Updating and expanding the storm water planning requirements to be undertaken by counties; authorizing counties to regulate storm water within a watershed-based planning area; authorizing the formation of water resources management authorities; enabling counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities to develop integrated water resources management plans; imposing duties and conferring powers on the Department of Environmental Protection, the Environmental Quality Board, counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities; providing for financing and for waiver of use for certain grant or loan funds; establishing the Integrated Water Resources Management Account; and making repeals.
Impact
If enacted, HB 699 would significantly amend existing state laws related to water management. It builds upon prior legislation, particularly the Storm Water Management Act of 1978, by introducing comprehensive and integrated planning requirements. The bill mandates that counties and municipalities adopt new comprehensive storm water management plans and provides for grant funding to assist with the implementation of these plans. This is aimed at improving local government's ability to manage storm water runoff effectively while also restoring and protecting water quality in the state’s rivers and streams.
Summary
House Bill 699, known as the Integrated Water Resources Restoration, Protection and Management Act, aims to update and expand storm water planning requirements across Pennsylvania. The bill empowers counties to implement water management strategies within watershed-based planning areas, creating a framework that allows for the establishment of water resources management authorities. This is intended to lead to more coordinated and effective management of storm water, thereby addressing issues related to flooding, erosion, and water quality degradation. The bill outlines responsibilities for various governmental bodies, including the Department of Environmental Protection and the Environmental Quality Board, to ensure compliance and effective execution of these plans.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 699 appears generally positive among environmental advocates and municipal leaders who view the bill as a proactive step toward better water management. Many supporters argue that the bill reflects a necessary evolution in the state's approach to managing storm water and natural resources. However, there are concerns from some local governments about the potential burden of new responsibilities without adequate funding. The balance of local control versus state oversight is also a notable theme in discussions about the legislation, with opinions divided on the implications of state authority in local decisions.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the adequacy of funding provisions and the feasibility of implementation requirements imposed on counties and municipalities. Opponents raise concerns that without sufficient financial resources, local governments may struggle to meet the new obligations outlined in the bill. Additionally, there is apprehension about how these changes may affect local autonomy in decision-making regarding water resource management. The establishment of water resources management authorities is another area of debate, as it proposes a centralized approach that may lead to a reduction in localized strategies tailored to specific community needs.
Updating and expanding the storm water planning requirements to be undertaken by counties; authorizing counties to regulate storm water within a watershed-based planning area; authorizing the formation of water resources management authorities; enabling counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities to develop integrated water resources management plans; imposing duties and conferring powers on the Department of Environmental Protection, the Environmental Quality Board, counties, municipalities and water resources management authorities; providing for financing and for waiver of use for certain grant or loan funds; establishing the Integrated Water Resources Management Account; and making repeals.
Merges the coastal resources management council with the department of environmental management and creates the bureau of coastal resources management within the department of environmental management.