Video & Transcript Research : 'prostate screening'
Page 116 of 248
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 03/03/25
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- , um, in the incident that there were narcotic pain medications found, and so they did do a drug screening
- a<01:47:45.320>
drug found and so they did do a drug found and so they did do a drug screening - <01:47:46.000>
talk <01:47:46.280>screening <01:47:46.639>on <01:47:46.960>him - <01:47:47.239>
and <01:47:47.320>it screening talk screening on him and it screening - talk screening on him and it was<01:47:47.560>
found <01:47:47.800>that <01:47:47.920><
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (02/18/2026)
Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- But they did say if you want to control the screen for the kid, for whoever is on this line, for some
- number of dollars per month, you get Apple Screen.
- to control the screen for the kid<05:43:57.280>
for <05:43:57.520>whoever <05:43:57.920 - That's the name of the Apple screen.
- <05:44:17.280>
off after that it shuts the screen off after that it shuts the screen off &
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Cmte on Rules - Subcommittee on the Federal Impact on Minnesotans and Economic Stability - 09/25/25
Transcript Highlights:
- So what I have up here on this on<00:08:04.800>
the <00:08:05.120>screen <00:08:05.360>< - 06.160>
is <00:08:06.639>uh <00:08:06.800>a <00:08:07.039>food on the screen - right now is uh a food on the screen right now is uh a food security<00:08:07.680>
scale. - But from the county side of it, I'm hearing and for nine years I've heard about the green screens and
- and how antiquated our green screens and how antiquated our system<01:37:09.760>
is <01:37:10.000
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- I note a couple: the newborn screening funding, RSA 132-A:10, specifically notes that newborn screening
- .A newborn screening funding uh RSA 13210.A A<02:44:01.040>
uh <02:44:01.359>specifically - funds received through through screening funds received through through uh<02:44:05.120>
the <- And finally, our newborn screening program, which enables some of the services we already detailed.
- 50:30.560>
program finally, our newborn screening program finally, our newborn screening program - funds received through through screening funds received through through uh<02:44:05.120>
VA
Virginia 2026 Regular Session
Tribute to Senator Yvonne Miller Work Group Jun 15th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- location for the portrait for Senator Miller, and that will require... look who just popped up on the screen
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
S/C on County & Regional Government May 12th, 2025
S/C on County & Regional Government
Transcript Highlights:
- especially suburban and exurban counties, this is, this bill will help get things on their radar screen
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
Business meeting to consider certain pending nominations. Apr 29th, 2025 at 09:00 am
Finance Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- He tells me it all starts with sifting machines that screen debris out of the water.
Keywords:
nominations, William Kimmett, Kenneth Keyes, Commerce Department, Tax Policy, economic agenda, trade, tax cuts, public testimony
Summary:
This meeting of the committee was centered around the consideration of nominations for two key positions: William Kimmett as Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade and Kenneth Keyes as Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy at the Treasury Department. Members were given the opportunity to provide remarks on the nominees, with discussions revealing contrasting views on their potential impact on U.S. economic policy. While some members expressed support for the nominees, highlighting their qualifications and expertise, others voiced strong opposition, arguing that their confirmation would further a harmful economic agenda that favors billionaires over average Americans. Senator Wyden, the ranking member, emphasized concerns about trade chaos and the detrimental effects on workers and businesses across the country.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session Feb 6th, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs (04/15/2026)
Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- So, all of the recommendations we make have been screened by HHS.
- recommendations we make um<00:08:03.040>
have <00:08:03.200>been <00:08:03.440>screened - <00:08:06.040>
They <00:08:06.160>enter um have been screened by HHS. - They enter um have been screened by HHS.
- The fact is that these contracts are carefully screened, and they are reviewed, and they approved by
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09
Judiciary Finance and Civil Law
Transcript Highlights:
- I could also share my screen, too. Okay, don't we need to print it? We don't need to print it.
- It's apparently been emailed to members, and we can post it on the screen, but we do not have it as a
- emailed to members and we can post it on emailed to members and we can post it on the<01:03:40.560>
screen - 03:41.800>
have <01:03:42.040>it <01:03:42.160>as <01:03:42.360>a the screen - , but we do not have it as a the screen, but we do not have it as a printed<01:03:43.160>
copy.
