Video & Transcript Research : 'mandate'
Page 101 of 372
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
February 4, 2025 - 09:00 AM
Transcript Highlights:
- Use of the term “shall adopt” on its face triggers a mandate.
- However, “shall adopt,” followed by “as deemed necessary,” reduces the mandate to being discretionary
- to go and look at that rule, review it, and see if there's parts of it, and have a legislatively mandated
Summary:
The committee received an informational presentation from the Joint Administrative Procedures Committee (JAPC/JAPSI) staff and Chair Representative Overdorf on how Florida administrative rulemaking is reviewed. Mr. Plant explained that JAPC is a joint legislative oversight committee that monitors agency rules under Chapter 120, focusing on whether rules stay within statutory authority, whether agencies are acting consistently with legislative intent, and how the rulemaking process works. He emphasized that agencies are creatures of statute, that rulemaking authority must be specific enough to support the rule, and that without a date certain in statute, agencies may delay rulemaking indefinitely. Members asked about how to ensure agencies actually adopt rules, how to identify rules that exceed legislative intent, and how JAPC handles internal policies and delayed rulemaking.
Representative Overdorf then described JAPC’s objection process and its limits. He said the committee does not approve or disapprove rules or direct agencies to adopt them, but it can object to proposed or existing rules that enlarge, modify, or contravene enabling statutes or fail to comply with Chapter 120. He noted that if an agency does not resolve an objection, a footnote is published in the Florida Administrative Code and the committee may recommend legislation to amend, suspend, or repeal the rule. He also discussed recent committee activity, including 1,355 proposed rules, 119 emergency rules, and 1,243 incorporated materials reviewed in 2024, and said the committee filed 31 objections against one agency after repeated noncompliance.
The discussion also touched on possible changes to Chapter 120, including the governor’s 2019 request that agencies include five-year sunset provisions in rules, and a proposal to instead require periodic legislative review rather than automatic expiration. Overdorf also said the committee is considering raising the current statement of estimated regulatory costs thresholds of $200,000 annually or $1 million over five years because inflation has made those limits too low. No votes were taken on legislation, and the meeting ended with adjournment.
MN
Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session
Investing in Minnesota Housing - Senator Eric Lucero Feb 3rd, 2025
Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- anything we can do to perhaps<00:04:41.120>
look <00:04:41.320>at <00:04:41.600>mandates - c><00:04:42.199>
or <00:04:42.479>other <00:04:42.840>types perhaps look at mandates - or other types perhaps look at mandates or other types of<00:04:43.520>
reforms <00:04:44.400>
Summary:
Senator Eric Lucero testified about Minnesota’s housing affordability challenges, arguing that rising interest rates, insurance costs, property taxes, and construction expenses are being passed on to renters and homeowners. He said the core problem is supply and demand: demand has risen while supply has not kept pace, in part because fewer homeowners are selling or downsizing. Lucero said the legislature should look for ways to reduce costs without creating major new state expenses, especially in a budget year with a projected deficit.
Lucero highlighted several policy ideas and bills. He said he has introduced a bill to exempt sales tax on building materials, which he argued would lower the final cost of new homes. He also said he is interested in reducing permit costs and examining other factors that affect construction costs, including materials and labor. On insurance and property taxes, he suggested lawmakers should consider reforms or relief measures, while noting that interest rates are largely beyond state control.
The discussion also focused on homeowners associations and common interest communities. Lucero said he has been part of a bipartisan work group for about six months that reviewed public testimony and expert input, and that the group has now issued recommendations. He said he and other legislators plan to turn those recommendations into one or more bipartisan bills aimed at improving transparency, accountability, and reducing costs for homeowners. He closed by saying housing affordability affects everyone and that he believes there is momentum this year for reforms that support homeownership and generational wealth.
TX
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Task Force on Homeowners and Commercial Property Insurance 10/22/25
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- They had a loss combined loss ratio of about 59%, which I think is good when you look at what we mandate
- They had a loss combined loss ratio of about 59%, which I think is good when you look at what we mandate
- by statute which unless it's mandated by statute which we've<00:47:10.240>
done <00:47:10.480> - <00:47:22.720>
Those <00:47:22.960>are mandated premium reduction. - Those are mandated premium reduction.
