts, Minnesota Statutes, contract qualifications, public integrity, criminal background, legislative auditor, public funds, state government, compliance, transparency, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Your statement that 40% of our agricultural lands are fallow or being unused for agriculture—define that
• c> 40%</c><00:41:30.599><c> of</c><00:41:30.760><c> our</c><00:41:31.160><c> agricultural</c> um statement
• 40% of our agricultural um statement 40% of our agricultural lands<00:41:33.359><c> are</c><00:41:33.640
• requirements for real estate disclosure requirements for real estate transactions<00:47:19.640><c> for
• um which allows them to or statements um which allows them to respond<01:10:49.040><c> faster</c><01

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> In addition to flagging the disclosure In addition to flagging the disclosure for<00:22:48.840><
• And are there consequences for not making these disclosures?
• </c><00:58:51.800><c> requirements</c> compliance with disclosure requirements compliance with disclosure
• </c><00:59:43.600><c> Are</c><00:59:43.720><c> there</c> making these disclosures?
• Are there making these disclosures?

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Require a disclosure on campaign mass text messages. I move for passage.
• the Texas Water Development Board's website while maintaining key financial and administrative disclosures
• So I want to clear up some statements that were made earlier.
• SB 2007 by Hagenbue relates to the voluntary disclosure of an applicant's military status when registering
• SB2776 by Hinojosa, relating to the disclosure of certain information by the Texas Juvenile...

Bills: HJR138, HB42, HB 104, HB 129, HB677, HB426, HB668, HB1699, HB2017, HB2128, HB2038, HB3783, HB3717, HB2316, HB3686, HB2563, HB3883, HB4021, HB2788, HB2663, HB3305, HB3173, HB3474, HB 1105, HB3531, HB3490, HB3597, HB 1295, HB3512, HB3010, HB3112, HB4215, HB3223, HB3464, HB3120, HB4214, HB4511, HB3704, HB4081, HB4783, HB4063, HB2783, HB4937, HB5085, HB2510, HB3426, HB4361, HB 1169, HB2516, HB2347, HB4034, HB4700, HB3560, HB5150, HB3860, HB3146, HB3924, HCR98, HCR92, HB1520, HB1545, HB5265, HB1887, HB1914, HB2402, HB2306, HB2350, HB3000, HB3237, HB3326, HB3211, HB 1056, HB2081, HB2187, HB3092, HB3308, HB3526, HB3750, HB4219, HB4230, HB4290, HB5238, HB4804, HB4749, HB245, HB1465, HB294, HB793, HB809, HB3928, HB334, HB2037, HB1973, HB285, HB4341, HB 1043, HB 1234, HB 1193, HB1729, HB2498, HB1314, HB1353, HB3960, HB3923, HB2221, HB2517, HB2518, HB2213, HB5092, HB3748, HB5246, HB4344, HB1482, HB4044, HB2702, HB4264, HB2807, HB2898, HB3181, HB3250, HB2091, HB2115, HB2542, HB2768, HB3349, HB4406, HB1593, HB1899, HB3133, HB3133, HB4960, HB3214, HB2145, HB 1201, HB5061, SB29, SB879, SB65, SB1745, SB412, SB412, SB1746, SB1238, SB1341, SB522, SB1532, SB1378, SB1062, SB2066, SB1963, SB2204, SB1366, SB2077, SB1967, SB1151, HB1618, HB2156, HB2615, HB2615, HB2349, HB1926, HB569, HB1762, HB38, HJR138, HB42, HB 104, HB 104, HB 129, HB677, HB426, HB668, HB1699, HB2017, HB2128, HB2038, HB3783, HB3717, HB2316, HB3686, HB2563, HB3883, HB4021, HB2788, HB2663, HB2663, HB3305, HB3173, HB3474, HB 1105, HB3531, HB3531, HB3490, HB3490, HB3597, HB 1295, HB3512, HB3010, HB3112, HB4215, HB3223, HB3223, HB3464, HB3120, HB4214, HB4511, HB3704, HB4081, HB4783, HB4063, HB2783, HB4937, HB5085, HB2510, HB3426, HB4361, HB 1169, HB2516, HB2347, HB4034, HB4700, HB3560, HB5150, HB3860, HB3146, HB3924, HCR98, HCR92

Keywords: carbon tax, carbon emissions, greenhouse gas, climate policy, fuel tax, emissions tax, Texas Constitution, Article VIII, tax limitation, environmental tax, fossil fuels, energy policy, legislative taxing authority, ballot proposition, constitutional amendment, higher education, funding, financial allocation, state budget, Texas A&M University

Transcript Highlights:

• It focuses narrowly on disclosure, ethical safeguards, and does not regulate pricing.
• As you know, there are required disclosures in other contexts in various court proceedings.
• So there are very many technical aspects to this bill, but really the sunlight and disclosure will tell
• They allow it to some degree, but they have far more regulations than just disclosure.
• If we have these disclosures of these agreements without it being on both sides, then there's going to

Bills: HB2255, HB2320, HB2548

Keywords: litigation finance, legal funding, lawsuit, financial services, access to justice, firearm regulation, manufacturing, safety standards, background checks, license requirements, health care market standards, hospital consolidation, merger review, health care transaction notice, attorney general review, antitrust, provider organizations, hospital systems, contracting affiliation, material change

Transcript Highlights:

• And finally, financial disclosure form.
• </c> how to best manage candidate disclosure how to best manage candidate disclosure forms<01:06:55.360
• </c> financial disclosure. financial disclosure.
• </c> the disclosure. the disclosure.
• </c> out your disclosure form. out your disclosure form.

Keywords: 927, senate, all