An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in nuisances, providing for the offense of late removal of campaign signage on public property; and imposing a . . . penalty.
Summary
HB292 would create a new offense in Pennsylvania law for the late removal of campaign signage placed on public property. It requires candidates, or people acting on their behalf, to follow any applicable local sign ordinances and to remove campaign signs by the deadline set by local law, but in any event no later than 10 days after an election.
The bill also establishes penalties for violations. A candidate who fails to timely remove the signage would commit a summary offense and could be fined between $50 and $300. In addition, the court would impose 5 to 30 hours of community service, to be completed within six months, during which the defendant must pick up campaign signs and litter or illegally dumped trash. The bill defines “candidate” broadly to include anyone seeking nomination or election to public office, and it would take effect 60 days after enactment.
Impact
HB292 would amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by adding a new section in the nuisances chapter, creating a state-level enforcement mechanism for campaign sign cleanup on public property. It would supplement, rather than replace, local sign ordinances by requiring compliance with local deadlines and setting a statewide backstop of 10 days after an election. The bill would affect candidates and campaign workers, and it would give courts authority to impose both fines and community-service penalties for noncompliance.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee debate or votes in the provided materials, the overall sentiment appears to be practical and enforcement-oriented rather than controversial on its face. The proposal suggests a cleanup and public-order rationale, aiming to reduce lingering campaign signage and associated litter after elections. No formal vote history or transcript evidence is available here to show organized support or opposition.
Contention
The main point of potential contention is the scope of state enforcement over what is often handled by local sign ordinances. Some may view the bill as a reasonable anti-litter and nuisance measure, while others could see it as an added burden on candidates and campaigns, especially where local rules already exist. The requirement that candidates perform community service picking up campaign signs and trash may also be debated as either a constructive penalty or an unusual sanction tied to political activity.
In riot, disorderly conduct and related offenses, providing for the offense of transporting dogs in external section of vehicle; and imposing penalties.