Summary:
The task force met on October 22, 2025, with a quorum present and several members participating remotely. Members approved the minutes from the previous meeting. Michelle Urick of the Legislative Coordinating Commission then gave an administrative update on proxy voting and the task force’s operating procedures. She said the enabling statute only authorizes the officially appointed member to act and vote, so proxy voting is not allowed, and votes must be cast in person at the meeting where the item is considered. She also said members may submit written positions, but not vote before or after a meeting. In response to concerns about attendance for future votes, the chair said the January meetings would be rescheduled if possible using a Doodle poll so more members could be present in person. The group also agreed to treat the revised document as operating procedures rather than a formal charter, with no separate adoption action needed at that time.
The task force then moved into testimony on homeowners and commercial property insurance. Paul Edgar of Minnesota Realtors said rising insurance costs are adding to housing affordability pressures, citing an increase in the monthly principal, interest, taxes, and insurance payment on a median-priced Minnesota home from $1,622 in 2021 to $2,642 in September 2025. He said higher insurance costs and limited coverage can affect buyers’ financing, especially for condominiums and townhomes, and urged continued work on liability and insurance-related laws that may discourage condo development. He also referenced prior bipartisan reforms to Minnesota’s condominium construction defects law and said his organization supports further improvements to encourage more condo production.
Keenan Ravery of the Minnesota Mortgage Association focused on how insurance requirements affect mortgage lending. He explained that lenders require insurance both at origination and throughout the life of the loan, with standards aimed at protecting collateral rather than providing full homeowners coverage. He said replacement-cost coverage has long been the norm, but recent issues with roofs, deductibles, HO-6 policies, and force-placed insurance have become pain points for consumers and lenders. He said his association is working with national trade groups on reforms that could allow more flexibility in coverage types and deductibles, and he expressed hope that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency may announce policy changes in the coming months or by early 2026. No votes or substantive policy actions were taken beyond approving the minutes and agreeing to pursue scheduling adjustments for January.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, May 21, 2025 - Part 1)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- That mandate made it clear that the American people were ready to get the country back on track.
- So these silly mandates that come along, people generally don't like them, such as the auto start-stop
- I know the auto perceived as a mandate.
- So these silly mandates that come along, people generally don't like them, such as the auto start-stop
- >
come <01:25:13.000>along, these silly mandates that come along, these silly mandates
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- The bill tries to ensure that public sector workers don’t enforce the edicts, commands, and mandates
- The organizations this bill identifies have never and will never issue an enforceable mandate on the
- <00:42:00.000>
on <00:42:00.160>the never issue an enforcable mandate on the never - The state and its political subdivisions from enforcing any mandates from these entities.
- It is, first of all, an unfunded mandate. We are a tiny town.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- Additionally, such a mandate disproportionately affects individuals with invisible disabilities who may
- additionally such a mandate additionally such a mandate disproportionately<00:49:00.200>
affects - We're also concerned with a mandated identification, having to go to DMV and get a driver or non-driver
- The mandated numbers haven't been increased since the ADA passed 35 years ago.
- numbers van accessible ones the mandated numbers haven't<00:59:25.760>
been <00:59:26.200>
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, July 21, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It's mandated that we have a postal service in this country.
- <00:24:18.080>
It's <00:24:18.400>mandated <00:24:18.799>that <00:24:19.039>< - It's mandated that we the constitution.
- This bill is not about creating a new bureaucracy or imposing heavy-handed mandates.
- >
that <06:15:27.280>the Relations Act mandates that the Relations Act mandates that the
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Education Policy and Administration (01/29/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- I think that parents should be involved, and the workshop is an excellent idea to mandate, giving them
- She said these federal mandates are very expensive to administer, and the IDEA legislation originally
- are very expensive to mandates are very expensive to administer<01:56:35.239>
and <01:56:35.400 - and shifts the costs unfunded mandate and shifts the costs for<01:56:53.679>
education <01:56: - at a federal and state are mandated at a federal and state level<02:06:13.639>
um <02:06:13.920
Summary:
The committee opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and noted weather-related absences and a large number of new bills. The chair said a subcommittee would be formed to review three cell phone bills, and a full committee work session on bullying would be scheduled for the week after next. The committee then began a hearing on House Bill 121, which would create local special education advisory councils in school districts.
Representative Glenn Cordelli, the sponsor, said the councils would be parent-driven, with parents of children with disabilities advising districts on education, safety, program development, evaluation, planning, policies, and communication with administrators. He said the bill would require at least quarterly meetings with district administration, an annual parent workshop, and a year-end report to the school board. He also cited federal guidance from the U.S. Department of Education on parent advisory councils and said the goal was to improve collaboration between parents and schools.
