To amend section 1333.82 of the Revised Code to revise the Alcohol Franchise Law.
Summary
HB194 amends Ohio Revised Code section 1333.82, which is part of the state’s Alcohol Franchise Law governing relationships between alcohol manufacturers and distributors. The bill revises several statutory definitions used in that framework, including “alcoholic beverages,” “manufacturer,” “distributor,” “franchise,” “good faith,” “brand,” and “sales area or territory.” In particular, it defines alcoholic beverages for this chapter as beer and wine, clarifies who counts as a manufacturer or distributor, and updates the meaning of an exclusive sales territory.
The bill also preserves and restates the law’s core concept that franchise relationships between manufacturers and distributors are contractual arrangements subject to statutory rules. It appears to narrow or clarify the scope of the law by excluding very small beer producers from the definition of manufacturer and by specifying that certain persuasive conduct does not, by itself, amount to bad faith or coercion. The measure would repeal the current version of section 1333.82 and replace it with the revised language.
Impact
If enacted, HB194 would directly amend Ohio’s Alcohol Franchise Law by changing the definitions that control how the statute applies to beer and wine manufacturers, distributors, and franchise territories. Those definitional changes could affect which businesses are covered, how exclusive territories are identified, and how disputes over franchise conduct are evaluated under sections 1333.82 to 1333.87 of the Revised Code. The bill would therefore influence manufacturer-distributor contractual rights and obligations, especially in the beer and wine distribution market.
Sentiment
Based on the available record, the bill appears to have been introduced without recorded committee debate or votes, so there is no documented public controversy or support in the provided materials. The overall tone of the measure is technical and clarifying rather than expansive, suggesting a legislative effort to refine existing alcohol franchise rules rather than overhaul them. Because no transcripts or vote history are available, sentiment can only be characterized as neutral and procedural.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the provided committee materials or voting history. Potential areas of dispute, based on the text alone, would likely involve the scope of the manufacturer exemption for smaller beer producers, the definition of good faith in franchise dealings, and how exclusive sales territories are assigned or protected. Any disagreement would most likely come from manufacturers, distributors, and permit holders affected by the revised franchise definitions.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.