A Resolution urging the President of the United States to delay any enforcement of the REAL ID program until it is eliminated.
Summary
House Resolution 131 is a nonbinding Pennsylvania resolution that urges the President of the United States to delay enforcement of the federal REAL ID program until the program is eliminated. It also urges Congress to abolish REAL ID entirely and directs that copies of the resolution be sent to the President, congressional leadership, and Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation.
The resolution states that REAL ID imposes burdens on citizens’ ability to travel and obtain identification, with particular emphasis on the difficulties it says married women face in obtaining compliant identification. It argues that repeated delays in enforcement, including the then-upcoming May 9, 2025 date, show the standards are unnecessary for national security and that continued uncertainty causes confusion and panic for people renewing IDs or planning travel.
Impact
If adopted, the resolution would not change Pennsylvania law or create new state regulatory requirements; instead, it would express the House’s position on a federal identification program and seek federal action. Its practical effect would be limited to formal advocacy, but it could add political pressure on federal officials regarding REAL ID enforcement and repeal. The measure is aimed at federal agencies, Congress, and Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation rather than state agencies or residents directly.
Sentiment
The bill’s tone is strongly opposed to REAL ID and supportive of delaying or ending the program. The sponsors frame the issue as one of individual liberty, travel freedom, administrative burden, and unnecessary federal intrusion. No committee debate or vote record is provided, so there is no evidence of organized support or opposition beyond the resolution’s stated position and sponsorship.
Contention
The main point of contention is the REAL ID program itself, especially whether it is a necessary national security measure or an unnecessary federal burden. The resolution highlights concerns about travel restrictions, identification requirements, and the claimed disproportionate impact on married women, while implicitly rejecting the federal government’s justification for the program. Because it is a resolution rather than a statute, the dispute is primarily political and policy-based, centered on federalism, privacy, and administrative convenience rather than state-law implementation.
Urging the President and Congress of the United States and the Environmental Protection Agency to address the requirements of the MS4 storm water management program to relieve the burden on taxpayers.
Concurrent Resolution; supporting the elimination of the United States Department of Education; urging the United States Congress to fully cooperate with such efforts.
Urging The President Of The United States, And All Members Of Any Current And Future Administration, To Abide By The Laws Of The United States Of America, Including By Complying With Orders Issued By The United States Courts.
Urging the President of the United States to adhere to the Constitution of the United States and the War Powers Resolution by seeking and obtaining explicit authorization from Congress before engaging United States Armed Forces in any hostilities involving foreign nations.