Keywords:
municipal nondisclosure agreement, NDA, public records, transparency, local government, county, city, town, school district, housing and redevelopment authority, economic development authority, port authority, economic development, land development, public financing, tax increment financing, TIF, abatement, municipal bonds, debt obligations
Summary:
The Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee approved the minutes from March 25 and March 26, then took up House File 4077, a bipartisan bill authored by Representatives Greenman and Roach. The bill would prohibit municipalities from entering into non-disclosure agreements with private entities that restrict disclosure about land development, economic development, or publicly funded projects, while preserving existing Chapter 13 data practices rules and trade secret protections. The authors argued the bill is needed to prevent secret agreements and backroom decision-making that undermine public transparency, and they moved that the bill be re-referred to the general register.
Several local officials and residents testified in support, including a St. Louis County commissioner, the mayor of Lonsdale, and residents from Farmington and Hermantown. Supporters said NDAs had been used in connection with data center and other development projects to keep elected officials and the public in the dark, eroding trust and limiting community input. They described the bill as a common-sense transparency measure and said existing law already protects legitimate trade secrets.
Opposition came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Business Partnership, which argued that NDAs are often necessary in early-stage economic development discussions to protect sensitive business information and remain competitive with other states. They warned the bill could discourage investment, jobs, and tax growth, and said it would impose a one-size-fits-all state mandate that limits local discretion. Committee members then debated whether the bill was too broad and whether it should be narrowed to data centers; supporters responded that the issue extends beyond data centers to other forms of economic development. A roll call vote was requested on the motion to re-refer the bill to the general register, but the final vote result was not stated in the transcript excerpt.
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- While you're riding in the vehicle,... ...While you're riding in the vehicle, there's a screen that displays
- And then I looked down at the screen, and about the time I looked down at the screen and looked up, which
- of truck drivers in the United States, I think, is a little bit of a false narrative, maybe smoke screens
- Things such as bomb sweeps, armed security personnel, TSA-style screening for all of the attendees, drone
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
PBS Info Briefing - Mon July 28, 2025 @ 2:00 PM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Okay, I'm going to share my screen. I just have a PowerPoint slide. Okay.
- >> Okay, I'm going to share my I'm going to share<00:20:11.120>
my <00:20:11.360>screen - share my screen. share my screen.
- 35.119>
make <00:44:35.280>yourself I don't know if you can make yourself visible on the screen
Summary:
The committee held an informational briefing on federal and state authority over National Guard deployment in response to civil protest or unrest, prompted by recent federal actions and the California litigation in Newsom v. Trump. The chair explained the purpose was to help lawmakers and the public understand the legal background, the status of the California case, and possible Hawaii policy responses. David Day of the Attorney General’s office outlined several recent federal immigration-related executive actions and enforcement directives, then described Hawaii’s participation in multiple lawsuits challenging federal funding conditions, data-sharing demands, and the birthright citizenship order.
A major portion of the briefing focused on Newsom v. Trump. Day summarized the June 2025 Los Angeles protests and the president’s memorandum federalizing National Guard units under 10 U.S.C. 12406, which California challenged as ultra vires, procedurally improper, and violative of the Posse Comitatus Act, the Tenth Amendment, and the APA. He said the district court initially granted relief, but the Ninth Circuit stayed the TRO and held, in a published decision, that review under section 12406 is highly deferential and that the president lawfully exercised authority under paragraph 3. He also noted California-law issues about orders being issued through the governor, and said Hawaii had supported California through amicus briefs and would continue to do so; the bench trial was scheduled for August 11-13.
