To amend section 4507.11 and to enact section 4506.091 of the Revised Code to require the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to administer all drivers exams in English.
HB 753 would require the Ohio Registrar of Motor Vehicles to administer driver examinations in English. The bill creates a new section of the Revised Code directing that both commercial driver knowledge and skills tests be conducted in English, and it amends the existing driver licensing statute to state that all examinations for temporary instruction permits, driver’s licenses, motorcycle endorsements, and motor-driven cycle or motor scooter endorsements must be given in English. It also prohibits the use of translators, translation dictionaries, electronic devices, or interpreters during the exam process, except when needed to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility requirements.
The bill preserves the existing structure of Ohio’s licensing system, including road tests, motorcycle testing, and the authority of the registrar and designated examiners to administer and supervise examinations. It does not change the substantive qualifications for licensure, but it would change the language and assistance rules governing how applicants are tested. The measure is currently only introduced and has been referred to the House Transportation Committee, with no recorded votes or committee testimony in the provided materials.
If enacted, HB 753 would amend section 4507.11 and add section 4506.091 of the Revised Code, making English the required language for all driver-related examinations administered by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles. It would eliminate the current statutory allowance for testing applicants who are illiterate or have limited English proficiency by alternative methods, while still preserving ADA-related accommodations. The bill would affect applicants for standard driver’s licenses, temporary instruction permits, motorcycle endorsements, and commercial driver’s licenses, as well as the registrar, deputy registrars, and other designated examiners who administer the tests.
The available record shows no committee debate, testimony, or votes, so there is no documented public sentiment in the materials provided. Based on the bill text alone, the measure appears framed as a uniform-language administration rule rather than a broader licensing overhaul. Because it would remove existing flexibility for applicants with limited English proficiency, it is likely to draw both support from those favoring English-only testing standards and opposition from those concerned about access for immigrant and non-English-speaking applicants.
The main point of contention is the bill’s elimination of translators, translation dictionaries, electronic devices, and interpreters for driver testing, except where required by the ADA. Supporters are likely to argue that English-only testing promotes consistency, safety, and a clearer standard for all applicants. Opponents are likely to focus on access and fairness, especially for immigrants, refugees, and other residents with limited English proficiency who may need assistance to demonstrate driving knowledge and skills. The bill also conflicts with the current statute’s language allowing applicants with limited English knowledge to be tested by alternative methods, making that change a likely source of debate.