Adds Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake in Putnam county to the definition of inland waterways.
Summary
S09506 amends section 911 of the New York Executive Law, which defines the state’s major inland lakes for purposes of the inland waterways program. The bill adds two Putnam County lakes—Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake—to the statutory list of inland waterways. It is a narrow, location-specific change that updates the existing list of protected or recognized inland lakes without altering the broader structure of the law.
By placing these lakes in the definition of inland waterways, the bill would extend whatever state-level planning, review, or policy considerations attach to that designation under the Executive Law. The practical effect is to bring Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake into the same statutory category as other named inland lakes already listed in the section, which may affect state and local treatment of shoreline, environmental, and development-related matters tied to inland waterways status.
Impact
The bill would amend the Executive Law’s inland waterways definition to include Lake Oscawana and Roaring Brook Lake in Putnam County. This changes the statutory list in section 911(4)(a), potentially making those lakes eligible for the same state recognition, planning considerations, or regulatory treatment that applies to other listed inland lakes under New York’s inland waterways framework. The measure does not create a new program or impose new statewide requirements, but it does expand the geographic scope of an existing statutory classification.
Sentiment
The available record suggests little to no controversy around the bill. There are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, and the measure appears to be a straightforward local designation bill. The tone of the legislation is administrative and supportive of including additional lakes in an existing statutory list, which typically indicates a neutral-to-positive reception.
Contention
No specific points of contention are documented in the materials provided. Because the bill simply adds two named lakes to an existing list, any disagreement would likely center on whether those lakes meet the criteria or whether the designation could affect local land use, environmental review, or shoreline development. However, no opposing arguments, amendments, or recorded objections are included in the available context.
Directs the commissioner of the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation to conduct a legal review for the re-designation of Donald J. Trump State Park, in Putnam and Westchester counties to a new name.