Transcript Highlights:

• The LWC has consistently made child care our very first priority. for over a decade.
• what, no matter how bad the budget gets, I think this is a perfect opportunity to reestablish our priorities
• So I want to make sure that you know that this is a top priority and that I ask for a commitment to help
• The CWS CARES Project aligns with the CalHS Cal HHS strategic priorities of a person-centered, data-driven
• This is a budget. ask and a priority of mine that I am concerned about as well, but we have to start

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Sometimes it's better to learn from individuals with a local focus on circumstances and priorities in
• And I think it's always one of my priorities that we have to be transparent with our taxpayer dollars
• However, I think their priorities are educators and students.
• Of your profession, does that give you priority?
• And when a system is run like a business, truth becomes a liability, not a priority.

Bills: SB 13, SB 27, SB 57, HB1325, HB1655, HB3312, HB5526, SB13, SB57, SB207, HB441, HB591, HB5019, SB27, SB843

Keywords: lobbying, public funds, political subdivision, local government, county association, municipal lobbying, registered lobbyist, Texas Legislature, taxpayer lawsuit, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, government finance, county dues, state association of counties, sheriffs association, law enforcement officers, legislative advocacy, bill tracking, legislative alerts, Government Code Chapter 556

Transcript Highlights:

• It is the signal that is being sent to the house of where this is a priority scale, not a preference
• What my mom said, let's respect teachers and make sure that they're made a priority.
• And they have made and consider public school accountability a top priority.
• And it's been a priority for Texas values for the past 10 years to give more authority to use textbook
• We are pleased that a longstanding priority of ours is making sure that textbooks on the bid list meet

Bills: SB451, SB762, SB1490, SB1262, SB1459, SB1750, SB1962, SB2252, SB2253, SB2365

Keywords: instructional materials, public schools, Education Code, adoption, rejected materials, local funds, open educational resources, Texas Education Code, school districts, open enrollment charter schools, funding restrictions, environmental regulation, business compliance, local authority, economic development, state preemption, local control, open education resources, SB 762, Texas public schools

Transcript Highlights:

• oversight board with members of the executive and legislative branches to create strategic investment priorities
• The priority for BEAD funding is to ensure that unserved sites are completely covered, and that underserved
• sites have been identified as what is called a community anchor institution, which makes them a priority
• recognizing the need to support their residents in this way and telling us that this program is a priority
• The League believes it is of the highest priority that we secure the funding future—emphasis on secure—of

