Oregon 2026 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB4063

Introduced
2/2/26  
Refer
2/2/26  

Caption

Allows a person to title and register a Kei truck in Oregon.

Summary

HB 4063 would create a legal framework for Kei trucks in Oregon. It defines a Kei truck as a very small motor vehicle originally manufactured in Japan or South Korea, with a 660cc engine, limited dimensions, and a model year at least 25 years old. The bill then amends multiple sections of the Oregon Vehicle Code to allow these vehicles to be titled and registered, sets a biennial registration fee for them, and exempts them from several existing vehicle equipment and emissions-related requirements. The measure also creates a new traffic offense for unlawfully operating a Kei truck on a highway with a posted speed limit above 65 miles per hour, punishable as a Class B traffic violation. In addition, it clarifies that Kei trucks are not subject to certain vehicle equipment rules, pollution-control requirements, or the state’s ethanol-gasoline mandate, and it excludes them from the definition of “motor vehicle” for certain emissions-control provisions. The bill also makes related technical amendments to title, inspection, registration, equipment, and fuel statutes to fit Kei trucks into Oregon law. The bill’s impact would be to open a path for legal ownership and road use of Kei trucks in Oregon while still limiting where and how they may be driven. It would affect vehicle owners, the Oregon Department of Transportation, vehicle dealers, and enforcement agencies by creating a new registration category and a new enforcement standard for highway operation. It also touches fuel retailers and emissions-related regulatory provisions by expressly exempting Kei trucks from some existing requirements. The overall sentiment in the available record appears neutral to favorable, but limited. The bill is presented as a straightforward vehicle-code update with a clear caption and digest, and there is no recorded committee testimony or vote history in the provided materials to show opposition or support. Because the bill was still in committee upon adjournment, there is no evidence here of final legislative consensus. The main point of potential contention is public safety and highway compatibility. The bill allows registration and title, but it also restricts Kei trucks from operating on highways posted above 65 mph, suggesting concern about their suitability for higher-speed roads. Another possible issue is the breadth of exemptions from equipment and emissions rules, which may concern regulators or safety advocates, while supporters are likely to focus on access, utility, and the ability to legally use imported Kei trucks in Oregon.

Impact

HB 4063 would amend Oregon vehicle, equipment, emissions, and fuel statutes to create a distinct legal status for Kei trucks. It would allow titling and registration, set a registration fee, exempt Kei trucks from several vehicle equipment and pollution-control requirements, and add a new traffic violation for operating them on highways posted above 65 mph. The bill would directly affect vehicle owners, ODOT, dealers, and enforcement agencies, while also creating a limited exemption from the state’s ethanol fuel requirement for Kei truck use.

Sentiment

The available record suggests a generally neutral-to-supportive posture toward the bill, but with little public debate captured. The measure is framed as a targeted legalization and regulatory accommodation for a specific class of imported vehicles, and no votes or committee transcripts are provided to indicate organized opposition or amendments. Because the bill remained in committee upon adjournment, there is no final legislative outcome to gauge broader sentiment.

Contention

The likely points of contention are safety, roadworthiness, and regulatory exemptions. Critics may question whether Kei trucks are appropriate for Oregon highways, especially given the explicit ban on operation on roads posted above 65 mph. Others may object to exempting them from certain equipment and emissions requirements, while supporters would likely argue that the vehicles are small, limited-use, and should be treated as a distinct category for registration and compliance purposes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.