Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

Pennsylvania House Bill HB165

Introduced
1/16/25  

Caption

An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in abortion, further providing for medical consultation and judgment.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly alter the legal framework surrounding abortion procedures in Pennsylvania, particularly affecting how healthcare providers must approach pain management for unborn children. Opponents of the bill may view it as a potential infringement on a woman's right to choose and complicating abortion practices by imposing additional medical protocols that must be followed.

Summary

House Bill 165 seeks to amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes related to abortions, specifically regarding the provision of pain relief medication. The bill mandates that no abortion shall be performed on an unborn child who is more than 15 weeks gestational age without first administering pain relief medication. Exceptions to this rule are provided for situations in which the physician is aware of an adverse reaction to the medication by the pregnant woman or in cases of medical emergencies where immediate action is required.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 165 is likely to be divisive, given the ongoing national discourse surrounding reproductive rights. Supporters may argue that the bill is a necessary step for fetal protection and medical ethics, asserting that pain relief is a humane consideration in abortion practices. Conversely, critics might label it as an unnecessary barrier to women seeking abortions, arguing that it prioritizes fetal pain over a woman's autonomy and healthcare decisions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the ethical implications of administering pain relief medication to a fetus and the potential for this legislation to create additional barriers for individuals seeking access to reproductive healthcare services. Opponents may frame the bill as an example of governmental overreach into personal medical decisions, while proponents are likely to argue for the necessity of compassionate medical care during abortions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

PA HB2005

In abortion, further providing for medical consultation and judgment and for informed consent.

PA HB1801

In abortion, further providing for medical consultation and judgment and for informed consent.

PA HB1844

In abortion, further providing for definitions and for medical consultation and judgment.

PA HB102

In assault, further providing for the offense of harassment.

PA HB407

In assault, further providing for the offense of stalking.

PA SB96

In assault, further providing for the offense of terroristic threats.

PA HB956

In assault, further providing for the offense of aggravated assault.

PA HB957

In other offenses, further providing for the offense of invasion of privacy.

PA HB56

In assault, further providing for the offense of terroristic threats.

PA HB259

In minors, further providing for the offense of sexual abuse of children.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.