Members then asked how Hawaii law differs from California’s and whether the Ninth Circuit ruling would control here. Day said the standard-of-review aspects would likely apply, but the California-specific procedural language about orders issued in the governor’s name does not appear in Hawaii law. The committee also heard from Colonel Lloyd C. Phelps of the Hawaii Department of Defense, who explained that National Guard activations generally occur under Title 10 federal orders, state orders, or other statuses, and said the June 2025 federalization mechanism was a Title 10 call-up. He began addressing the president’s authority, the Posse Comitatus Act, and Hawaii’s own preparedness, but the discussion was cut short and members indicated they would return to the topic later. No votes were taken.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Judiciary Committee Jul 1st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- I provide the information that I need to because I can't get to the next screen if I don't.
- I provide the information that I need to because I can't get to the next screen if I don't.
- I provide the information that I need to because I can't get to the next screen if I don't.
- So I really hope that. that I need to because I can't get to the next screen if I don't.
- I was just seeing my, like I see my screen, I was waving to myself up there.
Summary:
The committee met as a subcommittee without quorum at first, then later established quorum and continued hearing several bills. SB 27, the annual CARE Court cleanup bill, would require courts to consider CARE referral for certain misdemeanor defendants found incompetent to stand trial, combine some hearings, allow limited data sharing among licensed medical professionals, and expand eligibility to include mood disorders with psychotic features. Supporters said it would clarify the meaning of “clinically stabilized,” streamline the process, and help more severely ill people receive treatment; opponents argued it would expand CARE Court too broadly, strain county resources, and divert attention from housing and voluntary services. The bill passed to the Health Committee on a roll call vote and was placed on call.
SB 82, dealing with so-called “infinite arbitration clauses,” would limit consumer contract arbitration provisions to disputes arising from the product or service actually purchased. The author and supporters said the bill would stop companies from forcing arbitration in unrelated claims and would not ban arbitration itself. Opponents from business and banking groups argued the language was too restrictive, could create litigation over related transactions, and should be clarified as prospective only. The committee approved the bill and placed it on call after a roll call vote.
The committee then heard two reparations-related bills. SB 437 would direct CSU to develop a genealogical methodology and framework for verifying descendants of enslaved people, with oversight, reporting, and guardrails tied to recently allocated state funding. Supporters said the bill would create a fair, evidence-based process; opponents, including professional genealogists and reparations advocates, argued the work is already well understood, the bill is unnecessary, and it could delay action. SB 518 would create a Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery within state government, with divisions for genealogy, property reclamation, outreach, and legal affairs. Supporters framed it as needed infrastructure to implement reparations recommendations; opponents objected to locating it in the Department of Justice, warned about data privacy and law enforcement control, and criticized the inclusion of broader communities. Both bills were moved to Appropriations and placed on call. The committee also heard SB 52, the End AI Rent Hikes Act, which would prohibit the use of algorithms to collude on and artificially inflate rental prices; the author and supporters described it as a response to AI-assisted rent fixing in California’s housing market.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- :01:16.560>
on today I want to see people like me on today I want to see people like me on screen - and behind the camera to see our screen and behind the camera to see our Hawaii<02:01:19.639>
film - see on screen the current state<02:06:48.559>
of <02:06:48.679>Hawaii's <02:06:49.119>< - I rarely saw people who look like me on screen, but when my children and I watch Hawaiʻi Five-0, NCIS
- I rarely saw people who look like me on screen, but when my children and I watch Hawaiʻi Five-0, NCIS
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (02/19/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- With that said, we hosted a movie screening with the support of Dr.
- Or any other screenings.
- But that's actually screenings; it's not a diagnostic test, so it wouldn't be stopped by this bill.
- They provided dental care, and they would reach out to parents if there was more than just a screening
- there was more than just a a screening there was more than just a a screening or<05:38:55.718>
Summary:
The committee opened with House Bill 184, which would create a committee to study changing school start times. Members discussed Amendment 0394, which made the study committee’s duties more investigative and adjusted reporting recipients, including the Governor. Several members raised questions about whether the committee should review evidence-based studies, local district decisions, and existing district reports; supporters said the amendment would better allow the committee to gather information and recognize local control. The amendment passed 17-0, and the bill as amended also passed 17-0. Representative Litchfield noted that no one had testified in opposition and encouraged the future study committee to review an Oyster River School District report on school start times.