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held its second hearing on a large docket of technology, internet, cybersecurity, broadband, and media bills. Early testimony focused on community media funding legislation, with lawmakers and local access advocates arguing that as cable subscriptions decline and streaming grows, revenue tied to cable franchises no longer supports community television and PEG programming. Supporters said community media remains a key source of local news, government meeting coverage, and civic transparency as newspapers disappear or consolidate. A related bill on cable contract oversight also drew support, with testimony that the Department of Telecommunications and Cable is backlogged and should more actively review municipal-provider agreements and report its workload to the committee. Another major topic was a proposal to create a Massachusetts Innovation Fund for state IT modernization. The Alliance for Digital Innovation backed the bill, saying agencies need flexible upfront capital to replace outdated systems and improve cybersecurity, and pointing to the federal Technology Modernization Fund as a model. The witness noted that funding for the state program still needs to be identified. The committee also heard strong support for a bill requiring free broadband in public housing, with Rep. Emmela Goodwin and MAPC describing internet access as essential for jobs, school, telehealth, and civic participation. They said the digital divide in Massachusetts is driven largely by affordability rather than infrastructure, though questions were raised about costs, wiring, and whether all housing sites already have broadband access available at the curb. A substantial portion of the hearing centered on bills to limit addictive social media feeds for minors. Supporters, including lawmakers, parents, teens, and advocacy groups, argued that algorithmic feeds contribute to addiction, anxiety, body image problems, and other harms, and said the bills would restrict surveillance-based curation and overnight notifications while leaving search and followed accounts available. Opponents, including FIRE, CCIA, and the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, argued the bills would require invasive age verification, threaten privacy and cybersecurity, burden adults’ anonymity, and likely face First Amendment challenges. They also warned the measures could disadvantage smaller businesses and may be unconstitutional based on recent court rulings in other states. The committee also heard support for blockchain-related bills creating a commission, a pilot program, and consumer education efforts, with testimony that Massachusetts has the talent but needs a coordinated state strategy. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• Their priorities aren't more important than the other, but they're different, right?
• gonna have they're gonna have some limitations to getting this done because of their number one priority
• is answer ...to getting this done because their number one priority is answering 911 calls.
• Not that it’s not a priority school, but you understand the limited budgets and the priorities that they
• That's a huge priority.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The committee opened with remarks about moving JLAC to a more frequent monthly schedule and spending more time on each audit. Members also recognized Melanie Chesney of the Auditor General’s office for 32 years of service, with several members praising her work and her role in school safety and other audits. The meeting then turned to the JLAC-directed Arizona School Safety Special Audit on interoperable communication systems, with the Auditor General’s office presenting the December 2025 report. The audit found that the state had allocated nearly $26 million to interoperable communication efforts, but implementation varied widely. Auditors said all 14 law enforcement agencies used the money for interoperable systems, yet four agencies allowed private or tribal schools to participate contrary to statute, and several agencies failed to submit required expenditure reports. The report also found procurement problems: nine of 14 agencies did not follow procurement requirements or lacked documentation, many contracts lacked accountability provisions, and some agencies had not planned for ongoing costs. The audit estimated ongoing annual costs for an average rural county could range from about $16,000 to $382,000, and recommended that agencies document costs, follow procurement rules, monitor vendors, and plan for future funding. It also recommended the legislature clarify whether non-public schools may participate and revisit statutory system requirements that were vague or inconsistently interpreted. Members questioned the Auditor General about vendor licensing, whether systems could be built in-house, why some functions were not configured, and whether the systems were truly usable in emergencies. The presentation explained that some systems met requirements only in part, that Mutualink had a per-user licensing model affecting access to secure text and file sharing, and that some schools were unwilling or unable to install apps or keep devices logged in. The committee also discussed the difference between the separate school safety grant program administered by ADE and this interoperability fund, and several members expressed frustration with sole-source contracting and weak documentation. In the final portion of the presentation, auditors said only two of eight observed systems demonstrated all five critical emergency functions, while four agency systems could not be tested because they were reportedly not functioning. The committee then began hearing responses from county sheriffs, starting with the Arizona Sheriffs’ Association president, who emphasized county commitment to school safety and noted that some counties had implemented systems across multiple districts, including tribal and rural schools. No votes or formal actions were taken during the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• And when we talk about the teacher pay, we're talking about that being a priority now.
• Serving low-income and at-risk families is a priority of the child care assistance program.
• In recent rulemaking, we've removed activity requirements for priority families, making it easier for
• Our budget priorities for '27 are to achieve universal access. We have universal pre-K.
• Our budget priorities for '27 are to achieve universal access. We have universal pre-K.

