New York Senate Bill S09213

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/26
• Refer: 2/13/26
• Report Pass: 3/10/26

Caption

Provides for certain death benefits to correction officers, correction officer-sergeants, correction officer-captains, assistant wardens, associate wardens or wardens employed by Orange county.

Impact

The implementation of this bill is expected to increase the annual contributions from Orange County by approximately $41,000 starting fiscal year ending 2027. Additionally, there will be a one-time past service cost of $537,000 that will either be paid upfront or amortized over ten years at an approximate annual cost of $68,500. This financial adjustment reflects the anticipated costs associated with the new benefits for approximately 300 correction officers currently employed in the county.

Summary

Bill S09213 aims to provide enhanced in-service death benefits for retirement-eligible correction officers, including correction officer-sergeants, correction officer-captains, assistant wardens, associate wardens, and wardens employed by Orange County. The bill modifies the retirement and social security law to allow the beneficiary of a deceased correction officer to receive a lump sum payment equivalent to the pension reserve that would have been established had the member retired at the time of death. This provision is designed to offer financial support to the families of correction officers who pass away while still on duty or prior to retirement.

Contention

The most notable point of contention surrounding S09213 relates to the fiscal implications for Orange County. Critics may raise concerns regarding the increased financial burden on the county's budget, particularly the upfront and ongoing costs associated with the enhanced benefits. Proponents of the bill argue that providing adequate death benefits for correction officers is vital for acknowledging their service and the risks they face in their daily duties. The balance between fiscal responsibility and honoring the dedicated service of these officers presents a key debate among legislators.