Video & Transcript Research : 'cold case'

Page 120 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary C May 12th, 2026

Judiciary C

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's not the case in Louisiana.
  • The case of Frank Ford, Cosie.
  • The case of Frank Ford, Cosie.
  • , if that case is overturned.
  • Atkins case.
Summary: The committee first heard House Bill 137, which would strengthen penalties for knowingly making threats against schools, school activities, students, or school employees. The author said the bill responds to repeated false threats that disrupt schools, frighten families, and divert law enforcement, and it adds education and parental acknowledgment requirements. Members discussed possible juvenile consequences such as public service or physical work at schools, and the bill drew support from law enforcement, district attorneys, and Catholic bishops. It was reported favorably without objection. House Bill 321 followed, addressing Louisiana’s Safe Harbor law by expressly exempting minors from prostitution offenses and treating them as trafficking victims rather than offenders. The author, clergy, trafficking advocates, and a survivor testified that children involved in commercial sex are typically coerced, groomed, or controlled by traffickers, often family members or caregivers, and should receive protection and services instead of arrest. Witnesses described statewide advocacy and crisis-response services created in 2022, and committee members asked about prosecution of perpetrators and the prevalence of trafficking in rural areas. The bill was reported favorably without objection. The committee then approved House Bill 1246, a response to a fatal drunk-driving crash involving Jada Bright, which would allow law enforcement to keep intoxicated offenders in jail if they are not safe to release. An amendment was adopted to clean up the language, and the bill was reported favorably. House Bill 1104, creating a misdemeanor for possession of motor vehicle key-programming or emulating devices used to steal cars, also passed favorably with support from prosecutors and police. House Bill 552, a cleanup measure replacing references to intoxication with impairment in prior drug-related statutes, was reported favorably as well. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 310, which would require random reassignment when a defendant waives a jury trial in districts with more than two judges, unless the prosecutor agrees otherwise. Supporters said it would prevent judge shopping and address concerns about unusually high acquittal rates before particular judges, while opponents argued it raises due process concerns and effectively lets prosecutors choose the judge. Despite the opposition, the bill was reported favorably. The last major item was House Bill 1107, dealing with post-conviction death penalty cases involving claims of intellectual disability; the bill would set a 75 IQ threshold and create procedures for Atkins claims. Supporters said it would bring finality to long-pending capital cases and follow U.S. Supreme Court guidance, while opponents argued it would be unconstitutional under Atkins, Moore, and Hall because intellectual disability cannot be reduced to a single number. After extensive testimony and debate over amendments, the committee adopted the amendment and then reported the bill favorably.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • There's also gas cases, water, wastewater cases.
  • This is how these cases go. This is kind of the driest part of This is how these cases go.
  • You triage a case.
  • You know, you triage a case. I view this as triage. You know, you triage a case.
  • Water and wastewater rate cases.
Summary: The joint committee met with a quorum present and first received an overview of its jurisdiction and duties related to appointing the Florida Public Counsel. Staff explained the committee’s authority under joint rules and state law, noted that the current Public Counsel’s term expires February 28, 2025, and that applications for the next four-year term were open with a February 6, 2025 deadline. The committee then heard an extensive update from Public Counsel Walt Truerweiler on the Office of Public Counsel’s work representing utility ratepayers before the Public Service Commission and in appeals. Truerweiler described the office’s caseload and priorities, including electric, gas, water, and wastewater rate cases; storm recovery dockets; cost-recovery clauses; rulemakings; and customer service hearings. He emphasized that the office seeks to challenge unsupported or imprudent costs, find value for customers, and use expert analysis and customer testimony to shape outcomes. He highlighted recent and ongoing matters, including major Duke, TECO, Sunshine water/wastewater, and hurricane recovery proceedings, and said the office had fully litigated four of its last five rate cases, while also achieving a major settlement in Duke that reduced a requested increase and imposed cost controls on solar projects. Members praised the office’s work and asked about the benefits of settlements, staffing and compensation, and how the office decides when to fully intervene versus provide guidance or monitor a case. Truerweiler said settlements can create predictability, reduce uncertainty and expense, and produce tangible value for both customers and utilities. He also acknowledged recruitment challenges, including lower pay than comparable agencies and difficulty attracting attorneys who do not want in-person litigation work. The committee took no substantive action beyond receiving the presentations, and adjourned after a motion was adopted.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Human Services Apr 1st, 2025

Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • I don't have the CPS cases to review.
  • To me, this bill addresses once a criminal case is filed, once a law enforcement agency has filed a case
  • We have to dismiss this case now.
  • When it's in trial, they need to be doing discovery and prepping witnesses and getting cases, good cases
  • Um, is that a lot of cases?
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • So I have general jurisdiction, handling felony criminal cases and family cases. cases, civil cases,
  • there cases ripe for dismissal, then that's in fact what a judge should do—go and dismiss cases.
  • If you only set one case, you're not ever going to be certain because that one case is likely to settle
  • If you have a case that's going to trial, and you don't know if the next case on the list is going to
  • The cases we see primarily at the felony level are the smuggling cases, and at the misdemeanor level,
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Another one is age of the cases, essentially how long cases have been pending.
  • Another one is the age of the cases, essentially how long cases have been pending.
  • on the case, and also the size and complexity of the new case.
  • on the case, and also the size and complexity of the new case.
  • and throughout their case.
Bills: SB 1
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Courts, Corrections and Justice Aug 27th, 2025

Courts, Corrections & Justice Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • —69 or 70 cases.
  • it moves from being a JR case to a YR case.
  • usually is not the case.
  • cases at the very end of 2024.
  • All cases... and I know you made the point earlier that... there had been cases in which state cases
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence May 7th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Wood mentioned case law.
  • I think there are 82 active cases.
  • Uh, we are adjudicating cases.
  • They average and have over the last 12 to 14 years 52 cases per year.
  • Consumer cases can come in as a supplemental claim.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary C May 12th, 2026

Judiciary C

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's not the case in Louisiana.
  • That's not the case in Louisiana.
  • , if that case is overturned.
  • Smith case, pages 7 to 10 or so.
  • Smith case, pages 7 to 10 or so.
Keywords: 974, senate, all
AR

Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT Mar 16th, 2026

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT

Transcript Highlights:
  • Well, when was your bankruptcy case? I'm not familiar with the bankruptcy case, Senator.
  • And so that's why we had two separate cases. And the federal case has been dismissed?
  • The case was affirmed. Okay.
  • The case was dismissed. It was declined. What? They dismissed the case. Did they get an order?
  • case.
Keywords: 1204, all
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama House Special Session 2026 Part 2 May 8th, 2026

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, but we're talking about the Singleton versus Allen case right now. >> So, tell me in this case, in
  • All of that is comprised of all of those individual cases, as well as the NAACP Alabama cases, as well
  • >> The Senate case was not rolled into that congressional case at all. They're separate cases.
  • The Senate case was not rolled into that congressional case at all. They're separate cases.
  • You didn't do anything in the case?
Keywords: 1136, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • The court handled ten cases, having handled six cases in under ten minutes by Zoom, all on contested
  • Custody case.
  • I've had cases; I had a case like that where the parents were appealing.
  • In my case, let me testify about my case.
  • In our case, if we don't prove our case, the child could be in serious danger.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships Apr 22nd, 2025 at 02:04 pm

S/C on Family & Fiduciary Relationships

Transcript Highlights:
  • The court handled ten cases and managed six cases in under ten minutes by Zoom, all on contested probates
  • I've had cases— I had a case like that where the parents were appealing.
  • In these cases.
  • In my case, let me testify about my case.
  • In our cases, if we don't prove our case, the child could be in serious danger.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

