Transcript Highlights:

• I think this is simply an effort by the Democratic majority to stop the feedback.
• They don't want feedback on their policies, and I think they're wrong-headed, and there's a good reason
• And then after overwhelming feedback from the public in opposition to many of the taxes that were passed
• And then after overwhelming feedback from the public in opposition to many of the taxes that were passed
• Democratic majority came back with a bill the next year that removed the people's ability to provide feedback

Summary: House and Senate Republican leaders opened by criticizing several Democratic-backed measures they said would raise costs for Washington residents, including a utility surcharge in House Bill 2275, expanded producer responsibility for clothing, and a new tire fee in House Bill 2421. They framed the session around affordability concerns and argued that the majority was advancing taxes and fees that would make living and doing business in Washington more expensive. They also said the state should focus on transparency and accountability rather than new charges and restrictions. Much of the question period focused on immigration-related issues and public safety. The leaders condemned recent comments by Governor Ferguson and Attorney General Brown about events in Minnesota, saying the incidents should be investigated carefully without inflaming tensions. They opposed a Senate bill addressing face coverings for law enforcement and another proposal to fine the Northwest Detention Center if state inspectors are denied access, arguing both were attempts to regulate or pressure federal authorities. They also criticized a bill that would bar certain ICE agents from future law enforcement jobs in Washington, saying it would not improve public safety and would distract from the state’s shortage of officers. The leaders also discussed several other bills and policy ideas. They said a House bill limiting local anti-camping enforcement was delayed and expected back next week, with cities concerned about implementation and liability. They expressed general support for restoring College Bound funding for private universities, but said it should be handled through the budget without new taxes. They backed a bill to increase reporting and accountability for nonprofit and housing-related programs, citing concerns about fraud and misuse of public funds. They also strongly opposed a bill they said would make the initiative process harder, calling it undemocratic and a continued effort to reduce voter influence.

Transcript Highlights:

• passed legislation to give more insight into legislative spending, with the time needed to provide feedback
• Needed to provide feedback.
• publicly available for at least 45 days, providing people time to review the proposals and offer feedback
• The proposals and offer feedback.

Summary: The Senate Committee on Appropriations met with a quorum present, adopted the April 23, 2026 minutes, and then held a discussion focused on eligible legislatively directed spending items (LDSIs) for the FY 2027 budget. The chair explained that the committee was part of a new transparency process requiring legislators to publicly disclose LDSI requests, including the recipient, amount, and purpose, and noted that the forms must be posted publicly for at least 45 days before inclusion in the budget. He said Senate members submitted more than 500 eligible LDSI forms and House members submitted 750, for over 1,250 total proposals made available online. The chair emphasized that the process is intended to increase accountability and public awareness of how tax dollars are spent, and encouraged the public to review the posted forms on the Senate and House websites. During the meeting, four cards of support were read into the record: Wendy Fallow supported the Literacy Center of West Michigan project; Graham Filler supported the H.H.W. request on behalf of Kalamazoo County; and Mayor David LaGrand and Rob Verhulen both supported the aquarium request. No committee questions were raised, no substantive votes were taken on the LDSI items, and the committee moved through routine procedural actions. The meeting ended with a motion to adjourn, supported and adopted without objection.

Transcript Highlights:

• SOCR uses this feedback from these valued stakeholders to inform policy updates and training.
• Can you give one example of how student feedback has influenced best practices and any policy updates
• Can you get one example of how student feedback has influenced best practices and any policy updates
• Student feedback has influenced the best practices and any policy updates there? Sure.
• I don’t... ...you know, we’ve been giving constant feedback as templates are being developed.