Summary: The committee heard first from LFC staff on a brief about New Mexico’s universal child care expansion. Staff said child care assistance has clear benefits for parents and families, but LFC has not found evidence in New Mexico that it improves children’s educational outcomes; they argued pre-K is the better tool for that goal. The brief highlighted four concerns with universal access: an estimated annual cost of about $849.7 million, a sharp decline in registered homes, possible crowding out of lower-income families, and reduced access for children under age two. Staff also suggested possible mitigations such as prioritizing slots for low-income and at-risk families, reinstating sliding-scale co-pays, and tying quality improvements to workforce wages. Members raised questions about the cost estimate, funding sources, provider quality, and whether the data showed actual crowding out. Several lawmakers expressed support for child care generally but concern about the fiscal impact and whether universal access would divert resources from the families most in need. Others emphasized the importance of child care for workforce participation, rural communities, and family stability, and questioned how registered homes are counted and regulated. LFC staff clarified that the cost estimate was for child care assistance only, not the entire ECECD budget, and that the data showed declines in the share of lowest-income children and infants/toddlers served, though not causation. The ECECD secretary then presented the department’s response, saying universal child care is intended to complete a cradle-to-career system and that the department has already seen strong uptake, increased capacity, and rising workforce participation. She said 6,206 families were found eligible in the first month, the share of infants and toddlers served rose, and new provider applications and licensed slots increased after the November rollout. The department also emphasized wage increases, quality improvements, and a new wage scale/career lattice, while projecting a lower near-term cost than LFC’s estimate and requesting additional funding for child care, early pre-K, home visiting, workforce systems, and capacity-building. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided; the discussion was informational and focused on questions and testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• alleviate the symptoms of the housing crisis in our state, and actually many of them were listed in the priority
• actually many of them were listed<00:30:54.960> in<00:30:55.159> the<00:30:55.360> priority
• /c><00:30:55.799> booklet<00:30:56.200> that<00:30:56.279> we listed in the priority
• booklet that we listed in the priority booklet that we hand<00:30:56.679> delivered<00:30:57.000
• Affordable housing is a priority for our community. It's our number one priority in Mankato.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee heard House File 1987, the Minnesota Starter Home Act, and first adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which made minor cleanup changes, removed sections two and three, adjusted ADU language, and tweaked density language. The bill authors described the measure as a bipartisan effort to address Minnesota’s housing shortage by allowing more starter homes, duplexes, townhomes, and accessory dwelling units, while also limiting some local zoning barriers and preserving city protections in certain sensitive areas. They emphasized that the state has a large housing gap, rising home prices, and that the bill is intended as one part of a broader housing package. Supportive testimony came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Housing First Minnesota, Habitat for Humanity, AARP Minnesota, and Americans for Prosperity. These witnesses argued that workforce and starter-home shortages are hurting families, employers, and economic growth; that restrictive zoning and lengthy approval processes raise costs; and that more middle housing and ADUs would expand options for older adults, caregivers, working families, and people seeking homeownership. Several supporters said the bill would reduce regulatory barriers, lower development costs, and help communities add needed housing supply. Opposition or cautionary testimony came from city and municipal representatives, including officials from Cambridge, Eagan, and Mankato, as well as the League of Minnesota Cities and related groups. They argued that local governments already are approving substantial housing growth and need flexibility to manage zoning, parking, infrastructure, stormwater, and community input. They warned the bill could weaken local control, remove practical standards, and create unintended impacts such as more rental conversion in some neighborhoods or development without adequate infrastructure. No final vote on the bill itself was shown in the transcript beyond adoption of the A1 amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• Yes ma'am, that's a high priority for Comptroller Hager is that we make sure that there's no abuse or
• Gary Gibbs: in the various areas of priority for state government.
• The Commission's exceptional items in order of priority begin on page 7 with exceptional item number
• We know that this is a priority issue for you and appreciate all of your focus on our crime victims.
• Annette Leslie: ...a priority during my service on the Childhood Cancer Advisory Council.

Transcript Highlights:

• Those items in priority. order include the following.
• Yes, ma'am, that's a high priority for controller Hager is that we make sure that there's no abuse or
• But also projects in the various areas of priority for state government. and education, or health and
• The commission's exceptional items in order of priority begin on page 7 with a.
• We know that this is a priority issue for. you and appreciate all of your focus on our crime victims.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The commission's exceptional items, in order of priority, begin on page 7 with exceptional item number
• So is that why you're making, I guess, acceptance of marijuana priority to increase operations for veterans
• I'm Amanda Paassen with Every Texan, formerly the Center for Public Policy Priorities.
• Potential, I see that as a potential priority for additional support for the main ERS fund.
• And now CPRIT has made childhood cancer a priority, with 13% of their budget invested in childhood cancer

