Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon Senate Bill SB832

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Report Pass
6/4/25  
Engrossed
6/10/25  
Refer
6/10/25  
Report Pass
6/11/25  
Enrolled
6/16/25  
Passed
6/24/25  
Chaptered
7/2/25  

Caption

Relating to civil penalties for laws implemented by the State Department of Agriculture.

Summary

SB 832 updates Oregon law to increase and clarify civil penalties that the State Department of Agriculture may impose for violations of several agriculture-related statutes and rules. The bill sets different maximum penalty amounts depending on the program involved: up to $1,000, $2,500, $5,000, or $10,000 per violation. It also specifies that each violation, and in some cases each day a violation continues, may be treated as a separate offense. The bill also directs the department to adopt penalty schedules, follow contested-case procedures when imposing penalties, and deposit collected penalty revenue into the Department of Agriculture Service Fund. Those funds are continuously appropriated back to the department for administering and enforcing the underlying laws, rules, and orders. In one section, the bill adds an enforcement tool for unpaid penalties by allowing the department to suspend, revoke, refuse to issue, or refuse to renew certain licenses or registrations until the debt is paid. Overall, the bill strengthens the department’s enforcement authority across animal remedies, veterinary biologics, quarantines, and other agriculture regulatory programs. It does not create new substantive agricultural standards so much as it increases the consequences for violating existing ones and gives the department more leverage to collect unpaid penalties. The general sentiment appears largely supportive. The bill moved through the Senate with strong majorities and passed the House overwhelmingly, suggesting broad agreement that the Department of Agriculture needed clearer and stronger penalty authority. Early committee action was more cautious, including referral to Judiciary and later referral to Ways and Means, but the final votes indicate little opposition at the floor stage. The main point of contention appears to have been the scope and size of the penalties, along with the added authority to withhold licenses and registrations for unpaid fines. Those provisions affect manufacturers, licensees, registrants, and other regulated persons under the department’s programs, so concerns likely centered on enforcement severity and administrative discretion rather than the underlying policy goal.

Impact

SB 832 amends ORS 596.995 and creates new penalty provisions for violations of multiple agriculture statutes, including quarantine and crop/plant-related provisions. It expands the State Department of Agriculture’s civil enforcement toolkit, authorizes higher maximum penalties, and allows the department to condition licensing and registration actions on payment of assessed penalties. The bill also dedicates penalty revenue to the Department of Agriculture Service Fund for enforcement purposes, reinforcing the department’s ongoing administrative authority.

Sentiment

The bill appears to have enjoyed broad bipartisan support, with unanimous or near-unanimous committee recommendations at several stages and strong floor votes in both chambers. The final Senate and House votes suggest lawmakers generally agreed with strengthening enforcement and collection tools for the Department of Agriculture. The limited opposition that did appear was not enough to slow final passage, indicating the bill was viewed as a technical but important regulatory update rather than a controversial policy shift.

Contention

The likely areas of concern were the increased civil penalty ceilings, the ability to treat continuing violations as separate daily offenses, and the new authority to suspend or withhold licenses and registrations for unpaid penalties. These provisions could be viewed as giving the department substantial leverage over regulated businesses and individuals, especially manufacturers, licensees, and certificate holders. The committee referral to Judiciary and later Ways and Means suggests lawmakers wanted additional review of legal and fiscal implications, even though the bill ultimately advanced with strong support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

SD HB1088

Remove the requirement that counties remit to municipalities an amount equal to the road levy for calendar years 1984, 1985, and 1986.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.

CA SB834

An act to amend Section 1203.

NJ A2823

Establishes "Internet Predator Investigation and Prosecution Fund" with $200 assessment on persons convicted of certain offenses.

NJ S1546

Requires additional fines for certain crimes against minors to fund Amber Alert system.

CA SB1342

Criminal records: relief.

MO SB817

Authorizes a tax credit for certain charitable donations

CA AB2526

Special education local plan areas: apportionments: alternate assessments.