Pennsylvania House Bill HB458

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/16/23
• Refer: 3/16/23

Caption

Providing for a Constitutional Convention with limited powers, for a referendum on the question and for the selection, nomination and election of delegates; defining the powers, duties and operation of the Constitutional Convention; conferring powers and imposing duties on the Governor, the Secretary of the Commonwealth, officers of the General Assembly and county boards of elections; providing for a referendum on the Constitutional Convention's report; imposing a penalty; and making an appropriation.

Impact

If passed, HB 458 would significantly enhance public participation in potential constitutional changes by requiring a referendum that seeks voter approval for convening the Convention. This democratic approach is intended to enhance accountability and ensure that any changes made reflect the will of the people. The bill confers responsibilities on various state officials and outlines procedures for how the recommendations from the Convention will be submitted to voters in subsequent elections.

Summary

House Bill 458, titled the Limited Constitutional Convention Act, aims to provide a framework for convening a Constitutional Convention in Pennsylvania. The bill sets forth a specific structure for how delegates will be selected, the powers and limitations of the Convention, and how recommendations will be presented to the electorate for approval. The primary purpose of the Convention would be to consider amendments to Articles II, III, IV, and V of the Pennsylvania Constitution, including matters related to legislative processes and government structure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 458 appears mixed, as supporters advocate for the need to modernize the state constitution and increase political engagement among citizens. Conversely, detractors raise concerns about the implications of such a Convention, arguing that it could lead to unintended consequences, such as radical changes to existing rights or governmental structures. The debate centers around the balance between necessary reforms and the risks associated with reopening the constitution.

Contention

A notable point of contention within discussions around HB 458 is the scope of the Convention's authority. Critics are apprehensive that while the bill delineates certain limitations, the broad language could potentially open the door to significant alterations that were not intended by the original mandate. Furthermore, there is concern regarding the representation of various interests in the selection of delegates, leading to debates about who might be empowered to shape future amendments.