Bills: SB 1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards

Summary: The committee heard budget presentations from the Legislative Budget Board and agency officials on several agencies, starting with the Texas Historical Commission. LBB described a large biennial reduction driven mainly by the removal of one-time funding and discussed capital projects, rider changes, and exceptional items including Presidio La Bahia and the National Museum of the Pacific War. Senators asked about heritage trails, courthouse grants, unexpended balance authority, and the status of historical-site funding. Historical Commission leadership emphasized preservation, courthouse restoration, heritage tourism, coordination with the Alamo and other Texas Revolution sites, and requested additional IT, staffing, and vehicle funding. No votes were taken. The committee then reviewed the Pension Review Board and the Employees Retirement System. The Pension Review Board’s budget was largely unchanged aside from IT maintenance and salary adjustments, with an exceptional item for additional IT enhancements. Members discussed the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System’s funding dispute and the need for a workable restoration plan. ERS presented a much larger budget, including funding for the retirement system, the group benefits plan, and the legacy payment intended to reduce unfunded liability. Senators focused heavily on pension investment returns, benchmark comparisons, and rising health-care costs, especially pharmacy spending driven by GLP-1 drugs; ERS said the plan covers about 540,000 lives and that premiums would rise 8% while benefits remain unchanged. ERS also said it had no exceptional items, and committee members requested more detailed benchmark information. The committee also heard from the Texas Emergency Services Retirement System and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. TESSORS reported an unfunded liability, an infinite amortization period, and requested additional state support, staffing, and IT funding, including a statutory change to allow a higher contribution level; the agency warned that without more funding it may have to cut benefits. CEPRIT’s presentation covered its bond-funded cancer research and prevention portfolio, revenue-sharing from funded projects, and a request to increase salary limits for its CEO and chief scientific officer. Senators questioned CEPRIT’s accomplishments and return on investment, while CEPRIT cited screening, prevention, and research outcomes, including tens of thousands of detected cancers and precursors and hundreds of thousands of first-time screenings. The meeting ended after these presentations and questions, with no recorded committee action or vote.

Transcript Highlights:

• engineering a department that is not going to have any dollars to deploy, and that's got to be our top priority
• if and when there's a downturn in revenue, so you'll have that money you can spend on your top priorities
• So our office is recommending, and if the Legislature views this proposal as a high General Fund priority
• The Legislature, of course, might have different priorities on the pro-housing designation requirement
• And then if we, if these are necessary, and I'm trying to understand what priority that is, what are

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The subcommittee heard May Revision proposals focused on housing, homelessness, and related administrative changes, and took no votes, holding items open for later action. Item 1 would realign staff positions and resources as part of the Governor’s housing and homelessness reorganization, including shifting two Cal ICH positions to HCD, moving one Cal ICH position for communications/external affairs, and authorizing a chief deputy director at the new Housing Development Finance Committee. Administration witnesses said the changes were technical and net zero-cost, while the LAO recommended approval but asked for clarification on funding for the chief deputy. Several senators questioned whether the staffing shifts would weaken Cal ICH’s homelessness work and whether adding communications capacity was appropriate without new housing funding. Item 2 proposed creating a $100 million Disaster Rebuilding Fund at CalHFA, with $56 million General Fund and $44 million in existing National Mortgage Settlement funds, to support disaster-impacted homeowners through tools such as loan loss guarantees and interest rate buy-downs. CalHFA said the fund would help homeowners bridge the gap between insurance proceeds and rebuilding costs and would work through approved lenders. The LAO raised concerns about the lack of alternatives in the proposal, the broad discretion left to CalHFA in program design, and the General Fund cost. Senators pressed for more detail on eligibility, equity safeguards, lender oversight, and how many homeowners would actually benefit, with some warning the proposal was too open-ended and could miss the most vulnerable households. Item 3 addressed trailer bill language for HAP Round 7, including a proposed $500 million General Fund allocation tied to new accountability measures, pro-housing designation requirements for 14 large cities and 11 counties, local match requirements, streamlined system performance metrics, and recapture/reallocation of unspent funds. HCD said the proposal would avoid a new application process by treating Round 7 as additional disbursements of Round 6 and would provide technical assistance to jurisdictions. The LAO and several senators questioned the timing, the burden of pro-housing designation and local match requirements, the vagueness of some standards, and whether the proposal would delay rather than speed up funding. Members also debated whether the trailer bill preserved or weakened existing homelessness accountability metrics and whether the approach was too complicated given local budget pressures and ongoing homelessness needs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Because when you get a federal grant, all federal grant monies are divvied out by priority spending,
• So you are given by the federal government priorities in your spending of that grant money.
• But if your practices happen to be priority three through five, there's usually five priorities...”
• If your practices happen to be through priority three through five—there's usually five priorities; they

