In service and facilities, further providing for billing procedures.
Summary
HB172 amends Pennsylvania’s Public Utility Code provisions on billing procedures. It keeps the existing minimum payment windows for utility bills—at least 15 days for nonresidential customers and 20 days for residential customers—and continues to require that customers be allowed to receive monthly bills and be notified of that right. The bill also preserves itemization requirements for utility bills, including separate disclosure of basic service, taxes, fuel adjustment charges, and other commission-approved components.
The bill further addresses billing practices for electric and gas utilities that bill on a bimonthly or quarterly basis, requiring interim monthly statements to include estimated fuel adjustment charges and requiring the final bill to reconcile those charges using weighted averages of the applicable monthly rates. A key substantive change is the new restriction on back-billing: certain public utilities may not bill for previously unbilled service that accrued more than 12 months earlier, except where the delay resulted from commission or court proceedings or from fraud, theft, or meter tampering. The act would take effect 60 days after enactment.
Impact
HB172 would amend Title 66 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically section 1509 governing utility billing procedures. Its main legal effect is to limit how far back certain utilities can bill for previously unbilled service, while leaving existing notice, payment-period, billing-frequency, and itemization rules in place. The bill would directly affect public utilities covered by the statute, as well as residential and nonresidential utility customers who receive electric, gas, or other covered utility service.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee discussion or votes, the available record suggests a procedural and consumer-protection-oriented measure rather than a controversial one. The bill appears aimed at improving billing clarity and limiting surprise charges, which generally aligns with customer protections. However, without transcripts or vote history, there is no documented evidence of support or opposition from lawmakers, utilities, or consumer advocates.
Contention
The most likely point of contention is the 12-month limit on billing for previously unbilled service, which could be viewed by utilities as restricting recovery of legitimate charges and by consumers as protection against delayed or unexpected back-billing. Another possible issue is the administrative burden of monthly interim statements and fuel-adjustment reconciliations for utilities that bill less frequently. The exceptions for commission/court delays and for fraud, theft, or meter tampering suggest an attempt to balance consumer protection with utility recovery rights.
In general provisions, further providing for definitions; in procurement organization, further providing for specific construction powers, duties and procedures; in procurement of construction and design professional services, further providing for procurement of design professional services; providing for project delivery methods; and making a repeal.
In Entertainment Economic Enhancement Program, further providing for definitions, for procedure and for limitations; providing for regulation of self-service storage facilities; and making a repeal.
In sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax; and, in gross receipts tax, further providing for imposition of tax; and providing for reporting and for transfers.
In budget and finance, further providing for expenses; in facilities and supplies, further providing for deposits into account; and, in access to justice, providing for performance audit of account.