The committee then took up House Bill 394, concerning cooperative school district budget committees and board member representatives. Amendment 0476 was adopted 17-0 after discussion that it clarified the bill’s language and reflected work with the School Boards Association. The committee then voted OTPA on the bill, which also passed 17-0. House Bill 738, requiring background checks for employees and volunteers at certain non-public schools or education service providers receiving public funds, was moved inexpedient to legislate. Supporters said the bill would create practical and legal problems for private citizens and homeschooling families, and the motion passed 15-2 with no minority report, placing the bill on consent.
The committee next considered House Bill 235, which would amend the educator code of ethics and conduct to add responsibilities to parents. Supporters argued parents should be explicitly included in the code, while opponents said parents were already covered in existing ethics language and statute. The bill passed narrowly, 9-8. The committee then returned to House Bill 532 on alternate dispute resolution and individualized education plan team meeting facilitation. Amendment 0480H clarified that different rules would apply separately to neutral conference, mediation, and IEP facilitation; it passed 17-0, and the bill as amended also passed 17-0. Finally, the committee moved to House Bill 564, concerning adoption of school administrative unit budgets, and voted to retain the bill for further review because members said there was still confusion about how it would apply to single-district and multi-district SAUs.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Floor Session 5/11/26 - Part 3
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So, it's essentially a financial screening tool that we should add and would be of benefit for us to
- So, it's essentially<00:52:35.359>
a <00:52:35.920>financial <00:52:36.559>screening - <00:52:37.119>
tool essentially a financial screening tool essentially a financial screening - :53:27.599>
solid <00:53:28.480>uh <00:53:28.720>financial <00:53:29.440>screening - providing solid uh financial screening. providing solid uh financial screening.
Summary:
The House first adopted non-controversial motions, then approved an urgency motion to suspend the rules so Senate File 4476, the human services program integrity package, could move quickly to conference committee before the end of session. The House then adopted a DE amendment to insert House language into the bill, and proceeded to debate several amendments focused on program integrity, fraud prevention, and reporting requirements in human services programs.
Representative Schultz offered Amendment A5 to remove a sunset on the periodic data matching report requirement, arguing the report helps ensure only eligible people receive medical assistance and welfare benefits and should continue to be delivered annually. Supporters said the report had been inconsistently delivered, cited past findings of ineligible recipients, and framed the amendment as a low-cost accountability measure. Opponents, including Representative Nor, said the report had been sent to the chairs, that the issue should be handled through broader HR1-related changes and negotiations with the Senate, and that the amendment was not the right vehicle. After roll call, A5 failed on a 63-67 vote.
Schultz then offered Amendment A6, which would require reporting on homelessness programs, including how many people are served, total costs, outcomes, and possible recoupment of funds if reporting is inadequate. Schultz said the state spends tens of millions on homelessness programs without clear results and that better data would help the legislature make decisions and protect taxpayers. Several members supported the idea of more accountability, while others said the state already receives reports, that homelessness work is being done in partnership with stakeholders, and that the amendment was not the best approach. The discussion continued with further comments on homelessness data and program oversight, but no final vote on A6 is shown in the transcript excerpt.
WY
Transcript Highlights:
- Okay, I've gotten a little off track here trying to switch screens.
- <01:53:14.800>
trying <01:53:15.040>to <01:53:15.280>switch <01:53:15.599>screens - <01:53:16.080>
Can <01:53:16.239>you here trying to switch screens. - Can you here trying to switch screens.
- <02:37:07.600>
of but I'd be happy to share my screen of but I'd be happy to share my screen
MS
Mississippi 2026 Regular Session
MS Senate Floor - 7 January, 2026; 10:00 AM
Mississippi Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- The amendment I have before you, I think it's on the screen.
- The amendment I have before you, I think it's on the screen.
- Please place it on the screen. >> Thank you, Mr. President.
- Please place it on the screen. >> Thank you, Mr. President.
- Please place it on the screen. screen. screen.