Members raised questions about the use of “shall,” how councils would be formed in districts without PTAs/PTOs, whether the councils could function in very small districts, privacy concerns about parents disclosing their children’s disabilities, whether the councils should include guardians or educational professionals, and whether the councils would have any direct tie to the state advisory council. The sponsor said the requirement was intended to make the councils mandatory, that local districts could organize them organically if needed, that participation would be voluntary, that parents would not be required to disclose private information, and that the councils would remain advisory rather than determinative. He also said costs should be minimal. Testimony then began from Nicole Sheath, a pediatric occupational therapist and parent of four children with disabilities, who described her experience balancing advocacy, school collaboration, and the demands of her children’s therapies and education.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services (01/21/2025)
Labor, Industrial and Rehabilitative Services
Transcript Highlights:
- Some entities that have federal contractors are mandated to use it.
- It's a voluntary program right now unless you're in a mandated jurisdiction, so you can do that.
- jurisdiction so you're in a a mandated jurisdiction so you<03:09:27.040>
can <03:09:27.200> - It's not even like a mandate like Affordable Care Act mandate, right?
- year we get bills about uh mandating year we get bills about uh mandating stuff<05:21:33.280>
TX
Texas 89th Regular
89th Legislative Session - Second Called Session Aug 28th, 2025
Texas House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- That mandate is an unfunded mandate down to our local entities because that was not included in your
- I think it's a costly mandate.
- Well, this entire bill is a costly mandate, and we were told it's worth it.
- And once again, we are essentially putting out a mandate.
- It is Affirming, it is government-mandated suffering, and Texans know this is wrong.
Keywords:
sex designation, restroom access, civil penalties, private civil right of action, women's privacy, abortion, healthcare, jurisdiction, civil action, qui tam, prohibition, state law, youth camp, safety regulations, advisory committee, child welfare, health standards, summer camp, camp safety, child abuse reporting
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- It is not a mandate; it is a matter of choice.
- it is a matter of choice not a mandate it is a matter of choice over<00:02:17.959>
the <00:02: - This is not a mandate, and it's a choice to try it out, to adopt it, and to repeal it.
- It is not a mandate; it is about options. Please vote yes on 1071.
- <00:22:36.000>
it is about Choice it is not a mandate it is about Choice it is not a mandate
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- all recall back in 2018 when the Department of Education was sued because they were not meeting mandated
- <00:33:18.039>
de <00:33:18.360>herd measure would uh I guess mandate de herd measure - would uh I guess mandate de herd to<00:33:19.080>
reclassify <00:33:20.080>certain <00: - Each department is mandated to set up its own process, so each department would have to, um, and so there
- This is regarding the mandate for DOH to reclassify certain positions within the Department of Health
KY
Kentucky 2025 Regular Session
Government Contract Review Committee (2-11-25) - Upon Adjournment
Transcript Highlights:
- You said there was a legislative mandate. Do you have the KRS for that for this type of coverage?
- You said there was a legislative mandate. Do you have the KRS for that for this type of coverage?
- You said there was a legislative mandate. Do you have the KRS for that for this type of coverage?
- You said there was a legislative mandate. Do you have the KRS for that for this type of coverage?
- You said there was a legislative mandate. Do you have the KRS for that for this type of coverage?
Summary:
The committee approved the January 14 minutes and then considered a large agenda of contracts, including personal services contracts, amendments, memoranda of agreement, and Kentucky Entertainment Incentive Program items. The chair noted the agenda contained 240 items and emphasized the need for transparency in how contract approvals work. Several items were pulled for questions, while the rest were approved without objection.
The first major discussion involved seven contingency-fee contracts for the Attorney General’s office. Committee members asked about the apparent $20 million maximum per contract, and staff explained that the amount was a ceiling, not a guarantee, and that under the statutory waterfall in KRS 45A.717 a $20 million fee would require roughly $355 million returned to the Commonwealth. Staff also said the new batch included some new firms, that these contracts are being handled in 6- to 12-month batches, and that no money had yet been spent from the prior cycle. The committee then approved those contracts.
