To amend section 102.031 of the Revised Code to prohibit members of the General Assembly from receiving free or discounted tickets to sporting events.
Summary
HB409 would amend Ohio’s ethics law governing members of the General Assembly by adding a specific prohibition on accepting free or discounted tickets to professional sporting events. The bill defines professional sporting events to include games played by teams in the NFL, NHL, MLB, MLS, and NBA, and it creates a narrow exception for tickets that are part of a promotion generally available to the public on the same terms as everyone else.
The bill leaves in place the existing restrictions in section 102.031 on conflicts of interest, gifts, meals, travel, and voting in certain circumstances, but it adds a new category of prohibited benefit tied to sports entertainment. A violation of the new ticket ban, like a violation of the existing conflict-of-interest rule in division (B), could be punished by the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee with a fine of up to $1,000.
Impact
HB409 would directly amend section 102.031 of the Revised Code, expanding the ethics rules that apply to state legislators. It would make it unlawful for members of the General Assembly to knowingly accept complimentary or discounted tickets to professional sporting events unless the offer is part of a public promotion available on equal terms to the general public. The bill would also preserve the Joint Legislative Ethics Committee’s authority to impose fines for violations, thereby adding a new enforceable ethics restriction without changing the broader structure of Ohio’s gift and conflict-of-interest laws.
Sentiment
Based on the bill text and the absence of recorded committee testimony or votes, the available evidence suggests the measure is framed as a straightforward ethics reform with no documented opposition or support in the provided materials. Its purpose appears to be to tighten public confidence rules for legislators by limiting access to a common form of entertainment benefit. Because there are no transcripts or votes included, there is no clear record here of broader legislative sentiment beyond the bill’s anti-corruption and transparency rationale.
Contention
The main point of contention likely concerns whether free or discounted sports tickets should be treated as an improper gift or as a routine, low-value courtesy, especially when offered by teams, venues, or affiliated interests that may have business before the legislature. Another possible issue is the scope of the ban: the bill targets only professional sporting events and allows public promotions, which may raise questions about consistency with existing gift limits and whether similar restrictions should apply to other entertainment or event tickets. No specific objections or endorsements are documented in the provided committee materials.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.