PBS Public Hearing - Wed Feb 18, 2026 @ 10:00 AM HST

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • received a a dismissal in their case. received a a dismissal in their case.
  • a case is viable for prosecution. a case is viable for prosecution.
  • <00:46:49.440> where in these cases in these four cases where in these cases in these four
  • case, it's Jardine case or the Cordero case, it's it's<00:47:13.760> pretty<00:47:13.920>
  • overturned and his case was dismissed. overturned and his case was dismissed.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 1997, which would require IEPs for students with disabilities to include individualized emergency accommodations and evacuation supports. The Attorney General’s office supported the intent but recommended amendments to explicitly include students with Section 504 plans and to change references from “department schools” to “public schools” so charter school students are covered. Testimony in support came from disability advocates and several individuals, including Peter Fritz, who said emergency evacuation planning should be made explicit because it is not clearly required by federal law, and Ka Swan, who emphasized student safety during emergencies. No vote or final action was taken on the bill in the transcript. The committee then took up House Bill 2343, relating to the Maui State Veterans Home. The measure would repeal a deadline for transferring the home to a state agency with a Maui affiliation and instead require the transfer to occur as soon as practicable. The Department of Defense, the Office of Veterans Services, HHSC Oahu Region, and several individuals testified in support. Committee members asked whether a more definite deadline should be used, but the department said the open-ended language was preferable because the Maui entity is not yet ready and Oahu is currently providing oversight. No vote or final action was recorded. House Bill 2566, authorizing special license plates for Hawaii Civil Air Patrol members, was also heard. The City and County of Honolulu Department of Customer Services testified in opposition, while Johnny Perry testified in support. The committee did not take a vote in the transcript. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2493 on wrongful imprisonment compensation procedures. The Attorney General’s office opposed the bill, arguing it would create an automatic payment mechanism without a sufficient finding of actual innocence, could trigger payments within five days of dismissal, and raised concerns about insufficient time for prosecution review and about funding and appropriation issues. Supporters, including people who said they had been wrongfully convicted and later found actually innocent, argued the bill would reduce delays and help released individuals survive while awaiting compensation. Judiciary staff requested technical amendments and said operational details still needed review. Members questioned the AG about the meaning of “actual innocence,” burden shifting, and whether the bill would better define the standard, but no vote or final action was taken.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Expanding and modifying Medicaid fraud provisions 2/26/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • charges in the in the case. charges in the in the case.
  • Um, well, we are presently some of the cases that you reference have been cases that are charged under
  • that you reference have been the cases that you reference have been are<00:20:43.520> cases<00
  • . cases. cases.
  • fraud and allow us to charge that case fraud and allow us to charge that case going<00:21:43.760
Keywords: 1183, house
AR

Arkansas 2026 1st Special Session

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT Mar 16th, 2026

ALC-CLAIMS REVIEW/LITIGATION REPORTS OVERSIGHT

Transcript Highlights:
  • The case was Blake Burr.
  • Well, when was your bankruptcy case? I'm not familiar with the bankruptcy case, Senator.
  • And so that's why we had two separate cases. And the federal case has been dismissed?
  • The case was affirmed. Okay.
  • The case was dismissed. It was declined. And what response? The case was dismissed.
Summary: The committee first reviewed litigation reports from the Department of Labor and Licensing involving wage claims brought under the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act. Members questioned the department’s authority, jurisdiction, use of attorney fees and costs, and whether defendants had to be licensed. The department explained it has long enforced wage and overtime laws, that the claims were small-dollar cases handled by investigators and counsel, and that one case had been paid and dismissed while others were unresolved or had service issues. The committee voted to review or batch-file the labor cases after discussion. The University of Arkansas System then reported three pending lawsuits: an age- and race-discrimination claim by a tenured professor that was resolved early; an ADA/FMLA retaliation claim by a former employee that survived in part on a motion to dismiss and was moving into discovery; and a Section 1983 claim against a UAMS sergeant arising from a parking-ticket dispute, with the university explaining that only punitive damages could create personal exposure for the officer. The committee reviewed each report and voted to accept them. The Department of Finance and Administration presented a proposed tax settlement reducing a sales-and-use tax assessment from about $48,000 to $20,000 and waiving interest and penalties, which the committee approved for review. The Claims Commission then presented several claims: an unpaid salary differential for a Department of Health employee, reissued warrants, unpaid DHS bills, and multiple negotiated settlements involving ATRS, UAMS, Arkansas State Police, and ARDOT. Members approved or affirmed most of these items, including a $65,000 settlement in the Tetronics/ATRS matter, a $150,000 medical-negligence settlement, and several vehicle-accident settlements. The most extended debate involved a tax-delinquent property sale claim by Sharon Greer and relatives. The claimant argued they were not properly notified and sought the $4,200 excess from the 2009 sale. Land Commissioner counsel explained the excess had escheated to the county after the statutory claim period expired, while members debated sovereign immunity, standing, heirs, and whether the committee could or should award money anyway. The committee ultimately chose to hold the matter over for further review in a future joint session rather than decide it immediately. The committee also heard appeals from dismissed claims, including a UAMS medical-negligence claim, a land-sale notice claim, a pothole claim against ARDOT, and a judicial-immunity claim against the Court of Appeals; most dismissals were affirmed, and the Simpson matter was held over for additional review after the claimant testified.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/11/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • or be summarily dismissed cases that or be summarily dismissed cases that or complaints<00:12:51.199
  • is handled on a case-by-case basis.
  • chair representative dur the each case chair representative dur the each case is<00:30:11.080>
  • This case will be a case that we are working on for many years to come.
  • <01:27:51.840> came about how cases how cases were um came about how cases how cases were
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The Judiciary and Civil Law Committee met to hear an informational presentation from the Board of Judicial Standards. After brief member and staff introductions and a review of committee rules, the board’s executive secretary, Sarah Bas, and Mary Pat Maher explained the board’s history, mission, and operations. They described the board as an independent state agency that handles complaints about judicial misconduct and disability, issues advisory opinions, and educates judges on ethics. The presentation covered the board’s composition, complaint intake and screening process, and the levels of discipline available, ranging from summary dismissal and letters of caution to private admonitions, deferred disposition agreements, public reprimands, and formal complaints that can lead to Supreme Court review. Members asked about the board’s budget, public access to discipline records, confidentiality of complaints, and how the board balances accountability with protecting public confidence in the judiciary. The board said public discipline is posted on its website, while private admonitions, deferred dispositions, dismissals, and letters of caution remain confidential. It also said judges generally are told who complained so they can respond, though the board can withhold the source for good cause. Questions also focused on whether attorneys are underreporting misconduct, how many complaints are nuisance complaints, and whether the online complaint system changed the types of complaints received; the board said nuisance complaints make up more than half, the complaint types have not changed much, and it does not have data comparing complaint sources to outcomes. No votes or formal committee actions were taken.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Venue, and you know that Dallas County case—God, that was a really, really difficult case.
  • has not prejudged the case.
  • is informant testimony. ...comes up in high-profile cases, often murder cases.
  • In his case, the...
  • about the case.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Consumer Protection Restitution Account update 2/18/26

Minnesota House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sometimes you all bring us cases, folks in the audience bring us cases, we learn cases. their entire
  • > cases Audience bring us cases, we learn about cases from other government agencies.
  • So it's how we can do the cases and how we get the cases done.
  • So it's how we can do the cases and how we get the cases done. >> Okay. Thank you.
  • So it's how we can do the cases and how we get the cases done. >> Okay. Thank you.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee heard an update on the Consumer Protection Restitution Account, also called SPRA, from the Minnesota Attorney General’s office and AARP Minnesota. AARP described the fund as a first-of-its-kind consumer fraud restitution program that should encourage scam reporting, give the AG’s office more incentive to pursue cases, and provide financial recovery to victims, especially older adults. The AG’s office explained that the fund is financed by 50% of consumer enforcement recoveries up to $5 million per year, plus unclaimed or undistributable restitution, and said about $4.6 million had been deposited since July 1, 2025, largely from a Johnson & Johnson settlement. Jessica Whitney outlined how claims are processed: consumers file complaints, the office obtains a court order, then determines whether defendants have collectible assets before distributing funds in chronological order based on the date of the court order. She said the first major case is Woodbury Dental Arts, a defunct dental clinic whose patients filed more than 300 claims; the office estimates about 75% are likely valid, is reviewing them, and hopes to issue checks within a month. She also described upcoming cases involving High Road Builders and another home remodeling contractor, along with more than 100 individual fraud complaints, including nine claims totaling more than $5.2 million. Committee members raised concerns about delays, communication with constituents, and whether victims know if their cases are being processed. Whitney said the office is trying to improve outreach through press releases, community visits, senior centers, AARP, and Commerce senior outreach. She also flagged two possible legislative issues: restitution that cannot be distributed may not be subject to the $5 million cap, and the statute’s prohibition on pro rata payments may need reconsideration because available funds appear insufficient to pay all claims in full. The office said it would provide a fuller report in October and continue processing claims this fiscal year.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Apr 22nd, 2025

S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • At least 750 cases. And I have no clue how long it takes to litigate a case on a claim like this.
  • But there are certain cases, very complex cases, where a high level of expertise is needed.
  • And those cases are generally the most difficult cases that have been out there because if the case could
  • We spent $16,000 on the case of our own money. Those experts help us prevail in that case.
  • and then the second case.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 15th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that Dallas County case, God, that was a really, really difficult case.
  • And so if a defendant feels in that case, if a police officer feels in that case that, man, this trial
  • Elizabeth Henneke: 770 cases, at least what they told us is that most of them are law parties cases.
  • case.
  • That victim did that and that same grand jury that no-billed the case true-billed the case.
Bills: HB200