Summary: The Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance, chaired by Assemblymember Alvarez, held a hearing focused on University of California budget issues. The committee reviewed UC core operations funding, enrollment trends, federal funding threats, Title IX implementation, and basic needs support. Major themes included the end of the Governor’s multi-year UC compact, the state’s fiscal outlook, UC’s enrollment growth, and the potential impacts of federal policy changes on research, health care, and student aid. On core funding, the Department of Finance described the Governor’s proposal to continue compact-related support, defer some payments, and authorize a cash-flow loan. The LAO recommended a smaller or no base increase, earmarking some funds for capital renewal, retiring deferrals when possible, avoiding new compact commitments, and funding UC annually rather than through compacts. UC argued that the compact has supported enrollment growth, student services, and operating costs, but said campuses face rising expenses, structural deficits, and limited reserves. Members questioned the effects of deferrals on students and discussed the need to prioritize less harmful reductions if cuts become necessary. The enrollment panel focused on UC’s growth in California resident enrollment and the nonresident replacement plan at Berkeley, UCLA, and UC San Diego. The LAO recommended maintaining the current enrollment target, funding enrollment separately from base increases, pausing the nonresident replacement plan, and holding enrollment flat in 2027-28. UC said it has already met compact enrollment goals, grown California undergraduate enrollment by about 18,800 students, and that further growth depends on ongoing state support. The committee also discussed the cost of enrollment growth, possible differential nonresident tuition, and a reporting request for UC to analyze the nonresident replacement approach; the motion to adopt supplemental reporting language passed. The hearing also covered federal funding risks, with the LAO and UC warning that federal changes could affect research grants, medical center reimbursement, and student financial aid. UC said research cancellations and suspensions are disrupting labs and graduate student support, while federal health policy changes could increase uncompensated care at UC hospitals. In the Title IX update, UC described its systemwide civil rights structure, annual student training, and campus support offices, and members praised the work while asking about ongoing concerns and intersegmental collaboration. The final basic-needs item began with Finance stating the Governor’s budget does not change ongoing support, but the transcript cuts off before further discussion or action.

Transcript Highlights:

• So we would plan to have a lot of stakeholder feedback in this process.
• And we've done more than one draft that we've received feedback on and updated accordingly.
• that we've received feedback and we've updated accordingly.
• Two supported it, and 24 did not offer any feedback.
• May Revision feedback as soon as possible. All right now.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I would like for you to... ...make sure that you are looking at the provider feedback.
• And if we don't get the feedback, we'll be rejecting the bill language.
• Obviously, you're still going through the process of getting feedback from stakeholders.
• Obviously, you're still going through the process of getting feedback from stakeholders.
• So those are just my feedback right now.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So my understanding, Senator Salomon, and much of this feedback comes from our planning directors who
• Again, this is feedback I'm getting from people who do this work on the ground, not a technical expert
• I just wanted to get some commentary and feedback to work on it, so thank you. Thank you.
• Interestingly, a mix of feedback.
• Interestingly, a mix of feedback.

Summary: The Senate Local Government Committee heard several land use and infrastructure bills. SB 5633 on subdivision of land drew the most discussion: staff described a broad rewrite that would move many subdivision decisions from legislative bodies to administrative personnel, limit or eliminate public hearings for preliminary plats, require notice to nearby landowners, set completeness and 100-day decision timelines, and streamline concurrent review of related permits. Builders, Realtors, and some cities supported the bill as a long-overdue modernization that could reduce delays and housing costs, while county and city representatives raised concerns about eliminating public hearings, implementation details, and local accountability. The committee also heard SB 6274 on street standards and frontage improvements, which would require jurisdictions to identify infrastructure barriers to infill and middle housing and periodically review street and frontage standards; supporters said frontage mandates can make housing infeasible, while local government witnesses warned about conflicts with safety, ADA, and transportation goals. SB 6309 on high-capacity transit permits would let Sound Transit apply for permits before acquiring property and before some land use decisions, and would allow certain development agreements and subdivision exemptions to speed transit delivery; Sound Transit and city representatives supported it, and the committee waived the five-day notice rule to hear it. The committee also took testimony on SB 6279, which would incorporate the wildland-urban interface code into the state building code after statewide wildfire maps are completed and require state and local coordination on defensible space and local amendments. Supporters framed it as needed wildfire resilience planning, while opponents from counties, builders, environmental groups, and local officials argued the bill was premature, too rigid, and potentially inconsistent with environmental laws, local conditions, and insurance realities; several asked for more local flexibility, clearer map processes, and changes to the timing and scope of adoption. SB 6291 would extend from two to four years the period during which local health jurisdiction staff may inspect on-site wastewater systems under supervision before certification; public health officials supported it as a workforce and training fix, saying the current timeline is too short and costly. The committee also heard SB 5903, SB 6016, SB 5820, SB 6132, and SB 6189 in executive session, adopted substitutes on some bills, and advanced SB 6016, SB 5820, SB 6132, and SB 6189 out of committee by due-pass votes, with SB 6016 receiving a substitute and a member noting support but remaining concerns.

