In health care, repealing provisions relating to pregnancy and further providing for execution, for requirements and options and for example; and making an editorial change.
Summary
SB1197 amends Pennsylvania’s advance health care directive laws in Title 20 by repealing the existing statutory “pregnancy” provision that limited the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for pregnant patients. In its place, the bill updates the living will and health care power of attorney provisions so that a person may, if they choose, include instructions specifically addressing medical decision-making if they are diagnosed as pregnant. It also revises the statutory example form to remove the old mandatory pregnancy language and replace it with optional language about pregnancy-related care preferences.
The bill also makes related conforming changes to the authority of health care agents and the sample advance directive form, and it directs the Department of Health to ensure that providers have policies and procedures to notify patients about the repeal of the pregnancy provision. The measure is effective immediately and would change how advance directives are drafted, interpreted, and presented to patients and providers across Pennsylvania.
The general sentiment reflected by the bill text is that it is intended to modernize and expand patient autonomy in end-of-life planning, especially for pregnant individuals. Because there were no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no documented floor or committee debate to gauge broader legislative support or opposition. The bill’s structure suggests a policy shift away from a mandatory pregnancy-specific rule and toward optional, individualized decision-making.
The main point of contention likely concerns the repeal of the existing pregnancy protection rule, which previously required life-sustaining treatment, nutrition, and hydration for certain pregnant patients unless narrow medical exceptions applied. Supporters would likely view the repeal as restoring control to patients and their designated agents, while opponents could argue that removing the statute weakens protections for unborn children in situations involving incapacitated pregnant patients. The bill also touches on sensitive issues such as end-of-life care, abortion-adjacent policy, and the scope of advance directives, which are likely to be the central areas of disagreement.
Impact
SB1197 would repeal 20 Pa.C.S. § 5429 and revise Pennsylvania’s laws governing living wills, health care powers of attorney, and the statutory example advance directive form. It would remove the current pregnancy-specific mandate from the statute and instead allow individuals to include optional pregnancy-related instructions in their advance directives. The bill also requires the Department of Health to ensure licensed health care providers have notice procedures in place regarding the repeal, affecting provider compliance and patient education practices.
Sentiment
The bill appears to be framed as a patient-autonomy and advance-care-planning measure, with its text emphasizing optional directives and individualized decision-making. No committee discussion or vote history was provided, so there is no direct evidence of bipartisan support, opposition, or amendments. Based on the bill’s content alone, the likely sentiment is supportive among sponsors and advocates for reproductive and end-of-life autonomy, with anticipated concern from those who favor retaining pregnancy-specific treatment requirements.
Contention
The central controversy is the repeal of the existing pregnancy provision that required life-sustaining treatment for pregnant patients in certain circumstances. Supporters are likely to argue that the law should allow pregnant individuals to express their own medical preferences in advance directives and empower health care agents to follow those wishes. Opponents are likely to object that removing the statute could permit withdrawal of treatment in ways that could affect fetal viability or reduce protections for unborn children. Additional contention may arise over the bill’s impact on hospitals, physicians, and the interpretation of advance directives in pregnancy-related emergencies.
In abortion, further providing for legislative intent, providing for fetal heartbeat examination and further providing for medical consultation and judgment and for abortion on unborn child of 24 or more weeks gestational age; and making an editorial change.
Further providing for powers and duties of the Department of Environmental Resources; repealing provisions relating to appropriations; and making editorial changes.
Further providing for powers and duties of the Department of Environmental Resources; repealing provisions relating to appropriations; and making editorial changes.
In health care, further providing for applicability, for definitions, for criminal penalties, for definitions, for orders, bracelets and necklaces, for revocation, for absence of order, bracelet or necklace and for emergency medical services, repealing provisions relating to advisory committee and providing for discontinuance and for Pennsylvania orders for life-sustaining treatment; and making an editorial change.
In firearms and other dangerous articles, repealing provisions relating to firearms not to be carried without a license, providing for license not required, repealing provisions relating to carrying firearms on public streets or public property in Philadelphia, further providing for prohibited conduct during emergency, providing for sportsman's firearm permit, further providing for licenses and for antique firearms and repealing provisions relating to proof of license and exception; and making editorial changes.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to medical facility procedures for women experiencing certain medical conditions.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to medical facility procedures for women experiencing certain medical conditions.