Oregon 2024 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB4024

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Report Pass
3/6/24  
Engrossed
3/6/24  
Refer
3/6/24  
Report Pass
3/7/24  
Enrolled
3/7/24  
Passed
3/20/24  
Chaptered
3/25/24  

Caption

Relating to campaign finance; prescribing an effective date.

Impact

The bill fundamentally alters the existing framework of campaign finance within the state, enforcing stricter limits on contributions to candidates and political committees. As of January 1, 2027, it will restrict contributions from individuals to a maximum of $3,300 per election for state representatives and related offices, thereby impacting how candidates fund their campaigns. The bill also requires organizations making independent expenditures to disclose the sources of their funding, promoting accountability and transparency in political financing.

Summary

House Bill 4024 (HB4024) aims to modify campaign finance laws in Oregon to enhance transparency and create contribution limits for political donations. The legislation establishes caps on the amount individuals and political committees can contribute to candidates for various political offices. Additionally, it includes provisions for public funding for campaigns at the local government level, provided they align with the new contribution limits stipulated in the bill.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB4024 have been notably polarized. Proponents, including several legislators and advocacy groups, argue it is a crucial step towards limiting the influence of large donations in politics. They believe the increased transparency will empower voters by making the origins of campaign funds clear. Conversely, critics argue that the new restrictions could disadvantage smaller candidates who rely on greater flexibility in funding, suggesting that the bill may skew the political playing field in favor of well-funded incumbents.

Contention

One of the major points of contention is around the enforcement mechanisms for the new contribution limits and the penalties for non-compliance. Legislators have raised concerns about how these limits would affect grassroots campaigns and the potential for unintended consequences that could arise from such constraints. The debate underscores a broader philosophical divide regarding the balance between regulating campaign finance to prevent corruption and preserving the autonomy of political committees and candidates in their fundraising efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB3392

Relating to campaign finance.

OR HB4116

Relating to consumer finance loans; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB2081

Relating to state finance; and prescribing an effective date.

OR HB4018

Relating to elections; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB45

AN ACT relating to campaign finance.

OR HB3879

Relating to state financial administration; prescribing an effective date.

OR HB411

AN ACT relating to campaign finance.

OR HB171

AN ACT relating to campaign finance.

OR HB1467

Campaign finance.

OR SB206

AN ACT relating to campaign finance.

Similar Bills

WV HB2719

Campaign finance and reporting

WV HB5218

Providing that the Secretary of State shall notify a respondent of an election law complaint

WV SB833

Requiring Secretary of State notify respondent of election law complaint

SC H4563

House Rules, Standing Committee membership

MI HB5677

Elections: other; election of members to the Michigan public service commission; provide for. Amends sec. 699 of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.699) & adds ch. VIA. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5676'26

TX HB2402

Relating to the determination of fees, charges, and rates for certain benefits under Medicaid.

ME LD1642

An Act to Protect Maine Consumers by Simplifying Subscription and Health Club Membership Cancellations

TX SJR27

Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding the membership of the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the membership of the tribunal to review the commission's recommendations, and the authority of the commission, the tribunal, and the Texas Supreme Court to more effectively sanction judges and justices for judicial misconduct.