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative, with the timing on this, we all haven't been inundated with feedback, but do you know
• if there has been any public feedback from individuals on this language?
• But yeah, we've had some feedback.
• Energy Committee from Milk City, like even the people that were against it that helped put that feedback
• Energy Committee from Milk City, like even the people that were against it that helped put that feedback

Bills: HCR1030, HB1370, SB893, SB2, SB1589

Keywords: legislative procedure, session calendar, deadline schedule, bill deadlines, joint resolution, Oklahoma Legislature, 61st Legislature, regular session, adjourn sine die, floor deadline, third reading, committee deadlines, bill drafting, appropriations, budget bills, ethics commission, agency rules, administrative procedures act, local and special laws, pension legislation

Summary: The House first took up Senate Bill 893, a conference committee report on property and critical infrastructure. The bill would bar foreign principals from countries designated as foreign adversaries from owning agricultural land or other land, especially within 10 miles of military installations or critical infrastructure, and also restrict certain state software purchases tied to adversarial countries. Members asked about how later-designated adversary countries would be covered and about the delayed effective date, which was explained as giving current owners time to divest. The conference report was adopted without objection, and the bill then passed the House 89-0. The chamber then considered Senate Bill 2, another conference committee report on wind energy setbacks. The measure would establish statewide setback standards for industrial wind turbines, including 2.5 tip heights from occupied dwellings and 1.5 tip heights from nonparticipating property lines, with exceptions for projects that had already secured most site control or queue positions before the effective date and for small community-scale systems. Supporters said it was a compromise that at least put some protections into statute, while opponents argued it weakened earlier House language and eliminated county local-control options. After debate, the bill failed on a 20-67 vote. Later, the House voted 60-19 to override the governor’s veto of Senate Bill 1589, allowing it to become law notwithstanding the governor’s objections. The session also included prayers and announcements, including updates about Representative Cantrell’s hospitalization and a note that the Senate had adjourned sine die. The House then adjourned sine die for the second regular session of the 60th Oklahoma Legislature.

Transcript Highlights:

• I think this is simply an effort by the Democratic majority to stop the feedback.
• They don't want feedback on their policies, and I think they're wrong-headed, and there's a good reason
• And then after overwhelming feedback from the public in opposition to many of the taxes that were passed
• And then after overwhelming feedback from the public in opposition to many of the taxes that were passed
• Democrat majority came back with a bill the next year that removed the people's ability to provide feedback

Keywords: 904, all

Summary: House and Senate Republican leaders used the media availability to argue that the Democratic majority is making Washington less affordable through new taxes and fees. They cited measures including a utility surcharge bill, expanded producer responsibility costs for clothing, a tire fee bill, proposed tobacco and pharmaceutical taxes, and speculation about an income tax, saying these would raise the cost of living and burden working families and small businesses. They also criticized a bill affecting initiative procedures, calling it an attack on direct democracy, and said Republicans would continue to oppose measures they view as adding costs or limiting voter input. A major portion of the discussion focused on immigration-related bills and public safety. Republicans condemned Governor Ferguson’s comments about events in Minnesota as inflammatory and said the incidents there should be investigated without political escalation. They also opposed a bill to restrict face coverings for federal immigration officers, arguing it would not be enforceable and would not affect federal law enforcement. Another bill they criticized would allow the state health department to fine the Northwest Detention Center if inspections are blocked; Republicans said the state lacks authority to regulate the federal government in that way. They also rejected a proposal to bar ICE agents hired under the second Trump administration from future law enforcement jobs in Washington, saying it was political messaging and inconsistent with the state’s public safety needs. The caucuses also discussed several other bills and policy areas. They said they were generally supportive of restoring College Bound and Washington College Grants funding for private nonprofit colleges, but only if done through the budget without new taxes. They backed a proposal to increase accountability and reporting for nonprofit organizations involved in state programs, citing concerns about fraud in mortgage assistance and other state programs. On a housing bill that would limit local enforcement of anti-camping ordinances, House Republicans said the measure was delayed for further work and that cities were worried about implementation and liability. In closing, Republicans said they would keep pushing solutions centered on affordability, transparency, and public safety while continuing to oppose what they described as politically driven bills from the majority.

