Prohibits students from accessing their wireless communications devices on school property, unless authorized for classroom use; prohibits students from accessing social media platforms through the use of internet access provided by the school district, except when expressly directed to for class instruction.
This bill would add a new section to the Education Law restricting student use of wireless communication devices on school property during the school day. It defines wireless communication devices broadly to include cell phones, computers, gaming devices, and smart watches, but excludes school-provided technology used for instruction. Under the bill, students would generally be prohibited from accessing these devices during instructional time unless a teacher or school authorizes their use for classroom purposes.
The bill also bars students from accessing social media platforms using school district internet access, except when expressly directed for class instruction. Devices would need to be powered off and stored in a manner set by the Education Department, such as in lockers or phone pouches. Violations would be handled through progressive discipline under existing student conduct rules and local codes of conduct.
If enacted, the bill would create a statewide rule limiting student access to personal wireless devices during the school day and would require school districts to adopt or align policies for storage, enforcement, and discipline. It would also add a specific prohibition on social media use through school-provided internet, while preserving exceptions for classroom instruction, individualized education programs, Section 504 plans, and physician-determined health needs. The measure would affect students, school districts, administrators, and potentially parents and special education service providers.
The bill text and available context suggest a generally supportive policy approach focused on reducing distractions and regulating device use in schools. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no direct evidence of formal opposition or debate in the materials supplied. The bill appears framed as a school-management and classroom-order measure rather than a punitive technology ban, with built-in exceptions for instructional and health-related needs.
The main points of potential contention are likely to be the breadth of the device restriction, the requirement that devices be powered off and stored during the school day, and the social media prohibition on school internet. Supporters would likely emphasize classroom focus, reduced disruption, and clearer school rules, while opponents may raise concerns about student safety, parental communication, enforcement burdens, and privacy or equity issues. The exceptions for IEPs, Section 504 plans, and physician-directed use appear designed to address accessibility and medical concerns, which may be a key area of negotiation.