Members also questioned a Cabinet for Health and Family Services training contract, which officials said was needed because Finance provides only Kentucky-specific training, while the outside vendor offers broader procurement and federal-funds training; the committee approved that item. A University of Kentucky capital project contract for the State Capitol exterior renovation was approved after questions about the open-ended date, total project cost, and expected completion, with staff saying the overall project is projected for substantial completion by the end of 2026 and final warranty work could extend into 2027. A DCBS amendment for SSI eligibility determinations for children in out-of-home care was explained as an increase caused by a protest, a reissued RFP, and more children entering care; the committee approved it after discussion of the protest and scoring details.
The committee also approved a Transportation Cabinet amendment for an I-71 widening and interchange project in Oldham County after staff explained it was a time extension with no additional funds, though the project had evolved due to traffic changes and now includes an eight-lane bridge design. Finally, the committee discussed two Finance Cabinet facilities and support services amendments tied to the Capitol renovation and juvenile justice facility retrofits. Staff said the Capitol project contract covered the full design team, with completion projected around 2029, while the juvenile justice amendments covered additional design work for McCracken and Breathitt facilities, with final bid documents expected in June or July and construction anticipated to begin in the latter half of 2025. Both items were approved.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Cannabis Laws Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- We remove outdated and burdensome requirements, such as the vertical integration mandate.
- We remove outdated and burdensome requirements, such as the vertical integration mandate for medical
Summary:
Legislative leaders from the House and Senate met in Springfield to announce and sign a conference report resolving differences between competing cannabis reform bills. Speakers described the agreement as the result of several years of work and praised the bipartisan, bicameral collaboration of committee chairs, minority members, and staff. They emphasized that the final package reflects input from industry stakeholders, communities, and legislators across the state, including Western Massachusetts.
The conference report was presented as a broad modernization of Massachusetts cannabis law. Key provisions described included restructuring the Cannabis Control Commission to improve oversight and transparency, creating a portal to report illegal conduct, requiring updated reporting on public health, public safety, and tax impacts, and studying workplace safety standards. The bill also updates license caps and ownership rules, expands opportunities for social equity businesses, removes the medical vertical integration requirement, and revises purchase, possession, delivery, and advertising rules.
Speakers also said the legislation addresses emerging issues such as hemp-derived products and aims to support a more stable and equitable market. Several members noted that the bill is not perfect but represents a meaningful compromise and a step forward for the industry and the Commonwealth. The meeting concluded with the formal signing of the conference report and a motion to close.
OK
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Senate in Special Session A Jan 27th, 2025
Florida Senate Floor Meeting
MN
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- It is not creating a mandate. It's not creating a requirement.
- Uhm, Madam Chair, again, it is not a mandate. It's not a requirement.
- It is not creating a mandate. It's not creating a requirement.
- It's not creating a mandate. It's not creating a requirement.
- Uhm, Madam Chair, again, it is not a mandate. It's not a requirement.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (03/18/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- Is there a lot of mandates attached to federal funding? taking my question.
- Is that lot of mandates attached to it.
- You know, the mandates that you're given.
- Um you mandates put in into this report?
- the mandates that you that uh you're<00:22:10.080>
given.
Summary:
The committee first opened with brief remarks about a member’s recovery and then heard House Bill 518, which would require the commissioner of Health and Human Services to provide a detailed annual report of all costs related to DCYF. The sponsor, Representative Erica Layon, said the bill was intended to improve transparency, clarify how much time and money are spent on DCYF work versus other departmental work, and help future discussions about staffing, resources, and whether DCYF should remain within DHHS or become a separate department. She said the department could likely produce the report without additional cost, though she was open to adjusting the reporting date and possibly adding more detail about federal mandates.
Former Representative Betty Gay and several members supported the bill as a way to better document costs and procedures, while DCYF Director Marie Nunan said the department was not taking a position on the bill, already has many policies and operating procedures, and believed it could comply without a fiscal note. Members raised questions about whether the reporting requirement duplicated existing oversight, whether it should apply to other agencies, and whether the report should include federal funding mandates. Some suggested that a broader review or subcommittee on DCYF might be more useful than a single reporting bill.
In executive session, the committee voted 15-1 to retain HB 518, so it will not go on the calendar. Members said they wanted more time to discuss the bill, watch the budget process, and consider whether the reporting requirement could be implemented informally or through a broader oversight effort. The committee then moved on to House Bill 775, which was introduced by Representative Jodi Nelson as a measure to support supervised visitation centers. Dr. Scott Hampton testified in favor, describing the loss of visitation centers since 2019, the role of supervised visitation in protecting children and vulnerable parents in domestic violence cases, and the potential benefits for child safety, crime prevention, and family preservation.