Keywords: 959, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And it's going to be really about legislative priorities as to how we frame it. ...in order to make it
• more scalable, and it's going to be really about legislative priorities as to how we frame it or craft
• Ultimately, we need to recognize that the Legislature's priority here is to bend down the risk curve
• wildlands and start to turn around, I think the state of California would benefit from focusing a priority
• California would benefit from focusing a priority on the closer it is to the home that's going to be

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The hearing focused on home hardening and defensible space as wildfire mitigation tools, with members and witnesses emphasizing that California’s wildfire losses, insurance costs, and affordability pressures require a broader strategy than the status quo. The chair framed the issue as a tipping point for the state and asked witnesses to discuss how to scale mitigation, improve coordination, and make programs more effective and sustainable. Early testimony from the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety explained how embers, flames, structure density, and combustible materials drive community conflagrations, and described the IBHS Wildfire Prepared Home standards, including a base “Prepared” level and an enhanced level. IBHS said California is ahead of other states but still needs standardized, verified mitigation, and noted research suggesting home hardening can reduce losses and improve insurability. The Legislative Analyst’s Office highlighted key policy questions for lawmakers, including the state’s role, intergovernmental coordination, cost-effectiveness, program design, long-term sustainability, and barriers to implementation. Members pressed for practical, lower-cost approaches, and witnesses repeatedly stressed that the first five feet around a home is critical, that many mitigation steps are DIY or relatively low-cost, and that financing will be necessary because many homeowners cannot afford full retrofits. Megafire Action argued that home hardening is a market adoption challenge, not something the state can fully pay for, and recommended a blended model of education, low-interest loans, smaller grants, and insurance discounts to drive mass adoption. Ventura Regional Fire Safe Council and Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority described local programs using assessments, neighborhood-based Firewise efforts, grants, and resident participation, while also calling for better marketing, clearer standards, workforce development, and stronger links between mitigation and insurance benefits. In the later panels, Cal Fire and the State Fire Marshal described the state’s layered approach: parcel-level hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation. Cal Fire said its defensible space inspection program needs ongoing funding and staffing to remain permanent, and the LAO said the proposal has merit but could be modified depending on budget conditions and alternative funding sources. Cal Fire also described a forthcoming defensible space financial assistance program focused on Zone Zero and vulnerable communities, estimating about $8,000 per home and roughly 3,125 homes served with the proposed funding. The State Fire Marshal clarified that local Zone Zero ordinances cannot be less restrictive than state minimum standards, though local governments have flexibility above that floor. Throughout the hearing, members and witnesses returned to the need for a coordinated statewide marketing campaign, consistent standards, targeted incentives, and sustained funding to move from pilot efforts to mass adoption.

Transcript Highlights:

• Housing all motans is a strategic priority for all of us and housing is not possible without the management
• Housing all motans is a strategic priority for all of us and housing is not possible without the management
• :21:29.600> strategic housing all motans is a strategic housing all motans is a strategic priority
• :31.520> us<00:21:31.919> and<00:21:32.240> housing<00:21:32.640> is priority
• for all of us and housing is priority for all of us and housing is not<00:21:32.960> possible

Bills: HF3600, HF3809, HF3608

Keywords: housing, community land trusts, competitive development, development programs, Minnesota, HF3809, Minnesota eviction law, landlord-tenant, residential lease, minor child, children in eviction, eviction complaint, defendant prohibition, expedited eviction, expedited hearing, summary eviction, tenant protections, housing policy, civil penalty, nonwaivable lease terms

Transcript Highlights:

• came<00:07:21.840> up The Kentucky Collaborative on Child Care came up with eight key priorities
• training for a school district on how to strategically gather community input on the direction and priorities
• training for a school district on how to strategically gather community input on the direction and priorities
• c> of<00:32:19.760> their<00:32:20.000> local<00:32:20.320> school and priorities
• of their local school and priorities of their local school district.<00:32:21.440> This<00:32