Transcript Highlights:

• Fortunately, the Child Welfare Training Academy has been open to feedback, to build on their openness
• Fortunately, the Child Welfare Training Academy has been open to feedback, to build on their openness
• Fortunately, the Child Welfare Training Academy has been open to feedback, to build on their openness
• </c><00:11:05.440><c> to</c> Training Academy has been open to Training Academy has been open to feedback
• 07.279><c> on</c><00:11:07.440><c> their</c><00:11:07.639><c> openness</c><00:11:08.160><c> to</c> feedback

Bills: HF1346, HF1169, HF1276

Keywords: mandatory reporting, training requirements, child maltreatment, abuse detection, local welfare agency, child protection, child welfare, paperwork reduction, social services information system, SSIS, Department of Children, Youth, and Families, foster care, children in placement, county social services, Tribal governments, private child placing agencies, case management, administrative burden, information technology, human services

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:49:01.960><c> and</c> just seeking, of course, feedback and just seeking, of course, feedback
• So, we have not received any feedback yet.
• Um asking in received any feedback yet.
• </c><00:54:17.960><c> or</c> our weekly meetings for that feedback or our weekly meetings for that feedback
• They just hadn't said point of feedback.

Bills: HF3526, HF3375, HF3469

Keywords: home care, licensing, fines, advisory council, grant program, client safety, healthcare regulation, HF3375, Minnesota disability waiver, waiver rate system, human services, individualized home supports, individualized home supports with training, individualized home supports with family training, positive support services, employment support services, employment development services, employment exploration services, billing limits, service authorization year

Transcript Highlights:

• And we went through a process of soliciting some feedback from stakeholders here in the state.
• And so we want feedback on what's working, what's not working in the program.
• And so we want feedback on, you know, what's working, what's not working in the program. want feedback
• And then we also solicited feedback, you know, from legislative leaders as well, and then submitted to
• And we had to receive significant feedback and still are from CMS, too. Okay. All right. Thank you.

Summary: The committee heard extensive public testimony from youth advocates and public health speakers urging action on vaping. Witnesses said flavored products and social media are driving youth use in Arkansas, described nicotine addiction and health harms, and asked lawmakers to prohibit vaping in public indoor spaces, align vape rules with smoke-free laws, and expand prevention efforts. Committee members thanked the speakers and encouraged them to continue building support for future legislation. The main presentation was an overview of Arkansas’s Rural Health Transformation Program, a five-year federal initiative funded through CMS. State officials said Arkansas received about $209 million for the first year and may receive roughly $1 billion over five years if performance is strong. They emphasized that the program is intended for targeted, locally driven transformation rather than general operating support, debt relief, or new construction, and outlined four initiatives: Heart, PACT, Rise, and Thrive, focused on prevention, access and coordination, workforce development, and technology. Officials said applications would open in the spring, with a reimbursement-based process and a goal of launching all four initiatives by June. Members asked detailed questions about eligibility, rural definitions, school gardens, faith-based and nonprofit partnerships, mobile clinics, EMS, behavioral health, residency slots, and whether urban providers serving rural patients could apply. Officials said the program would favor regional collaboration, could support targeted renovations and expansion of existing programs, and would allow residency growth and some equipment or infrastructure purchases, but not food purchases or permanent new construction. They also said a committee of state health and finance officials would review applications, with heavy technical assistance and an expectation of quick turnaround. The committee also reviewed two DHS/Health Department rules. One implemented Medicaid and CHIP coverage and care coordination for eligible incarcerated youth before and after release, including targeted case management and screening services, with no public comments received. The other updated audiology licensing rules to reflect recent acts expanding scope of practice and changing the renewal deadline. Both rules were reviewed without objection, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• And we went through a process of soliciting some feedback from stakeholders here in the state.
• And so we want feedback on what's working, what's not working in the program.
• And then we also solicited feedback, you know, from legislative leaders as well, and then submitted to
• And we had to receive significant feedback and still are from CMS, too. ...the final say on what goes
• And we had to receive significant feedback and still are from CMS, too. Okay. All right. Thank you.

Summary: The committee first heard extensive public testimony from youth and advocates urging stronger restrictions on vaping. Speakers described vaping as a youth-targeted public health problem, citing flavored products, social media marketing, nicotine addiction, brain development concerns, school disruption, and exposure to harmful aerosol. They recommended prohibiting vaping in public indoor spaces and aligning vape rules with smoke-free laws. Committee members praised the speakers and encouraged them to continue building support for future legislation. The main presentation was on Arkansas’s Rural Health Transformation Program, administered through DFA. Secretary Jim Hudson and program director Brad Andi explained that Arkansas received about $209 million in the first year under the federal program, with potential for roughly $1 billion over five years if performance is strong. They emphasized that the program is meant for long-term rural health transformation, not general operating support, debt relief, or new construction. The state’s plan centers on four initiatives: HEART for prevention and community health, PACT for access and provider collaboration, RISE for workforce development, and THRIVE for technology and telehealth. Officials said applications will be handled through upcoming notices of funding opportunity, with a focus on local, shovel-ready projects, regional collaboration, and transparency. Committee members asked how the program would work for hospitals, clinics, nonprofits, schools, faith groups, and urban providers serving rural patients. Officials said eligibility is broad if applicants can show a connection to rural health, and that targeted renovations, mobile units, school-based clinics, farm-to-school or garden projects, EMS equipment, residency expansion, and behavioral health initiatives may fit if they align with the plan. They stressed that the program cannot fund working capital, routine maintenance, or new buildings, but can support repurposing space and collaborative networks. Members also raised concerns about protecting existing rural providers from being displaced, and officials said applications would be reviewed by a state committee with technical assistance and a reimbursement-based process. The committee then reviewed and took no objection to several DHS and Health Department rules. DHS presented a Medicaid/CHIP rule implementing federal requirements for incarcerated youth, including pre- and post-release coverage, care coordination, targeted case management, and screening services, with no public comments received. The Health Department also presented a licensing rule for audiology and speech pathology that implements recent acts and changes the renewal deadline; that rule was likewise reviewed without objection. The meeting adjourned after no further business.

Transcript Highlights:

• WHAT TYPE OF FEEDBACK HAVE YOU RECEIVED AT THIS POINT?
• THE CAPTURE DEVICES IS AN EXAMPLE OF FEEDBACK WE CONTINUE TO RECEIVE.
• WHAT HAS BEEN THERE FEEDBACK. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.
• WE ARE WILLING TO GET ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK BUT NO FEEDBACK AT THIS POINT HAS BEEN NEGATIVE TO MY KNOWLEDGE
• SCENE NINE, SENATOR BURGESS YOU I RECOGNIZE. >> THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR THE FEEDBACK.

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• glucose health, and related to information that we're able to provide the user with some helpful feedback
• So we're giving that feedback, but in an empathetic way.
• Feedback as well.
• And the ones who iterated, where we actually gave them more feedback, found it more useful than others
• found it more useful than than others next slide iterated, where we actually gave them more feedback

Summary: The hearing focused on how artificial intelligence is being used across California’s life sciences sector, from digital health and medical devices to cancer research, drug discovery, and biosecurity. The chairs emphasized California’s economic leadership in biotechnology and the need to balance innovation with privacy, consumer protection, and equitable access. Members also raised concerns about whether the state can preserve its research and manufacturing ecosystem, and about the role of public infrastructure such as CalCompute, open-source tools, and state procurement in supporting innovation. The first panel featured representatives from UCSF, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. They described AI applications in remote blood pressure monitoring, wearable and sensor-based health data, cancer drug discovery, learning from every patient, clinical trial matching, and public health surveillance. Witnesses stressed that AI can speed discovery and improve care, but only if data can move across systems, models are validated, and privacy safeguards are strong. They also warned that innovation could be hollowed out if compute, data access, and translational funding are not supported in California. Committee members asked about HIPAA and CMIA protections, interoperability with Epic, validation of AI tools, FDA regulation, and whether proprietary models limit independent evaluation. Witnesses said consumer sensor data often falls outside HIPAA, that FHIR and other interoperability standards already exist, and that open-source layers could sit on top of existing EHR systems. They also discussed the need for ongoing post-market monitoring, human oversight, and faster regulatory pathways, especially for AI-enabled diagnostics and personalized therapies. The second panel highlighted company use cases. Pangea Data described AI systems that identify care gaps in chronic, rare, and oncology conditions and argued for better reimbursement frameworks so rural and smaller providers can adopt them. Dexcom explained how it uses AI in its continuous glucose monitoring products, with strong FDA-backed verification, validation, cybersecurity controls, and guardrails to prevent unsafe advice. Lilly Ventures discussed AI in drug discovery and the need to modernize development pipelines, while Twist Bioscience was introduced as another company working on AI-driven life science innovation.

