To repeal section 2151.271 of the Revised Code to remove the option for the juvenile court to transfer a proceeding against a juvenile to the county where the juvenile resides.
Summary
HB571 would repeal Ohio Revised Code section 2151.271, eliminating the statutory option for a juvenile court to transfer a juvenile proceeding to the county where the juvenile resides. In practical terms, the bill removes a venue-transfer mechanism in juvenile cases, leaving the original court to retain the matter rather than allowing relocation of the proceeding based on the youth’s residence.
Because the bill is a repeal-only measure, it does not create a new procedure or substitute standard; it simply deletes the existing authority from state law. The change would affect juvenile courts, prosecutors, defense counsel, and juveniles whose cases might otherwise be moved to another county under current law.
Impact
The bill would amend Ohio juvenile procedure by removing section 2151.271 from the Revised Code, thereby eliminating a court’s ability to transfer a juvenile case to the county of the juvenile’s residence. This would narrow venue-transfer options in delinquency or related juvenile proceedings and could affect where hearings are held, which local court administers the case, and how counties allocate juvenile justice responsibilities.
Sentiment
There is no recorded committee testimony or vote history in the provided materials, so the bill’s political or stakeholder sentiment cannot be directly measured from the record. Based on the text alone, the measure appears technical and procedural rather than ideological, but it could still draw differing views from those who favor keeping cases in the originating court versus those who prefer transfers to the juvenile’s home county for convenience or local supervision.
Contention
The main point of contention is likely whether juvenile cases should remain in the filing county or be transferable to the county where the juvenile lives. Supporters of repeal may argue that keeping proceedings in the original court promotes consistency, jurisdictional clarity, or administrative efficiency, while opponents may contend that home-county transfers better serve family access, rehabilitation, and local support services. No specific objections or endorsements are documented in the provided committee or vote materials.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.