To repeal section 5501.60 of the Revised Code to replace the requirement that the Department of Transportation construct certain interstate interchanges with a traffic congestion study.
Summary
SB 31 repeals an existing statute that required the Ohio Department of Transportation to construct certain interstate interchanges, and replaces that mandate with a traffic congestion management study. The bill directs the Director of Transportation, in consultation with the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (or, at the Director’s discretion, with NOACA leading the work), to study congestion along Interstate 71 in a defined corridor in northeast Ohio.
The study area is bounded by U.S. Route 42, State Route 303, and West 130th Street, and the resulting report is due by December 31, 2026. The report must be submitted to the Governor, legislative leaders, transportation committee chairs, and the local governments of Strongsville, North Royalton, and Brunswick. The bill also allows the report to include recommended solutions for mitigating and managing congestion concerns identified in the study.
Impact
If enacted, SB 31 would remove the current statutory requirement for ODOT to build specified interstate interchanges and substitute a planning-oriented process focused on traffic analysis and congestion management. It would shift the state’s obligation from a construction mandate to a study and reporting requirement, affecting ODOT, NOACA, and the named local governments in the I-71 corridor. The bill would also repeal section 5501.60 of the Revised Code, thereby changing the underlying transportation law governing this project area.
Sentiment
Based on the bill’s structure and caption, the measure appears to be framed as a practical alternative to a construction mandate, emphasizing study, coordination, and data-driven planning rather than immediate infrastructure spending. No committee transcript or vote record is provided, so there is no direct evidence of floor debate or recorded support/opposition. The available context suggests a neutral-to-procedural posture, with the bill presented as a replacement for a specific transportation requirement rather than a broader policy dispute.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely whether the state should be required to build the interchanges outright or instead first complete a congestion study and consider alternative solutions. Supporters of the bill would likely favor the flexibility, cost control, and planning approach of a study, while opponents of repealing the existing mandate may view it as delaying or weakening a promised infrastructure project. The affected local communities—Strongsville, North Royalton, and Brunswick—along with transportation officials, would be the primary stakeholders in any disagreement over whether the corridor needs construction or further analysis.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.