Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB2828

Introduced
1/9/23  
Refer
1/12/23  

Caption

Relating to technology support structures.

Impact

HB 2828 has significant implications for local laws regarding telecommunications infrastructure. By requiring towers to meet specific siting and aesthetic standards, the bill seeks to balance technological advancement with community interests. The requirement for a county’s administrative review before any construction or modification indicates a shift towards more locally tailored regulations. The need to blend new structures into their environments may also promote accountability among telecommunications companies with respect to local landscapes and community norms.

Summary

House Bill 2828, titled 'Relating to technology support structures', proposes to establish review criteria for telecommunications towers that counties must apply. The bill mandates that existing telecommunications towers comply with these new criteria by January 1, 2030. This creates a framework that governs the development, alteration, and reconstruction of telecommunications towers, specifically addressing the environmental and aesthetic considerations of these structures. It aims to ensure that new towers are constructed with due regard to local surroundings and operational necessities while enhancing communication services across counties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2828 has been generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step for better managing telecommunications development. They believe it addresses long-standing concerns about the visual impact of towers and the inherent needs of local communities. However, there are concerns regarding the regulatory burden it may place on telecommunications providers, especially smaller companies that might struggle to meet stringent local criteria while remaining competitive.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for this legislation to impose extensive regulatory oversight that could delay necessary infrastructure improvements. Critics argue that the bill may complicate the approval process and create barriers for the efficient deployment of technology necessary for modern communication systems. Additionally, the imposition of fines for non-compliance raises questions about the fairness and implications for service availability in underserved areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR HB3253

Relating to technology support structures.

OR HB2883

Relating to technology support structures; declaring an emergency.

OR HB876

Zoning; wireless facilities, temporary support structures.

OR HB876

An Act to amend and reenact § 15.2-2316.3 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 15.2-2316.4:4, relating to zoning; wireless facilities; temporary support structure.

OR SB109

Prc & Supporting Agency

OR SB6222

Supporting public school students by improving their access to surplus technology hardware.

OR A1433

Establishes "Task Force on Supportive Technology for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities."

OR HB1420

Relating To Supportive Housing.

OR HB1420

Relating To Supportive Housing.

OR HB2432

Supporting public school students by improving their access to surplus technology hardware.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1046

telecommunications infrastructure; equipment requirements

AZ SB1027

Critical telecommunications infrastructure; construction requirements

FL S0344

Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991

AZ SB1620

Arizona space commission; board; membership

AZ HB2610

utility relocation; funding; bonds

NJ A3931

Removes requirement that local units may only provide broadband telecommunication service via wireless community service network.

FL H0435

Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991

IL SB2369

SECURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT