Ohio 2025-2026 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB424

Caption

To amend section 145.295 of the Revised Code regarding transfers or purchases of certain retirement service credit.

Summary

HB424 would revise Ohio Revised Code section 145.295 governing how members of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) can obtain service credit from certain other public retirement systems. The bill addresses transfers and purchases of credit involving the Ohio Police and Fire Pension Fund, the State Highway Patrol Retirement System, and military service credit. It sets out when a PERS member may receive full credit for prior service, what payments and interest must be transferred or repaid, and the conditions under which a member may convert, restore, or repurchase credit. The bill also clarifies the mechanics for members who previously received refunds from a uniform retirement system and later want to regain that service credit in PERS. It preserves rules requiring the member to be eligible for retirement or disability benefits and to retire or accept disability benefits within 90 days after notice that the credit has been obtained. It further provides for refunds or reversals if the member does not retire as required or if a disability application is denied, and it confirms that qualifying service credit obtained under the section counts as Ohio service credit.

Impact

HB424 would amend the statutory rules that govern inter-system retirement credit transfers and purchases within Ohio public retirement systems, primarily affecting PERS members with prior service in the police and fire or highway patrol systems, as well as members with military service credit. It would also affect the administrative duties of PERS and the uniform retirement systems by specifying how contributions, employer amounts, and interest are calculated, transferred, certified, refunded, and restored. The bill would not create a new retirement system benefit, but would refine eligibility and accounting rules for moving service credit between systems and for repurchasing previously refunded credit.

Sentiment

Because the bill was only introduced and has no recorded committee testimony or votes in the provided materials, there is no documented public sentiment or legislative debate to measure. Based on the text, the measure appears technical and administrative rather than controversial, aimed at clarifying retirement credit transfer procedures and ensuring actuarial payments are properly handled. The absence of recorded opposition or support in the available history suggests the bill had not yet generated visible contention at this stage.

Contention

The main potential points of contention are likely to involve retirement-system funding, fairness between member groups, and the cost of allowing service credit to be transferred or repurchased with interest. The bill requires payment of employee and employer contributions plus interest, which may be viewed as protecting system solvency, but members or employee groups could question whether the formulas are too restrictive or expensive. Another possible issue is the 90-day retirement or disability deadline after notice that credit has been obtained, which could be seen as limiting flexibility for members seeking to use the credit.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.