Keywords: Convene 00:00 Senate Message 04:26 Report of Committees 05:13 Orders of the Day/ HB 6 06:22 HB 480 14:13 HB 562 17:55 HB 136 25:53 HB 257 29:47 HB 490 35:54 Motions, Petitions, and Communications 40:30 Introduction of New Bills and Resolutions 52:44 Recess for ConC/Rules Meeting 53:49 ConC/Rules Report 57:12 Floor Amendments 58:49 Adjournment 58:59, 958, all

Summary: The House convened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, established a quorum with 96 members present, excused absent members, and approved the journal from February 13, 2026. The Senate also transmitted Senate Bills 72 and 110 for concurrence. Committee reports advanced several bills, including measures on deputy coroner training, local jail booking procedures, local business tax collection, peace officers, Kentucky National Guard benefits, and first responder mental health. The chamber then considered House Bill 6 on child care. The sponsor described it as the product of extensive stakeholder collaboration aimed at improving affordability, quality, access, and data in child care, including changes to the low-income subsidy program, employee child care assistance, Kentucky All-Stars, micro-centers, and a military child care pilot program in House Committee Substitute 1. The substitute was adopted, and the bill passed 84-11 with one abstention after supportive remarks from members emphasizing workforce needs, family support, and military families. House Bill 480, relating to state contracts, was explained as requiring clearer contract terms for appropriated funds, partial payment protections, a 1% penalty for late payment, and semiannual reporting on whether cabinets are paying bills on time. A member noted a planned amendment to limit the bill to state-funded appropriations, but the bill passed 96-0. House Bill 562, relating to alternative high school diplomas, would create a Kentucky alternative diploma for certain students with disabilities and require the Education and Labor Cabinet to maintain employer information for graduates; members spoke in strong support of the bill’s workforce and dignity goals, and it passed 96-0. House Bill 136, relating to campaign finance, was amended to remove a $15,000 cap and allow campaign funds to pay for reasonable security costs for candidates; the sponsor cited rising threats to elected officials, and the bill passed 97-0. The transcript ends as the House moved on to House Bill 257.

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, wondering if, based, you know, again on an intent, um, would your priority number seven, which is
• Um, wondering if, based, you know, again on an intent, um, would your priority number seven, which is
• Um, wondering if, based, you know, again on an intent, um, would your priority number seven, which is
• /c><00:09:55.120> number<00:09:55.519> seven<00:09:56.160> which would your priority
• number seven which would your priority number seven which is<00:09:56.480> the<00:09:56.720><

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Department, I can assure you that keeping New World Screw Worm out of the United States is the highest priority
• And I don't know what EPA's timeline will be, but I know it's a priority for them. to other technologies
• Screwworm because it's a priority for the secretary obviously for you all in Texas and especially the
• We've made it one of our top priorities at the association, as you all have heard today. is going to
• We recognize that's the only way to stop this threat, and that is our biggest priority is. the increased

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And so I think that's a focus that we have to keep in the mix on this at a fairly high priority level
• And so I think that's a focus that we have to keep in the mix on this at a fairly high priority level
• And so I think that's a focus that we have to keep in the mix on this at a fairly high priority level
• And so I think that's a focus that we have to keep in the mix on this at a fairly high priority level
• And so I think that's a focus that we have to keep in the mix on this at a fairly high priority level

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a very high priority of our state's county attorneys.
• This is, as I say, one of the highest priorities for our state's county attorneys.
• We're able to deliver those three priorities. In addition, Representative Naddobe...
• I think it was one of our top priorities among other things, but this is something that's very important
• My top priority was improving public health.

Transcript Highlights:

• House File 3, a high-priority spending bill. 600,000.
• That's what we do to make sure that we're picking the priorities together rather than forcing legislation
• 00:24:22.800> the to make sure that we're picking the to make sure that we're picking the priorities
• priorities priorities together together together rather<00:24:26.360> than<00:24:26.560> forcing
• Let's show Minnesotans that we make this a priority, that we don't just wait till the end.

Keywords: 1183, house