In powers of department and local authorities, further providing for specific powers of department and local authorities.
Summary
HB2397 amends Pennsylvania’s Vehicle Code, specifically Title 75, section 6109, which governs the Department of Transportation’s and local authorities’ powers over permits for processions, special activities, and assemblages on State-designated highways. The bill adds a new subsection stating that the department may not deny a permit solely because the sponsor does not indemnify elected officials who participate in the procession, special activity, or assemblage, so long as the sponsor otherwise meets the existing requirements of subsection (j).
In practical terms, the bill limits the ability of the department to condition highway-use permits on indemnification agreements covering elected officials. It preserves the existing permitting framework for parades, demonstrations, and similar events on state highways, but removes one potential basis for permit denial. The act would take effect 60 days after enactment.
Impact
The bill would directly amend 75 Pa.C.S. § 6109 by adding subsection (k), narrowing the Department of Transportation’s discretion in administering permits for processions, special activities, and assemblages on state-designated highways. It would affect sponsors of public events, elected officials who participate in those events, and the department or local authorities involved in permit review, by prohibiting permit denial when the only missing condition is indemnification of elected officials.
Sentiment
No committee transcript or vote record is available, so there is no documented debate or recorded vote to indicate broader legislative sentiment. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears targeted and procedural rather than expansive, suggesting a focused policy effort to prevent permit denials tied to indemnification requirements.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely the indemnification requirement itself: supporters would view the bill as preventing an unnecessary barrier to permits for public processions and assemblies, while opponents may argue that elected officials participating in such events should be protected by indemnification before a permit is issued. The bill specifically addresses the department’s authority, so any disagreement would center on whether removing this permit condition shifts risk or liability away from public officials and event sponsors.
In licensing of drivers, further providing for schedule of convictions and points; in rules of the road in general, further providing for speed timing devices; and, in powers of department and local authorities, further providing for specific powers of department and local authorities.
In registration of vehicles, further providing for person with disability plate and placard; in fees, further providing for exemption of persons, entities and vehicles from fees; and, in powers of department and local authorities, further providing for specific powers of department and local authorities.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; in miscellaneous provisions, providing for the offense of careless operation of electric scooters; and, in powers of department and local authorities, further providing for specific powers of department and local authorities.