To amend sections 323.152 and 4503.065 of the Revised Code to increase the homestead exemption amount and income limit.
Summary
HB103 would expand Ohio’s homestead tax relief by increasing the value of property shielded from taxation under the homestead exemption and by raising the income cap for eligibility. For qualifying homeowners who are age 65 or older, permanently and totally disabled, or certain surviving spouses, the bill changes the exemption calculation from $25,000 of property value to $50,000 of property value, which would increase the amount of local property taxes reduced for eligible homesteads. The bill makes parallel changes for manufactured and mobile homes, increasing the comparable exemption amount and updating the income threshold used to determine eligibility.
The bill also preserves and carries forward related tax reductions for disabled veterans and surviving spouses of disabled veterans, as well as surviving spouses of public service officers killed in the line of duty, while applying the higher exemption amount to those categories as well. It retains existing rules that limit the exemption to one homestead or one manufactured/mobile home, exclude special assessments, and bar reductions for certain tax fraud convictions. The bill specifies that the homestead changes apply beginning with tax year 2025 and the manufactured-home changes beginning with tax year 2026, and it requires the tax commissioner to continue annual inflation adjustments using the GDP deflator.
Impact
HB103 would amend Revised Code sections 323.152 and 4503.065, directly affecting Ohio’s property tax and manufactured-home tax relief statutes. The practical effect would be to increase the amount of tax relief available to eligible elderly, disabled, veteran, and surviving-spouse homeowners, while also expanding eligibility to higher-income households by raising the income limit. Counties and local taxing authorities would see reduced taxable collections from qualifying homesteads and manufactured homes, and county auditors would administer the updated exemption amounts and income thresholds under the tax commissioner’s annual certification process.
Sentiment
The bill appears generally supportive of tax relief for homeowners, especially seniors, disabled residents, veterans, and surviving spouses, and its introduction with many cosponsors suggests broad interest in expanding the homestead exemption. Because the bill was only introduced and no committee testimony or votes are provided, there is no recorded formal debate in the available materials. The overall tone of the measure is pro-relief and pro-tax reduction for eligible residents.
Contention
The main policy issue is fiscal: increasing the exemption from $25,000 to $50,000 and raising the income limit would reduce property-tax revenue for local governments and other taxing districts. Any concern would likely come from local fiscal stakeholders, school districts, and other entities dependent on property-tax collections, while supporters would emphasize affordability for fixed-income homeowners and disabled residents. Another possible point of discussion is whether the higher income threshold broadens the benefit too far beyond the most financially vulnerable households.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To amend sections 3505.01 and 3505.10 of the Revised Code to modify the deadline for a political party to certify its nominees for President and Vice-President to the Secretary of State.
To amend sections 3517.12, 3517.13, and 3517.155 of the Revised Code to modify the Campaign Finance Law regarding foreign nationals and statewide initiatives and referenda and to declare an emergency.
To delay the deadline for a major political party to certify its presidential and vice presidential candidates to the Secretary of State for the 2024 general election.