Transcript Highlights:

• We have also been receiving a lot of great public feedback.
• I hear quite a bit about Proposition 1 and just wonder what kind of feedback you're getting in public
• However, there's also a lot of great clinical feedback we're receiving, such as how many sessions.
• They're conducting surveys of their users to obtain feedback.
• We have released several pieces of guidance in draft for stakeholder feedback.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• reimbursements were offered on a first-come, first-served basis, which we certainly have gotten feedback
• Certainly, we got some feedback in this particular one that it was a look back.
• So we did hear the feedback from a number of producers that they had already made changes to their labor
• We know that we got feedback on those, so those changes do not affect our other grant offerings that
• stakeholder and industry recommendations... ...is really about gleaning some of that additional feedback

Bills: HB2104, HB2223, HB2348, HB2554, HB2619

Keywords: aviation, wildland fires, funding, disaster relief, emergency response, irrigation, district director, contracts, beneficial interests, agriculture, timber sales, land sales, process efficiency, legislation, department language, tribal rights, fishing rights, salmon management, state-tribal agreements, natural resources

Transcript Highlights:

• alternative methodology and then give time for the public and the Legislature to be able to give feedback
• to assess whether... ...the Legislature to be able to give feedback to assess whether there is agreement
• I can speak to the feedback piece.
• And how long do you believe that the process of engagement and feedback would be?
• Of course, we would love to get your feedback on what the Legislature is considering.

Summary: The committee took up issue number seven, Child Care Rate Reform Transition Plan, and heard a presentation from the LAO on an eight-part transition plan for the period before implementation of the alternative methodology-based child care rate system. The plan would provide interim rate increases to existing regional market rates and standard reimbursement rates beginning January 1 of the budget year, keep the higher of SRR or ARMR as the single rate, annualize cost-of-care supplements, update hold-harmless language, eliminate the private market cap, authorize one-time systems transition funding with JLBC approval, and require annual reporting on parent co-pays. Members asked about the timeline and public/legislative feedback process, and administration staff said they were working toward the July 1, 2025 deadline while continuing stakeholder engagement through the rate and quality advisory process. Public comment was overwhelmingly focused on child care and early learning funding. Providers, county offices, advocacy groups, and education organizations urged the Legislature to move quickly on the alternative rate methodology, provide interim relief through a cost-of-living adjustment, reimburse based on enrollment rather than attendance, and preserve health and retirement benefits and workforce stability. Many speakers also pressed for funding to expand the promised 200,000 child care slots, warning that waitlists remain long and providers are under financial strain. Several commenters supported maintaining or extending grants and technical assistance for transitional kindergarten, inclusive early education, and mixed-delivery early learning programs. A separate set of comments addressed the Inclusive Early Education Expansion Program, with Sacramento County education officials and others urging a statewide plan that would extend support to the 20 counties not currently receiving grants, especially rural areas. Other speakers raised concerns about facilities and staffing impacts from TK expansion, the need for consistent eligibility rules across subsidized programs, and the importance of statewide systems-level funding. The chair thanked the LAO, administration, and public commenters, said the item would remain open until after the May Revision, and adjourned the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• That was part of making sure we just got some more feedback on it, too.
• So, I appreciate your feedback both here and in the committee.
• That was part of feedback in judiciary.
• So, I appreciate feedback on it, too.
• </c> Any comments or feedback from that? Any comments or feedback from that?

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That allows us to get feedback early, to see on a smaller scale if we're building the right thing for
• incorporate feedback from users across<00:15:39.760><c> the</c><00:15:40.000><c> way.
• </c> against the real world getting feedback. against the real world getting feedback. um<00:16:00.560
• </c><00:16:02.800><c> early</c> um that allows us to get feedback early um that allows us to get feedback
• We took that feedback applications.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• One of the things that we wanted to do was not only get feedback on our approach and our methodology,
• Because one of the things that feedback.
• in is that they wanted to see a feedback in is that they wanted to see a lot<01:41:01.520><c> more</
• One of the and provide that feedback.
• </c> and all of our staff um to get feedback and all of our staff um to get feedback was<01:57:33.679

Bills: SB2024, SB896, SB2613, SB494, SB2391, SB2125, SB2614, SB2615, SB3262, SB3325, SB3118

Keywords: charter schools, public-private partnership, school facilities, education funding, community need, education, capital improvement, reporting, transparency, technical expertise, public school land transfer, Department of Education, DOE, land conveyance, fee simple title, tax map key, TMK, Act 307, Session Laws of Hawaii 2022, Act 139