Enacts the "choice in responsible gaming act"; requires mobile sports wagering operators to establish default betting limits on their platform and to notify authorized sports bettors of their ability to opt-out of the default betting limits.
Summary
S09048, titled the "choice in responsible gaming act," would require every mobile sports wagering operator in New York to build default betting limits into its platform. The bill defines a default betting limit as a maximum amount a bettor may wager over a defined period, and directs the Gaming Commission to set the limit before the law takes effect using best practices for responsible gambling.
The bill would automatically place new mobile sports bettors, and existing bettors as of the effective date, into the default limit unless they choose to opt out. Operators would also have to notify bettors at registration, and notify current users that they have been opted in and may opt out. The measure takes effect 180 days after becoming law, with any needed regulations authorized to be adopted in advance.
Impact
The bill would amend section 1367-a of the racing, pari-mutuel wagering and breeding law by adding a new subdivision governing mobile sports wagering limits. It would impose a new compliance obligation on mobile sports wagering operators to implement commission-set default limits and provide required disclosures, while preserving bettor autonomy by allowing opt-out. The New York State Gaming Commission would gain authority to determine the default limit and to support implementation through rules and regulations.
Sentiment
The bill’s framing suggests a generally supportive, responsible-gaming orientation, emphasizing consumer protection rather than prohibition. Because there are no committee transcripts or recorded votes provided, there is no direct evidence of opposition or endorsement in the available record. Based on the text alone, the measure appears designed to balance gambling access with safeguards against excessive wagering.
Contention
The main point of potential contention is the balance between responsible gaming protections and personal choice. Supporters are likely to favor the default limit as a harm-reduction tool, while critics may argue that mandatory limits interfere with bettor autonomy or impose operational burdens on operators. Another possible issue is how the Gaming Commission will set the default limit and whether one statewide standard can appropriately reflect different betting behaviors and risk profiles.
Same As
Enacts the "choice in responsible gaming act"; requires mobile sports wagering operators to establish default betting limits on their platform and to notify authorized sports bettors of their ability to opt-out of the default betting limits.
Enacts the "choice in responsible gaming act"; requires mobile sports wagering operators to establish default betting limits on their platform and to notify authorized sports bettors of their ability to opt-out of the default betting limits.
Provides that mobile sports wagering operators and mobile sports wagering platforms are prohibited from limiting the size and frequency of deposits or wagers of authorized sports bettors because the bettor obtains financial benefit or due to the bettor's waging activity; provides exceptions for suspicious wagering activity and indications of a gambling disorder; requires such operators and platforms to provide electronic written notice when an authorized sports bettor is limited or banned.
Provides that mobile sports wagering operators and mobile sports wagering platforms are prohibited from limiting the size and frequency of deposits or wagers of authorized sports bettors because the bettor obtains financial benefit or due to the bettor's waging activity; provides exceptions for suspicious wagering activity and indications of a gambling disorder; requires such operators and platforms to provide electronic written notice when an authorized sports bettor is limited or banned.
Establishes certain limits on sports betting for both mobile and casino sports betting to include advertisements and wager limits; prohibits the use of credit cards to make deposits on mobile sports betting.
Prohibits mobile sports wagering operators and mobile sports wagering platforms from allowing more than five deposits from an authorized sports bettor in a twenty-four hour period.
Prohibits mobile sports wagering operators or platform providers from permitting, accepting, or facilitating the placement of a sports wager through a mobile application or platform from any individual on a college campus in the state; requires mobile sports betting platforms to implement geofencing restrictions on campuses and properties; limits exposure to gambling for college-aged students; reduces distractions in academic settings.
Prohibits mobile sports wagering operators from enabling or otherwise permitting authorized sports bettors to deposit or withdraw funds to or from their account through gift certificates, open loop gift certificates, or e-wallets.
Prohibits mobile sports wagering operators or platform providers from permitting, accepting, or facilitating the placement of a sports wager through a mobile application or platform from any individual on a college campus in the state; requires mobile sports betting platforms to implement geofencing restrictions on campuses and properties; limits exposure to gambling for college-aged students; reduces distractions in academic settings.
Requires mobile sports wagering operators to submit anonymized data to the gaming commission; authorizes the gaming commission to share such data for the purposes of studying the impact of mobile sports wagering on problem gambling.