Summary:
The Senate convened with a quorum present, heard an invocation from Reverend Chip Stevens of First Baptist Church in Jackson, and recited the pledge of allegiance. The body then dispensed with the reading of the journal, committee reports, and bill titles, and received several guest introductions, including the president of Mississippi University for Women, the physician of the day, and the session’s pages.
The main item of business was Senate Bill 2004, the Mississippi PERS Stability Act. Senator Sparks explained that the bill would provide a $500 million infusion to the PERS accumulated employers account on July 1, 2026, followed by $50 million annually for 10 years, with backup funding from unobligated general funds if needed. He said the measure was intended to help address the system’s roughly $26 billion liability and to support both state employees and local government employers, noting that the state had already taken other steps to strengthen PERS. The bill was advanced to engrossed status, read for the third time, and placed on the calendar for final passage.
Senator Norwood asked whether the funding would help local governments, and Senator Sparks said it would, because the liability is shared by all employers in the system and affects local balance sheets and bond ratings. Senator Bryan then spoke at length in opposition to the broader direction of retirement policy, criticizing the committee process, the fragmentation of retirement legislation, and what he described as incentives for privatization and unfair treatment of new hires. He said he would still vote for the bill because it sends money into the system, but argued that the state should focus retirement benefits on older retirees and avoid further benefit expansions. Senator Sparks responded that the bill was a necessary cash infusion to honor commitments to employees, stabilize the system, and avoid insolvency, and said more PERS legislation would follow.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- The READ Act provides us with screening of students for dyslexia, and this legislation helps with the
- >
uh <00:59:43.319>we <00:59:43.440>know <00:59:43.680>that hearing screenings - uh we know that hearing screenings uh we know that problems<00:59:44.200>
in <00:59:44.400> - <00:59:55.839>
of <00:59:56.039>of act provides us with screening of of act provides - us with screening of of students<00:59:56.520>
for <00:59:56.920>dyslexia <00:59:57.920
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
SPEED Task Force (STF) - Thu Sept 11, 2025 @ 9:30 AM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- ><00:39:53.440>
look <00:39:53.520>at <00:39:53.680>for <00:39:54.000>pre-screen - <00:39:54.880>
uh of what we look at for pre-screen uh of what we look at for pre-screen uh - <01:09:47.040>
with <01:09:47.279>AI <01:09:48.400>uh looking at pre-screening - So, I believe the pre-screening software is CIF Check.
- From there, the red cycling symbol, you go into pre-screen, and that's where all of your formatting of
Summary:
The task force held its first meeting, beginning with roll call and introductions of members and participants in the room and on Zoom. The chair emphasized Sunshine Law transparency, noted the meeting was on September 11, and opened public testimony on the orientation report. No one testified in person or on Zoom, and the chair observed a moment of silence in remembrance of 9/11 before moving into the agenda.
The chair then reported on several orientation presentations given statewide between July 18 and September 5, including meetings with transit-oriented development, the Maui Chamber of Commerce, the Kona-Kohala Chamber, the Japanese Chamber of Commerce on Hawaiʻi Island, the Hawaiʻi Island Chamber of Commerce, the Hawaiʻi Island Native Hawaiian Chamber, and the Capo Chamber of Commerce. The main presentation item was a detailed overview from Kauaʻi County on its permitting process. County staff explained that zoning and building permits are handled separately on the outer islands, with zoning focused on form, character, and compatibility, and building permits focused on health and safety. They described a two-tier zoning system: ministerial permits that are automatically approved if not acted on within 30 days, and discretionary permits that go to the planning commission and can become lengthy contested cases if there is intervention. They also discussed special management area review in coastal areas, which can add time, and explained that building permits must conform to what was approved in zoning.
Kauaʻi County staff also outlined the building permit process, including online and in-person submission, coordination with planning, engineering, water, wastewater, health, and fire agencies, and the county’s fully electronic review system using ProjectDox and related software. They noted that applicants are encouraged to check zoning, water, wastewater, and floodplain issues before hiring someone to prepare plans, especially for homeowners. The county shared permit and utility statistics and said the public can check permit history through Click2Gov. No votes were taken during the portion of the meeting provided; after the Kauaʻi presentation, the chair opened a question period for members.